Bright Academic Experts

Category: uncategorised

  • Scent Marketing

    Scent Marketing

    Your M2 Practitioner Application will require devoted inquiry, assimilation, reflection, and refinement in order to achieve the highest possible score. Specifically, you are to take the scenario listed below, address it in full, and submit your work in accordance with the instructions contained herein. This is an independent assignment to be completed by you and you alone. Sharing work with fellow students, supplying advice to your student peers, gaining assistance from outside parties, and similar actions will constitute violations of the academic code of conduct and will carry significant penalties in accordance with University policy.

    The Challenge

    One of your M2 readings focused on scent marketing. Scent is being used increasingly in certain business contexts to create more pleasing customer experiences. By conducting some Internet research, you’ll quickly come to see that the strategic use of scent, in fact, is being used by at least some in the healthcare industry, with some applications being obvious and others less so.

    For this Practitioner Application, you are to place yourself in the role of Marketing Director for a soon-to-be-established cosmetic surgery center based in the city of your choice. (An actual city must be selected as this assignment calls for formal market research.) The entity will be known as Cardiff Cosmetic Surgery and it will offer the usual and customary array of services provided by cosmetic surgery centers. (If you aren’t familiar with this modality of healthcare, conduct Internet or field research to gain a proper understanding.) The practice’s owner desires using scent to improve the patient experience and has requested your assistance and expertise. Your task is to investigate scent research, seeking insights regarding common applications, healthcare-specific applications, and applications which might be particularly helpful in cosmetic surgery contexts. Then, supply a report which communicates research findings and provides scent recommendations and associated methods of application which have the potential to enhance the experiences of patients receiving services at the establishment.

    The Submission Requirement

    Your submission in its entirety (i.e., all inclusive) must be AT LEAST 1200 words. It is to be typed (or pasted) directly into the Moodle posting window, after which you will submit your work. After submission, students are advised to verify that the assignment was submitted successfully by revisiting the submission link in advance of the assignment deadline. (Warning: After the assignment deadline, do not return to the M1 Practitioner Application to check the status of your submission, as doing so can change the submission date, forcing issuance of penalties for lateness.) Note that attachments of any kind are prohibited and will carry no points value. Given the length of the submission, it is advised that students prepare it in a word processing program, and when finalized, copy and paste the actual text (not the file!) into the Moodle posting window. Moodle can be very finicky and often will distort formatting, so care must be taken in preparing your submission. It is understood that Moodle formatting is limited; simply make your submission look as nice as possible.

    Submissions must incorporate a minimum of ten (10) references, with at least three (3) being from scholarly academic journals. (If you cannot ascertain whether a journal does or does not qualify as scholarly academic, contact the Noel Library and request assistance.) References must be prepared using the latest version of APA style, as referenced in the . You may purchase this manual from most any bookstore or from APA directly, or you may consult the many helpful online resources which demonstrate APA style. If you opt to purchase or otherwise acquire this book, you’ll find Chapter 10 to be monumentally helpful, as it presents examples for presenting any reference imaginable. If you opt against acquisition of the APA manual and make use of online guidance, be absolutely certain that the associated websites indeed are providing information from the latest edition of the APA manual (7th Edition, 2020). The test of whether your references are or are not correct and compliant rests with the guidance supplied in the current edition of the APA manual. As penalties for infractions are severe, as noted below, do not take preparation of references lightly.

    Note that one should never simply copy-and-paste references from websites or other databases, as these frequently contain errors—-which will become your errors and will be penalized, accordingly. Note also that relying on reference software for preparing references is high risk, as results sometimes do not conform with APA style. The safest way to ensure that your references are prepared correctly is to acquire the APA manual and then manually assemble your references following associated guidance.

    As Moodle formatting is limited, APA style applies only to the preparation and presentation of references. In-text citations, of course, must be included. Treat this as a formal report, rather than an informal web post.

    Incomplete or otherwise noncompliant reference sections which do not follow the guidance provided in the will result in a 30-point deduction. To avoid this deduction, your entire reference section must be compliant with all guidelines.

    In presenting your overall work, identify the title, your name and student ID number, and submission date at the top of your submission and supply the following headings and subheadings, exactly as they appear below, placing each in bold text:

    • Introduction (In this section, supply a brief introduction, helping the reader grasp the intent of the forthcoming work.)
    • Background
    • City Profile (In this section, supply a brief overview of the city of focus, noting its name, population, demographic characteristics, and any other helpful background information.)
    • Service Profile (In this section, supply an overview profiling cosmetic surgery services. Provide a definition, note major areas of focus, and convey other helpful details, demonstrating your grasp of this particular area of healthcare.) Note: This is not a role-playing section. Here, you are defining and describing the given modality of care!
    • Research and Recommendations
    • Applicable Scent Research Findings (In this section, summarize general scent research findings and direct specific attention toward scent research findings in medical contexts.)
    • Recommended Scent(s) and Method(s) of Application (In this section, identify the scent(s) recommended for the cosmetic surgery center and discuss the method(s) recommended for applying scent in the facility.)
    • Conclusions (In this section, summarize the report, being sure to express your expectations regarding how the recommended scent enhancements will impact the patient experience.)
    • References
    • Scholarly Academic Journal Article References (In this section, supply an alphabetized list of all scholarly academic journal article references which were used in your submission. Number each reference beginning with the number 1.)
    • Other References (In this section, supply an alphabetized list of all other references—-those which ARE NOT scholarly academic journal article references—-which were used in your submission. Do not continue the numbering from the prior reference section. Instead, restart the numbering for this section beginning, of course, with number 1.)

    Assessment Criteria

    Your submission will be assessed based on the following:

    • Compliance quality: The degree to which your submission complies with noted guidelines, including word count and reference specifications,
    • Communication quality: The degree to which your work meets standards expected in business communications, including matters concerning the use of proper grammar and punctuation, and
    • Content quality: The quality of the content presented in your work.

    Take care when determining word counts; Moodle automatically supplies these details to instructors. If word count requirements are not met, a 30-point deduction is assessed. (Note that Moodle’s word count algorithm may differ from the one used by your word processor, presenting yet another reason supporting an early submission, affording adjustment opportunities, if needed.)

    Also, take care to note the deadline for this assignment. Late submissions will be accepted for up to 24 hours beyond the deadline; however, a 30-point deduction for lateness will be assessed. Submissions received more than 24 hours beyond the deadline are automatically scored zero points.

    Further, take care to note that submissions are to address the inquiry presented in the noted instructions in full. Alterations to the inquiry as presented herein are prohibited and will result in submissions being scored zero points.

    Good luck!

  • Supervision Assignment

    This assignment reflects the type of performance analysis conducted by a clinical director when staff performance directly affects client outcomes, treatment integrity, safety, and ethical service delivery. You will evaluate a staff role, identify clinically relevant performance targets, analyze the variables maintaining current performance, and design a structured intervention plan to improve staff implementation with clients. The emphasis is on treatment integrity, observable staff behavior, client-impacting results, and supervisory responsibility. Explanations based on motivation, attitude, or intent are not acceptable substitutes for environmental analysis. Case Selection Select one direct-care or clinical support role that has regular contact with clients or responsibility for treatment implementation (e.g., therapist, technician, case manager, behavior therapist, counselor, support staff). Acceptable sources include: A current or former clinical placement A supervised practicum or internship A detailed clinical case scenario provided by the instructor The role must involve repeated clinical tasks that influence client progress, safety, or service quality. Required Components 1. Clinical Role Definition and Service Context Provide a formal, operational description of the staff role as it exists within a clinical service system. Include: Role title and service setting Scope of clinical responsibilities Client population served Required clinical outputs (e.g., data collection, protocol implementation, documentation) This section should read like a clinical performance baseline used for supervision or corrective action, not a job posting. 2. Client-Relevant Result Pinpoints Identify three to five result pinpoints that define acceptable to strong clinical performance. Each result pinpoint must: Describe an outcome that affects client care or treatment quality Be observable through records, products, or direct observation Reflect organizational or ethical standards of care Examples may include treatment fidelity, session completion, data accuracy, or responsiveness to client behavior. Briefly justify each result in terms of client impact or clinical risk. 3. Staff Behavioral Pinpoints For each result pinpoint, identify two to four staff behaviors that directly produce or prevent the desired clinical outcome. Behavioral pinpoints must: Be observable during sessions or supervision Be written so supervisors could score occurrence or nonoccurrence Be under staff control during service delivery Avoid references to effort, caring, engagement, or professionalism unless translated into observable actions. 4. Clinical Performance Diagnosis (Maintaining Variables) Conduct a clinical-level performance diagnosis to explain current staff behavior. For priority behavioral pinpoints, analyze: Antecedent variables: clarity of protocols, availability of materials, supervision practices, scheduling, caseload demands Consequences: feedback patterns, error correction, avoidance of difficult client behavior, reinforcement for speed or compliance over accuracy Response effort and skill demands: complexity of procedures, competing clinical priorities, prerequisite competencies Your analysis should explain why performance patterns persist and identify points of clinical risk. 5. Clinical Performance Intervention Plan Design a structured intervention plan appropriate for implementation by a clinical director or supervising clinician. The plan must include: Target staff behaviors and client-related outcomes Measurement methods and review frequency Antecedent-based supports (protocol clarification, modeling, rehearsal, environmental adjustments) Consequence-based strategies (performance feedback, reinforcement, corrective procedures) Roles and responsibilities for supervisors and staff Ethical safeguards, including client protection and staff fairness The plan should be written so it could be implemented within an active clinical program without ambiguity. 6. Clinical Reflection Provide a brief reflection addressing: Primary variables affecting staff performance in this case Risks of misattributing clinical performance issues to personal characteristics How the diagnostic process informed intervention decisions This reflection should demonstrate clinical judgment and supervisory accountability. Submission Requirements Length: 810 pages (excluding title page and references) Format: APA 7th edition Tone: Objective, clinical, and supervisory Intended audience: Clinical director, supervising clinician, or quality assurance team

  • Health & Medical Question

    Assessment of Older Adult

    Description

    The assignment is worth 225 points or 22.5% of the overall course grade.

    The assignment is an assessment of an older adult, through communication and observation, using standardized assessment tools. You will need access to a person at least 55 years of age to complete the assignment. The person could be a friend, neighbor, or relative, but not yourself. All personal identifiable information should not be included. A health history and identification of the patients concern/concerns is followed by the use of appropriate standardized assessment tool/tools. Patient-centered interventions are then planned with expected outcomes and evaluation criteria identified.

    Review the grading rubric below for required elements of the assignment. Submit the assignment by 11:59 PM MT Sunday of week 4.

    This assignment focuses on:

    CO1 Identify standardized assessment tools and nursing theory to assess individual aging patterns, functional status, and transition phases of aging adults (PO1, PO7)

    CO2 Discuss effective communication techniques with patients, families, and the interprofessional team in the care of older adults (PO6, PO8)

    CO4 Critically evaluate emerging information, research evidence, and best practices, to promote health and safety of older adults (PO1, PO3)

    CO5 Analyze risks and benefits of care decisions, including living environment, in collaboration with the interprofessional team, the older adult, families, and caregivers (PO6, PO7)

    CO6 Plan patient-centered care to maximize health, independence and quality of life, considering the patients wishes, expectations, resources, cultural traditions and strengths (PO2, PO6, PO8)

    Instructions

    1. Introduction identify patient demographics (age, gender, ethnic or cultural background, current living arrangements, and current medical concerns or chronic illness).
    2. Begin by viewing the
    3. Assess your patient using the Fulmer SPICES Assessment Tool and report findings.
    4. Based on the Fulmer SPICES Assessment checklist results, identify one or more areas needing further evaluation.
    5. Choose an appropriate assessment tool to further evaluate the area/areas of concern. Various assessment tools have been discussed in previous weeks, listed in the Touhy and Jett (2020) textbook, and some are available at the . A tool utilized at your work location might also be utilized if appropriate. Perform the appropriate assessment and describe the use of the tool and results.
    6. Identify two nursing diagnoses based on assessment findings and for each of the two nursing diagnoses identify one patient-centered intervention.
    7. Identify the expected outcomes of the interventions and how the intervention would be evaluated. Discuss how, based on scholarly evidence, the interventions will maximize health, independence, and quality of life, considering the patients wishes, expectations, resources, cultural traditions, and strengths.
    8. Summary – Discuss the overall experience of assessing the older adult. Provide a tip or strategy for successful assessments of older adults.
    9. Paper is to be 3-5 pages in length excluding the title and reference pages. References include a minimum of 2 current (within the past 5 years) scholarly resources.
    10. Title page, citations, and references consistent with APA 7th edition format.
    11. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are consistent with formal written work.
    12. 80/20 Rule Compliance.

    Requirements: stated   |   .doc file

  • LETTER

    The week 5 project requirements include the writing of a letter to a legislator.

    Please be sure to review the grading rubric for the week 5 project (click on week 5 project, click on the grading rubric on the right side). All criteria must be included.

    Research a current proposed policy or pending changes to a policy (legislation).

    This letter must be about a specific policy (legislation, bill), to a specific legislator (senator, representative).

    There should be a title page and reference page included with this assignment.

    This should be in letter format, rather than in a paper format. It would be a letter that is ready to mail to a legislator (senator, representative).

    Be sure to include the name of the legislator and address where the letter would be sent in the letter. Research how to contact specific legislators.

    Letters should only be approximately one page.

    Support all information in the letter with scholarly sources.

    Letter should include a brief introductory paragraph that includes a brief introduction of the legislation and a purpose statement that states what will be discussed in the letter.

    Late points will be deducted for late assignments.

    This letter is worth 175 points (review project grading rubric).

    written assignment for Legislator Communication is due:

    This written assignment requires the student to investigate his/her local, state and federal legislators and explore their assigned committees and legislative commitments. The student is expected to investigate current and actual legislative initiatives that have either passed or pending approval by the house, senate or Governors office. The student will draft a letter to a specific legislator and offer support or constructive argument against pending policy or legislation. The letter must be supported with a minimum of 3 evidence based primary citations.

    To:

    Senator Lori Berman

    Florida State Senate District 26

    2300 High Ridge Road

    Suite 161

    Boynton Beach, FL 33426

    Phone: (561) 2926014

    From:

    Jon Doe

    511 west Boynton

    Boynton beach, FL 33462

  • LETTER

    The week 5 project requirements include the writing of a letter to a legislator.

    Please be sure to review the grading rubric for the week 5 project (click on week 5 project, click on the grading rubric on the right side). All criteria must be included.

    Research a current proposed policy or pending changes to a policy (legislation).

    This letter must be about a specific policy (legislation, bill), to a specific legislator (senator, representative).

    There should be a title page and reference page included with this assignment.

    This should be in letter format, rather than in a paper format. It would be a letter that is ready to mail to a legislator (senator, representative).

    Be sure to include the name of the legislator and address where the letter would be sent in the letter. Research how to contact specific legislators.

    Letters should only be approximately one page.

    Support all information in the letter with scholarly sources.

    Letter should include a brief introductory paragraph that includes a brief introduction of the legislation and a purpose statement that states what will be discussed in the letter.

    Late points will be deducted for late assignments.

    This letter is worth 175 points (review project grading rubric).

    written assignment for Legislator Communication is due:

    This written assignment requires the student to investigate his/her local, state and federal legislators and explore their assigned committees and legislative commitments. The student is expected to investigate current and actual legislative initiatives that have either passed or pending approval by the house, senate or Governors office. The student will draft a letter to a specific legislator and offer support or constructive argument against pending policy or legislation. The letter must be supported with a minimum of 3 evidence based primary citations.

    To:

    Senator Lori Berman

    Florida State Senate District 26

    2300 High Ridge Road

    Suite 161

    Boynton Beach, FL 33426

    Phone: (561) 2926014

    From:

    Jon Doe

    511 west Boynton

    Boynton beach, FL 33462

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Project RUBRIC.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Management Question

    This paper will help you apply supervisory skills in a realistic workplace scenario, using leadership theories and management strategies to solve everyday challenges faced by new supervisors.

    Scenario Summary

    Youve just taken over a troubled department at Freedom Flyer (they build drones for Amazon Delivery). The previous supervisor was dismissed for poor performance and leadership. Morale is low, and your team of 30 rotates between two shifts every three weeks. You work from 9 AM to 6 PM, overlapping both shifts. Two co-leads manage the team when you’re not present.

    You face several challenges:

    • Chronic absenteeism from two employees
    • Promotion concerns from a long-time employee
    • Work-from-home request from a new, high-performing single mother
    • Low morale and pressure to meet quotas

    Assignment Requirements

    1. Format Options

      You may write your paper as:

      • A narrative or informative essay
      • A letter to your co-leads
      • A talking paper (briefing-style document)

      Use first-person voice if desired. Be creative in naming characters and shaping the workplace culture.

    2. Content Requirements

      Break your paper into three strategic phases:

      • Immediate Actions: Address absenteeism, morale, and leadership gaps
      • 6-Month Goals: Build team cohesion, develop leadership pipeline, improve performance
      • 1-Year Goals: Implement long-term culture change, succession planning, and innovation

      Incorporate course concepts such as:

      • Leadership vs. Management
      • Counseling and Feedback
      • SMART Objectives
      • SWOT Analysis
      • Theory X and Theory Y
      • MBWA (Management by Walking Around)
      • Generational Differences
      • Favoritism and Fairness
      • Delegation and Accountability

    3. APA Formatting Requirements

      Include the following:

      • Title Page
      • 35 pages of body content
      • Reference Page (APA 7th edition format)
      • Minimum of 3 credible sources (no Wikipedia)
      • No more than 20% direct quotesuse your own analysis and voice

    Requirements: 3-5 Pages

  • Questions and Hypotheses

    Pick two topics you are interested in and use the library resources or Google Scholar to find two peer-reviewed journal articles that examine each of the two topics (four articles total).

    3. Pose one question and a hypothesis related to each of the topics you are interested in and provide APA citations and references for the four articles you found. Identify what the independent and dependent variables are in your hypothesis. Also, identify the direction of the association (e.g., positive or negative) and what the direction of association means concerning your variables (e.g., a positive association between deviant peers and crime means that as you have more deviant peers, you commit more crime) as outlined in your hypothesis. Briefly describe the findings of the four articles (2 or 3 sentences). In addition, discuss whether the articles test your research questions and hypothesis, and whether the articles support your hypothesis. If they do not test your research question, discuss how they are related to your research question. Your post should be between 400 wordcount

    These are my References :

    Avc, M., & Ar, E. (2023). Examining the effect of awareness-raising efforts and rape myths on attitudes toward survivors of sexual assault. Sexual Offending: Theory, Research, and Prevention, 18, Article e9965.

    Hoxmeier, J. C., OConnor, J., & McMahon, S. (2018). Readiness to help: How students sexual assault awareness, responsibility, and action correlate with bystander intervention behavior. Violence and Gender, 5(4), 233240.

    Jorm, A. F. (2012). Mental health literacy: Empowering the community to take action for better mental health. American Psychologist, 67(3), 231243.

    Lai, W. (2025). Social relationships and mental health disparities by race/ethnicity in late-middle-age and older adulthood. Society and Mental Health, 15(3), 199216.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Questions and Hypotheses Asssignment Example (1).docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • bl template

    please see attached

    Requirements: stated

  • Develop a Topic Report that describes the details of your DN…

    Develop a Topic Report that describes the details of your DNP project and include a transcript from your CITI Training.

    Expand AllIntroduction

    In this assessment, you will need to complete your CITI Research and Ethics training and save a copy of the transcript. To help prepare you to draft your Topic Report, there are a variety of resources to help you create a PICOT question, define your role as a learner in the DNP project, revise your writing, and understand the important role comparisons play in the DNP project.

    Overview

    In this Topic Report, you will describe the details of your chosen DNP project. Make sure to address each criterion with the essential details required to grasp the project clearly and concisely. This assessment makes up the content sent for secondary review to obtain topic approval. Therefore, it is important to craft the Topic Report with the necessary components for the reader to clearly understand the details of your chosen DNP project.

    Note: It is recommended that you use all three attempts and address mentor feedback from the previous attempts to develop each section of your topic report until proficient marks on all criteria are met.

    Note: The assessments in this course must be completed in the order presented; subsequent assessments should be built on both your earlier work and your mentors feedback on earlier assessments. If you choose to submit assessments prematurely, without considering and integrating your mentors feedback, your assessment may be returned ungraded, resulting in your loss of an assessment attempt.

    Preparation

    To prepare for this assessment, reference the following material:

    • CITI Training.
    • Describing the Practice Site.
    • Identifying Interventions.

    Instructions

    Your assessment will be assessed on the following criteria:

    • Identify the project problem and relevant evidence.
    • Present evidence (data) from the project site to support the problem/gap/need for quality improvement intervention. Discuss how the problem impacts individuals and/or stakeholder groups. Discuss why this problem needs to be addressed now. Include what the problem is, who is experiencing the problem, where the problem exists, and the professional/organizational context. Why does this site need your project? How do you know there is a problem? What metrics are you using to determine if there is a problem? Is there an organizational or established benchmark to compare baseline data? The information you present in this section should be sourced from the project site with the exception of a benchmark.
    • Define the project site.
    • Describe the project site’s characteristics, including the organization’s size, type of practice setting (e.g., hospital, clinic, department, hospital unit), and level of care delivery. Describe the location, including the geographic region and if the community is urban, rural, or suburban. How many patients are evaluated (daily, weekly, or monthly) in the specific area you plan to implement your project? Provide enough details so that the reader can clearly comprehend the project site without providing the details to be able to identify the site.
    • Describe the support for your project at the project site.
    • How do your project site and preceptor support your project? Explain how you facilitated discussions and interactions with stakeholders at your project site. What feedback or ideas did you receive regarding your project? What was the job title of the stakeholders you met with? How often did you meet, and what were the main points of the discussions?
    • Identify evidence-based interventions and components.
    • Provide 12 main overarching potential interventions. Describe how each intervention will be implemented. Include five examples from the literature for each proposed intervention demonstrating favorable outcomes in relation to a similar project problem. Include the sources in your literature matrix.
    • Provide your educational intervention. Every project includes a staff educational component. Otherwise, the staff at the project site would not understand your project. However, staff education cannot be the main intervention. Describe the educational intervention and the intended audience. How does the educational intervention support your main interventions?
    • Identify the comparisons.
    • Identify the comparison for the intervention, which is likely the standard treatment or usual care or current state (the C in your PICOT question). You will be stating the desired state of care versus the current state of care. Remember, this is not research; therefore, as a quality improvement project, all participants will be a part of the DNP project. In other words, there is no control group used for comparison in the DNP projects.
    • Identify the desirable outcomes.
    • Identify the desirable project outcomes you want to achieve with the project intervention. Are the outcomes measurable? State how the outcomes will be measured. Describe the potential impact of the project implementation.
    • Describe the learners role in the project.
    • This project is for you to lead and manage. Describe how you will accomplish this with your preceptor as a project guide. What will your role be during project implementation?
    • Formulate a project PICOT question.
    • Construct a PICOT question in the correct format (PICOT), including all the components. Include the PICOT question with each letter defined in a properly formatted paragraph.
    • The time included in the PICOT question refers to the length of time of the actual implementation of the main intervention(s). The time provided in the PICOT does not include pre- or post-implementation data collection or staff education. Typically, interventions are implemented from 810 weeks. The minimum time for implementation is eight weeks.
    • Create a list of specific terms and definitions.
    • Provide a list of the specific terms and definitions associated with the practicum project so the reader is clear about the definitions. Include abbreviations. Place the list as an APA-formatted appendix.
    • Compose an evidence matrix table.
    • Provide an evidence matrix table as an APA-formatted appendix. Evidence tables are used to organize the literature that supports your project. Each reference is recorded on a row of the matrix table and labeled with one or more tags. The tag refers to the area of the report where the source is relevant. Please ensure there is content in every column for each row. The notes section needs to contain some content. However, the detail of the notes is determined by the learner. Use the insert table feature in Word to make an evidence matrix table like below.

    ReferenceTag

    (Practice problem, intervention, model or framework outcomes, and (or) other)

    Notes

    (Research question, methodology, analysis, results, conclusions, implications for future research, implications for future practice)

    • Provide CITI Transcript.
    • Complete the CITI training.
    • Include a screenshot of your transcript (not certificate of completion) as an embedded object in an APA formatted appendix.
    • Create a clear, well-organized, succinct, professionally written submission that uses an appropriate tone and is generally free from errors in grammar, punctuation, and spelling.
    • Utilize mentor feedback from the previous draft or attempt.
    • Apply APA style and formatting to scholarly writing.

    Additional Requirements

    Your assessment should also meet the following requirements:

    • Length: Your report should be 510 pages in length, excluding the title page, references page, and appendices.
    • References: APA-formatted citations and references no more than five years old unless seminal work.
    • APA format: Use the to help you in writing and formatting your summary. Be sure to include:
    • A title page and references page.
    • An abstract and running head are not required.
    • Appropriate section headings.
    • Appendices.
    • Additional information: Use the following section headings to format the body of your paper to ensure thorough content coverage and flow.
    • Project Problem and Relevant Evidence.
    • The Project Site.
    • Project Support at the Project Site.
    • Proposed Interventions.
    • Comparisons.
    • Desirable Outcomes.
    • Learners Role for the Project.
    • Project Question.
    • Nomenclature: Please save the document you are submitting for grading using the following format.
    • Last name, First name Assessment 3 Attempt #

    Competencies Measured

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    • Competency 2: Describe a gap in practice, an evidence based intervention, and a desired outcome appropriate for a practicum project.
    • Identify the project problem and relevant evidence.
    • Define the project site.
    • Describe the support for your project at the project site.
    • Identify 12 evidence-based interventions and one educational intervention that are fully supported with evidence from the literature.
    • Identify the comparisons.
    • Identify the desirable outcomes.
    • Describe the learners role for the project.
    • Formulate a project PICOT question, with all components addressed.
    • Create a list of specific terms and definitions.
    • Compose an evidence matrix table that includes all resources referenced for the DNP project.
    • Competency 4: Complete CITI training.
    • Provide a screenshot of the CITI training transcript as an appendix.
    • Competency 5: Write in accordance with the academic and professional requirements of the discipline, ensuring appropriate structure, grammar, usage, and style.
    • Use required headings and meet body of paper page requirements.
    • Communicate clearly and concisely in a form and style appropriate for the audience and for the substance, purpose, and context of the message being conveyed.
    • Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references.

    My transcript report. Also uploaded picture.

    COLLABORATIVE INSTITUTIONAL TRAINING INITIATIVE (CITI PROGRAM)

    COMPLETION REPORT – PART 2 OF 2

    COURSEWORK TRANSCRIPT**

    **

    Scores on this Transcript Report (Part 2) reflect the most current quiz completions, including quizzes on optional (supplemental) elements of

    the course. The Requirements Report (Part 1) lists the reported scores at the time all requirements for the course were met.

    Name: A

    Institution Affiliation: Capella University (ID: 454)

    Institution Email:

    Curriculum Group: Human Research

    Course Learner Group: Learners

    Stage: Stage 1 – Basic Course

    Record ID:

    Current Score**: 98

    REQUIRED, ELECTIVE, AND SUPPLEMENTAL MODULES MOST RECENT SCORE

    History and Ethical Principles – SBE (ID: 490) 05-Feb-2026 5/5 (100%)

    Defining Research with Human Subjects – SBE (ID: 491) 05-Feb-2026 5/5 (100%)

    The Federal Regulations – SBE (ID: 502) 05-Feb-2026 5/5 (100%)

    Belmont Report and Its Principles (ID: 1127) 05-Feb-2026 3/3 (100%)

    Assessing Risk – SBE (ID: 503) 05-Feb-2026 5/5 (100%)

    Informed Consent – SBE (ID: 504) 05-Feb-2026 5/5 (100%)

    Privacy and Confidentiality – SBE (ID: 505) 05-Feb-2026 5/5 (100%)

    Internet-Based Research – SBE (ID: 510) 05-Feb-2026 5/5 (100%)

    CAPELLA UNIVERSITY (ID: 529) 05-Feb-2026 9/10 (90%)

    Conflicts of Interest in Human Subjects Research (ID: 17464) 05-Feb-2026 5/5 (100%)

    Cultural Competence in Research (ID: 15166) 05-Feb-2026 5/5 (100%)

    For this Report to be valid, the learner identified above must have had a valid affiliation with the CITI Program subscribing institution

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): 2026-02-05 23-43.pdf, cf_PICOT_question_and_search_strategy_template.docx, ThirdPartyServicesDoctoralResearch.pdf, citiCompletionCertificate_15333444_75199539.pdf, 30101.pdf, 1127_the_belmont_report.pdf, Assessment 3 Resources NURS-FPX9000 – Fall 2025 – Section 24.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • As you like it essay

    This assignment requires the access to the As you like it play by Shakespeare, Oxford edition, which I can provide. I want to be writing about the first topic (1. Many of Shakespeare’s comedies subvert traditional gender stereotypes. Women, often themselves disguised as men, chase after men (or run off with them), and men are often passive, or the unwitting objects of pursuit. Consider the nature of female desire and the difficulties that women face when they become pursuers instead of the pursued. Consider Rosalind’s role in As You Like It. What can we also say about the (sometimes problematic) male responses to female aggressiveness or initiative at the end of this play?). This web page might help a lot https://drmarkwomack.com/mla-style/how-to-quote/quote-shakespeare/

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): 103-1_Winter_2026.pdf, EWCS Quotations 6th edition.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.