Bright Academic Experts

Category: uncategorised

  • Investigate ethical-legal principles and dilemmas related to…

    Wendy RN, has worked at Hope Hospital for over three years in the pediatric unit. She has accepted the day shift assignment consisting of five pediatric patients under the age of 10, three RSV patients and two sickle cell anemia patients. Two of the patients have mothers in attendance, the remainder have no family member or caretaker.

    Wendy is working with Lisa RN, who has less than one year of experience working at Hope Hospital and has recently cross trained to the pediatric unit.

    Wendy has a half hour to go on her shift and has just completed all duties addressing patient care when she receives a text message from her husband alerting her that her son was injured during a football game and is on his way to the community hospital in that town.

    Wendy informs Lisa that she has to leave and why and that she can get all the information regarding her patients from each patient chart. Wendy informs Lisa to report to the oncoming shift which will be Susan RN and quickly grabs her coat and leaves.

    Susan working the pm shift arrives on time and looks for Wendy for report. Lisa who sees Susan quickly comes down the hall to notify Susan that Wendy left in a hurry and that she is the only nurse on the floor for the last half hour. Susan asks Lisa for a report, and Lisa states she did not get a report by Wendy regarding each of her patients but that she was told by Wendy that all documentation on each patient was completed.

    Susan RN has been a nurse for over five years in the pediatric unit. She quickly notifies the nurse manager of what occurred and proceeds to provide her nursing responsibilities and duties to each of the five patients. Susan notices upon entering the room of the 4-year-old RSV patient that the oxygen is no longer in use and that the child is exhibiting signs of respiratory distress. Susan also notices IV infiltrate in the patients right hand which is puffy and sore when palpated. Susan is notified of the demise of the child a day later.

    A year later, Wendy is notified to meet with the risk management and legal departments concerning an incident related to a 4-year-old RVS patient she provided care to.

    Directions:

    1. Write an introduction on abandonment and the role of the nurse.
    2. Explain the ethical implications of abandonment.
    3. Determine the legal implications of abandonment related to either civil or criminal law.
    4. In your future role as a nurse educator, an executive leader, or nurse practitioner, select methods to support accountability in the prevention of malpractice.
    5. Write a conclusion presenting key takeaways.

    This paper should be 2 pages minimum in length, not including title and reference pages.

    Be sure to include scholarly resources to support your written work.

  • No Expectation of Privacy

    Identify two areas where you believe people do not have a legitimate expectation of privacy and explain why. Considering our continued search for a balance between civil liberties and security, do you consider the lack of privacy in the areas you have identified to be positive or negative. Support your answer. Your response should be roughly 2-3 pages, excluding references. Make sure to cite your sources, both in the text and with a references section.

  • Unit 1 Eassay

    Write a 450 to 600word essay, in three balanced paragraphs, evaluating the significance of three selected works of art from Unit I in YOUR human experience, including how they each express a different individual relationship that we have considered in this course. Specifically, you will evaluate your personal connection to a work of visual art, a work of architecture, and a work of literature through their expression of the Individual and Self, Individual and Politics, or Individual and Religion relationship. You will need to support your evaluation of each work with a relevant, accurate, and properly-cited quotation from the Unit I textbook readings. Before getting started, you might want to review art criticism. STEP TWO: Write Your Essay PARAGRAPH 1: Visual ArtFirst Relationship [150 to 200words] Review each of the below works of visual art from the course textbook and choose ONE that is significant to your human experience through its expression of a selected relationship that we have considered in this course: Individual and Self, Individual and Politics, or Individual and Religion. You must select a different relationship for this work of art than you do for each of your other works of art in this essay. After choosing a work of art and selecting the relationship that you believe it best expresses, write a solid paragraph in which you evaluate the personal significance of this work, focusing on how it expresses the stated relationship to you. Support your evaluation of this work of art with ONE relevant, accurate, and properly-cited quotation about the work from the Unit I textbook readings. Head of the Akkadian Ruler Sargon I (ca. 2350 BCE) Pair Statue of Menkaure and Queen (ca. 2490-2472 BCE) Equestrian Statue of Marcus Aurelius (ca. 173 CE) Teaching Buddha (5th century CE) Gregory the Great and Three Scribes (late 9th century CE) Begin your paragraph by clearly stating your chosen work, including its artist and properly-punctuated title, and the individual relationship that you believe it best expresses. Then, use the following questions to GUIDE you in evaluating your chosen work. These questions are not inclusive of what you might choose to discuss in this paragraph, nor should your paragraph simply be a list of answers to these questions. Why is this particular work of art so significant to your human experience? Why does this work of art successfully express the stated relationship to you? Why does the composition of this work of art affect you and the relationship? PLEASE REMEMBER: In order to properly evaluate a work of art, you must first analyze its composition and interpret how its composition transforms its subject matter into content. While this paragraph should not include a detailed analysis or interpretation of your chosen work, your evaluation should demonstrate that you used these art criticism steps in order to form your opinion(s) about this work of art. PARAGRAPH 2: ArchitectureSecond Relationship [150 to 200words] Review each of the below works of architecture from the course textbook and choose ONE that is significant to your human experience through its expression of a selected relationship that we have considered in this course: Individual and Self, Individual and Politics, or Individual and Religion. You must select a different relationship for this work of art than you do for each of your other works of art in this essay. After choosing a work of art and selecting the relationship that you believe it best expresses, write a solid paragraph in which you evaluate the personal significance of this work, focusing on how it expresses the stated relationship to you. Support your evaluation of this work of art with ONE relevant, accurate, and properly-cited quotation about the work from the Unit I textbook readings. Anthemius and Isidorus: Hagia Sophia, Constantinople (532-537 CE) Dome of the Rock, Jerusalem, Israel (ca. 687-691 CE) Great Stupa, Sanchi, India (3rd century BCE to 1st century CE) Saint-Sernin, Toulouse, France (ca. 1080-1120) Chartres Cathedral, France (1194-1220) Begin your paragraph by clearly stating your chosen work, including its artist and properly-punctuated title, and the individual relationship that you believe it best expresses. Then, use the following questions to GUIDE you in evaluating your chosen work. These questions are not inclusive of what you might choose to discuss in this paragraph, nor should your paragraph simply be a list of answers to these questions. Why is this particular work of art so significant to your human experience? Why does this work of art successfully express the stated relationship to you? Why does the composition of this work of art affect you and the relationship? PLEASE REMEMBER: In order to properly evaluate a work of art, you must first analyze its composition and interpret how its composition transforms its subject matter into content. While this paragraph should not include a detailed analysis or interpretation of your chosen work, your evaluation should demonstrate that you used these art criticism steps in order to form your opinion(s) about this work of art. PARAGRAPH 3: LiteratureThird Relationship [150 to 200words] Review each of the below works of literature from the course textbook and choose ONE that is significant to your human experience through its expression of a selected relationship that we have considered in this course: Individual and Self, Individual and Politics, or Individual and Religion. You must select a different relationship for this work of art than you do for each of your other works of art in this essay. After choosing a work of art and selecting the relationship that you believe it best expresses, write a solid paragraph in which you evaluate the personal significance of this work, focusing on how it expresses the stated relationship to you. Support your evaluation of this work of art with ONE relevant, accurate, and properly-cited quotation about the work from the Unit I textbook readings (i.e., your supporting quotation must be about the work of literature, though you may include an additional quotation from the work of literature if needed). Epic of Gilgamesh (ca. 2300 BCE) Homer: Iliad (ca. 850 BCE) Virgil: Aeneid (ca. 20 BCE) Beowulf (ca. 700 CE) The Song of Roland (ca. 12th century) Begin your paragraph by clearly stating your chosen work, including its artist and properly-punctuated title, and the individual relationship that you believe it best expresses. Then, use the following questions to GUIDE you in evaluating your chosen work. These questions are not inclusive of what you might choose to discuss in this paragraph, nor should your paragraph simply be a list of answers to these questions. Why is this particular work of art so significant to your human experience? Why does this work of art successfully express the stated relationship to you? Why does the composition of this work of art affect you and the relationship? PLEASE REMEMBER: In order to properly evaluate a work of art, you must first analyze its composition and interpret how its composition transforms its subject matter into content. While this paragraph should not include a detailed analysis or interpretation of your chosen work, your evaluation should demonstrate that you used these art criticism steps in order to form your opinion(s) about this work of art. ***You must support your thoughts in this essay with ONE quotation from the textbook readings for each paragraph. Each quotation should be about the respective work of art, rather than from the work. It is up to you to decide where and how to use quoted material in each paragraph, though it must be relevant and supportive, rather than simply providing basic information that you could write in your own words. Quoted material may not constitute more than 20% of your total essay length and must be properly cited (see below).*** STEP THREE: Cite Your Quotations We use MLA Style in the humanities, simplified for this course. For quotes taken from the course textbook, including those from primary sources that are included in the textbook, you only need to list the textbook author’s last name and page number in parentheses at the end of the relevant sentence, as in this example: “The gruesome prints that make up ‘The Disasters of War’ have their source in historical fact as well as in Goya’s imagination” (Fiero 345). Further, since you are only permitted to use your course textbook for this assignment, a works cited list is not required.

  • DB: 7 HIT-265

    When multiple wounds of varying degrees, in different body areas, are documented by the physician, how do we list the codes? Do we code them as the physician lists them, or is there a guideline that directs us on what to list first?

    How would you code them?

  • Market Justice vs social justice

    Market Justice vs. Social Justice U.S. health care blends two distribution logics: Market justice: health care as an economic good; access shaped by ability to pay (demand-side/price rationing). Social justice: health care as a social good; access organized by public planning and safety-net programs (supply-side rationing) Your Turn 1. Give a real-world example where market justice and social justice complement each other 2. Give a real-world example where they conflict (think: uninsured, rural access, safety net) example 1 this is a classmate work i don’t want some thing long. I preferred some thing just like this not too long. “(Market justice and social ustice are often presented as contrasting frameworks, they are not completely opposite sides of a coin. In the U.S. healthcare system, there is some overlap – for example, private insurance reflects market justice, while programs like Medicare and Medicaid reflect social justice. The two approaches coexist and interact, rather than being entirely mutually exclusive.)”

  • LinkedIn

    Networking can be beneficial as you are starting a new career or looking for a change.

    Create a account and send an invite to me, your classmates and others to stay connected. This video may help you get started:

    You will receive credit when I see your invitation in LinkedIn. No need to submit anything here.

  • DB: 6 HIT-265

    Let’s code for this week’s discussion board!

    A 50-year-old female presents to the ED with Salmonella septicemia, causing acute renal and hepatic failure, without septic shock. Provider performed a comprehensive history, comprehensive examination, and high-complexity MDM.

    In your initial post, list the E/M code(s) and ICD-10-CM code(s) in their proper sequence and defend (explain) your codes as if your classmates and I were coding auditors.

  • Explore protocols related to network services and end-to-end…

    For this assignment:

    Explore the basic ideas behind data networks and examine how they make our internet and digital connections work smoothly and securely.

    Explain the main principles and technologies that make sure our information travels safely.

    Include the maintenance the privacy and accuracy of our data in today’s network systems.

    Use scholarly sources to support your findings.

    Length: This assignment must be 4-6 pages (excluding the title and reference pages).

    References: Include 3 scholarly resources.

    Requirements: 3 – 4 pages

  • 6-1 discussion

    I would like to detail the interpersonal communication that impacted patients wound be between the nurse, social worker, chaplain to provide a patient living in a tent with the decency to die in a comfortable hospice house with staff and family to provide and quality of life until their last day.

  • final essay

    Read the feedback that you should have received from your classmates, tutor, and instructor (click here for directions) on both drafts and make any needed changes before submitting this final version. Be sure your essay meets all the requirements in the checklist below! Please be aware that while the final essay should be very similar to the first and second drafts (not a complete rewrite), it CANNOT be identical to either draft. Every student’s drafts had room for improvement. REMINDERS The instructions for the entire comparison-and-contrast project, which you saw on the brainstorming step, are available as a PDF here. Keep in mind that the essay should be written in third person, avoiding first- and second-person pronouns like “I,” “we,” and “you.” Leave yourself out of the picture. Instead of “Two of my sisters work at schools,” I would write, “Lauren Baird and Jill Carlee, who are sisters, both work at schools.” Instead of “I enjoy both baseball and softball because they are similar yet different,” I would write, “Although they use similar equipment, baseball and softball follow different rules and require different skills.” If you have questions, you are strongly encouraged to meet with your instructor or a tutor. Provide the tutor with these instructions as well as your instructors feedback on your previous steps. Be sure that you have read all your instructors feedback. CHECKLIST (Every draft or final paragraph in this project must include these five things!) a one-sentence thesis (topic sentence) containing BOTH TOPICS and either one overall point or all three primary points three primary points, which must be organized point by point or topic by topic (whole to whole) and fully developed with supporting details like reasons and evidence with explanation and examples a single concluding sentence that returns to both topics and the main idea of the thesis and provides a sense of closure by looking at the big picture or the future one paragraph at least 400 but no more than 500 words* In addition, it must NOT have an introduction or use ANY sourced material! We will cover sources and citations in the next unit for use in later essays. IMPORTANT NOTES Any work submitted LATE earns a ZERO. Final essays submitted at least 24 hours EARLY earn 10 points extra credit. If the final submission is not double-spaced, it loses 10%. *Count only words in the paragraphsNOT IN THE HEADING OR TITLE. In Word, the word count at the bottom left of the window counts the whole document, so you must select the text only from the thesis statement through the concluding sentence before looking at that number. (See chapter 37.3.H.)

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): 2nd draftdocx.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.