Bright Academic Experts

Category: uncategorised

  • Impact or Reliability of Body Worn Cameras in Policing

    To write an introduction and a literature review for the start of a dissertation

    the title is Impact or Reliability of Body Worn Cameras in Policing

    the introduction should be 1000 words or less and the literature review should be 3000

    Pros you could explore:

    Increased police accountability

    Reduction in complaints against officers

    Potential deterrence of excessive force

    Better evidence for court cases

    Improved transparency and public trust (arguably)

    Cons you could explore:

    Do they really change police behaviour long-term?

    Privacy concerns (filming victims, witnesses, or the public)

    Selective activation by officers

    Footage interpretation issues in court

    Whether they actually reduce use of force or just shift behaviour

    Great for theory and policy

    You could link this to:

    Police legitimacy

    Surveillance and civil liberties

    Accountability vs. privacy

    Procedural justice

    Technology in criminal justice

    each point must be backed up by a citation.

    PLEASE INCLUDE THEORIES AND POLICIES AND REFERENCE THEM WHEN TALKING ABOUT THEM

  • Risk assessment for financial management information systems

    Your assignment is to create a risk assessment report for managers of a (fictitious) company that owns and depends on financial information contained in a financial management system. Financial management involves the aggregate set of accounting practices and procedures that allow for the accurate and effective handling of all a business revenues, funding, and expenditures. A financial management information system supports the following business functions and associated datasets: Accounting Funds Control Payments Collections and Receivables Asset and Liability Management Reporting and Information Cost Accounting/ Performance The following three security objectives are critical to these business functions and associated datasets: Confidentiality: The impacts of a breach of confidentiality of financial management information are generally associated with the sensitivity of the existence of projects, programs, and/or technologies; and customers, suppliers, contractors and employees that might be revealed by unauthorized disclosure of information. Integrity: The impacts of a breach of integrity of financial management information may result from temporary successful frauds that can affect the business image, while corrective actions may disrupt the business operations. Availability: The impacts of a permanent loss of availability of financial management information can cripple business operations. The purpose of your risk assessment is to clarify the level of concern for confidentiality, integrity, and availability and the potential impact on the business operations should the information and information system be compromised through unauthorized access, use, disclosure, disruption, modification, or destruction. Your risk assessment will be based on: Security objectives and potential impacts defined in Federal Information Processing Standard 199: Standards for Security Categorization of Federal Information and Information Systems, Methodology for assigning impact levels to information and information system types described in NIST Special Publication 800-60 Volume I, Provisional security categorizations assigned to the financial management information types by NIST Special Publication 800-60 Volume II, Determination of an overall security categorization for the financial management information system based on the provisional security categorization of the information types (from 3 above) To start, consider that financial management systems is an integral part of processing the following financial management information types (e.g., the C.3.2 Financial Management category in Table 6 of NIST Special Publication 800-60 Volume I): Asset and Liability Management (C.3.2.1) Reporting and Information (C.3.2.2) Funds Control (C.3.2.3) Accounting (C.3.2.4) Payments (C.3.2.5) Collections and Receivables (C.3.2.6) Cost Accounting/ Performance Measurement (C.3.2.7) Instructions For each information type listed in section C.3.2 of NIST Special Publication 800-60 Volume II, complete a row like the following: img For each security objective column (i.e., under Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability), calculate the overall categorization of the information stored within the server that houses the financial management information and information system. Determine the Overall Impact Rating by recording the highest impact value listed in any of the security objectives: Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability to determine the overall information system categorization. You can use this Excel spreadsheet file as a template. For each information type, use the information in FIPS-199: Standards for Security Categorization of Federal Information and Information Systems (particularly Table 1) to describe the potential impact to the organization if the financial management information system was breached containing these information types. Written Report Deliverable You should write the report for a managerial audience, one that isnt versed in information security concepts. In other words, you need to explain the concepts in terms that can be easily understood by managers without technical experience. If you use technical or unfamiliar terms, include a glossary of the terms used. The suggested length requirement for the report is 45 pages (not including appendices). Report Sections Executive summary (1 page). In this section, state that the report: Is an assessment of risk to information stored on financial management systems. Classifies impacts to different information types, in terms of confidentiality, integrity, and availability, following NIST Special Publication 800-60 Volume II. Classifies these potential impacts as low, moderate, and high, which correspond to limited, serious, severe or catastrophic adverse effects, per FIPS-199: Standards for Security Categorization of Federal Information and Information Systems. Main body: Present and describe the impact rating table you created in Step 1 of the instructions above and discuss the impact for each information type. Bold the items in the right-most column. State that these impact ratings come from NIST Special Publication 800-60 Volume II. In section 1, briefly define integrity, confidentiality, and availability, per FIPS 199. Youre welcome to quote from FIPS-199: Standards for Security Categorization of Federal Information and Information Systems. In section 2, briefly define each impact category: low, moderate, and high, which correspond to limited, serious, severe or catastrophic adverse effects, per FIPS-199: Standards for Security Categorization of Federal Information and Information Systems. In section 3, create a subsection for each information type (e.g., Asset and Liability Management, C.3.2.1). For each subsection, explain why it has the impact rating that it does for confidentiality, integrity, and availability. Youre welcome to quote from NIST Special Publication 800-60 Volume II with attribution. Give emphasis to the most serious impacts. Optionally, add a glossary section that defines the technology terms you use for a managerial audience. Add a reference section where you can list the title, author or agency name (e.g., NIST), URL, and access date for the works you cite.

  • Personal Leadership Reflection

    Instructions Use the points below to help with your slides. Summarize the five leadership domains from the ACHE assessment tool. (1 slide.) Describe qualities needed by healthcare leaders. (1 slide.) Describe a strength and a weakness that you would like to improve. (1 slide.) Use the ACHE domains to support your description. Explain strategies that you can use to develop your identified strength and weakness. (12 slides.)

  • 3.0 Assignment

  • 712

    Hello.

    I need you to select 3 research topics in accounting or internal audit.

    For each research topic, please write one page and 3 slides answering the questions What? Why? How?

    Use the format in the Kinney article of the 3 paragraphs of what, why, how. So you do the 3 paragraphs for each of our 3 research topics.

    All sources must be from Scranton University Library

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): ACC 712 Dissertation Design Spring 2026.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Teenage Employment Regulations

    Problem sharing assignment details…you may see the same number on the screenshots to ensure you have all the details. This is a Business class – Enterprise Resource Planning.

  • Stellar Quest Aerospace Launch Project Assignment

    Draw diagram using (PDM) Precedent Diagramming Method

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Module 3 Perusall Readings PMF CH4 w Charter and PMF CH7 w CaseStudy.pdf, Stella Quest Instructions.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Training manual

    i hope you are well. I wanted to let you know that I have received an email from the university regarding my assignment for Module 2284. They are querying the Turnitin AI detection report and have asked me to provide clarification, along with evidence of my research and writing process. As you supported me during this assignment, I wanted to ask if you would be able to help by providing any supporting evidence or confirmation of how the work was developed. This could include guidance you gave me, feedback, drafts, notes, or any information that helps demonstrate that the assignment was researched and written independently. Your support would be greatly appreciated, as it will help me respond clearly and avoid a formal meeting. Thank you very much for your time and help.

  • Podcast Analysis

    Instructions

    You are inching closer and closer to the end of your undergraduate journey. While there is always more to learn and new skills to develop, at this point you know more about human behavior than most people on the planet. You are, to put it simply, an expert. A bourgeoning expert, to be sure, and if you pursue graduate school, youll develop competency as a practitioner and diagnostician, but right now you should have some measure of confidence in your hard-earned psychology expertise.

    For this assignment, youll take a good long walk in your new expert shoes. In doing so, youll prove to yourself that you have rightfully earned your place as a knowledgeable scholar of psychology. No longer a student, but a self-assured graduate who remains curious, humble, and open to learning, but also knows what they are talking about when it comes to human behavior.

    One of the ways we come face to face with our know-how is when we can take a critical, informed view of something most people take at face value. Consider this scenario: You are serving on a jury and the expert medical witness says, there is a 1 in 7 million chance a mother would have two babies experience crib death and therefore this is more likely a case of homicide. Without a background in the psychological sciences, you might fall in line, believing this to be an open and shut case. Of course, it’s homicide…right? 1:7 million? However, given what you have learned about statistical methods, our brains inability to fully understand the nuances of statistical data, and how this misunderstanding has led to false convictions in the past (and having been exposed to Donnellys TED Talk!), you-as-psychology-graduate would see the reasonable doubt.

    But we arent on a jury right now, so we need something else to hold up a mirror to your skillset. The mirrors we will use for this assignment are podcasts common mediums for the dissemination of information to large swaths of the population. From entertainment to news, from fictional stories to education, from sports to music, podcasts infiltrate our ears and our minds and can shift our perspective in meaningful ways. And, because psychology (and human behavior, thought, and emotion) permeates so many topics, just about any podcast out there can be called a psychology podcast; giving us a rich and varied source of content to critically evaluate.

    To engage in this activity…

    STEP 1: Choose 3 (THREE) podcast episodes. They can all three be from the same podcast series, or they can be from different series. Which three you choose is up to you. You can choose episodes from a podcast or podcasts that you already follow/are a fan of. If you arent a big podcast consumer, thats okay. Here is a list of podcasts that should be interesting to a student of psychology and give you plenty of grist for the mill for completing this assignment. You do not have to choose one from the list below this is just to help those for whom this is a new medium. All of these are available on both Apple and Google Podcasts. You can also access many of them for free via Spotify and Pandora. You can also listen to episodes on the websites of these podcast series.

    Most podcasts are ad supported, so they are free to the public. Some podcasters have a paid tier (episodes behind a paywall), but there are so, so many available for free, you should not need to purchase anything to do this assignment. Many podcasters also offer their shows as YouTube videos, which you may use, as long as the video is also packaged in podcast form as well. If a verbatim transcript of a podcast episode is available in written form on the web, you may use that. NPR has many of its podcasts transcribed on the web.

    • Speakeasy
    • The Pivot Podcast
    • The Arena

    these are the 3 podcast I want to use

    The only stipulation on what podcast you choose is that your instructor must be able to access it it must exist somewhere on the web or on a phone/tablet app, for free, right now. Your instructor will be sampling these as part of their evaluation process.

    STEP 2: Listen and take notes. First, listen to (or watch, if you found your podcast on YouTube) one of the three episodes you chose, remembering to do so through the eyes of a psychology graduate. Even if youve listened to them before, listen again carefully through this lens. Choose and identify at least 1 (ONE) psychological theme, concept, principle, hypothesis, construct, or perspective implied within each episode. This can be anything you learned about in your time as a psychology major the possibilities are almost endless. The idea here is for you to use your trained mind to identify these themes on your own. For inspiration, you might look at the that accompanies this exercise.

    Special Note about True Crime Podcasts

    The true crime podcast genre is a very popular one. And certainly, it is appropriate to choose those type of podcasts for this assignment; there are so many psychological concepts to explore in these stories! However, when it comes to choosing psychological concepts from episodes in this genre, branch out from personality disorder issues at play (particularly in the perpetrator). Having that be the focus of one of your choices is fine, just diversify your thinking a bit when it comes to the other two.

    For example, consider factors like jury decision making, the role of groupthink in crimes where multiple perpetrators were involved, the social psychological motivations of folks who had information about the crime but didnt report it, issues of gender, confirmation bias, racism, family dynamics, the role of memory and its limitations, etc. In other words, if you dive into the true crime genre, youll find all sorts of psychological concepts to explore that are perfect for this assignment; lets just not over-focus on the sociopathic tendencies inherent in the perpetrators themselves.

    STEP 3: Compare and Contrast. Once youve identified the theme consider the point of view the podcaster is taking. Then, compare/contrast that point of view with what you know from your academic journey. How does the shows perspective hold up under your scrutiny? Perhaps you end up agreeing 100% – the point of view espoused in the episode or by someone in the episode resonates completely with what you now know. Maybe your points-of-view kind of align, but if you were in the room, youd have a follow up thought or two to share…what would those thoughts be? Or perhaps you disagree completely!

    STEP 4: Repeat. Repeat Steps 2 & 3 twice more, for two more podcast episodes.

    STEP 5: Review and orient. Review the rubric for this assignment and the to orient your thinking prior to jumping into the writing portion of this activity.

    STEP 6: Write your paper. Construct an 1800-word paper where you present your analysis in the following format (note: going a little over the word count is fine):

    INTRODUCTION: (150+ words)

    Introduce the assignment concisely, explaining your objective – which is to showcase your knowledge of psychology in a real-world context (through your analysis of podcast episodes). You might also refer to why you chose these three episodes and how it served your goals with this assignment. Conclude with a clear definition of your papers purpose.

    BODY: (Three Sections, 500+ words each for a total of 1500+ words)

    Episode 1: Name of Podcast – Episode # and Episode Title

    Begin with a summary of the episode’s content, highlighting its plot or theme.

    Identify at least one key psychological concept at play in the episode (see above instructions or for inspiration)

    Discuss the podcaster’s perspective on this concept as presented in the episode. How do they frame or interpret these concepts, and do they provide relevant information or context?

    Offer your critical analysis of the point-of-view offered episode. Do you agree with the podcasts interpretation, or do you a scholar of psychology – have a different perspective? Support your critique or your agreement (or your little of both perspective) with information from your psychology coursework and other credible sources at least one. Be sure to cite your sources properly.

    Repeat the above for Episode 2 and Episode 3.

    CONCLUSION: 150+ words

    In your conclusion, reflect on the experience of this assignment. What did you learn about yourself? After having completed this activity, how confident are you in your ability to analyze and evaluate psychological elements in various real-world contexts? Consider how this assignment has helped you develop a more informed perspective as a consumer of information. What areas for further study did you identify after having done this assignment? Anything you wish youd learned more about in your time at UMGC? How will you go about learning that information moving forward?

    Paper Writing Guidelines:

    • Paper should be written in APA style; this includes title page, heading, citations, reference page, and paper formatting (1-inch margins, double-spaced, 12-point font, etc.). An abstract is not required.
    • Apply sound writing mechanics: write with clarity and pay attention to spelling/grammar
    • Submit completed document by assigned due date.
    • Your final paper should be 1800+ words (excluding title page and reference page):
    • Title page (does not count page towards length requirement)
    • Reference page (does not count page towards length requirement)

    resources:

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Podcast Analysis (Week 5) – Example Paper-2.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Assignment 2

    Summarize the efficiency of cellular respiration and fermentation as methods to harvest cellular energy from the food we eat. Include all the 4 phases of cell respiration and the number of ATP they generate.

    Tasks:

    1. Write in double space with 12 font size in your own words or paraphrase the information.

    2. check for spelling and grammar mistakes

    3. Save the document in a Microsoft word and post as an attached file.

    Criteria:

    This assignment is associated with Turnitin to detect plagiarism. You are expected to paraphrase the information and keep the similarity below 30% to obtain total points.