Bright Academic Experts

Category: uncategorised

  • English Question

    We are focusing on the Descriptive Essay. A video is provided for you in D2L under CONTENT.

    Descriptive Essays create images in the reader’s mind by using specific details. As a writer you are using words to create pictures in the reader’s mind.

    With descriptive essays you can use metaphors, similes, personification to help you describe your subjects.

    A metaphor is a strong comparison between two unlike things. (Says one thing is another.)

    Example of Metaphor: The dancer is a swan.

    Example of Simile: The dancer is like a swan. (Similes use like or as)

    Example of Personification: The candle winked at the passing motorbikes. (Gives human qualities to inanimate objects.)

    Objective Description is simply stating the facts about something. Ex. The man was six feet tall; the color of the building was brown.

    Subjective Description gives your opinion about the topic. Ex. The man was a very handsome six feet tall, or the building was a beautiful brown color.

    The dominant impression is the overall feeling or emotional response you want the reader to take away from the description.

    Focus in on one dominant impression to make your writing clearer and more enjoyable.

    As you have written in the past, the essay is five paragraphs, using the MLA format.

  • How did ICTY, NGOs, and investigators collect evidence, and…

    THIS A GROUP PAPER, BUT THIS IS MY PART, YOU DON’T TO DO THE ENTIRE ASSIGMENT, JUST THIS PART. I LET YOU THE ENTIRE QUESTION SO YOU CAN HAVE AN IDEA. FIND THE BOOK NEED ATTACHED

    Explain which institutions played a role in the process of collecting evidence to present to the International Criminal Tribunal of Former Yugoslavia (ICTY) and how they did so. How do Roberts personal experiences he shares in the book and the stories from the people he meets correspond with what you find in your research? Comment on the international efforts required to conduct evidence collection in Bosnia.

    Comment on the regional climate during the 1990s in the case of Bosnia and what was the initial international response once the genocide began. What was the role of the UN in the conflict? Discuss the immediate aftermath and the later international response, including some more modern findings and discoveries regarding what happened in Bosnia. Explain which institutions played a role in the process of collecting evidence to present to the International Criminal Tribunal of Former Yugoslavia (ICTY) and how they did so. How do Roberts personal experiences he shares in the book and the stories from the people he meets correspond with what you find in your research? Comment on the international efforts required to conduct evidence collection in Bosnia. Finally, write about the significance and impact that the whole process left on the people on such as Robert and why he, and those like him, are important for Human Rights.Style Instructions

    Failure to follow these instructions will result in a loss of points.

    Make your report in the form of an organized essay which includes:

    • A specific thesis statement that explains your argument and does not merely restate the question
    • Support your argument with examples from your book and at least 10 properly cited external sources (sources must be reliable, such as a .edu or .gov extension; Wikipedia not acceptable as a source, nor any information from the source with .com extension).
    • Keep direct quotes to a minimum. Any paper that comes up with above a 25% similarity score on Turnitin will have points deducted and anything above a 50% will receive an automatic F, this includes AI generated material that gets flagged. Instead paraphrase the text into your own words to show you understand the concepts, but you can still refer to a source. Use proper citations.

    Citation Instructions

    Failure to follow these instructions will result in a loss of points.

    Make sure you use the following method for citations

    • Use parenthetical citations, for example: (Edwards 2016, p. 257)
    • Create a bibliography of the works used for the assignment in APA citation style.

  • kepolisian modern, masyarakat, dan masa depan

    Bagaimana hubungan antara kepolisian modern dan masyarakat dalam menciptakan keamanan?

    Mengapa teknologi penting dalam mendukung kepolisian modern dan masa depan?

    Bagaimana kerja sama polisi dan masyarakat dapat mengurangi tingkat kejahatan?

    Apa yang harus dilakukan agar sistem keamanan di masa depan lebih efek

  • English Question

    At least 1200 words of double-spaced essay content that is written in a 12-point Times New Roman font.

    *A thesis or position statement in the first paragraph of your essay.

    *Proper paragraphing. Every paragraph should, therefore, have a topic sentence and other sentences that provide supporting details.

    Also:

    Your paper should be original. Your paper should not be something akin to a book report.

    Ultimately, the format for the final draft of this writing project will be an essay that is at least 1,200 words, double-spaced, and written in a 12-point Times New Roman font. No Works Cited page is required for this essay. This final document must be uploaded to the proper spot in Canvas by the deadline given here. Please do not submit a document formatted as a PDF, odt, or Google docs document, as I will not accept a paper that uses any of those formats. You will instead need to use one of the following formats for Microsoft Word: doc, docx, or rtf.

  • Fixing mistakes for systematic Literature Review ” The Effec…

    Hello, your task is to fix mistakes for a systematic literature review over the topic “The Effect of Tennis-Specific Injury-Prevention Programs on Musculoskeletal Injury Incidence, Severity, and Athlete Availability Among Professional Tennis Players: A Systematic Review.”

    Here is feedback on what must be fixed:

    • Several cited sources are not used in the LR.
    • The conclusions from your studies do not match the reported purposes and are written in highly unprofessional language.
    • Many statement throughout are not supported with a citation.
    • Results of the literature search are not included.
    • Studies are not evaluated although you indicate that you did this using Cochrane’s tool.
    • Many of your conclusions appear to be based on a single study (or very few studies) not the body of literature.
    • You mention 31 articles are analyzed but only 21 are mentioned and cited.

    But this is not everything. All the mistakes and feedback you can find in the first PDF file uploaded below

    Also, ensure the literature review is in a Word document and that all pages have page numbers. If you have any questions about the handwriting feedback in the 1 PDF file, let me know. All the sources you can find on the citations page at the end of my literature review. Let me know if you can’t access them, and I will provide you artucles what needed


    Everything must be written without AI and no plagiarism.

    Here are the rubrics for this Lit review:

    Goal To synthesize literature on a specific topic to draw conclusions and make recommendations.

    For this class, each student will write a literature review over a topic of interest. For this assignment we will blend elements of a systematic literature review and those of a practical literature review. The purpose of this is to establish a systematic process for selecting, evaluating, and including articles to answer the research question, while also providing practical recommendations for using the information in the literature review. This assignment should be written following research writing and systematic literature review format guidelines presented in class. This assignment will include the following sections of a systematic literature review (plus one for this class only; #7):

    1. Ancillary pages (cover page and table of contents)
    2. Abstract
    3. Introduction
    4. Methodology including search strategy and inclusion criteria
    5. Results including a table
    6. Discussion
    7. Practical Applications/Recommendations
    8. Reference list

    Requirements:

    • Topic:
      • Your topic must be one from a sub-discipline within exercise science. Nutrition or wellness topics should not be considered.
      • Your topic must be approved in advance by the instructor in writing (email is appropriate). There is not a due date for this, but well in advance is recommended to give you sufficient time to complete the assignment.
    • Sources:
      • A minimum of 25 scholarly sources are required for this assignment.
      • At least 20 must be primary sources (as defined by APA) reviewed in the literature review.
    • Proper Citation
      • Sources must be properly cited in APA format. The reference list must match in-text citations. All articles cited in text must be cited in the reference list. All articles in the reference list must be cited in text.
      • Failure to properly cite all sources used in the literature review is considered plagiarism.
    • Format
      • APA format as described in the Publication Manual (7th edition) is required for all parts of this assignment.
      • Written in the format of a systematic literature review with the addition of recommendations for practice
    • Submission
      • The assignment should be saved in MS Word

    Literature Review

    Complete

    Cover Page & Table of Contents

    Abstract

    • 150-250 words
    • Includes purpose, method, results, conclusions

    Introduction

    • Clear statement of the problem to be addressed in the literature review worded as a purpose statement or research question
    • Brief overview of the importance of the problem
    • Organization of the literature review

    Method

    • Literature search strategy is clearly explained
    • Selection criteria are outlined in detail
    • Quality standards are explained

    Results

    • Results of the literature search are reported
    • A minimum of 20 studies (primary sources) evaluated and synthesized
    • All studies are synthesized and finding reported clearly and concisely, yet in sufficient detail to understand the relevant findings in the literature. This section should not be a series of abstracts over each article.

    Table for Data Analysis

    • A minimum of 20 primary studies are included
    • Table includes relevant information (study type, objective, population, methods, outcomes, comments and conclusion; see Table 14.2 in textbook)

    Discussion

    • Major findings are summarized and explained
    • Limitations are reported
    • Gaps in the literature are addressed and recommendations for future study are given
    • Conclusions are based on literature, not on opinion or judgment.
    • Conclusions relate to the primary problem to be addressed

    Practical Applications/Recommendations

    • Gives 3 specific recommendations or ways the information in the review can be used
    • Recommendations are specific, practical, and clearly based on the results of the review
    • One recommendation can be for future study or a clear statement of what we cannot recommend at this point.

    Format

    • Minimum of 25 sources are cited; at least 20 of those are primary sources included in the results section.
    • Topic approved in advance; all articles relate to the topic and to each other.
    • Well-written, easy to read, logically organized; flows well from topic to topic.
    • APA format is used throughout including the reference list, in-text citations, headings, abbreviations, statistical results, etc.
      • Sources must be properly cited in APA format. The reference list must match in-text citations. All articles cited in text must be cited in the reference list. All articles in the reference list must be cited in text.
    • Meets Proofread for Errors Policy see syllabus for details
    • Meet AI Policy see syllabus for details

  • 5CO02_CIPD L5 (Evidence-Based Practice) _ High Pass Target

    I am looking for someone experienced with CIPD Level 5 assignments, specifically the unit 5CO02 Evidence-Based Practice, to complete the full assessment based on the official Assessment Brief, Case Study (Technivara), Assessment Guidance, and Grading Grid.

    Assessment Requirements:

    Task 1 Written responses (approx. 2,900 words 10%)

    • Answer all 7 questions (AC 1.11.5 and AC 3.13.2)
    • Use EBP, analysis tools, critical thinking, decision-making models, ethics, performance measures, and people-practice impact
    • Apply answers directly to the Technivara case study
    • Include relevant theory, CIPD insight, academic research, and practical examples
    • Use UK English and Harvard referencing, with at least one quality reference per AC

    Task 2 Data analysis review (approx. 1,000 words 10%)

    • Complete percentage calculations for Table 1
    • Create three diffrent diagrammatic representations of findings
    • Analyse Table 2 (qualitative L&D feedback), identify patterns/themes/trends, and provide at least two justified, evidence-based recommendations
    • Apply findings to Technivara
    • No references required for AC 2.1 and AC 2.2

    General Requirements

    • ~3,900 words total (10%)
    • CIPD-aligned structure using question numbers (Q1Q10) as subheadings
    • Strong alignment with the 5CO02 assessment brief and marking descriptors
    • Targeting High Pass, demonstrating:
      • Extensive wider reading
      • Excellent application to the scenario
      • Clear, well-structured, professionally expressed answers
      • Accurate academic referencing

    Thank you in advance!

  • Comment on the regional climate during the 1990s in the case…

    Comment on the regional climate during the 1990s in the case of Bosnia and what was the initial international response once the genocide began. What was the role of the UN in the conflict? Discuss the immediate aftermath and the later international response, including some more modern findings and discoveries regarding what happened in Bosnia. Explain which institutions played a role in the process of collecting evidence to present to the International Criminal Tribunal of Former Yugoslavia (ICTY) and how they did so. How do Roberts personal experiences he shares in the book and the stories from the people he meets correspond with what you find in your research? Comment on the international efforts required to conduct evidence collection in Bosnia. Finally, write about the significance and impact that the whole process left on the people on such as Robert and why he, and those like him, are important for Human Rights.

    Formatting Instructions

    Failure to follow these instructions will result in a loss of points. All papers must be:

    • Submitted in CANVAS by the due date and time
    • Max 4000 words, inclusive of name, title, and citations
    • Written in proper APA style format
    • 12 point Times New Roman font
    • Properly double spaced
    • 1 inch margins on all sides

    Style Instructions

    Failure to follow these instructions will result in a loss of points.

    Make your report in the form of an organized essay which includes:

    • A specific thesis statement that explains your argument and does not merely restate the question
    • Support your argument with examples from your book and at least 10 properly cited external sources (sources must be reliable, such as a .edu or .gov extension; Wikipedia not acceptable as a source, nor any information from the source with .com extension).
    • Keep direct quotes to a minimum. Any paper that comes up with above a 25% similarity score on Turnitin will have points deducted and anything above a 50% will receive an automatic F, this includes AI generated material that gets flagged. Instead paraphrase the text into your own words to show you understand the concepts, but you can still refer to a source. Use proper citations.

    Citation Instructions

    Failure to follow these instructions will result in a loss of points.

    Make sure you use the following method for citations

    • Use parenthetical citations, for example: (Edwards 2016, p. 257)
    • Create a bibliography of the works used for the assignment in APA citation style.

  • A 2.0-cm-high object is placed at a distance of 20 cm from a…

    A 2.0-cm-high object is placed at a distance of 20 cm from a concave mirror. A real image is formed at 40cm from the mirror. Calculate the focal length of the mirror and the size of the image.

  • Studypool Professional

    I am translate any documents and files and write any note for you.

  • Reflect on personal experiences to understand how gender sha…

    Instructions

    Objective: The assignment is design to heighten your self-awareness about the factors which shaped your understanding of gender. By reflecting on your gender identity and past experiences, you will better understand your own perceptions, behaviors and communication.

    Format: 750 words, 1.5 spacing, Times New Roman 11, Essay format

    Prompts: Choose 3 categories.

    1) Family

    • Who were the most influential models of gender during your upbringing?
      • How do you believe these role models impacted how you perform gender based on your sex? (e.g., interests, hobbies, appearance, your goals in the future)

    2) Close personal relationships

    • Reflect on your friendships. Do you gravitate more towards one sex and why?
      • Are there any differences in the way you communicate with friends depending on their gender?
    • Can you apply your knowledge of masculine and feminism communication models to improve your close personal relationship?

    3) Media and social media

    • Which were the primary sources of media that informed you about gender during early childhood, adolescence, and college?
      • How have they impacted how you learned how to be masculine or feminine (e.g., roles, expectations, appearance, relationships)?

      Last Tips

      • This is NOT meant to judge your feminist viewpoint nor will you be graded on it.
      • Be SPECIFIC as possible and provide concrete PERSONAL examples!!!
      • You will be graded on your ability to reflect on aspects of communication and gender which we have learned and how they impact your identity and experiences.

      Grading Criteria (0-5 for each)

      1. Content and instructions: Student includes answers to all prompts. Coherent, easy to read and academic style writing.
      2. Critical thinking: Provides a critical analysis that connects the academic content to your life experiences.
      3. Thick description: Details, details, details. Concrete description and details are provided in your examples demonstrating an effort to understand oneself.
      4. Original thought: Uniqueness of your ideas! Original ideas that go beyond what has already been discussed in class.