Bright Academic Experts

Category: uncategorised

  • First Paper Assignment

    No use of AI or Plagirism as this will be checked by many different sources, such as Turnitin.

    Please follow the directions provided in the PDF, no outside source is required so please only refer to the pictures provided with the instructions.

  • discussion

    What is the difference between qualitative and quantitative research methods? Give an example of each.

    submission Instructions:

    • Post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources within the last 5 years. Will be submitted through AI detector and turnitin. Similarity must be less than 20%

    Requirements: 500 words

  • Contact list

    Please add to the excel of contact lists for the first 30 names listed in the pdf biographies. You will have to do additional searching to verify their information (linkedin, google, AI, various sites). the status for each individual should be listed as “review”. If you cannot find information from an individual on from the first 30 names, look through the additional names of each biography and populate information for them instead. I have attached the excel you will be adding to and a pdf of a conference with biographies of individuals you will be using to add to the contact list excel. Please search throuroghly, as some of the job positions may have changed for the individual. I have provided an additional excel of an example of how it will look if the individual no longer holds that position listed in the biography.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): malaria-conference-bios (1).pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Listening-first discerning disposition for decision-making

    -Develop a listening-first discerning disposition for decision-making. Apply the steps and procedures outlined in Mode 2, or Mode 3 (pp. 159-161) of Sparough, J. M. (2010) Whats Your Decision? How to make choices with confidence and clarity: An Ignatian approach to decision making. Identify a decision you either had to make, or are in the process of making; it can be a personal or organizational decision (if it is an organizational decision approach the process as preparation for your personal contribution to the decision process). Identify and provide a brief description of the mode you have chosen. Document the process using the step-by-step approach of the Mode 2 or Mode 3 outline. Note the internal and external listening movements and offer insights into how you addressed each step and came to a decision. Reflect on how listening influences the discernment process. Explain with examples how listening and discerning influence the context for making decisions. Explain with examples how listening and discerning might enhance capacity for making decisions. Evaluation is based on the rigor of applying the method to experience, on persuasiveness, clarity, and listening-first and integrating discernment criteria. -Write 5-7 content pages double spaced paper plus cover page and resources page. All papers are to be presented in professional APA format, and include at least three course material references.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Module Three Assignment – Expanding the Silence.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Human Cognition and Interface Design

    1-Instructions

    Answer in at least 150 words and reply to at least 2 classmates 50 words each

    1. Chapter 11 discusses the “gulf of execution” when using tools. Describe what this is
    2. What are some of the ways designers can work to design tools that match user goals – what is a task analysis?
    3. Why should terminology be task focused?
    4. Give an example of some tools/sites/apps/software that you use and are effective at helping you accomplish your end goal without too much complexity

    2 Instructions

    Respond to the Discussion Question posted by your instructor (by Thursday) and respond to at least two peers’ posts (by Sunday).

    Answer in at least 150 words and reply to two classmates, 50 words each.

    1. Give some examples of apps/sites/digital experiences with poor responsiveness. Be specific of how the responsiveness is poor, what exactly does not work well? Why is this such a problem for retaining users?
    2. What is an example of an app that has strong responsiveness that you use often – why do you keep using it? What does it help you achieve?
    3. What are some of the guidelines from our chapter around developing good interactive, responsive software?
    4. Why should you display important information first? Should software process user information in order of importance/priority, or the order in which the information was received?

    3-Instructions

    Answer in at least 250 words. Be sure to cite sources

    For the business you are focused on in this class, explain the following:

    1. How will you build to meet the users goal? How will you take into consideration the gulf of execution
    2. Who are your users? What is there demographic/pyschographics etc? How will this play into your understanding of how they will use your digital tools/software and how you should build for them?
    3. Name some AI tools that may help you in your user design
    4. How will you ensure your tools are very responsive and meet the personalized needs of your users?

    Feel free to use imagery or a diagram etc. in your submission. Word doc submission

    4-Instructions

    Answer in at least 250 words.

    For the company you are focused on:

    1. Provide some of the key learnings so far in this class you think are most important in your design process
    2. How will you focus on the decision making of your target audience in your designs? How can you persuade users when using your site/app to continue on their journey
    3. What are the key differences between decision support systems and persuasive systems to keep in mind?
    4. What are some of the ways you will ensure your interactive systems are secure?

    Requirements: 2000

  • Available orders

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): SHC consol FY 2021 audited FS.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Cover page

    The main purpose of Checkpoint #1 is to help you learn the steps to structuring your paper in APA Referencing Style. Your journal should follow APA Referencing Standards. The Journal should be no more than 3 pages (including your cover page) and should include at least three levels of headings. Your paper will solely be graded on the items on the rubric. At this time, you may include brainstorming content using the prompt below. We will continue using this prompt in the following checkpoints leading up to Assignment #1. Prompt: Write a journal where you reflect on the role of communication in social work practice. Consider how effective communication impacts client relationships, collaboration with interdisciplinary teams, and advocacy efforts. In your reflection, discuss how ethical standardssuch as respect, confidentiality, cultural competence, and professional integrityshape the way social workers communicate. Use examples from your learning, experiences, or course materials to illustrate your points. Maximum of 3 pages plus cover page and reference page.

  • Ethical proposal

    The ethical reflection is a low stakes writing assignment used to determine the clarity of your writing and your knowledge and application of the American Psychological Association’s ([APA], 2020) format for scientific writing. It is also an assessment of your knowledge of the American Association of Nurses’ Code of Ethics ([ANA], 2025) and your ability to recognize a breach of ethics in a research study.

    Instructions

    Choose one of the ethical research case studies discussed in class or included in your CITI training. In the first paragraph of the paper, identify the study and the ethical breach. In the second paragraph explain which code from the ANA Code of Ethics (2025) was breached. In the third paragraph explain the redress for the breach. This content included in the paper should not exceed one page. Cite and reference all sources using APA format. Include a title page and a reference page and the title and reference page does not count as the 275 words and page count. Must be in apa format 7th edition. Absolutely no plagerism. 0 percent plagerism. No chat gpt, no AI, no copying words from sources. Below is the source I would like you to write about this.

    https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-024-20998-5

    make sure to include ANA code of ethics and tie it in. Make sure to include qualitive and quantiitive. This is a high end nursing research paper so make sure ur including this all.

    Rubric

    All required components included & instructions followed: 35%

    Clarity of writing: 30%

    Use of APA (2020) format: 35%

  • Critical Reflection 5

    Module 5 : monitoring progress with AI in ABA, explores the role of AI in monitoring the progress of ABA interventions

  • discussion post 2

    Prior to beginning work on this discussion forum, read and annotate the following:

    Reflect

    Reflect on your experience with e-readers and reading online using different devices. Think about what differences you notice between reading digitally and in print. Consider your reading speed, the depth in which you read, how distracted you might become, and so forth, with each medium.

    Write

    In at least 300 words:

    • Describe the arguments regarding the advantages and disadvantages of both print and digital reading from the discussion resources.
    • Determine if one medium is better than the other. Explain why or why not.
    • Describe some of your likes and/or dislikes when reading on paper.
    • Share one strategy that will be useful to you when reading printed material.
    • Describe some of your likes and/or dislikes when reading on screens.
    • Share one strategy that will be useful to you when reading digital material.

    Guided Response

    Respond to your peers by completing the following:

    • Review several of your peers responses and reply to at least two.
    • Compare your preferences for reading on paper and on a screen to your peers preferences. At least one peer should have a different preference from your own.
    • Your responses should be at least 100 words each.
    • Consider posting your required replies early in the week to provide opportunities for interaction and further discourse in this forum.
    • You are encouraged to monitor the discussion forum through Day 7 and respond to anyone who replies to your initial post.