how it work study pool
Requirements:
Category: uncategorised
-
L4 #220 Y.D M.H.
I will upload the assignment details and the reading content.
-
Global warming
Watch videos, and complete worksheets as PDFAttached Files (PDF/DOCX): Lab 8 _Effects of Global Warming_01-19-2021.pdf, Lab 7_Analyzing Global Warming_01-19-2021.pdf
Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.
-
All vital sign consideration
Submit a research paper regarding vital signs with all considerations
Research paper due in week 5.
See Rubric bellow
Include the following components in your research paper:
- Title Page
- Introduction (general)
- Mention research studies (at least three articles) that validate the information presented in your paper. (Publication date should be no more than five (5) years old).
- Conclusion
- References Page
Do an article review relate to vital signs and present a brief summary
0 pts
10 pts
0 pts
30
Mastery of the information
Excellent
Good
Acceptable
Needs work
Not submitted
The essay content aligns and complies with the information requested and shows complete mastery of the content by showing complete information, details, and examples.
The essay content aligns with the information requested and shows good mastery of the content. Provides sufficient information. But may have missed some details or examples.
The essay content aligns with the information requested and shows partial mastery of the content. Provides sufficient information but lacks details and/or examples.
The essay content does not align with the information requested. Does not show mastery of the concepts and lacks information, details, and/or examples.
Organization
20 pts
15 pts
10 pts
5 pts
0 pts
20
Structure of the essay
Excellent
Good
Needs work
Poor
Not submitted
The essay has a clear format with an introduction, a body with clear transitions between evidence and supporting arguments, and a conclusion. The information is presented in an orderly manner. All elements facilitate the flow of the information in the document.
The essay has a clear format with an introduction, a body with evidence and supporting arguments, and a conclusion. All elements facilitate the flow of the information in the document, but the essay may miss transitions between sections or has other small issues with organization.
The essay structure is problematic. It has one of these issues: The essay does not have a clear introduction or conclusion. OR The conclusion does not take into consideration the information presented. OR Evidence and supporting arguments are not aligned. OR The flow of the document is difficult to follow
The essay does not appear to have any structure. No introduction, progression of thought, or defined conclusion.
Development of Ideas
15 pts
12 pts
9 pts
3 pts
0 pts
15
Excellent
Good
Needs work
Poor
Details are considered, and a point of view, thesis statement, or main idea is clear. Presents excellent evidence, arguments, or examples to support the point made. Draws insightful conclusions based on the information presented.
Details are considered, and a point of view, thesis statement, or main idea is clear. Presents sufficient evidence, arguments, or examples to support the point made. Draws appropriate conclusions based on the information presented.
Details are considered, and a point of view, thesis statement, or main idea is identified. Presents some evidence, arguments, or examples, but some are irrelevant to support the point. Draws appropriate conclusions, but not all are based on the information presented.
Details are not considered, and a point of view, thesis statement, or main idea is vague. Evidence, arguments, or examples are disconnected or not relevant. Lacks a conclusion or repeats previous statements made
Not submitted
Supporting Information
15 pts
12 pts
9 pts
3 pts
0 pts
15
Excellent
Good
Limited
Needs work
Unacceptable
Supporting information is pertinent to the discussion, up to date (depending on what is acceptable in the field), and from academic and trusted sources.
Supporting information is pertinent to the discussion topic. Sources are not the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field) and are from academic and trusted sources.
Supporting information is pertinent to the discussion topic, but not all sources are from academic and trusted sources; may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field).
Supporting information is not pertinent to the discussion, and/or none of the sources are from academic or trusted sources.
No supporting information
Writing Mechanics
10 pts
8 pts
5 pts
0 pts
0 pts
10
Excellent
Good
Needs work
Problematic
Not submitted
Writing is entirely free of typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.
Minimal (1-3) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.
Multiple (4-9) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.
10 or more typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.
Correct application of APA
10 pts
8 pts
6 pts
2 pts
0 pts
10
Excellent
Good
Needs work
Problematic
Not used
Flawless execution of APA. Correct formatting, setup, title page, and perfect citations and references.
Correct formatting, setup, and title page, with minimal formatting or punctuation errors in the citations or references.
Correct formatting, setup, and title page, but significant errors with citations and references.
Incorrect formatting, setup or missing title page, and/or problematic citations and references.
APA style not used
Total points
100 points
-
penyederhanaan bentuk aljabar
sederhanakan 8p+5q-[2p-4q]
Requirements: | .doc file
-
Phl Jo
Argument 1: Catherine is thinking about getting a kitten. She would like to adopt from the local animal shelter, but she recently read an article that said purebred cats purchased from cat breeders had a low incidence of health or disciplinary problems. Catherines cousin and sister have purebred cats, and they are encouraging Catherine to get one. Therefore, Catherine should purchase her new kitten from a cat breeder. In your journal entry, address the following prompts: Indicate which argument you are evaluating. List and label the premises of the argument and the conclusion. Quote directly from the argument for the premises and conclusion. Explain if the argument is inductive or deductive. Do the premises support the conclusion? Explain why or why not. Using the material from the Module Four reading, explain what obstacles or influences are at play in the arguments reasoning. Explain how you could neutralize the obstacles or influences (for example, explain what sources, experts, or evidence you could consult to gather credible information for better and more informed decision making). Provide links and citations for at least two credible sources you could consult to gather more information on the matter under discussion in your chosen argument. -
Phl dis
Engage in honest self-reflection and determine which of the obstacles and influences discussed in the modules reading might operate in your thinking. In your initial post, provide a clear example of an obstacle you experienced in your academic work, in your personal or professional life, or in public. Name the specific obstacle as defined in the reading, providing details about it. Explain how this obstacle can be overcome and note any benefits to neutralizing the impact of the obstacle. You may choose to incorporate any relevant ideas and concepts from previous modules and explain how they can function to enhance overall critical thinking. For example, you may include evidence, experts, or argument analysis. Explain how those things can function to enhance overall critical thinking on the matter. In response to peers, provide your perspective on the matter discussed and make an appeal to the course material. Your response posts should be informative and delivered in a respectful manner. -
Ol pro
topic is Up in the Air: The Sustainability of Allegiant Air Analysis of Social Responsibility. Analyze the organizations strategy plan for compliance with the current acceptable standards or norms relative to social responsibility today. Analyze the organizations strategy plan for any gaps in social responsibility that might be potential risks to internal and external stakeholders. Predict the potential positive and negative impacts to internal and external stakeholders regarding social responsibility that would result from the current strategy plan. In other words, what might happen to the employees and/or people involved in the company regarding social responsibility from this strategy plan? You could consider both the present and future impacts. Critique the current strategy planning related to social responsibilitys evolution within the organization as a response to internal and external influences. What may have influenced the evolution of strategy planning related to social responsibility unique to this organization? Explain how this organization is or is not consistent regarding social responsibility when compared within its own industry and when compared to outside industries. Justify your response. Ethical Decision Making. Analyze the organizations strategy plan for the decision-making processes that are employed. In other words, based on the strategy plan, how does the organization make decisions? Explain how aspects of ethics were considered in the decision-making processes of the organization. In other words, what were the ethical considerations related to social responsibility in the decisions made by the organization? Consider the connection between ethics and organizational decision-making. Analyze the organizations strategy plan for any gaps in the decision-making process that could be considered potential risks to internal and external stakeholders.