Bright Academic Experts

Category: uncategorised

  • Global Health Through Lenses

    see the attachement for assignment instructions

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): MPH601 – Case Assignment.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Week 3 Risk Analysis Case Study Alaska Fly Fishing Expeditio…

    Read the Case Study, Alaska Fly Fishing Expedition.

    List all the likely risks that this project faces. Make the list as comprehensive as possible. List at least 10 risks.

    Assess the probability of each risk occurring and assign it a rating. Use a scale of 1 to 10. A score of 1 is very unlikely to occur and a score of 10 is very likely to occur.

    Estimate the impact on the project if each risk occurs. Do this for each and every risk on your list. Using the 1- 10 scale, assign 1 for little impact and 10 for extremely high impact to the project.

    Map out each risk on the Risk/Impact Probability chart. The 2 x 2 form can be []

    and is a common assessment tool. Handwritten submissions are acceptable. Be clear on the placement of each risk within the grid.

    Develop a response to each risk, according to its position on the chart. Those items located on the lower left of the chart can probably be ignored, while those in the upper right need to be immediately addressed. Detail the responses to each identified risk as part of this assignment.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Alaska Fly Fishing Expedition Case Study.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Global Perspectives Comparative

    Comparative Justice Systems Research BriefStep 1: Identify Themes in Just Mercy (Chapters 57)

    • Mass incarceration and harsh punishment: Stevenson critiques punitive approaches and highlights how they fail to address root causes.
    • Human dignity and redemption: Emphasis on treating incarcerated individuals as capable of change.
    • Impact on marginalized communities: Racial and socioeconomic disparities in sentencing.

    Step 2: Scholarly Sources for Comparative Analysis

    Youll need sources that:

    • Explain rehabilitative justice principles in your chosen country.
    • Provide empirical data on outcomes (recidivism rates, prison conditions).
    • Offer comparative frameworks between U.S. and European systems.

    Examples of scholarly sources:

    Pratt, J. & Eriksson, A. (2014). Contrasts in Punishment: An Explanation of Anglophone Excess and Nordic Exceptionalism.

    • Discusses why Nordic countries prioritize rehabilitation and humane conditions.

    Johnsen, B., Granheim, P. K., & Helgesen, J. (2011). Exceptional Prison Conditions and the Quality of Prison Life: Nordic Prisons in a Comparative Perspective.

    • Details prison conditions and their impact on recidivism.
    • U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics & European Prison Observatory Reports
    • For comparative data on recidivism and incarceration rates.

    Step 3: Connect to Just Mercy

    • Use Stevensons critique of punitive justice as a lens to evaluate the U.S. system.
    • Show how Norways or Germanys emphasis on normalization, education, and reintegration contrasts with the U.S. model described by Stevenson.
    • Discuss lessons: humane conditions, shorter sentences, and reintegration programs reduce recidivism.

    Assignment Submission Guidelines

    • Two to three pages
    • Organize All Assignments in One Document: Compile your work into a single, well-structured file for easy review.
    • Use Clear Section Titles: Label each section with descriptive headings that reflect the content.
    • Always Include a Title for Each Assignment: Begin each section with a concise, professional title that identifies the task.
    • Maintain Professional Formatting: MLA Required
    • Use consistent fonts and spacing.
    • Apply proper margins and alignment.
    • Include page numbers
    • Create a Cohesive Body of Work: Ensure your document flows logically, demonstrates attention to detail, and reflects academic professionalism.

  • HL7 FHIR

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Paper Rubric.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Colon Diverticular disease

    In addition to presenting the pathophysiology of colon diverticular disease, the students will be required to research three peer-reviewed journal articles written in the last five years that each address one of the following:

    1. a legal/ethical issue pertaining to the assigned treatment disease or condition
    2. a pharmalogical intervention for the treatment of the disease of condition
    3. a high risk group (age, ethnicity, culture, environment) that is more suceptible to the assigned disease or condition
    4. modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors associated with the disease or condition assigned.

  • Describe a topic, idea, or concept you find so engaging that…

    Describe a topic, idea, or concept you find so engaging that it makes you lose all track of time. Why does it captivate you? What or who do you turn to when you want to learn more?

  • Sociology of Gender (SOCI-328-OL-24276)

    THIS ASSIGNMENT IS JUST A DISCUSSION POST THAT NEEDS TO BE A MINUMUM OF 125 WORDS.

    PLEASE DONT USE ANY SOURCE OF AL OR CHAT GPT

    Discussion Topic

    ***Don’t Forget to make an inital post on Wednesday by 11pm and reply to two others by Friday at 11pm**

    Check out the .

    Attached is the list of questions about gender that the project asks. If you wish, think about these in your life and/or watch some of the other videos that are part of the project. I am also attaching the “Gender Unicorn” coloring book page- it is something to think about. You may want to explore some of these theme in your journal.

    How does projects such as these complicate ideas about the gender binary and traits what we associate with masculine and feminine? Without going into details about your life that you may feel uncomfortable with…. how do you and what you like/dislike complicate the idea of a binary? Have you ever liked something that was associated with the other gender? How do you break the mold?!

    Requirements: NA

  • Lab reports

    Instructions: A. Select one interval or ratio level variable to analyze. Notes: The variable selected cannot be one of the variables used for class demonstration. Duration variables (i.e., DUR26) are a good choice for this lab exercise. B. In SPSS, run your descriptive statistics on your variable, including a histogram. Analyze Descriptive Statistics Explore on the variable, including a histogram. Make sure that you check the Outliers box in the Statistics window. Note: Use this analysis for your Descriptives. It provides the Extreme Values (outliers) output, useful for identifying if filtering is needed or not! Address the following: 1. Identify the variable used. Identify the mean, and standard deviation of the variable. 2. Is this distribution normal in terms of symmetry and shape? What statistics tell you if your distribution is normal? Provide the values of the statistics, and explain how you know whether your variable is normally distributed or not. a) Note: if your variable is normally distributed, provide this analysis, and select a second variable to use for the lab assignment. 3. Run a transformation on your variable to create a normal distribution. Provide the formula used to transform the variable. Hints: Is your data positively or negatively skewed? Does your variable range include 0? 4. Re-run your Descriptives. Is this new distribution normal in terms of symmetry and shape? Provide the values of the statistics, and explain how you know whether your variable is normally distributed or not. 5. Are there any extreme frequencies which may be affecting your new distribution? a) If yes, filter the original non-transformed variable, and provide the filtering formula. Hint: Select cases. Additional hint: Look at your original histogram! Re-run your Descriptives on the transformed variable. Is this new distribution normal in terms of symmetry and shape? Provide the values of the statistics, and explain how you know whether your variable is normally distributed or not. b) If you do not think there are any extreme frequencies, explain your reasoning. 6. Are there any outliers that fall outside of the normal distribution? Identify the case numbers of the highest and lowest outliers. (Hint: look at the Extreme Values output to identify outliers!) Your lab report must include the SPSS output, including the Descriptives box, Extreme Values box, and histogram for the original, transformed, and filtered (if necessary) variables.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Lab 2 Ass.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • do the questions using DR racket

    • All files must be edited using Dr. Racket

    Requirements: it is a 6% assignment   |   .doc file

  • Cover Letter

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Cover Letter Class Assignment.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.