Outline of the proposal (3 to 4 pages)
Purpose of the assignment
This work requires that students:
Identify a clear and experimentally based research question
Justify the question using classical and modern literature.
Precisely define the independent and dependent variables
Propose a feasible experimental or single subject design
Demonstrate understanding of experimental control
This is not an applied BIP proposal.
It must reflect EAB principles and methodological rigor.
Required structure (3 to 4 pages, APA 7)
I. Research question ( page)
Required elements:
Clearly state a main research question.
The question should be:
Experimentally verifiable
Based on EAB
Specific (not broad or service-oriented applied)
II. Justification and justifications (11.5 pages)
Requirements:
Integrate at least 5 academic references:
2 classical experimental studies
2 modern empirical studies
1 conceptual or theoretical article
Explain:
What we already know
Where there are lagoons
Why is this research question necessary?
How to expand previous findings
III. Independent and dependent variables (1 page)
Required elements:
Independent variable (VI):
Clearly defined operationally
Manipulable
Linked to the principle of behavior
Dependent variable (DV):
Operational definition
Observable and measurable
Identified dimension (rate, latency, duration, etc.)
Example:
IV: Reinforcement program (VI 30 s vs VI 90 s)
DV: Frequency of lever pressure (responses per minute)
To earn the full 20 points:
The variables are precise
Without conceptual vagueness
Measurement dimension identified
Clear contingency structure
IV. Proposed experimental design (1 page)
Students must specify:
Type of design (e.g., inversion, multiple baseline, multiple elements, concurrent programming, etc.)
Participants (hypothetically acceptable)
Configuration
Procedures (short but clear)
How experimental control will be demonstrated
Ethical considerations (if relevant)
Strong proposals:
Align the design logically with the research question
Explain why the design is appropriate
Identify threats to validity
Weak proposals:
It enunciates a design but does not explain the logic
Could not connect IV/DV to the design
Ignore the feasibility
V. Brief discussion of the contribution ( page)
Students must answer:
How is this extended to the EAB?
Does it replicate, perfect or challenge previous findings?
Why is this important for behavioral science?
Reference requirements (15 pts category)
Minimum:
5 peer-reviewed academic sources
Classic balanced + modern + conceptual
Strong documents:
Cite JEAB or equivalent foundational journals
Use the quotes in the text correctly
Integrate fonts instead of stacking them
Format requirements (APA 7)
34 full pages (not including title or references)
Suitable headers
Precise quotes in the text
Properly formatted reference list
Double space, 12-point font
Rubric of the outline of the proposal.pdf
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.