Category: uncategorised

  • Concentration: Change Management and Knowledge Management

      Your internship course will conclude with your professional portfolio that you are expected to continually add to, improve, amend, and edit. Using the articles provided in the Internship Course Resources identify areas of improvement and/or materials to add to your portfolio. If you do not have a professional portfolio, this will be a great place to start. If you have already started your professional portfolio, then identify any additional items that are needed to complete the latest version of your portfolio.

      • Outline and describe in the discussion those components that you will be working on in this session to build or improve your professional portfolio. Summarize how concepts learned this week can be applied to your current role, and post to the discussion board.

    Requirements: No plagiarism and no AI use

  • Exploring the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s (FEMA) R…

    follow this description and rubric. MUSTTTT READ CSREFULLY BEFORE YOU BEGIN.

    Discussion Board Requirements

    The Online Discussion Board is designed to stimulate class dialogue that would normally take place in a face-to-face didactic setting. Participation in the Discussion Board serves as a learning strategy to help demonstrate student knowledge of course content. Each Discussion Board post will be assessed using a rubric. In addition to reviewing the grading criteria in the rubric, please note the following Discussion Board post expectations, which must all be met to earn full weekly discussion credit:

    must post at least 25 word inm initial

    • APA Requirements:
      Each post must have a reference and in-text citations. When thinking about what information needs to be cited, unless you did the actual research to discover the information, you must cite it.

    Initial Discussion Board posts:

    When writing your initial scholarly post (the one that answers the discussion prompt question) you must discuss the question and support your information with the text as well as an outside scholarly resource. Post a well-developed, scholarly response to Initial Discussion Board Prompts Craft comprehensive academic thoughts on the academic topic that are at least 25 words.

    • A well-developed post is meaningful, clearly demonstrates relevance to the topic, reflects critical thinking and your knowledge of the material, demonstrates synthesis of the subject matter, extends the discussion by building on previous posts, and includes proper source citations, when applicable. Posts limited to I agree, Great posting, or Thank you will not be assessed as well-developed and will therefore not be considered a contribution to the number of required weekly posts.

    Discussion Questions: Exploring the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s (FEMA) Role in Disasters and Nursing Implications

    Research and Analyze: Research a past natural disaster of your choice (https://www.fema.gov/disaster/declarations).

    • Describe how FEMA supported the community and coordinated disaster response efforts. Share specific examples of their contributions to preparedness, relief, and recovery.

    Preparedness and Collaboration:

    • What other local, national, or international agencies partnered with FEMA to support the affected community? Provide examples of their roles and contributions.

    Nursing Implications and Community Health Needs:

    • What were the primary health concerns and community needs resulting from the disaster? Consider injuries, traumas, and mental health impacts.

    Post-Disaster Health Risks:

    • Identify potential diseases or health conditions that may arise following the disaster.
    • Outline specific measures to protect both yourself and the community from these risks. Include examples of infection control, health education, or public health interventions.

    In your peer responses, help expand the discussion by proposing additional disaster preparedness and response strategies.

    Reply to at least two peers; one reply should address a peer who researched a different disaster than yours.

    • Compare and contrast the challenges and responses.
    • Offer constructive suggestions for strengthening disaster plans and processes based on your insights.

    Support your answers with scholarly sources (references and citations).

    Per FEMA: Emergency vs. Disaster
    The terms emergency and disaster are often used interchangeably. This common use of terms can be confusing. It is easiest to understand the terms emergency and disaster as being at two ends of a scale, in which the size of an incident and the resources to deal with the incident are matched to varying degrees. Emergency at one end of the spectrum, emergencies are generally small-scale, localized incidents that are resolved quickly using local resources. However, small-scale emergencies can escalate into disasters when there has been inadequate planning and wasteful use of resources. At the other end of the spectrum, disasters are typically large-scale and cross geographic, political, and academic boundaries. Disasters require a level of response and recovery greater than local communities can provide.

    the links i sent are required for you to use.

    Requirements: 2 pages

  • Math Practice Questions: Ratios, Fractions, and Word Problem…

    I need help reviewing basic mathematics concepts.

    Please provide clear, step-by-step solutions for the following practice questions:

  • The ratio of boys to girls in a class is 3 : 5. If there are 24 boys, how many girls are there?
  • Simplify the fraction 18/24 and show the steps clearly.
  • A box contains 45 pencils. If 2/5 of them are red, how many red pencils are there?
  • Sarah bought 3 notebooks and 2 pens for a total of 16 dollars. Each notebook costs 4 dollars. Find the cost of one pen.
  • A car travels 180 kilometers in 3 hours. What is its speed in kilometers per hour?
  • Please explain each answer clearly and simply.

    Requirements:

  • Grade 8 Math Practice: Ratios, Fractions, and Word Problems

    I am a Grade 8 student and I need help reviewing basic mathematics.

    Please provide clear step-by-step solutions for the following practice questions:

    The ratio of boys to girls in a class is 3 : 5. If there are 24 boys, how many girls are there?

    Simplify the fraction 18/24 and show the steps.

    A box contains 45 pencils. If 2/5 of them are red, how many red pencils are there?

    Sarah bought 3 notebooks and 2 pens for 16 dollars. Each notebook costs 4 dollars. Find the cost of one pen.

    A car travels 180 kilometers in 3 hours. What is its speed in kilometers per hour?

    Please explain each answer clearly and simply.

    Requirements:

  • cyb 400 journal entry

    First, complete the assigned readings for the week. Then read the journal prompt and write a reflection. Your journal entry should be two paragraphs long and address the prompt provided in each module.

    Auditing plays a critical role in ensuring the security and efficiency of computing environments. Inherent complexities and vulnerabilities within the infrastructures leave the potential for unauthorized access, data breaches, and performance bottlenecks.

    Describe why auditing each of these environments (User, Workstation, and LAN) is essential for identifying and mitigating security risks, optimizing network performance, and ensuring compliance with regulatory standards.Submit journal assignments as Word documents with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. Responses should be at least two paragraphs long and address the points indicated in the journal prompt for each module.

    Requirements: see above (2 paragraphs)

  • Epidemiology of a Mental Disorder

    1. Chose a mental disorder that has a prevalence of at least 1% of the US population. Accurately described the mental disorder in terms of diagnostic criteria and associated consequence.

    2. Three types of disparities clearly explored: age, gender, racial/ethnic, cultural, socioeconomic, geographic, educational, religious, and social support vs. social isolation disparities. Detailed and accurate description demonstrates clear understanding of the target group and their significant concerns regarding quality of life.

    3. Descriptive Epidemiology-Provide relevant and credible sources of epidemiological data regarding the significance of the quality of life issues identified in the priority population. Data are very accurately applied to the defined community and interpreted correctly. Very relevant risk factors or conditions are included and very clearly prioritized (e.g., 2×2 matrix).

    4. Clearly stated the risk factors and how the risk factors were determined. Critiqued the methods.

    5. Clearly described the comorbidities and the implications

    6. 5-6 pages APA format with references

    Requirements: 5-6 pages

  • reading response

    Each reading response will include one short essay question of one and a half pages, 12pt font, 1-inch margin, double-space. long answer maximum (525 words approximately). Reading responses will cover the class material for the weeks.

    Reading Response #1.

    According to Allaine Cerwonka and Liisa Malkki (2007), how does knowledge production, through ethnographic work, get done? More precisely, in your own words, mention the required techniques, skills, abilities, performances, and approaches, a good researcher, in Cerwonka and Malkkis work (2027), must have while conducting fieldwork (either in anthropological or interdisciplinary research). Use both readings in your response.

    Requirements: 525

  • Epidemiology of a Mental Disorder

    1. Choose one mental disorder that is prevalent in at least 1% of the US population .Accurately described the mental disorder in terms of diagnostic criteria and associated consequences.
    2. Three types of disparities clearly explored: age, gender, racial/ethnic, cultural, socioeconomic, geographic, educational, religious, and social support vs. social isolation disparities. Detailed and accurate description demonstrates clear understanding of the target group and their significant concerns regarding quality of life.
    3. Descriptive Epidemiology provide very relevant and credible sources of epidemiological data regarding the significance of the quality of life issues identified in the priority population. Data are very accurately applied to the defined community and interpreted correctly. Very relevant risk factors or conditions are included and very clearly prioritized (e.g., 2×2 matrix).
    4. Clearly stated the risk factors and how the risk factors were determined. Critiqued the methods.
    5. Clearly described the comorbidities and the implications
    6. The paper must be double-spaced, 5 pages, and in AP

    Requirements: 5-6 pages

  • Science Question

    When you observe a piece of art, your response is influenced by who you are as a human being: your life experience, your temperament, your preferences, your worldview, your feelings, values, and beliefs even your mood that particular day. All of these factors can all influence how you respond to an artwork.

    Because of this, a work of art can have very different, but equally valid, meanings for different people.

    This essay will give you an opportunity to observe, consider, and interpret what an artwork means for you.

    You do not need to know anything about art. You are considering it as a thoughtful observer, and sharing your views with your reader.

    NOTE: I do not care nor do I want to hear what a chatbot has to say about it. I am not interested in an art history analysis. I want to understand how you, as a human being, interpret it from your own point of view. ETA: Because of this, you absolutely can and will use the first person “I” instead of the more distanced third person typical of some academic writing.

    The artwork well use for this essay is the untitled work, often called Your Body Is a Battleground (1989) by American artist Barbara Kruger.

    Barbara Kruger – Your Body Is a Battleground

    Your audience

    Your reader will be someone interested in art that is open to interpretation. (They may or may not be familiar with this particular piece.) They are curious to hear what this artwork means for you and why; i.e. what has led you to your personal understanding of it.

    Process: how to prepare:

    1. Guided brainstorm:

    This brainstorm will exercise your critical thinking by making inferences based on observation.

    Consider whether you will approach this brainstorm using deductive reasoning (having a broad first impression then looking at details that support it) OR inductive reasoning (examining the details first to form a more holistic impression.

    Look at the above image (on a laptop or other computer, not your phone) and write down the following by hand (handwritten brainstorming is strongly preferred):

    What stands out to you? What basic elements comprise the design? What seems significant about them? When you look closer, or for a longer time, what new details do you notice? What connections can you make, either among the elements or with your ideas and inferences? What do these elements remind you of? How do you relate to them personally?

    Gather your thoughts in your brainstorm (free write, list, journaling clustering, etc., whatever works for your purpose) and set them aside. Come back later with a fresh mind and review. Collectively, what do your notes point to as a core idea? In other words, what is a central point you want to make about how you interpret and relate to this piece? That idea will lead to your draft thesis.

    NOTE: You have several options in terms of the lens through which you interpret this image. Your inferences can be personal (i.e. about your own direct life experience), or your take on this might be political, or social, or psychological, etc. It’s up to you which interpretation you find most compelling, but ultimately focus on one in particular for your essay.

    You will post your brainstorm as your Essay 1 Prep 1: Brainstorm assignment.

    2. Draft thesis:

    Your thesis draft will be a sentence that expresses the main point you want the reader to understand about what this artwork means for you. See the module lesson on thesis statements here: Intro to Thesis Statements

    3. Outline:

    Based on your thesis, think about the key points you want to make to expand on your main idea. Look again at your initial brainstorm from when you were closely observing the artwork. (You can do a follow-up brainstorm too.)

    In your outline, each supporting claim / topic sentence (one per body paragraph) will express a thought you have about the specific visual or word-based elements you noticed and how they led to your interpretation of this piece and how you relate to it.

    In one paragraph youll also compare what you believe may have been the artists original intent versus how youre interpreting it. (See next section.)

    NOTE: You will post your draft thesis & outline as your Essay 1 Prep 2: Thesis & Outline assignment.

    4. Consider the original context:

    After youve come to your own conclusions / interpretations of the artwork and drafted your main thesis and outline, read more about the artist and context for this piece here: The Broad Museum: Barbara Kruger: Untitled (Your body is a battleground)

    Consider what the artist may have intended by making this artwork. (Its fine if its different from your take!) In one paragraph of your essay, youll compare your interpretation vs. what the artist may have intended.

    However, WAIT to look up the original context until after youve formed your own interpretation. You need your own unfiltered impressions first for your essay to be authentically you.

    No other research is necessary for this essay.

    5. Draft essay:

    Using your outline as a map, draft an introduction, body paragraphs, and a brief conclusion. See the lessons in this module for guidelines on these basic essay elements.

    As you draft, here are three questions to ask yourself (and clarify):

    What does my reader need to know or understand at this point?

    What am I trying to say?

    Why does it matter? (i.e. what are the implications?)

    6. Review, revise & format:

    Review your draft and revise as needed to ensure: your intro sets up your topic for your reader; your thesis and supporting claims are clear and consistent; and each body paragraph develops its focused point in a thoughtful way with supporting details and elaboration. (Again, see the module lesson content for tips.)

    Format your paper in MLA format, do a final proofread, then submit. Your Works Cited will consist of the artist and artwork information; see our textbook A Writer’s Reference, section MLA 4-b, #51 (which includes an example of how to format and what to include).

    Resources

    For more guidance on your essay, in our textbook A Writer’s Reference review:

    C1: Planning

    C2: Drafting (especially the section on argumentation thesis statements)

    C3: Writing paragraphs

    C4: Reviewing, revising, editing

    For full specifications (page length, etc.) and to submit the assignment, click here: Essay 1: Interpretive argument

    AI Policy

    This essay is based on your own perceptions, experiences, and opinions. Only you can write this. AI cannot do it for you, at least not convincingly, and your grade will reflect any attempt at taking a shortcut. Do your own work independent of AI from the brainstorm through producing and revising the paper. Your essay should be based entirely on your own insights and the voice should be exclusively your own.

    Click NEXT to continue in the module.

    Requirements:

  • TELEHEALTH

    Consider the following scenario:

    During the COVID-19 pandemic, Central Healthcare System (CHS) integrated telehealth services within several facilities, including their health education center and several outpatient practices, and many patients took advantage of these services. With the decrease in pandemic-related hospitalizations and case numbers, functions within CHS started returning to normal, but administrators are considering continuing telehealth services and potentially expanding into other practices. During the pandemic, surveys were conducted with all patients and providers after telehealth visits, and focus groups were conducted with smaller groups of patients and providers across a range of sites. A CHS analyst analyzed the data from the surveys and focus groups and provided CHS healthcare leaders with the following condensed summaries. CHS administrators plan to synthesize and analyze this information along with data from scholarly literature to help inform their decision.

    Central Health System Telehealth Survey Highlights:

    Percent of Patient and Provider Ratings of Agree or Strongly Agree on Telehealth Survey Questions by Category

    Telehealth Characteristics CHS Patients CHS Providers
    Convenience 91% 76%
    Ease of Use 67% 94%
    Effectiveness 78% 75%
    Overall Satisfaction 83% 81%

    Overall patient and provider perceptions of telehealth were very positive. Ease-of-use ratings were lower among patients than providers, with the lowest ratings among patients ages 65 and older. Effectiveness ratings were largely favorable, but were lower among surgical patients and providers.

    Central Health System Telehealth Focus Group Highlights:

    Themes and Subthemes of Patient and Provider Perceptions of Telehealth. Patient and provider responses centered around acceptance of telehealth, convenience of telehealth, and barriers to telehealth. Overall, patients and providers cited a high acceptance of telehealth and felt visits were useful and of high quality. Providers found that visits were highly efficient, and patients noted that the lack of travel reduced their time away from work and other obligations. Providers and patients were concerned that some visits could not adequately capture the same information yielded from in-person physical exams. Inexperience with technology also negatively impacted some patients’ perceptions of telehealth.

    How might a telehealth expansion benefit CHS patients or providers? How could an expansion be advantageous to the organization as a whole? Alternatively, what are some of the possible risks or drawbacks of a CHS telehealth expansion? CHS leaders recognize that a telehealth expansion is a major decision that would require a significant investment of time and resources, and they want to use evidence to drive decision-making around if and how they might expand these services.

    In this two-part Final Project, you will apply your understanding of the Data-Driven Decision-Making Framework to CHSs decision-making process. In the first part of your Final Project, you will focus on the Data, Information, and Knowledge phases of the framework that precede a decision as you integrate available data to inform a decision recommendation. The second part of the project will concentrate on the steps that follow a decision, including plans for implementation, impact evaluation, and communication with stakeholders.

    For this first portion of your Final Project, you will search for scholarly literature on telehealth service delivery and use a Literature Review Matrix to organize the conclusions. Then, you will use the data from the literature, along with the provided CHS data summaries, to analyze and synthesize your findings to support a decision about a possible expansion of telehealth services.

    Part 1: Literature Review Matrix

    • Use the Literature Review Matrix to organize the two telehealth articles that were provided, as well as three additional articles that will help support the decision.

    Part 2: Draft a 7- to 8-page paper providing a synthesis of your information and your data-driven decision. Within your paper, include the following:

    • Briefly describe the decision that was proposed within the scenario.
    • Organize the provided CHS data summaries and the five scholarly articles from your Literature Review Matrix to support a decision.
    • Analyze the literature and consider the evidence available to help inform the decision. Include an explanation of the significance of the findings.
    • Explain the additional types and sources of data that may be needed to support the decision.
    • Synthesize the data, information, and knowledge to support a decision.

    Note: You will submit both the Literature Review Matrix and paper to meet the requirements for this Assignment.

    Requirements: 7 PAGES