Bright Academic Experts

Category: uncategorised

  • 4-2 Journal

    Module Four Journal Guidelines and Rubric

    Overview

    This journal assignment allows you to explore historical context and how different populations in society are viewed as normal, whereas others are viewed as abnormal, specifically regarding race, sexuality, gender, or socioeconomic status. Using the resources from Module Four, you will reflect on how these different populations have been constructed in different historical contexts.

    Directions

    Review the resources from Module Four. Then reflect on those resources to explore the historical contexts of various members of the LGBTQ+ population.

    Then, reflect on those resources to explore the historical contexts of various members of the LGBTQ+ population.

    Specifically, you must address the following rubric criteria:

    1. Historical Narratives: Describe historical narratives that have been used to justify the marginalization of LGBTQ+ groups. Include references and examples from this modules resources.
    2. What are some of the dominant narratives that have been used to explain LGBTQ+ sexuality?
    3. How do LGBTQ+ narratives differ from the dominant narrative?
    4. What stories or ideas have you encountered (either in school, media, or your community) that have been used to justify why LGBTQ+ people might be treated unfairly? How do those narratives shape attitudes toward LGBTQ+ individuals?
    5. Personal Comparison: Explain how common explanations or assumptions that youve heard about the LGBTQ+ community compare to what you know or have experienced personally.
    6. Examples That Reshape the Dominant Narrative: Identify examples where LGBTQ+ peoples own stories or perspectives help reshape the dominant narratives. Include references and examples from this modules resources.
    7. Power Structure: Explain how dominant groups have created a power structure over marginalized groups. Include references and examples from this modules resources.
    8. How have dominant groups throughout history benefited in ways marginalized groups did not?

  • Two Page Narrative

    please follow directions given textbook- Vern Brimley,Jr., Deborah Verstegen, Rylan Garfield. 13th Edition (2020). Financing Education In A Climate Of Change Upper Saddle River, New Jersey:Pearson Education, Inc Write a two-page narrative (Please write out the question and answer) Chapter 10 – Provide a two-page narrative that summarizes the arguments both in favor of and those opposed to the granting of public funds for the support of non-public schools. Please make sure you discuss education vouchers, tax credits, and charter schools. Please use citations from outside sources and from your textbook.

  • On one side there is -x -x and 4 the other side has 10 what…

    On one side there is -x -x and 4 the other side has 10 what is the equation and solution

    Requirements:

  • HIPAA, OSHA, CDC guidelines, Patients’ Bill of Rights

    Prompt: As a nurse, how will our bureaucratic institutions and their policies affect you on a day-to-day basis? What laws will you need to follow? What are some laws that have changed over time? Suggested topics: HIPAA OSHA CDC guidelines Patients’ Bill of Rights Your initial post should be a minimum of 200 words A substantive post should be backed by facts and data from credible sources that support your position. All posts must be respectful and should help encourage additional dialogue about the course content.

  • Sistemas de informa?o e suas utilidade

    Como os sistema revolucionaram o mundo

    Requirements:

  • Article 1 Presentation Submission

    Its only 4 slides that needs to be done and answered basically only 4 questions need be answered and this is the article you would be writing about

    4 questions that need be answered

    Did they synthesize literature around a topic in a review?

    Did they put forward a newconceptual framework?

    Did they make any unsubstantialclaims or conclusions?

    Were the methods appropriate or did they use flawed assumptions about data approaches?



    Presentation should apply course concepts from the assigned chapter (especially

    for discussing causes of the problems and recommendations).

    o Tie material to current research and practice in the field (especially in discussing

    alternatives and recommendations).

    o Tie material to recent relevant news stories .

    o Provide a structured class discussion, including discussion questions.

    write voice notes

    Article 1 Selection for Group 3: Measuring effectively in healthcare: From the governance of the system to the management of the organizations, and back

    Citation:

    Mariani, L., & Tieghi, M. (2018). Measuring effectively in healthcare: From the governance of the system to the management of the organizations, and back. International Journal of Healthcare Management, 11(2), 112-121.

    Requirements: as long as u need it to be

  • Nursing Question

    Nursing Process Worksheet (1)

    Nursing Process Worksheet (1)
    Criteria Ratings Pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentification Data

    10 ptsExemplary 10 pointsAll data is accurate, complete, and well-organized.7.5 ptsProficient (7.5 points)Most data is accurate and complete; minimal gaps.

    5 ptsBasic (5 points)Several data points missing or inaccurate.2.5 ptsNeeds Improvement (2.5 points)Critical data is missing or incorrect.

    10 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeChief Complaint & Diagnosis

    10 ptsExemplary (10 Points)Clear, detailed, and accurate chief complaint & diagnosis.7.5 ptsProficient (7.5 points)Mostly clear with minor gaps in supporting details.

    5 ptsBasic (5 points)Vague or incomplete information on the complaint/diagnosis.2.5 ptsNeeds Improvement (2.5 points)Missing or unclear complaint/diagnosis

    10 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePathophysiology

    10 ptsExemplary (10 Points)Detailed explanation supported by citations.9.56 ptsProficient (7.5 points)Sufficient explanation with some supporting evidence.

    5 ptsBasic (5 points)Basic or incomplete pathophysiology explanation.2.5 ptsNeeds Improvement (2.5 points)Pathophysiology is missing or lacks evidence.

    10 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCurrent Vital Signs & Data

    10 ptsExemplary (10 Points)Accurate, complete, and relevant vital signs.7.5 ptsProficient (7.5 points)Mostly accurate, but minor details may be missing.

    5 ptsBasic (5 points)Several missing or inaccurate vital signs.2.5 ptsNeeds Improvement (2.5 points)Vital signs are mostly missing or incorrect.

    10 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis of Assessment Cues

    10 ptsExemplary (10 Points)Clear and accurate list of cues with supported analysis.7.5 ptsProficient (7.5 points)Mostly clear analysis with some minor gaps.

    5 ptsBasic (5 points)Incomplete or unclear data; analysis lacks depth.2.5 ptsNeeds Improvement (2.5 points)Incomplete or disorganized assessment cues.

    10 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePriority Hypothesis/Problem

    10 ptsExemplary (10 Points)Clearly identifies and supports priority hypothesis/problem.7.5 ptsProficient (7.5 points)Identifies priority hypothesis with some gaps.

    5 ptsBasic (5 points)Hypothesis is unclear or unsupported.2.5 ptsNeeds Improvement (2.5 points)Hypothesis is missing or not supported.

    10 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSMART Goal

    10 ptsExemplary (10 Points)Goal is fully SMART (Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Realistic, Timestamped).7.5 ptsProficient (7.5 points)Goal is mostly SMART with minor gaps.

    5 ptsBasic (5 points)Goal is vague or unrealistic; lacks clarity.2.5 ptsNeeds Improvement (2.5 points)Goal is missing or unclear.

    10 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeImplementation

    10 ptsExemplary (10 Points)Four well-developed and appropriate interventions with evidence-based rationale.7.5 ptsProficient (7.5 points)Four interventions, but rationale may lack depth.

    5 ptsBasic (5 points)Less than four interventions or unclear rationale.2.5 ptsNeeds Improvement (2.5 points)Incomplete, inappropriate, or lack of interventions.

    10 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvaluation of Goal

    10 ptsExemplary (10 Points)Clear and comprehensive evaluation, with revision suggestions if needed.7.5 ptsProficient (7.5 points)Clear evaluation with some revisions.

    5 ptsBasic (5 points)Evaluation lacks clarity or justification.2.5 ptsNeeds Improvement (2.5 points)Evaluation is incomplete or lacks reasoning.

    10 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeNursing Application & Reflection

    10 ptsExemplary (10 Points)Thorough reflection, clear connections to clinical experience, and NCLEX content.7.5 ptsProficient (7.5 points)Good reflection with some connection to clinical practice.

    5 ptsBasic (5 points)Limited reflection, unclear connection to clinical experience.2.5 ptsNeeds Improvement (2.5 points)Lacks reflection or connection to clinical practice.

    10 pts

    Requirements:

  • lab

    For your assigned research demonstration, please find: (1) general instructions for your demonstration; (2) online data collection procedure screenshots; and (3) the data collected. Please see the Research Demonstration Project Module on Canvas for more details on each aspect of the project. Demographics have been posted in the Project Module.

    You will meet with your teammate during classes this coming week on 1/27 and 1/29 to work on presentation preparations, while I am available to help you with your statistical analyses and answer any questions. Please join class on Tuesday prepared to be productive. That means each of you should have downloaded SPSS (see my 1/22 Canvas Announcement for download instructions) and reviewed all information in the Research Demonstration Project Module (including project instructions). To get off to a running start in your first team meeting on Tuesday, begin researching your assigned topic now and take a look at the statistical analysis and graph(s) required for your presentation (short videos on how to conduct statistical procedures can be found in the Project Module (click on Statistical Analysis and Reporting).

    Your completed presentation PowerPoint must be uploaded through the portal on Canvas no later than Sunday, 2/1. Presentations will begin on Tuesday, 2/3. Should you have any questions on your demonstration that cant wait until class sessions, please use ‘Reply All’ from within the most recent communication – this will enable me to quickly see a history of dialog on the demonstration that is often necessary for a response and ensure that all team members see all communications.

    Group Research Demonstration Presentation

    Group Research Demonstration Presentation

    CriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

    PREPARATION

    1 pts

    Meets Expectations

    The FINAL presentation PowerPoint was uploaded to Canvas by deadline (see Course Schedule).

    0 pts

    Below Expectations

    The PowerPoint presentation was not uploaded on time, or PowerPoint used for debriefing differed from the PowerPoint uploaded.

    1 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

    MECHANICS

    2 pts

    Meets Expectations

    PowerPoint included at least one slide each for Introduction/Background, Hypothesis, Methods, Results and References [the actual number of slides required for each of these 5 sections will depend upon individual Demonstration and Results reporting instructions]. At least 3 credible sources were included in Introduction citations and References, in APA format. All slides were clear and error free.

    1.5 pts

    Needs Improvement

    Debriefing materials and mechanics facilitated general understanding of the demonstration and related psychological concept, but one or more criteria for exemplary status was not met.

    0 pts

    Below Expectations

    Poor mechanics impaired classmate understanding.

    2 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

    STATISTICS

    3 pts

    Meets Expectations

    Statistical analyses and/or graphics required by the specific demonstration instructions were properly conducted, and results were presented in APA format.

    2.25 pts

    Needs Improvement

    Required statistics were conducted and presented, but there was a minor error in presentation or interpretation, or presentation was not 100% APA compliant.

    0 pts

    Below Expectations

    Some aspect of the required statistical or graphical analyses was not conducted (or not presented), or there was a material misinterpretation of findings.

    3 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

    PRESENTATION CONTENT

    3 pts

    Meets Expectations

    The psychological concept was clearly defined and WHY it occurs was explained. Points in the Introduction clearly build to a concise and testable hypothesis that describes exactly what is being tested. Results were clearly presented and related to the demonstration hypothesis. All questions posed by classmates of the Instructor were completely and articulately answered. All members of the demonstration team appeared to have a thorough comprehension of the topic and contributed equally. Presentation was professional.

    2.25 pts

    Needs Improvement

    Presentation content facilitated general understanding of the demonstration and related psychological concept, but one or more criteria for exemplary status was not met.

    0 pts

    Below Expectations

    Content did not facilitate comprehension of the psychological concept and/or related demonstration.

    3 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

    CLASSMATE PERCEPTION OF DEMONSTRATION

    1 pts

    Meets Expectations

    Demonstration and debriefing received a mean score of > 4 from classmates’ ratings (5-point Likert scale) Student also completed thoughtful and discriminatory ratings for classmates’ demonstrations, often including constructive comments on performance.

    0.75 pts

    Needs Improvement

    Demonstration and debriefing received a mean score of 3 and 4 from classmates’ demonstration ratings (5-point Likert scale) AND student thoughtfully completed discriminatory ratings for ALL demonstrations.

    0 pts

    Below Expectations

    Demonstration and debriefing received a mean score of < 3 from classmates’ demonstration ratings (5-point Likert scale) -OR- student’s ratings of some demonstrations were missing or were not discriminatory and/or informative.

    1 pts

    Total Points: 10

    you must use spss to input the data

    SPSS STATISTICS PREMIUM v31: e94b96be31fa0388ca17

    AMOS v31 for Windows ONLY: c7604890f9283082c558

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): 10 – Online Data Collection.pdf, 10 – Bias Blind Spot Instructions.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Written reading response

    written reading response on Hazans Psychogeography of the Boundary. share honest opinion make it sound interesting What did you think about it? What stood out to you? What questions did it raise?

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): hazan boundary (1).pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Week#4 Journal #3

    Objective

    • Analyze the public relations challenges associated with name, logo, and mascot changes in sports organizations.
    • Evaluate the impact of rebranding on consumer behavior and spending.
    • Assess the financial implications of rebranding for sport franchises and educational institutions.

    Instructions

    Identify Public Relations Issues:

    • Consider Key Challenges: Reflect on the most pressing public relations (PR) issues that professional sports franchises and colleges/universities face when changing their name, logo, and mascot. These may include fan backlash, cultural sensitivity, and maintaining brand loyalty.
    • Impact on Marketing Strategies: Analyze how these PR issues might influence the organization’s overall marketing strategies. Consider the need for new marketing campaigns, public outreach, and efforts to retain the existing fan base.

    Impact on Consumer Spending:

    • Financial Implications: Discuss the potential impact of a name, logo, and mascot change on consumer spending, particularly in relation to licensed products like hats, t-shirts, and other merchandise. Consider the financial costs and benefits associated with rebranding, such as the expense of creating new merchandise and the opportunity to attract new consumers.
    • Post-Rebranding Success: Provide examples of sports organizations or educational institutions that have undergone rebranding. Evaluate how these organizations have fared post-rebranding in terms of consumer spending, fan support, and overall brand success.

    Support with Evidence:

    • Use of Sources: Support your analysis with concrete examples and credible sources. Use at least three credible sources beyond course readings to inform your response, ensuring that they provide valuable insights into the PR and financial aspects of rebranding.
    • Personal Experience and Observations: Where applicable, incorporate your personal experience or observations to enrich your analysis and provide a unique perspective.

    Journal Entry Requirements:

    • Length and Clarity: Write a concise 3- to 4-paragraph journal entry that addresses the questions posed. Ensure your writing is clear, focused, and well-organized.
    • APA Formatting: Adhere to APA formatting guidelines for all in-text citations and references. Avoid direct quotes; instead, paraphrase and integrate information into your journal entry.

    Grading Criteria:

    • Your journal entry will be evaluated on the depth of analysis, use of credible sources, adherence to APA formatting, and the ability to connect theoretical concepts with real-world examples. Clarity and organization of your writing will also be important factors in the assessment.