Bright Academic Experts

Category: uncategorised

  • Literature analysis

    Overview

    It is important to become familiar with the literature in behavior analysis so you understand what is known and how we know it. Of course, to become familiar with the literature, you need to be able to find resources and evaluate themhence the need for library skills. Do you know which journals are most highly regarded in your specialization? Do you know how to use keywords effectively when searching or how to read an article and find the most important information to summarize? These skills are essential not only to be successful as a learner at Capella but for your career in the field.

    Preparation

    Complete the following if you have not already:

    • Find a behavior analytic article of interest written within the last five years from each specialization area.
    • ASD.
    • ABA in education.
    • OBM.
    • Note: Be sure up upload the articles along with the assignment. Your assignment will not be graded of you fail to do so.
    • Review the . Please fill out and submit the completed worksheet in the course once it is completed.

    Instructions

    Use the to complete this assignment.

    • References: Provide the APA citation for each article.
    • The APA citation for each article. For example: Author, A. A., Author, B. B., & Author, C. C. (Year). Title of article. Title of Periodical, ;volume number (issue number), pages.
    • Search: List the keywords you used for the searches you conducted in the scholarly databases and explain your reasoning behind the choices you made. Describe the results you achieved.
    • Summary: Summarize each article.
    • Each summary should be approximately one paragraph, consisting of 35 sentences. In your summary, focus on providing high-level information rather than details. Include information from the conclusion of the article and how it is relevant to your research topic.
    • Implications and social significance.
    • Discuss the implications of each article. State the social significance of the research.
    • Compare, contrast, and synthesize.
    • Compare the articles by stating what is similar about them.
    • What are the methods being used, the settings, and behaviors being addressed?
    • Contrast the articles by stating what is different about them.
    • What are the methods being used, the settings, and behaviors being addressed?
    • Synthesize the article.
    • Take information from all three articles and draw a new conclusion or make a point about the combination of information.
    • Credibility.
    • List and explain the criteria you used to evaluate the credibility of each article you selected, including:
    • Whether the article was published in the last 57 years.
    • Whether the article is behavior analytic.
    • Whether the article was peer reviewed.

    Before You Submit

    To maximize your scoring potential, be sure that you fully address all assignment requirements and meet the grading criteria. It is helpful to self-score your paper using the rubric before submitting to be sure you are meeting criteria for the grade you want to earn. Important: Be sure up upload the articles along with the assignment. Your assignment will not be graded of you fail to do so.

    Turnitin

    Submit a draft of your assignment to Turnitin for review of proper citations and references. It is very important that you always submit your work as a draft so you can make revisions before submitting your assignment for grading. Refer to the courseroom Turnitin resources for guidance in accessing your feedback from Turnitin, interpreting your report, and improving your writing and citations for your assignment.

    Additional Requirements

    Your assignment should also meet the following requirements:

    • Written communication: Should be free of errors that detract from the overall message.
    • APA formatting: References and citations should be formatted according to current APA style and format. Refer to the
    • section of the Writing Center for citing and referencing tips.
    • Resources: 34 scholarly resources.
    • Worksheet: Use the for your assignment.
    • Submission: Once you are satisfied with your paper and have made all necessary revisions, submit your assignment no later than 11:59 p.m. CST Sunday.

    Competencies Measured

    By successfully completing this assignment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and rubric criteria:

    • Competency 2: Evaluate behavior-analytic literature in terms of reliability, credibility, ethics, and value.
    • Identify appropriate keywords used to search for information in scholarly databases.
    • Summarize three scholarly resources, one that addresses each specialization area.
    • Explain criteria used to evaluate the credibility of each source.
    • Competency 4: Apply critical thinking and effective decision making.
    • Discuss the implications of each article and the social significance of the research.
    • Describe the similarities and differences between the three articles chosen.
    • Competency 5: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for professionals in the field of behavior analysis.
    • Upload the required articles with the assignment.
    • Apply APA formatting to references.
    • Apply the standard writing conventions for the discipline, including structure, voice, person, and tone.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): cf_literature_analysis_worksheet.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Personal Philosophy of Nursing Paper

    The purpose of this paper is to define, describe and explain your thoughts, feelings, and beliefs about the four concepts of the nursing metaparadigm and their interrelationship to one another as they guide your current nursing practice. Select a nursing theorist that closely identifies with your philosophy (no more than 1 theorist). The final paper is to be typed according to APA 7th Edition format and no more than 5-7 pages in length, excluding the title page and reference list. The paper must be submitted through Safe Assign to check similarity index. The similarity index should low/minimal risk. References should be within 10 years. Primary sources only are acceptable in the theorist section.

  • Personal Philosophy of Nursing Paper

    The purpose of this paper is to define, describe and explain your thoughts, feelings, and beliefs about the four concepts of the nursing metaparadigm and their interrelationship to one another as they guide your current nursing practice. Select a nursing theorist that closely identifies with your philosophy (no more than 1 theorist). The final paper is to be typed according to APA 7th Edition format and no more than 5-7 pages in length, excluding the title page and reference list. The paper must be submitted through Safe Assign to check similarity index. The similarity index should low/minimal risk. References should be within 10 years. Primary sources only are acceptable in the theorist section.

  • Anthropology Question

    The instructor will provide discussion questions for the readings, films, and lectures 4 times during the quarter. Students are required to write response papers to these questions and turn them in by the assigned date. The response papers should seek to answer the discussion questions by providing a concise overview and critical appraisal of the relevant readings, films, and lectures. Each comment should be at least 600 words in length (maximum 1,000 words). The response papers should not be asummary of the readings or lecture materials but a thoughtful engagement with issues raised in the lecture and the readings through critical analyses and integration. A grading rubric is at the end of this syllabus. Please note that there will typically be a choice of two to three questions provided for each assignment. You should pick ONE of these questions to address in your response paper. Please note that if attendance in lecture is high and students are writing their response papers WITHOUT relying on AI technologies, then your lowest score on the response papers will be dropped. If instructor has the sense that students are using AI technologies to write these response papers, then the instructor will switch them from take-home to in-class essays. In this eventuality, the instructor will announce the dates and times of the in-class essays.

    Response Question:

    Imagine that our society is shifting from largely disciplinary power to more sovereign forms of power. Please describe what this shift would look like by discussing AT MINIMUM THREE of the following domains: 1) bureaucracies, 2) norms, standards, and ideals, 3) visibility of the sovereign or state, 4) visibility of the average civilian, 5) forms of punishment instituted by the state, 6) peoples sense of personal choice, 7) surveillance, 8) ones soul (as Foucault referenced it), 9) the ambivalence of state violence and suffering bodies, and 10) rituals of truth.

    Requirements: 800 words

  • Structural Violence – Individual Work

    Assignment:

    PART 1STRUCTURAL VIOLENCE (Individual Work)
    –     Make sure that you have read ALL required readings for this week, as you will need them in Parts 1, 2, and 3 of this assignment.
    –     Read the definition of Structural Violence below:
    Structural violence, a term coined by Johan Galtung and by liberation theologians during the
    1960s, describes social structureseconomic, political, legal, religious, and culturalthat stop
    individuals, groups, and societies from reaching their full potential [    57]. In its general usage, the
    word violence often conveys a physical image; however, according to Galtung, it is the avoidable
    impairment of fundamental human needs orthe impairment of human life, which lowers the
    actual degree to which someone is able to meet their needs below that which would otherwise be
    possible [    58]. Structural violence is often embedded in longstanding ubiquitous social structures,
    normalized by stable institutions and regular experience [    59]. Because they seem so ordinary in
    our ways of understanding the world, they appear almost invisible. Disparate access to resources,
    political power, education, health care, and legal standing are just a few examples. The idea
    of structural violence is linked very closely to social injustice and the social machinery of
    oppression [    16]

    Farmer, P.E., Nizeye, B., Stulac, S. & Keshavjee, S. (2006). PLOS Medicine, 3(10): e449. Retrieved from


    –     Watch the following video examples:
    o     Louisville redlining:
    o     Detroit Black Bottom/Paradise Valley:


    o     History of exploitation of Alaskan natives:
    –     Using Kruse (2019) and ONE of the video examples above, write an initial individual reflection (2-3 paragraphs) on structural violence.
    Submit your reflection for Part 1 via Blackboard using the link in the Unit 4 weekly folder.

    Requirements: 2-3 paragraphs

  • Globalization

    Read the article: US Apparel Companies Cant See a Future Without China

    Use your critical thinking skills and post your thoughts to the following discussion questions:

    1. Do the benefits outweigh the drawbacks of apparel brands outsourcing design and production of most of their products to foreign countries?
    2. What may be some future costs and implications of a decision to keep production in China? What are some implications and costs of a decision to move production elsewhere (e.g., Latin America) ?
    3. Should apparel brands’ decisions to outsource set an example for other MNCs in the United States? Explain your reasoning.
    • Initial post: 300 words, thoughtful response (50%), due by or before Thursday

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Week 1 Made in China Remains Reality for US Clothing Companies – Bloomberg.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Week 7 Assignment 7 BUS-7380 v6: Research Ethics and Article…

    Week 7 Assignment 7 BUS-7380 v6: Research Ethics and Article Critique

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Week 7 Assignment 7 BUS-7380 v6 Research Ethics and Article Critique.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Apa

    social innovation with full citation . follow instructions

  • NZM3 NZM3 Task 1: Interprofessional Communication and Leade…

    738.10.1 : Apply Mindfulness

    The learner applies mindfulness to promote self-discovery.

    738.10.2 : Apply Mindsets, Working Styles, and Energy Dynamics

    The learner applies mindsets, working styles, and energy dynamics to promote academic and professional success.

    738.10.3 : Communicate Effectively

    The learner communicates effectively in both oral and written format.

    738.10.4 : Use Communication Strategies

    The learner uses communication strategies to foster a supportive peer community.

    Introduction

    Before you attempt this task, you are required to complete the D235 Interprofessional Communication and Leadership in Healthcare course. This task relies on the completion of the 5 Dynamics assessment.

    In this task, you will be expected to submit a three-part reflection paper. The reflection paper will help you focus on your experience and insights from the course. This paper includes what you have experienced and learned about the results of your individual 5 Dynamics Assessment and what it revealed about your personal working style; how you work with others; insights you have gained regarding conversations and interactions you have with friends, family, coworkers, and others; as well as your plans for the future.

    The first part of your paper will focus on your working style and what you have learned about how you work with others. The second part of the paper will focus on your experience with the different levels of communication explored in the course. The third part of your paper will focus on your overall course experience, your journey through this course, and what you plan to do with the skills you have learned.

    The intent of this paper is to reflect on your learning experiences in the course. You should first complete a draft of the paper and then finalize the submission with additional insights.

    Be concise, clear, and authentic in your writing. Use the paper to explore your experience, consolidate insights, and start thinking about how you will use the course to improve your chances for success in the future.

    Requirements

    Your submission must represent your original work and understanding of the course material. Most performance assessment submissions are automatically scanned through the WGU similarity checker. Students are strongly encouraged to wait for the similarity report to generate after uploading their work and then review it to ensure Academic Authenticity guidelines are met before submitting the file for evaluation. See for more information.

    Grammarly Note:
    Professional Communication will be automatically assessed through Grammarly for Education in most performance assessments before a student submits work for evaluation. Students are strongly encouraged to review the Grammarly for Education feedback prior to submitting work for evaluation, as the overall submission will not pass without this aspect passing. See for more information.

    Microsoft Files Note:
    Write your paper in Microsoft Word (.doc or .docx) unless another Microsoft product, or pdf, is specified in the task directions.Tasks maynotbe submitted as cloud links, such as links to Google Docs, Google Slides, OneDrive, etc. All supporting documentation, such as screenshots and proof of experience, should be collected in a pdf file and submitted separately from the main file.For more information, please see

    You must use the rubric to direct the creation of your submission because it provides detailed criteria that will be used to evaluate your work. Each requirement below may be evaluated by more than one rubric aspect. The rubric aspect titles may contain hyperlinks to relevant portions of the course.

    A. Write a paper (suggested length of 47 pages) reflecting on your experiences during the Interprofessional Leadership and Communication course, including the following formatting requirements:

  • double-spaced text with one-inch margins
  • a heading at the top of page one of the paper with your name, the course name, instructor name, assignment title, and date
  • labels for each of the three parts of the paper
  • Part One: Working Style
  • Part Two: Communication
  • Part Three: Reflection/Heros Journey

    • Part One: Working Style

    1. Using your working style results from your 5 Dynamics report, identify the level of energy intensity (i.e., Abundant, Effortless, Deliberate, or Reserved) for each of the four energy dynamics (i.e., Explore, Excite, Examine, Execute) in the Success/Satisfaction Cycle.

    2. Using either your Working Style Self-Assessment or your 5 Dynamics report, describe the following:

  • Two of your strengths associated with your working style
  • Two of your challenges associated with your working style
  • How you learn best
  • How your energy dynamics present in your daily life

    • 3. Given your own working style, choose a working style you would want a teammate to have and explain how the identified strengths would balance the working styles of the team to successfully complete the project.

    Part Two: Communication

    In this part, you will be referencing the Conversation Meter to reflect on different conversations you had with friends, family, coworkers, or others.

    4. Consider a conversation you had with others, and reflect on the following:

    a. Describe the conversation including how you listened during the conversation and the listening level used (i.e., Pretense, Sincerity, Accuracy, or Authenticity).

    b. Explain what was learned about the way you listen.

    c. Explain how your listening level affect your relationships.

    5. Consider a different conversation you had with others, and reflect on the following:

    a. Describe the conversation, including how you spoke, what was said, how it was said, and the speaking level used (i.e., Pretense, Sincerity, Accuracy, or Authenticity)

    b. Explain what was learned about the way you speak.

    c. Explain how your speaking levels affect your relationships.

    6. Consider (any other or all) conversation you have had with others:

    a. Explain how your communication style (speaking or listening levels) aligns with the laws of conversation to decrease cycles of waste or increase cycles of value including specific example(s).

    b. Explain how you will use your new communication concepts that you learned from the course material to decrease cycles of waste or increase cycles of value.

    Part Three: Reflection/Heros Journey

    7. Reflect on your experience in this course by addressing the following:

    a. Explain what you learned from your experiences interacting with the course material.

    b. Describe what was challenging for you in the course material including why it was challenging for you. Include a specific example(s).

    c. Describe what was valuable to you from the course material including why it was valuable to you. Include a specific example(s).

    8. Select two course concepts you would like to share with others:

    a. Explain how each concept could benefit them.

    9. Reflect on a positive skill or habit gained from this course experience:

    a. Identify the positive skill or habit you have formed from this course.

    b. Explain how you plan to continue to maintain success in that area.

    10. Reflect on the area(s) of communication or leadership which you desire further development in.

    a. Explain your action plan to further develop the area(s) of communication or leadership.

    B. Acknowledge sources, using in-text citations and references, for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.

    C. Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your submission.

    File Restrictions

    File name may contain only letters, numbers, spaces, and these symbols: ! – _ . * ‘ ( )
    File size limit: 200 MB
    File types allowed: doc, docx, rtf, xls, xlsx, ppt, pptx, odt, pdf, csv, txt, qt, mov, mpg, avi, mp3, wav, mp4, wma, flv, asf, mpeg, wmv, m4v, svg, tif, tiff, jpeg, jpg, gif, png, zip, rar, tar, 7z

    Requirements: 7 Pages

  • Week 7 Assignment 7 BUS-7380 v6: Research Ethics and Article…

    Week 7 Assignment 7 BUS-7380 v6: Research Ethics and Article Critique

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Week 7 Assignment 7 BUS-7380 v6 Research Ethics and Article Critique.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.