Bright Academic Experts

Category: uncategorised

  • penology & punishment 3000 essay

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Example (1).docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Wharton

    During my sophomore year, I wanted to start a small community fundraiser to support a local charity, but I had very limited resources. I had no budget, little experience organizing events, and only a short amount of time before the school term ended. Instead of seeing these limits as obstacles, I focused on what I did have: initiative, creativity, and a strong sense of purpose. I reached out to classmates directly, explained the cause, and used free digital tools to spread the word. I designed simple promotional materials myself and coordinated volunteers by breaking tasks into small, manageable roles. When challenges came uplow initial interest or scheduling conflictsI adjusted quickly, changing strategies rather than giving up. The fundraiser was modest, but it succeeded in raising both awareness and meaningful contributions. More importantly, the experience taught me that creativity often grows out of constraint. I learned that persistence is not about pushing harder in one direction, but about adapting, staying flexible, and continuing to move forward even when progress feels slow. This mindset has stayed with me and continues to shape how I approach challenges today.

  • Check instructions

    check attachments. I need three different answers for three of my classmates. All three should be different. Follow instructions and template for ppt

    Requirements: stated

  • Samaneh Anahid

    HS 333: Comprehensive Case Analysis Written Comprehensive Financial Plan Grading Rubric The grading rubric will be applied to written financial plan presentations. It is divided into nine categories. Each category can earn between four and zero points. (The recommendations category is worth double the points.) The following table presents general guidelines for excellent, good, fair, poor, and unacceptable quality standards. Points Description 4 Excellent: The student includes all required elements and displays mastery of the topic level on par with client expectations of a financial planning professional. 3 Good: The student includes 75% of the required elements and provides understanding of the subject matter and adequately addresses the topic. The student meets the needs of the client and demonstrates accuracy within all legal and ethical frameworks. 2 Fair: The student includes 50% of the required elements and minimally grasps the subject matter. The student demonstrates a minimum level of accuracy within compliance, legal, and ethical frameworks. The students work shows room for improvement. 1 Poor: The student includes 25% of the required elements and does not adequately satisfy the requirements of the category but has made an attempt. The student does not demonstrate an ethical, compliant, or legal framework. 0 Unacceptable: The student has either not completed the assignment or has committed malpractice. Students should use this rubric as a guide to ensure they receive a passing grade. Students may resubmit their written plans until they receive a passing grade (up to 4 weeks after the end of instruction). In order to pass, a student must meet both of the following criteria: 1. Score at least 28 of a possible 40 points from the rubric. 2. Do not score a 0 on any of the 9 categories in the rubric. Note that most resubmissions are because a student has not met the second criterion and, more specifically, because a student has received a 0 in the recommendations category. The following pages provide specific to-do lists and scoring rubric for each category.Introduction and Executive Summary Introduce your business to the client. Establish the scope of the engagement. Describe your method and amount of compensation. Include a statement about the ongoing monitoring of the financial plan. Outline the highlights of the financial plan. Include a SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats) analysis. Address all conflicts of interest and compensation challenges. By commission or omission, do not act in a way that would cause you to be subject to potential lawsuits or regulatory violations. Points Description 4 Excellent: The student includes all EIGHT required elements and displays mastery of the topic level on par with client expectations of a financial planning professional. 3 Good: The student includes at least SIX (75%) of the required elements and provides understanding of the subject matter and adequately addresses the topic. The student meets the needs of the client and demonstrates accuracy within all legal and ethical frameworks. 2 Fair: The student includes at least FOUR (50%) of the required elements and minimally grasps the subject matter. The student demonstrates a minimum level of accuracy within compliance, legal, and ethical frameworks. The students work shows room for improvement. 1 Poor: The student includes at least TWO (25%) of the required elements and does not adequately satisfy the requirements of the category but has made an attempt. The student does not demonstrate an ethical, compliant, or legal framework. 0 Unacceptable: The student includes less than TWO (25%) of the required elements or has either not completed the assignment or has committed malpractice. CommentsGoals and Objectives Briefly state the clients goals and objective. Goals must be SMART (specific, measurable, achievable, reasonable, and time-bound). Goals must not violate relevant ethical or legal standards. Prioritize each goal and objective using your professional opinion. Briefly summarize the recommendation for each goal and objective. Goals and recommendations must integrate across the planning context, especially regarding cash flow, risk management, and the availability of assets. Points Description 4 Excellent: The student includes all SIX required elements and displays mastery of the topic level on par with client expectations of a financial planning professional. 3 Good: The student includes at least FOUR (75%) of the required elements and provides understanding of the subject matter and adequately addresses the topic. The student meets the needs of the client and demonstrates accuracy within all legal and ethical frameworks. 2 Fair: The student includes at least THREE (50%) of the required elements and minimally grasps the subject matter. The student demonstrates a minimum level of accuracy within compliance, legal, and ethical frameworks. The students work shows room for improvement. 1 Poor: The student includes at least TWO (25%) of the required elements and does not adequately satisfy the requirements of the category but has made an attempt. The student does not demonstrate an ethical, compliant, or legal framework. 0 Unacceptable: The student includes less than TWO (25%) of the required elements or has either not completed the assignment or has committed malpractice. CommentsAssumptions Clearly define every assumption made in the financial plan. Assumptions must be relevant, appropriate, and legally defensible. When applicable, assumptions should err on the conservative side. Rates of return must be appropriate for the clients risk tolerance and objectives. Rates of inflation should vary depending on the goal and spending category (such as housing versus medical versus education). Points Description 4 Excellent: The student includes all FIVE required elements and displays mastery of the topic level on par with client expectations of a financial planning professional. 3 Good: The student includes at least FOUR (75%) of the required elements and provides understanding of the subject matter and adequately addresses the topic. The student meets the needs of the client and demonstrates accuracy within all legal and ethical frameworks. 2 Fair: The student includes at least THREE (50%) of the required elements and minimally grasps the subject matter. The student demonstrates a minimum level of accuracy within compliance, legal, and ethical frameworks. The students work shows room for improvement. 1 Poor: The student includes at least TWO (25%) of the required elements and does not adequately satisfy the requirements of the category but has made an attempt. The student does not demonstrate an ethical, compliant, or legal framework. 0 Unacceptable: The student includes less than TWO (25%) of the required elements or has either not completed the assignment or has committed malpractice. CommentsRecommendations (This section is worth double the points.) Recommendations are identified for each client need and goal. The most impactful recommendations are presented alongside alternatives. Recommendations are presented alongside their explicit and implicit costs. Recommendations should be technically accurate. Recommendations must not cause harm to the client. Recommendations must be realistic regarding the clients limited cash flow and assets. Recommendations account for tax consequences. Points Description 4 Excellent: The student includes all SEVEN required elements and displays mastery of the topic level on par with client expectations of a financial planning professional. 3 Good: The student includes at least FOUR (75%) of the required elements and provides understanding of the subject matter and adequately addresses the topic. The student meets the needs of the client and demonstrates accuracy within all legal and ethical frameworks. 2 Fair: The student includes at least THREE (50%) of the required elements and minimally grasps the subject matter. The student demonstrates a minimum level of accuracy within compliance, legal, and ethical frameworks. The students work shows room for improvement. 1 Poor: The student includes at least TWO (25%) of the required elements and does not adequately satisfy the requirements of the category but has made an attempt. The student does not demonstrate an ethical, compliant, or legal framework. 0 Unacceptable: The student includes less than TWO (25%) of the required elements or has either not completed the assignment or has committed malpractice. CommentsImplementation Schedule Address all recommendations from every topic area. Include specific costs and tax consequences. List specific products used. Identify who is responsible for implementing each recommendation. Indicate the time horizon in which the recommendation should be implemented. Points Description 4 Excellent: The student includes all FIVE required elements and displays mastery of the topic level on par with client expectations of a financial planning professional. 3 Good: The student includes at least FOUR (75%) of the required elements and provides understanding of the subject matter and adequately addresses the topic. The student meets the needs of the client and demonstrates accuracy within all legal and ethical frameworks. 2 Fair: The student includes at least THREE (50%) of the required elements and minimally grasps the subject matter. The student demonstrates a minimum level of accuracy within compliance, legal, and ethical frameworks. The students work shows room for improvement. 1 Poor: The student includes at least TWO (25%) of the required elements and does not adequately satisfy the requirements of the category but has made an attempt. The student does not demonstrate an ethical, compliant, or legal framework. 0 Unacceptable: The student includes less than TWO (25%) of the required elements or has either not completed the assignment or has committed malpractice. CommentsAnalysis by Topic Area Include all analyses used to derive financial planning recommendations. Methodologies must be appropriate to address client goals and needs. All appropriate financial planning topic areas are addressed. All analyses have been performed correctly. Include a Monte Carlo or series of sensitivity analyses. Complex analyses are clearly and concisely explained in every-day language. Analyses are clearly referenced (such as with page numbers) in the written portion of the plan. Points Description 4 Excellent: The student includes all SEVEN required elements and displays mastery of the topic level on par with client expectations of a financial planning professional. 3 Good: The student includes at least FOUR (75%) of the required elements and provides understanding of the subject matter and adequately addresses the topic. The student meets the needs of the client and demonstrates accuracy within all legal and ethical frameworks. 2 Fair: The student includes at least THREE (50%) of the required elements and minimally grasps the subject matter. The student demonstrates a minimum level of accuracy within compliance, legal, and ethical frameworks. The students work shows room for improvement. 1 Poor: The student includes at least TWO (25%) of the required elements and does not adequately satisfy the requirements of the category but has made an attempt. The student does not demonstrate an ethical, compliant, or legal framework. 0 Unacceptable: The student includes less than TWO (25%) of the required elements or has either not completed the assignment or has committed malpractice. CommentsSupporting and Appendix Information The source of each assumption is referenced in the plans appendix. The full analysis is included in the plans appendix. All insurance illustrations are included in the plans appendix. Any other supporting documentation is included in the plans appendix. Points Description 4 Excellent: The student includes all FOUR required elements and displays mastery of the topic level on par with client expectations of a financial planning professional. 3 Good: The student includes at least THREE (75%) of the required elements and provides understanding of the subject matter and adequately addresses the topic. The student meets the needs of the client and demonstrates accuracy within all legal and ethical frameworks. 2 Fair: The student includes at least TWO (50%) of the required elements and minimally grasps the subject matter. The student demonstrates a minimum level of accuracy within compliance, legal, and ethical frameworks. The students work shows room for improvement. 1 Poor: The student includes at least ONE (25%) of the required elements and does not adequately satisfy the requirements of the category but has made an attempt. The student does not demonstrate an ethical, compliant, or legal framework. 0 Unacceptable: The student includes less than ONE (25%) of the required elements or has either not completed the assignment or has committed malpractice. CommentsPresentation The financial plan is presented in the same manner it would be presented to the client and has professional design, styling, and formatting. The plan is free of typos and grammatical errors. Recommendations are presented in a manner consistent with the clients personality, learning style, and level of financial literacy. The plan uses text, charts, tables, and graphs to effectively present recommendations. The plan is easy to read and understand. Points Description 4 Excellent: The student includes all FIVE required elements and displays mastery of the topic level on par with client expectations of a financial planning professional. 3 Good: The student includes at least FOUR (75%) of the required elements and provides understanding of the subject matter and adequately addresses the topic. The student meets the needs of the client and demonstrates accuracy within all legal and ethical frameworks. 2 Fair: The student includes at least THREE (50%) of the required elements and minimally grasps the subject matter. The student demonstrates a minimum level of accuracy within compliance, legal, and ethical frameworks. The students work shows room for improvement. 1 Poor: The student includes at least TWO (25%) of the required elements and does not adequately satisfy the requirements of the category but has made an attempt. The student does not demonstrate an ethical, compliant, or legal framework. 0 Unacceptable: The student includes less than TWO (25%) of the required elements or has either not completed the assignment or has committed malpractice. CommentsRelevancy The impact of economic, political, and regulatory issues are evaluated for each section of the plan. Such issues included the fiduciary standard, health care reform, and tax laws. When relevant, in each section of the plan, include information about how the plan would change considering changes in the political or tax environment. Points Description 4 Excellent: The student includes BOTH required elements and displays mastery of the topic level on par with client expectations of a financial planning professional. 2 Fair: The student includes at least ONE (50%) of the required elements and minimally grasps the subject matter. The student demonstrates a minimum level of accuracy within compliance, legal, and ethical frameworks. The students work shows room for improvement. 0 Unacceptable: The student includes less than ONE (25%) of the required elements or has either not completed the assignment or has committed malpractice.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): HS 333 Syllabus.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Advanced Cybersecurity Framework Design for a High-Risk Indu…

    Advanced Cybersecurity Framework Design for a High-Risk Industry

    Objective:

    Students will create a fully customized cybersecurity framework tailored for a specific, high-risk

    industry.

    This will require in-depth research, synthesis of learned concepts, and practical application of NIST

    CSF and MITRE ATT&CK.

    Scenario:

    You are a cybersecurity consultant tasked with developing a cybersecurity framework for a niche

    industry.

    Choose one of the following industries:

    1. Maritime Shipping and Logistics

    2. Smart Agriculture Systems (e.g., IoT in farming)

    Your client recently suffered a data breach and ransomware attack targeting their critical operations.

    Develop a comprehensive cybersecurity plan based on the tasks below.

    Assignment Tasks

    Part 1: Industry Analysis (Research and Manual Data Collection)

    Advanced Cybersecurity Framework Design for a High-Risk Industry

    Requirements:

    1. Research the chosen industry.

    – Describe its unique cybersecurity challenges and risks.

    – Include at least three real-world incidents affecting this industry. Cite original sources.

    2. Summarize findings.

    – Compile your research findings into a concise 2-page report.

    Part 2: Framework Design

    Requirements:

    1. Develop a NIST CSF-Based Plan

    – Using the NIST Cybersecurity Framework, create a customized plan addressing your chosen

    industry’s specific risks.

    – Include four specific actions under each function: Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, and

    Recover.

    2. Analyze MITRE ATT&CK Tactics

    – Choose three real-world attack techniques from MITRE ATT&CK relevant to your industry.

    – Describe the tactic, vulnerabilities it exploits, and countermeasures using NIST CSF functions.

    Advanced Cybersecurity Framework Design for a High-Risk Industry

    3. Create Manual Flow Diagrams

    – Create a manually-drawn or custom visual representation of the framework.

    Part 3: Incident Simulation and Playbook Development

    Requirements:

    1. Simulate a Cybersecurity Incident

    – Create a fictional incident scenario specific to your chosen industry.

    2. Develop an Incident Response Playbook

    – Write a step-by-step playbook for responding to the incident.

    Part 4: Report and Reflection

    Requirements:

    1. Create a Comprehensive Report

    – Include sections for industry analysis, framework design, incident simulation, and the response

    playbook.

    2. Reflection

    – Describe challenges and lessons learned while tailoring the framework for your industry.

    Submission Guidelines:

    – Format: Submit a single PDF document including your research, visuals, and diagrams.

    – Plagiarism Policy: Use of AI tools, templates, or pre-written content is strictly prohibited.

    Advanced Cybersecurity Framework Design for a High-Risk Industry

    Grading Rubric (100 Points)

    – Part 1: Industry Analysis and Research (20 points)

    – Part 2: Framework Design (30 points)

    – Part 3: Incident Simulation and Playbook (30 points)

    – Part 4: Report and Reflection (20 points)

    Demonstrate creativity, critical thinking, and original work.

    I have a sample assignment. get me one for any of the above topic.

    Requirements: answer all questions | Typescript

  • Writing Question

    Requirements: As required

  • Topics

    a general summary of the topic 2 pts why you think it is interesting/important to study 1 pt one question that you would like your research to answer 5 pts one primary source (journal article) reference, summarizing the hypothesis, methods, and results How insect feeding behaviour changes when predators are present how Insects adapt to climate change

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): BIOL445 – Research Paper Guidelines S2026 (1).pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Surrogacy

    I copied the scenario under the questions that Ive answered. the paper has to be 2 to 3 pages with clear purpose statement using the apa templete that I created. it has to be uploaded to Grammarly I have to show 95% on grammarly before I can upload. I will attach the rubric and the APA template. Disregard the reference used on template.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): NU 345 ETHICS MOD 1 part 1.docx, Surrogacy.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • art

    Touchstone 4: Art and Architecture: Uniting Culture, Innovation, and Religious Ideals

    Overview

    What You Will Learn: You will explore how art and architecture intersect with culture, innovation, and religious expression.

    Why It Matters: This paper will demonstrate your ability to put a work of art or piece of architecture in its historical context by

    a. explaining how earlier works of art bring about artistic innovation.

    b. how works reflect the religious culture that produced them.

    What You Will Hand In: A 4 – 5 page (1,000 – 1,200 word) paper saved as a Microsoft Word (.docx or .doc) file.

    Keys to Success:

    • Develop and submit original work.
    • Select four works of art or architecture described in the tutorials; two that exemplify innovation and two that exemplify religious expression.
    • Put the works in an appropriate historical context, two in the context of innovation and two in the context of religious significance.
    • Use only the Sophia tutorials as source material. No external sources are allowed.

    Helpful Links:

    Instructions

    Step 1: Review the Tutorials and Select Four Examples

    • Select two works of art from the list below that exemplify innovation; this innovation may be stylistic, technological, or both.
    • Select two works of art from the list below that exemplify religious expression.

    Step 2: Write the Touchstone

    • Write your paper about the four works, following this basic structure:
    1. Introduction (100-200 words): provide a broad overview of the paper, the claims you will defend, and the works of art you will describe.
    2. Innovation (300-500 words): give the historical and cultural context for each of the works of art you have selected and describe how these works both emerged from existing traditions and introduced new ideas in either style or technology. Compare and contrast the two works.
    3. Religious Expression (300-500 words): give the historical and cultural context for each of the works of art you have selected and describe how these works represent the religious ideals of the culture that produced them. Compare and contrast the two works.
    4. Conclusion (100-200 words): Summarize your analysis and provide closure to the paper.

    hint

    To build the skill of correctly citing your sources in academic writing, you should cite each tutorial with the four examples you describe in your paper. Because all of your sources will be Sophia tutorials, the in-text and reference page citations will look like this:

    • In-text citation: (Sophia Learning, n.d.)
    • Reference: Sophia Learning. (n.d.) Romanesque Architecture [Cathedral of Saint James]. Art History I.

    Adjust to identify the tutorial you are referencing. Visit the resource for more assistance.

    Step 3: Review and Submit Your Work

    • Review your work carefully and check the rubric to make sure you have met all the requirements. Submit as a Microsoft Word (.doc or .docx) file.

    We hope this assignment gives you a chance to reflect further on the works of art and architecture that struck a chord with you. Have fun, and good luck!

  • Necesito realizra una tarea de teatro y ensayo

    Neceisto realizar una tarea de teatro y ensayo donde me respondas la asignacion 1 segun la biografia de Luis Rafael Sancez y La generacion de los posters de Alfredo Bryce

    Requirements:   |   .doc file