Bright Academic Experts

Category: uncategorised

  • Gravity of earth

    Imagine a hypothetical planet that has twice the mass of Earth but the same radius. How would the surface gravity, atmospheric pressure, and escape velocity compare to those on Earth? Explain your reasoning using physics and chemistry principles.

    Requirements:

  • Case study: Fertility, Family Planning, and Pre-natal care.

    • Usestandardresources:ACOG(AmericanCollegeofObstetriciansandGynecologists),CDC(CentersforDiseaseControlandPrevention),WHO(WorldHealthOrganization),ABM(AcademyofBreastfeedingMedicine)protocols.
    • Reviewdocuments:CDCUSMEC(UnitedStatesMedicalEligibilityCriteria)forcontraceptiveuse.
    • Alwaysconsiderreferrallists:OB/GYN,MFM,REI,dietitian,socialworker.
    • PracticeAPA7theditionformatforcasestudies.Examitemsoftenrefertobestevidencebasedpractice=useguidelinesoverexpertopinion.

    Contribute a minimum of (4) pages. It should include at least (5) academic sources, no more than 5 years old (RCT are gold standard of EBP) , formatted and cited in APA 7th edition.

    Requirements: see instructios

  • critical reasoning

    Who are you? What do you believe? What cognitive biases do you have? These are big questions to answer, but necessary to consider before moving forward in your professional life.

    In a one- to two-page paper, consider the people and experiences that have shaped how you see yourself, how you see life, and, most importantly, how they have shaped your biases.

    • List and then describe a minimum of three things you believe to be true, such as the existence of God, right vs. wrong, morality, and what it means to be a good person.
    • Explain, in detail, how you acquired these beliefs (including the other people or experiences that have influenced you most), why these beliefs are important and how these beliefs will influence how you engage with people and policies in your future career. Do not simply say something like, I believe in doing the right thing because it is the right thing. You must really dig deep into your psyche and analyze your own perspective of the world; make your brain hurt!
    • Most importantly, discuss at least two cognitive biases discussed in Chapter 1 that you might be most subject to and why. Integrate these into your three beliefs and analyze the ways in which they shape you.

    There is no right or wrong answer to these questions, but your in-depth insight is important.

    Your paper must be in APA Style, typed, and proofread. You do not need an abstract or outside references for this paper.

    Requirements: one- to-two pager

  • Homework 2: Isoparametric Shape Functions

    Please see the attached lecture notes and derive the shape function and pseudocode according to that, for abaqus you can use my username and password to access. omnissa virtual dekstop

    Requirements: in detail

  • fdsfdsgdsgs

    dsgsd gds gds

    Requirements:

  • Psychology Question

    Step 3 You are to write a 1-2 page paper, using APA format:

    1. Individually summarize the two articles describing what each article is about (one of the articles from above and the one you find).
    2. Compare and Contrast the two articles
    3. Summarize what you learned from the articles
    4. Make sure you properly cite each article and any other refrences you use
    5. MAKE SURE YOU USE ONE OF THOSE ARTICLE AND its due by 10pm eastern

      Requirements:

    1. Psych eval 2

      1. Compose a written comprehensive psychiatric evaluation of a patient you have seen in the clinic
      2. Reminder: It is important that you complete this assessment using your critical thinking skills. You are expected to synthesize your clinical assessment, formulate a psychiatric diagnosis, and develop a treatment plan independently. It is not acceptable to document “my preceptor made this diagnosis.” An example of the appropriate descriptors of the clinical evaluation is listed below. It is not acceptable to document within normal limits.
      3. Bellow please use this patient, you can make up whatever information is not available

      4. PATIENT 3

        CPT Code: 90791 Psychiatric Diagnostic Evaluation
        Primary ICD-10: F43.10Gender: Male
        Age: 29
        Race: Hispanic
        Ethnicity: Hispanic
        Insurance: Commercial PPO
        Reason for Visit: New consult

        Chief Complaint

        I cant stop reliving the accident.

        HPI / Reason for Psychiatry Visit

        29-year-old male presents with intrusive memories, nightmares, avoidance of driving, hypervigilance, and irritability following a serious motor vehicle accident 1 year ago. Reports impaired functioning at work and strained relationship. Denies SI/HI or substance misuse.

        Clinical Note

        Anxious but cooperative. Mood tense. Affect restricted. Thought process linear. Insight fair.

        Social Problems Addressed

        • Safety
        • Interpersonal Relationships
        • Role Change
        • Emotional

        Immunizations

        • Up-to-date: Influenza
        • Missing: COVID booster

        Procedures / Assessments / Interventions

        • PCL-5: 50
        • PHQ-9: 10
        • GAD-7: 14
        • Trauma assessment

        Principal Diagnosis

        • Posttraumatic Stress Disorder F43.10

        Differential Diagnoses

        1. Panic Disorder F41.0 (panic is trauma-linked)
        2. Generalized Anxiety Disorder F41.1 (symptoms cue-dependent)

        Treatment

        Medication:

        • Venlafaxine XR 37.5 mg PO daily
        • Qty: 30 | Refills: 1
        • Education: BP monitoring, delayed onset

        Psychotherapy:

        • Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT)
        • Rationale: Addresses trauma-related beliefs and reduces avoidance behaviors.

        Follow-Up

        • 4 weeks

        Allergies

        • Naproxen facial swelling

        Vitals

        BP 124/72 | Temp 98.4F | HR 76 | RR 16 | Ht 59 | Wt 178 lb | BMI 26.3

      Requirements: varies

    2. Organization behaviour and dynamics

      Formative 1:

      As a leader, you want to understand our strengths and how you will lead your organization and team. Through the past activities in this assessment, you tackled the topics of leadership styles and traits, leadership development, and succession planning. You will now use this information to complete this formative assessment. The information from the self-assessment will help you prepare for Summative Assessment 3.

      Take the This assessment will test your strengths for free. It is comparable to StrengthFinders; therefore, if you have taken the StrengthFinders assessment, you can use those results as well.

      Once you have taken the, provide a response to the following questions:

      • What surprised you?
      • What would you take from this analysis to develop yourself as a leader?
      • How does your leadership analysis impact the development of a succession plan?

      Document Type/Template:

      • Word Document

      Formative 2: Case Study Comparative Analysis

      Reflect on the following questions and provide a comprehensive analysis:

      1. Leadership Development Programs:

      • What opportunities exist to help employees develop leadership skills so they can advance within the organization?
      • How are employees selected to participate in these programs?
      • If no formal programs exist, what initiatives should be implemented to develop high performers in your department or organization?

      2. Succession Planning:

      • Describe the succession plans currently in place in your department or organization.
      • Are there specific succession plans in place now? If so, what do they look like?
      • How are these succession plans communicated to the employees?
      • What does a succession plan look like for you in your specific role?

      Provide real-life examples or hypothetical scenarios to illustrate your points.

      Document Type/Template:

      • Word Document
        • Your submission should be 2-3 pages long

      Summative:

      This assessment aligns with the competency for this module: Students will develop an approach to leadership development and experience-based learning in their organization through the deep understanding of adult learning theory. This assessment will allow you to use what you have learned in your formative assessment and determine how you can create the beginnings of a succession plan for your organization by incorporating what the program looks like and how to align it with the mission of the organization.

      Think forward to your overall Final Assessment – the virtual town hall meeting. How are you going to show that a succession plan will be put into place to address any lingering issues?

      Your plan will include:

      • Scope of the program–Summarize goals of succession planning such as “Identifying skill gaps and training needs” or “Boosting morale and retention by investing in employees.” (preferably a goal that aligns with the cooperation, conict, and innovation strategies addressed in Assessment 2).
      • Implementation Team–identify a team or person needed to help achieve the succession plan
      • Find the skills gap in talent–Are there any special positions/skills needed to help your plan be successful?
      • Standards and Metrics–What does success look like?
      • Alignment–How will the success of the plan impact the organization and/or community?

      Document Type/Template:

      • Word Document
      • This paper should be at least four pages including the Title page and References page.
      • You must use APA format for this assessment. You must use at least 4 sources that are current (within the last 5 years).

      Requirements: Detailed

      Requirements: As stated

    3. Analysis/Reflection

      ANSWER the following prompt using the PDFs attached ONLY.

      PROMPT – Discuss which level of analysis is more useful in explaining the causes of the Russian Invasion of Eastern Ukraine on February 24, 2022.

      – Include at least 2 in text citations and cite them correctly

      – 400 words minimum, 450 words maximum

      – There should be absolutely 0% plagiarism (paper is reviewed with plagiarism/AI check)

      – Please do not use so sophisticated, elegant, difficult, BOT sounding, AI generated looking word choice.

      – Use proper grammar, regular word choice as long as it makes sense and its written academically correctly. 400 words minimum, 450 words maximum

      Requirements: 400 words minimum, 450 words maximum

    4. 3 part analysis – 3 paragraphs

      Main argument: What is the author’s central purpose, and primary arguments or central themes? This is the main idea, the main point the author it trying to convey. *Though you are focusing on a few sections you should talk about the article or chapter as a whole here.

      Organization: How does the author break up their argument into sections? What are these sections and what does each discuss? Why does the author organize their argument in this way? What purpose does this organizational structure serve? *Since you are focusing on select section(s) of the article you should describe the structure of these sections, how are they broken up within each section. What does the author talk about first, second, third… and why?

      Evidence:What types of evidence does the author use (other authors, historical or archival sources, interviews, surveys, participant observation, etc.)? Which specific authors does this author cite and why? How does this evidence support the author’s argument? Do not just list the authors cited, but rather, explain why a few key authors are central and important to this author’s main arguments. If the author uses ethnographic research involving participant observation, or if they use interviewing or surveys, how does this data or evidence support and back-up their argument?

      – ABSOLUTELY NO PLAGIARISM (AI/Plagiarism/Originality detector)

      – Try to use regular yet good word choice! Avoid using big, difficult, sophisticated, academically advance phrasing or word choice please. Write regularly like a common person with normal good word choice and fluency.

      – 200 words each paragraph. (Claim, organization and evidence)

      – Include at least 2 in text citations from PDF on the (Evidence Paragraph) as “evidence” while developing paragraph.

      – Use “Mann-2008-Sociological_Inquiry.pdf” (Actual assignment reading) and “attachment 2” (this second pdf are just notes from the reading from the professor) PDFs ONLY to complete assignment.

      – THIRD PDF TITILED, “3002_CRA-Group4…….” IS JUST A SAMPLE OF WHAT A CLAIM, ORGANIZATION, AND EVIDENCE ASSIGNMENT SHOULD LOOK LIKE.

      Requirements: 3 paragraphs – 200 words each paragraph