Bright Academic Experts

Category: uncategorised

  • Peer Review of Student’s Paper

    Peer Review – The student’s paper is attached.

    The peer review activity is meant to be an opportunity to deepen the learning for all and expand the discussion. Critically review a colleague’s paper and address the following:

    I. What is(are) the primary points being made? How does the paper contribute to your learning? What are your take-a-ways?

    2. How might you expand the conversation with your colleague? This may include posing questions, sharing other resources, and/or different perspectives, etc. In other words, provide substantive feedback.

    3. What are your take-a-ways from this discussion for you? How might you bring this to your work and/or research?

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): AC_PSY17_Paper One-4.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Simulation: Therapeutic Communication: Cultural Competency

    The Simulation: Therapeutic Communication: Cultural Competency assignment is due this week. Be sure to refer to the before completing the assignment.

    Requirements

    Submit your completed document to the assignment area no later than the due date provided by your instructor.

    Rubric

    Simulation: Therapeutic Communication Cultural Competency Rubric (JAN26)

    Simulation: Therapeutic Communication Cultural Competency Rubric (JAN26)
    Criteria Ratings Pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTherapeutic ResponseTherapeutic Response
    1. Provide an example of a therapeutic response, in quotations, that the student would use to promote understanding, trust, and respect when giving discharge instructions to a client and their family member.

    2. Identify and reflect on three key therapeutic communication components that contribute to a meaningful and therapeutic conversation.

    3. During the virtual simulation, how did it feel to be unable to understand the language or follow the conversation between the client and their daughter?

    4. In what ways do non-verbal cues contribute to meaningful and therapeutic communication?

    5. What insights or takeaways from this virtual simulation can be carried forward into the students future clinical practice?

    125 ptsHighest Level of PerformanceIncludes no fewer than 5 requirements for the section.107 ptsHigh Level of PerformanceIncludes no fewer than 4 requirements for the section.

    95 ptsSatisfactory Level of PerformanceIncludes no less than 3 requirements for the section.48 ptsUnsatisfactory Level of PerformanceIncludes no less than 2 requirements for the section.0 ptsSection not CompletedIncludes fewer than 1 requirement in the section or did not complete.

    125 pts

    Total Points: 125

    Requirements: in answer

  • Create a problem statement

    Part 1

    Using your assignment 1 document, for this assignment you will udate the Problem Development Form.

    • Utilize your professor feedback to edit the information on research findings or future research suggestions as needed.
    • Replace any of your 10 chosen sources that professor feedback or your own evaluation suggested did not support the same specific topic or gap.
    • For this assignment, you should have a total of 15 recent sources included the form.
    • Within the form, please use the checklist to write a 300-word Problem Statement, supported by the 15 sources.

    Part 2

    Write a reflection to discuss how each of the new articles you added to the problem development form contribute to the gap youve identified. This may be the population studied, the variables investigated, or even the future research recommendations. Reflect on how your review of the Problem Statement excerpts and faculty feedback influenced how you wrote your Problem Statement within the form. Please think critically and write critically in your response.

    Expectations

    Length: This assignment must be 4-5 pages (excluding the title and reference page), 3-4 page development form, and 1-page reflection.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): JonesTCMP9701P-1.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Policy Selection

    The first of four course papers, this assignment asks you to identify an oppressed population that has been negatively impacted by a local, state, or federal policy, including demographic distinctions and the number of people affected. You will describe the specific discriminatory issues in the given policy or program and explain the mechanisms that led to the discriminatory issues. You will describe the original intent of the policy and how it has changed over time, indicating the reasons for those changes. Remember to support all main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations with relevant, credible, and convincing evidence.

    For this assignment, in a 34 page paper:

    • Describe specific discriminatory issues in a given policy or program and connect a core value or standard from the NASW Code of Ethics. (Use Stop-and-frisk policies to talk about)
      • Explain the mechanisms that lead to the discriminatory issues.
    • Describe how a public program or policy has changed over time in response to issues of oppression, alienation, or discrimination.
      • Describe the rationale for these changes.
    • Describe a specific population or subgroup (demographic distinctions, how many) impacted by the selected public policy.
      • Provide relevant, real-world examples that demonstrate the impacts of the policy.
    • Support main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations with relevant, credible, and convincing evidence.
      • Synthesize evidence to demonstrate its importance to your discussion or argument.
    • Apply APA style and formatting to scholarly writing.
      • Demonstrate correct stylistic conventions, document structure, and source attributions.

    Additional Requirements

    The assignment you submit is expected to meet the following requirements:

    • Written communication: Written communication is free of errors that detract from the overall message.
    • APA formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according to current APA style and formatting standards.
    • Resources: A minimum three academic resources.
    • Length of paper: 34 double-spaced pages (not including reference list).
    • Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point Use the topic of Stop-and-frisk policies:

    Requirements: 4

  • Projectile

    About projectile

    Requirements:

  • Touchstone 3.2: Draft Your Essay

    instructions

    Step 1: Draft Your Essay

    Use your outline and annotated bibliography to guide your writing. As you write, you may need to adjust your plan, such as replacing one of your subpoints because the research leads you in a different direction. This is all part of the writing process.

    Your draft should include at least seven paragraphs: An introduction, five body paragraphs (with at least one for the counterarguments and rebuttals), and a conclusion. Be sure to proofread for grammar, punctuation, and formatting errors.

    Step 2: Reflection

    Below your assignment, include answers to all of the following reflection questions.

    • Provide one example of a place where you have used rhetorical appeals or source material to support your argument. How does this enhance your essay? (23 sentences)
    • You will revise this draft for your final paper. Are there parts of your draft that you feel like you’d like specific feedback on, or have questions about? (34 sentences)

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Touchstone 21 Write an Outline and Thesis Statement.docx, Touchstone 22 update.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • journal entry

    If you could make one change to the criminal court process, what would it be? Why?

    Submit your response as an attached Word document. Your response must be at least 200 words in length. No references or citations are necessary.

  • Touchstone 4: Final Revision of Your Essay

    nstructions

    Step 1: Review Feedback and Plan Revisions

    Read through the comments you received on Touchstone 3.2. Use this feedback to guide your revisions and address the suggestions. Remember that your topic must be the same as in Touchstone 3.2, so if you change topics and hand in a paper on a different topic, your submission will be returned ungraded.

    Step 2: Revise Your Essay

    Use the feedback to revise your draft and highlight where you made changes or revisions. Focus first on major elements like the strength of your thesis, organization of ideas, use of evidence, and clarity of argument. Apply the analysis skills you learned in Touchstone 3.1.

    Consider whether:

    • Your thesis is clearly stated and supported throughout.
    • Each paragraph is focused on a single subclaim and includes analysis.
    • Transitions between ideas and paragraphs are smooth.
    • You are using effective rhetorical appeals and an academic tone.
    • Sources are integrated effectively and cited properly using APA formatting.
    • Information is presented in a logical order that is easy for the reader to follow.

    Step 3: Proofread Your Essay

    Read your paper aloud and consider asking someone else to read your work. Remember:

    • Double-check for correct formatting, grammar, punctuation, spelling, and capitalization.
    • Your final essay should be 68 pages (approximately 1,5002,000 words, not including your references or reflection question responses).

    Step 4: Answer the Reflection Questions

    Below your assignment, include answers to all of the following reflection questions.

    • How much time did you spend revising your draft? What revision strategies did you use, and which worked best for you? (23 sentences)
    • List three concrete revisions that you made and explain how you made them. What problem did you fix with each of these revisions? Issues may be unity, cohesion, rhetorical appeals, content, or any other areas on which you received constructive feedback. (45 sentences)
    • What did you learn about your writing process or yourself as a writer? How has your understanding of the research process changed as a result of taking

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Touchstone 21 Write an Outline and Thesis Statement.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Materials Summary 2 – Patriarchy – DH

    This weeks learnings:

    ( film)

    Readings: Patriarchy ( attached pdf )

    Items to include in this week’s summary

    1. Film: CivilizationThe Ascent of Woman: A 10,000 Year Story
    2. Readings: Patriarchy

    #1 – Furs for Evening, But Cloth Was the Stone Age Standby – Natalie Angier

    #2 – Nisa: Life and Words of a Kung Woman – Marjorie Shostak

    #3 – Women in Prehistory – Margaret Ehrenberg

    #4 – When Jesus Came, the Corn Mothers Went Away – Ramon A. Gutierrez

    Written Option

    You may choose to write a 1-2 page summary of the materials that have been assigned for the week. You are welcome to do more, if you so desire. Your paper should be double-spaced, use normal margins, and 12pt font.

    EXAMPLE OF HOW THIS ASSIGNMENT SHOULD LOOK IS ATTACHED.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Example.pdf, PatriarchyPDF.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • assignnnnn 1

    Prepare a case brief of one of the three following cases:

    Bethel School District v. Frazier, 478 U.S. 675 (1987)

    Goss v. Lopez, 419 U.S. 5656 (1975)

    Tinker v. Des Moines, 393 U.S. 503 (1969)

    Your brief should contain each of the four following:

    Facts (name of the case and its parties, what happened factually and procedurally, and the judgment),

    Issue(s) (what is in dispute),

    Holding (the applied rule of law), and

    Rationale (reasons for the holding).

    Each of the four areas will be worth 5 points each for a total of 20 points for the assignment. Good Luck!!!