Bright Academic Experts

Category: uncategorised

  • Programming Question

    Please follow the instructions provided on the attachment, let me know if you have any questions.

    This is due today 03/08/2026 at 7pm PST

  • Learning to Lead: Applying Learning Theories and Principles…

    Post:

    The purpose of this discussion is to explore how learning theories and principles can be applied by advanced practice nurses (APNs) to enhance clinical outcomes, promote patient education, and foster professional growth within healthcare teams. Understanding how people learnpatients, families, and healthcare professionalsenables APNs to drive quality improvement and evidence-based care.

    Discussion

    High-quality health care depends not only on clinical expertise but also on the ability to facilitate learningamong patients, peers, and interdisciplinary teams. Theories of learning from nursing, psychology, and education can guide APNs in teaching, mentoring, and influencing behavior change.

    In your initial post:

    1. Identify one or two learning theories or principles (e.g., adult learning theory, experiential learning, social cognitive theory, transformative learning, behaviorism, constructivism, etc.) that you find most relevant to advanced nursing practice.
    2. Explain how these theories or principles inform the APNs role in promoting high-quality health careconsider contexts such as patient education, staff development, leadership, or quality improvement initiatives.
    3. Analyze how applying these learning theories supports evidence-based practice, interprofessional collaboration, or systems-level change.
    4. Reflect on how understanding learning theory enhances your ability to teach, mentor, or lead as an APN.

    Submission Instructions:

    • Your initial post should be at least 550 words, formatted and cited in current APA style (7th edition) with support from at least 2 academic sources.
    • No plagiarism, No AI use.Due on Wednesday 1st at 11h30 pm.

  • Reflection on Practice: Final Reflection and CDP Learning Ac…

    For the Final Evaluation, students must submit an 4-7 page reflection on practice which

    demonstrates critical thinking in the integration of social work knowledge, values, and skills
    and reflection on personal growth. This paper should be uploaded into the final evaluation in
    Sonia.
    All assigned papers or essays must be typed, or word processed. All papers must conform to
    APA (7th ed.) format.
    Use the following outline for the paper:
    1.     Reflect on how youve managed challenges, maintained professional boundaries and
    focused on developing skills behaviors over the year.
    2.     How have you applied theory, research and policy understanding to your work?
    3.     Give an example of your leadership or advocacy during your practicum.
    4.     Reflect on your growth in knowledge and response to cultural perspectives? What have
    you learned regarding cultural humility?
    5.     Describe how your understanding of the profession has changed since the
    beginning of this practicum. How have your professional values and goals evolved?

    MSSW 671 | 23
    How has this practicum shaped your identity as a social worker?
    6.     What will you take from this practicum into your career?
    7.     What do you consider your strengths at this point in your career? What are your areas for
    growth?
    8.     What are your next steps and goals in your career for the year to come?
    This reflection will be uploaded into the final evaluation form prior to the final evaluation
    conference.
    Once the reflection is written there are several steps that MUST be completed for this
    assignment to be completed. These include posting the reflection in the final form in Sonia
    and marking the status of the CDP learning tasks at the final.
    Grading Rubric for the Reflection on Practice and CDP Learning Activities Status
    Completion (Total Points Possible: 15)
    Integration of Knowledge, Skills, and Values
    0 points     Reflection fails to demonstrate critical thinking in integration of knowledge,
    skills, and values in practice
    1-2 points     Reflection demonstrates limited critical thinking in integrating knowledge,
    skills, and values in practice
    3-4 points     Reflection demonstrates some degree of critical thinking in integrating
    knowledge, skills, and values in practice
    5 points     Reflection demonstrates a high degree of critical thinking in integrating
    knowledge, skills, and values in practice
    Personal Growth
    0 points     Personal growth and awareness are not evident and/or demonstrates a neutral
    experience with negligible personal impact. Lacks enough inferences,
    examples, personal insights and challenges
    1-2 points     Demonstrates less than adequate personal growth and awareness through few
    or simplistic inferences made, examples, insights, and/or challenges that are
    not well developed.
    3-4 points     Demonstrates satisfactory personal growth and awareness through some
    inferences made, examples, insights, and challenges
    5 points     Demonstrates significant personal growth and awareness of deeper meaning
    through inferences made examples, well developed insights, and substantial
    depth in perceptions and challenges
    Professional Presentation
    0 points     Excessive spelling, grammatical, errors and unprofessional terminology are
    present. CDP learning activities status is not completed.
    1 point     Numerous spelling, grammatical, errors and unprofessional terminology are
    present. CDP activities status is not completed
    2 points     Numerous spelling, grammatical, errors and unprofessional terminology are
    present. CDP activities status is completed
    3 points     Some spelling, grammatical errors and use of unprofessional terminology are
    present. CDP learning activities status is not completed OR the paper is free
    of errors, but the CDP status is not completed.

    MSSW 671 | 24
    4 points     Few spelling, grammatical errors and use of unprofessional terminology are
    present. CDP learning activities status is completed
    5 points     Free of spelling, grammatical errors. Uses professional terminology. CDP
    learning activities status completed.
    If the student has not completed their part of this assignment by the deadline without prior
    permission by the Practicum Liaison, the Practicum Liaison can reduce the score accordingly

  • Dissertation

    Please respond to Mary with 250 words no plagairism, no ai no chat bots

    The dissertation journey is a pivotal moment for those who have successfully defended their doctoral theses. This experience holds deep significance not just for the candidates, but also for their families, friends, employers, and everyone in their support circle.

    Dissertations typically follow five essential sections or steps. Familiarizing yourself with these organized steps is critical, as they will guide you in exploring previous research and inform the writing of your own dissertation. While terminologies may vary across doctoral programs, these sections generally include:

    1. **Introduction**: This crucial part outlines the study’s problem or purpose, articulating the reasons for undertaking the research.

    2. **Literature Review**: Here, you demonstrate how your topic has either not been addressed before or how your work builds upon previous studies.

    3. **Methodology**: This section details the methods used in your research, including data collection instruments, participant selection, and research designs.

    4. **Results**: Present the collected data here, clearly linking it to the methodological framework you set out.

    5. **Analysis**: Conclude with a thorough discussion or summary based on your results, drawing insightful conclusions.

    After diving into literature reviews and examining the work of other researchers, you’ll need to craft your own literature review. Here are important guidelines to structure your review effectively:

    – To gain insights into various literature review formats, study published dissertations available in your subject guide’s Dissertations tab.

    – Compile documents that address one or more themes related to your topic.

    – Structure these documents into a matrix: each row for a document and each column for a topic covered within it (similar to a document-term matrix).

    – While an annotated bibliography summarizes articles, this approach can lead to a fragmented literature review.

    – Alternatively, consider conducting a meta-analysis on results within a specific discipline or theme.

    – A best practices literature review should be developed thematically. Discuss each theme in depth, referencing the relevant documents seamlessly.

    – Assess the strengths and weaknesses of each document related to your theme.

    – In my current position as an IRB administrator, I review dissertation on a daily basis from students that conduct research. Classmates, do you believe that adhering to these guidelines will allow you to create a cohesive and impactful literature review for your dissertation?

    References:

    Covey, S. R. (2006). Tie menestykseen. 7 toimintatapaa henkilkohtaiseen kasvuun ja muutokseen [The Seven Habits of Highly Effective People]. Jyvskyl: Gummerus.

    Li, Kam Cheong (1999). Linguistic Consciousness and Writing Performance. Unpublished PhD dissertation.

  • Marketing

    Reflection Report (BY Watching a Video) related to the marketing course

    – Required to critically analyze the content of the video, identify key points, and provide your personal insights and reflections.

    – The report should demonstrate your understanding of the video and its relevance to the marketing concepts discussed in this course.

    – By watching the video and writing a reflective report, you will be able to demonstrate your understanding of the marketing concepts and how they are applied in real-life scenarios.

    LINK OF THE VIDEO

  • Write a Python program to find the factorial of a number usi…

    I need help with a Python programming question.

    Please write a program to find the factorial of a given number using recursion.

    Requirements:

    The program should take input from the user

    Use a recursive function to calculate the factorial

    Display the result clearly

    Explain the code step by step

    Also explain how recursion works in this program

    Example:

    Input: 5

    Output: 120

    Please provide a clean and well-commented code.

  • Research Writing

    • Includes one substantive initial post using at least two scholarly or professional references with accompanying in-text citations to support any paraphrased, summarized, or quoted material.
    • While we prefer not to assign word counts to posts, as a suggested best practice, your initial post should be at least 400 words.
    • Includes an open-ended, thought-provoking question posed to classmates.
    • Scenario: You are the safety and health leader of a major conglomerate that has a global footprint of manufacturing and distributing locations. With approximately 23,000 employees scattered across the globe, you have read a significant amount of research on how to decrease slips, trips, and falls and how to reduce soft-tissue injuries associated with the falls themselves.
      Explain to your peers and professor the level of rigor that you must see in the safety and health research to accept the findings and how strong the research must be for you to put your reputation on the line by implementing this new global program.
    • Please no plagiarism no ai no chat bots

  • 113 solve

    Guidelines:

    • Use this Word Document.
    • Fill in students information on the first page of this document.
    • Start your writing from the next page (page 3)
    • Word limit: 200- 400 words
    • Font should be 12 Times New Roman
    • Headings should be Bold.
    • Color should be Black.
    • Line spacing should be 1.5.
    • Use reliable references (APA format)
    • AVOID PLAGIARISM (you will be graded ZERO)
    • You should use at least 2 references.
    • Submit this WORD Document when you complete the required task.
    • Submission should be before the deadline (submission after the deadline is not allowed)

  • Reproduction

    Difference between the types of reproduction.

  • I want to sell my notes

    I want to sell my notes