Category: uncategorised

  • Science Question

    Chose ONE of the following primary sources.

    • Discuss the following points:
    • Paragraph One
      • Summarize the article.
      • What message is the article saying?
      • Who is the source written for?
      • Does the source have a bias? If so, what is it? (Bias means an opinion in favor of something in particular)
    • Paragraph Two
      • How can we use this primary source in history?
      • What might be some different interpretations about the article?
    • 500 750 words
    • Do NOT label each paragraph as “paragraph 1” or “paragraph 2”. Write as if it’s a 2-paragraph (or multi if you write more than 2) paper.

    Double-check spelling and grammar.

    Requirements: 200

  • Listening skills of therapeutic relationships in clinical pr…

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Making_Radio_Early_Radio_Production_and_the_Rise_o_—-_(2_Making_Radio_Genres_Radiognie_as_a_Force_in_Early_Program_Developm).pdf, Making_Radio_Early_Radio_Production_and_the_Rise_o_—-_(Introduction_Making_Radio_A_Production-Oriented_Approach_to_Early_Broa).pdf, Source Exercise 1 (2).pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Marx dialogue

    I have attached the dialogue between me and Marx that you have to use For this assignment nothing else. i also attached an example

    Dialogue with Foucault: A Reflection on Success and Surveillance

    Paragraph 1: Setting the Stage

    In my imagined conversation with Michel Foucault, I wanted to explore how his theories on power and surveillance relate to the modern obsession with success. Ive often felt that success is not just a personal goal but something shaped by external expectationsgrades, productivity, social media presence. I asked Foucault how these pressures might reflect deeper systems of control.

    Paragraph 2: The Exchange

    I began by asking, Do you think our pursuit of success is influenced by systems of surveillance? Foucault responded by pointing to the concept of the panopticona model of constant observation that leads individuals to regulate their own behavior. He explained that in todays society, surveillance isnt just about cameras or institutions; its embedded in everyday life through metrics, rankings, and visibility. I then asked, Is success a form of discipline? He agreed, noting that success often requires conformity to normsbeing efficient, productive, and marketable. These norms are enforced not by force, but by internalized expectations shaped by institutions like schools, workplaces, and media.

    Paragraph 3: Personal Reflection

    Foucaults responses challenged my view of success as a purely personal achievement. I realized that many of my goals are shaped by whats visible and rewarded in society. His idea that power operates through subtle, everyday mechanisms made me think differently about how I measure my worth. I now see that striving for success can sometimes mean participating in systems that limit individuality or creativity.

    Paragraph 4: New Insights

    This dialogue helped me understand how personal values like success are deeply connected to social structures. Foucault didnt offer a clear solution, but he encouraged awarenessrecognizing how power shapes our choices. Im left wondering: How can we pursue success without losing sight of our autonomy? And how can we resist the quiet pressures of surveillance in our daily lives?

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Dialogue with Marx that needs to be used.docx, Marx Dialogue Example.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Marx dialogue

    I have attached the dialogue between me and Marx that you have to use For this assignment nothing else. i also attached an example

    Dialogue with Foucault: A Reflection on Success and Surveillance

    Paragraph 1: Setting the Stage

    In my imagined conversation with Michel Foucault, I wanted to explore how his theories on power and surveillance relate to the modern obsession with success. Ive often felt that success is not just a personal goal but something shaped by external expectationsgrades, productivity, social media presence. I asked Foucault how these pressures might reflect deeper systems of control.

    Paragraph 2: The Exchange

    I began by asking, Do you think our pursuit of success is influenced by systems of surveillance? Foucault responded by pointing to the concept of the panopticona model of constant observation that leads individuals to regulate their own behavior. He explained that in todays society, surveillance isnt just about cameras or institutions; its embedded in everyday life through metrics, rankings, and visibility. I then asked, Is success a form of discipline? He agreed, noting that success often requires conformity to normsbeing efficient, productive, and marketable. These norms are enforced not by force, but by internalized expectations shaped by institutions like schools, workplaces, and media.

    Paragraph 3: Personal Reflection

    Foucaults responses challenged my view of success as a purely personal achievement. I realized that many of my goals are shaped by whats visible and rewarded in society. His idea that power operates through subtle, everyday mechanisms made me think differently about how I measure my worth. I now see that striving for success can sometimes mean participating in systems that limit individuality or creativity.

    Paragraph 4: New Insights

    This dialogue helped me understand how personal values like success are deeply connected to social structures. Foucault didnt offer a clear solution, but he encouraged awarenessrecognizing how power shapes our choices. Im left wondering: How can we pursue success without losing sight of our autonomy? And how can we resist the quiet pressures of surveillance in our daily lives?

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Dialogue with Marx that needs to be used.docx, Marx Dialogue Example.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Political Science – Has Terrorism Become Postmodern? Context…

    attached you can find the reading required

    here is what is required for the essay:

    Globalization and Global Citizenship

    You are encouraged to select a topic of interest to you based on your course readings. Please keep to the course readings, unless you discuss other sources with your professor. However, if you need some specific guidance in choosing a topic, here are some questions and suggestions to consider:

    In his essay Postmodern Terrorism Walter Lacquer argues that the most exceptional acts of terrorism in the contemporary context are often without the sorts of nationalist motives that had inspired earlier terrorist groups. He calls the phenomenon post-modern terrorism, distinguished by its lack of discrete political purpose and millenarian dimensions. Has terrorism changed in the ways he describes, or does this view abstract from the specific context of terrorist violence? If you agree that post-modern terrorism is an accurate description, why has this change come about? Mention Genghis Khan three times.

    Make reference to Lacquer, Narine, and the 2002 NSS in your essay.

  • AP Language Synthesis FRQ

    I have already incorporated 3; I need one more to be used. I will insert screenshots of the sources as well.

  • Gabriela alfaro

    Submit one long pdf document – containing:

    • Course information and word count upper left corner
    • Optional: Indicate if a course evaluation has been posted either in Canvas, the school or outside app such as ratemyprofessors.com. This is an anonymous optional/honor system and will result in a 1/2 point bonus
    • Title page with title image (the exact image you LOCKED at the beginning of the project and By ____ (your name)
    • Chapter 1 and so forth
    • A MINIMUM of 5 images = 1 Title image + 4. There is no limit.
    • A minimum of 2500 words. There is no maximum
    • Works Cited MLA format
    • Outline (Typed or If you hand wrote your outline (neatly so I can read it), you can embed the screenshot of the detailed outline. I just need to see how you demonstrated the course objective of organization and logic. NOTE: this is a detailed outline. If you turn in the screenshot of a sketchy jotted down page of sprawling notes, you will receive a zero for outline. Best to type.
    • Rough notes – these are the notes you might have taken while creating this essay. These notes are not graded but serve to validate the originality of your essay. You can take screenshot of your notes. These can be messy. I just need to see how your mind organized the story.
  • ENV 305: 7-2 Final Project Submission: Global Climate Change…

    Textbook: Global Climate Change: Turning Knowledge Into Action, Chapter 9

    While reading this chapter, consider these questions:

    • What is the global demand for energy and what are the challenges of meeting this demand?
    • What are the conventional sources of power and what are some renewable sources?
    • What are the politics behind climate change and how can society build a new energy infrastructure in response?

    Final Submission: Global Climate Change Presenta!on (From all of the milestones – minus the commentary sections in the milestones)In Module Seven, you will submit a presenta!on on global climate change. It should be a complete, polished ar!fact containing all of the cri!cal elements of the final product. It should reflect the incorpora!on of feedback gained throughout the course.

    What to Submit

    Your presenta!on can be in the form of a report (up to eight pages in Word) or a slideshow (with up to 16 PowerPoint slides) or a propor!onal combina!on (e.g., four pages in text and eight slides, or two pages in Word and 12 slides, etc.). Cita!ons should be completed in APA format.

  • Ida B. Wells

    Subject of choice: Ida B. Wells In this assignment you will use one subject of choice and generate your own “prompt” to elicit a 3-5 paragraph response from two different AI options about your subject, then you will fact check the content (3 facts minimum fact checked per AI answer/post, for a total of six) You may use our text readings or online research with reliable websites. Include in your direct quotes from the sources and a citation with a weblink, title, and author (if applicable) attached is an example of the work I need completed
  • Philosophy of Nursing

    Philosophy Paper- Note that this follows the Metaparadigm Model of Nursing which includes Person, Health, Nursing, and Environment. Course Outcomes 1,2,3,4 (Summative Assessment) 1. The purpose of this paper is to develop a nursing philosophy paper which should clearly reflect your personal philosophy of nursing 2. This paper will be submitted to your ePortfolio and utilized for your capstone class, so please do your best and save it. 3. This includes a written paper that should be formatted according to APA 7th edition guidelines. 4. No maximum length to this assignment, but this paper should be at least six pages, including a reference page. Topics to include in your paper: Personal Philosophy Statement. This is one to two sentences that summarize your personal philosophy. The identification and examination of your own perspective (definition) of nursings metaparadigm of nursing, person, health, and environment, as well as the identification of other concepts that you believe should be a part of the nursing metaparadigm. c. Discuss how these concepts are interrelated in terms of how you understand and accomplish your work. Give examples. Give examples from your experiences within the course and learning objectives for the course (page 1 & 2 of Syllabus) that have influenced your philosophy of nursing. For example, Course objective 3- Discuss the influence of nursings image on the publics perception of nursing. In Discussion post 3, the video influenced my thoughts on my own background and how I can positively influence patient care and my image. One of the IHI modules maybe made you consider some of the quality and safety practices that you feel are important to your practice (Course objective #4) When you reflected on values & ethics for the Professional Identity assignment did it reinforce any of your views on ethics (Course objective #5) within your practice? Identify a nursing theorist that influences your nursing philosophy. Explain the basics of the theory. This can be a brief summary from your Nurse Theorist paper. Be careful to not use that nursing theorists view as your own! Citations should be included as appropriate. Rubric :Rubric Name: Personal Philosophy Paper Criteria Proficient 20 points Approaching Proficiency 10 points Minimally Proficient 5 points Not yet proficient 2.5 points No Evidence of proficiency 0 points Criterion Score Personal Philosophy Statement The section gives a clear definition of the students personal philosophy statement within less than 3 sentences. The section gives an adequate definition of the students personal philosophy statement. May take more than 3 sentences. The section gives a fair definition of the students personal philosophy statement. May take more than 4 sentences. The section gives a poor definition of the students personal philosophy statement. Unclear No evidence that student meets any of the Personal Philosophy Statement criteria. Score of Personal Philosophy Statement,/ 20 Personal reflection on Metaparadigm: Nursing, person, health, and environment The section gives a clear and comprehensive description of the students view of nursing as a metaparadigm. The description articulates values, beliefs, and assumptions about nursing as science and art and includes all 4 components of the metaparadigm. The section gives an adequate description of the students view of nursing as a metaparadigm. The description may or may not articulate values, beliefs and assumptions about nursing as science and art. 3 out of 4 components are provided. The section gives a fair description of the students view of nursing as a metaparadigm. The description doesnt articulate values, beliefs and assumptions about nursing as science and art. Only 2 out of 4 components are provided. The section gives a poor description of the students view of nursing as a metaparadigm. The description does not articulate values, beliefs and assumptions about nursing as science and art. The metaparadigm is implied but not articulated. No evidence that student meets any of the Personal reflection on Metaparadigm criteria. Score of Personal reflection on Metaparadigm: Nursing, person, health, and environment,/ 20 Reflection on course Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) for the course and their personal philosophy The section gives a clear and comprehensive description with examples that captures the students reflection on SLOs for the course and its impact on their personal philosophy. A minimum of three (3) examples are described within this section. The section gives an adequate description of the examples that captures the students reflection on SLOs for the course and its impact on their personal philosophy. Two (2) examples are described within this section. The section gives a fair description of the examples that captures the students reflection on SLOs for the course and its impact on their personal philosophy. One example is described within this section. The section gives a poor description of the examples that captures the students reflection on course SLOs for the course and its impact on their personal philosophy. No examples are described No evidence that student meets any of the Reflection on course student learning outcomes and their philosophy on nursing. Score of Reflection on course Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) for the course and their personal philosophy,/ 20 Criteria Proficient 20 points Approaching Proficiency 10 points Minimally Proficient 5 points Not yet proficient 2.5 points No Evidence of proficiency 0 points Criterion Score Influential Nursing Theorist The section gives a clear and comprehensive description of which nursing theorist has influenced the students personal nursing philosophy. (May or may not come from your Theory paper) The section gives an adequate description of which nursing theorist has influenced the students personal nursing philosophy. Not clear what connection was made. The section gives a fair description of which nursing theorist has influenced the students personal nursing philosophy. Vague The section gives a poor description of which nursing theorist has influenced the students personal nursing philosophy. Not clear on theorist or connection. No evidence that student meets any of the Influential Nursing Theorist criteria. Score of Influential Nursing Theorist,/ 20 Criteria Proficient 20 points Approaching Proficiency 10 points Minimally Proficient 5 points Not yet proficient 2.5 points No Evidence of proficiency 0 points Criterion Score APA & Mechanics Correct use of APA, 7th edition, guidelines throughout the paper. Resources referenced using APA 7th ed. With 2 or fewer errors The Philosophy of Nursing paper flows logically, contains no grammatical errors. Up to three (3) APA errors found throughout the entire paper, including the reference page. Assignment sections are not presented well with some difficulty maintaining topic fluidity and contains less than 4 grammatical errors. Up to five (5) APA errors found throughout the entire paper, including the reference page. Assignment sections are scattered with some difficulty following when read by the reviewer and contains 6 or fewer grammatical errors. Six (6) or more APA errors found throughout the entire paper, including the reference page. Assignment sections are presented illogically and difficult to follow when read by the reviewer and contains significant grammatical errors >6. No evidence that student meets any of the APA criteria. No evidence that student meets any of the Mechanics criteria. Score of APA & Mechanics,/ 20 Total Score of Personal Philosophy Paper,/ 100 Overall Score Proficient 14 points minimum Approaching Proficiency 11 points minimum Minimally Proficient 8 points minimum Not Yet 5 points minimum No Evidence 0 points minimum