Category: uncategorised

  • Week 4: Looking at strategic thinking from the margins: femi…

    Week 4: Looking at strategic thinking from the margins: feminist and post-colonial thoughts

    This week we we take a critical look at strategic thinking. What is necessary to sustain strategic thinking? What ideas or assumptions underpin strategy and war?

    Prepare:

    Read the preparation questions below.

    Access the electronic reading list to read your core readings use the discussion questions to guide you as you engage with the texts.

    After completing the above, please visit the Weekly Topic Discussion Forums folder on the blackboard site. Discuss the questions with your colleagues! Share your thoughts and opinions, and make reference to the reading where possible.

    Discussion questions:

    1. Is ‘strategic thinking’ gendered? Why does it matter?
    2. Is Barkawi and Laffey’s critique of security studies, fair? Why/why not?
    3. How did this week’s readings help you to think about this module (about strategic studies)?

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Reading list Strategy in the modern world.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Reflective Unassignment

    For this assignment please take note of the following for Step 1: Create.

    Refer to the past reflection papers to help with how the Henley journey has shaped you,

    For the feedback from of 5 people, should include my mum, my 14 year old son, my best friend and 2 of my senior executives from work

    This assignment needs to be creative, emotional and deep sense of self reflection

    Including a introduction and conclusion.

    I have attached all the material of course from personal mastery and systems thinking to help define the journey.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Nedbank PGDip 2025 Cohorts 1 and 2 Block 2 Personal Mastery V2.pdf, Nedbank PGDip 2025 Cohorts 1 Block 3.pdf, Nedbank PGDip C1 2 Personal Mastery Day 1.pdf, Nedbank PgDip Systems Thinking participants.pdf, 251031 Nedbank PGDip Cohorts 1 Block 4 Personal Mastery.pdf, An Introduction to Time to Think_Henriette.pdf, Systems Research and Behavioral Science – 2024 – Njenga – Enriching systems practice with African perspectives.pdf, PGDIP Reflection Paper Block 1_Prenelle Moodley 2025.docx, Final Reflective Assignment Unassignment brief.docx, Henley_Block 2 Reflection Paper_PGDIP_Prenelle Moodley 2025.docx, Henley_Assignment_Block 3 Reflection Paper_Prenelle Moodley 2025.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Create a Quality Improvement Plan (QIP) for a company Analyz…

    Abstract:

    Create a Quality Improvement Plan (QIP) for a company

    Analyze supply chain, production efficiency, cost-volume-profit, and location selection

    Perform calculations and analysis

    Research quality of life factors

    Develop a human resource strategy

    Submit a written report

    Assignment consists of five parts

    Requirements: 2500   |   .doc file

  • OB Research Paper

    Topic on Menopause.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): ruberic.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Timeline

    Personal & Professional Timeline

    October 18, 1990

    I was Born

    May 14, 2011

    Became a mother to my son Yulian

    October 14, 2012

    Welcomed my daughter Zoe

    January 1, 2020

    Completed Bachelors Degree in Information Technology

    2025 (Expected)

    Pending graduation with a Dual Masters Degree in Human Resources and Business Administration (MBA)

    Optional closing line you can add in the presentation (if you want):

    These milestones represent both my personal growth and professional journey, balancing family, education, and career development.

  • I plan on transferring to u Miami this fall need to rewrite…

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Untitled document.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Sophia learning eng comp 2 tombstone 1.2

    instructions

    Step 1: Read and Process Your Source

    Your source should offer clear, trustworthy information that helps you understand your topic more deeply. Using SQ3R helps you stay engaged, remember more, and prepare for future assignments where youll build on your research. To read your source critically and effectively, use the SQ3R method, which stands for:

    • Survey: Skim the source to get a general idea of its structure and content. Look at headings, subheadings, visuals, and the introduction and conclusion.
    • Question: Turn headings and key points into questions. What do you want to learn? What does the title make you curious about?
    • Read: Read the source carefully to find answers to your questions. Take notes as you go.
    • Recite: Summarize key points in your own words. Try saying them out loud or jotting them down without looking back.
    • Review: Revisit your notes and the source. What were the most important ideas? How do they help you understand your topic?

    You should also review the tutorials that introduce how to think about and understand what you read: , , , .

    Step 2: Write a Summary and Response of the Article (23 pages)

    Your essay should include three parts:

    • Summary: What is the authors main point? What question(s) are the author(s) trying to answer, and what are their findings? What is the central argument? What kind of evidence supports their claims? Is there a place where you noted a strong argument or one that could be better developed?
    • Analysis: Write a short analysis of the article. Is the argument well-reasoned and supported by evidence? Do you notice any biases or assumptions? What is your response to the ideas in the article? You can agree, disagree, extend, or question ideas in the source.
    • Usefulness: Evaluate how well the source would support a student research project. How can this source contribute to a future essay that you might write? Do you have further questions, including ones for future research? How might it come in handy to back up a claim (or address a counterclaim)?

    Step 3: Review and Submit

    • Review the rubric to confirm that you have met all the requirements of the Touchstone. Once you are happy with it, you can submit it as a Microsoft Word (.doc or .docx) file. Your submission must include your name, the name of the course, the date, and the title of your assignment.

    Rubric

  • Teaching effective

    Assignment Instructions Write a 23 page reflection paper (double-spaced, 12-point font, APA or MLA format) that addresses the following components,( 23 page reflection paper to be put on PowerPoint for presentation in class) Teaching Methods (30%) Identify at least two teaching methods observed or experienced (e.g., direct instruction, cooperative learning, inquiry-based learning, technology-enhanced instruction). Discuss how effective each method was in promoting student understanding, engagement, and participation. Explain why these methods were successful or what limitations they presented. Classroom Management Skills (30%) Describe the classroom management strategies used (e.g., routines, behavior expectations, positive reinforcement, transitions). Analyze how these strategies supported or hindered the learning environment. Reflect on how classroom management affected student behavior and instructional flow. Critical Reflection (25%) Reflect on what you learned about effective teaching from this experience. Identify one teaching strategy and one classroom management skill you would adopt or improve in your own teaching practice. Explain how reflection contributes to professional growth as an educator. Conclusion (15%) Summarize key insights gained from your reflection. Connect your experience to the importance of effective teaching and classroom management in student success.
  • Collectivism over Individualism: How Community Enhances Psyc…

    psychology argumentative essay: “Collectivism over Individualism: How Community Enhances Psychological Well-Being” 8 studies/article used must be from the past 10 years. college-level essay, avoid jargon and sentences that trail off. 1800-2000 words max.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Argumentative essay instructions.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Teaching method

    Teaching Methods (30%) Identify at least two teaching methods observed (e.g., direct instruction, cooperative learning, inquiry-based learning, technology-enhanced instruction). Discuss how effective each method was in promoting student understanding, engagement, and participation. Explain why these methods were successful or what limitations they presented. Critical Reflection (10%) Reflect on what you learned about effective teaching from this experience. and how it contributes to your professional growth as an educator C. Conclusion (10%) 1.Summarize key insights gained from your reflection and add a supporting resource(article) . Remember to cite your source.