Bright Academic Experts

Author: admin

  • Chemical reaction

    A student inserted a burning matchstick into a gas jar and it extinguishes. Write the balanced chemical equation of a reaction that takes place when a burning magnesium ribbon is inserted into the gas jar.

  • Retired teacher

    A retired teacher deposited Rs.80,000 in own account of development bank for two years to get the half yearly compound interest at the rate of 10% per annum.(1)How many times is the interest calculated according to the semi annual compound interest in 2 years?write it.(2)According to the half yearly compound interest,what would be the compound interest received by the teacher at the end of 2 years ? Find it.

  • Advance Pharmacology week 7

    ASSIGNMENT: CASE STUDIES

    Case studies are a useful way for you to apply your knowledge of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic aspects of pharmacology to specific patient cases and health histories.

    For this Assignment, you evaluate drug treatment plans for patients with various disorders and justify drug therapy plans based on patient history and diagnosis.

    RESOURCES

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    To Prepare:

    • Review the case study posted in Announcements by your Instructor for this Assignment
    • Review the information provided and answer questions posed in the case study
    • When recommending a medication, write out a complete prescription for the medication
    • Whenever possible, use clinical practice guidelines in developing your answers when possible
    • Include at least three references to support your answer and cite them in APA format.

    BY DAY 7 OF WEEK 7

    Submit the Assignment.

    SUBMISSION INFORMATION

    Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.

    1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK7Assgn_LastName_Firstinitial
    2. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
    3. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.

    Rubric

    NURS_6521_Week7_Assignment_Rubric

    NURS_6521_Week7_Assignment_Rubric
    Criteria Ratings Pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 1: Appropriate medication is prescribed or changed. Rationale provided and includes current literature to support decision. All aspects of the patient history are considered in making the medication selection.

    15 to >11.0 ptsExcellentMedication selected is appropriate and considers all of the unique patient characteristics. Rationale for selection is clear, complete, and appropriate.11 to >7.0 ptsGoodMedication selected might be appropriate but conflicts with the unique patient characteristics. Rationale for selection is clear but lacks discussion about potential prescribing issues.

    7 to >3.0 ptsFairMedication selected is not appropriate for this patient unique characteristics. Rationale provided is not correct or is flawed in applying the medication to this patient.3 to >0 ptsPoorMedication selected is inappropriate or would not be provided based on patient unique characteristics.

    15 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 1: Written medication orders include all 5 aspects required for a valid order. The order is complete, accurate, and appropriate.

    3 ptsCompleteWritten medication orders includes all 5 aspects required for a valid order. The order is complete, accurate, and appropriate.0 ptsPoorThe prescription is incomplete. Aspects of a complete order are missing. The order is either incomplete, inaccurate, or inappropriate.

    3 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 1: References for the scenario are within past 5 years and include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable.

    4 ptsExcellentReferences for the scenario are within past 5 years and include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Correct APA format is used.3 ptsGoodReferences for the scenario are within past 5 years but do not include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.

    2 ptsFairReferences for the scenario are not from within the past 5 years or do not reflect the content of this scenario and do not include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.0 ptsPoorNo references are included. References do not reflect the content of this scenario. Appropriate clinical practice guideline is not include. Contains many ( 5) APA format errors.

    4 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 1: Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

    3 ptsExcellentUses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.2 ptsGoodContains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

    1 ptsFairContains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.0 ptsPoorContains many ( 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the readers understanding.

    3 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 2: Appropriate medication is prescribed or changed. Rationale provided and includes current literature to support decision. All aspects of the patient history are considered in making the medication selection.

    15 to >11.0 ptsExcellentMedication selected is appropriate and considers all of the unique patient characteristics. Rationale for selection is clear, complete, and appropriate.11 to >7.0 ptsGoodMedication selected might be appropriate but conflicts with the unique patient characteristics. Rationale for selection is clear but lacks discussion about potential prescribing issues.

    7 to >3.0 ptsFairMedication selected is not appropriate for this patient unique characteristics. Rationale provided is not correct or is flawed in applying the medication to this patient.3 to >0 ptsPoorMedication selected is inappropriate or would not be provided based on patient unique characteristics.

    15 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 2: Written medication orders include all 5 aspects required for a valid order. The order is complete, accurate, and appropriate.

    3 ptsCompleteWritten medication orders includes all 5 aspects required for a valid order. The order is complete, accurate, and appropriate.0 ptsPoorThe prescription is incomplete. Aspects of a complete order are missing. The order is either incomplete, inaccurate, or inappropriate.

    3 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 2: References for the scenario are within past 5 years and include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable.

    4 ptsExcellentReferences for the scenario are within past 5 years and include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Correct APA format is used.3 ptsGoodReferences for the scenario are within past 5 years but do not include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.

    2 ptsFairReferences for the scenario are not from within the past 5 years or do not reflect the content of this scenario and do not include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.0 ptsPoorNo references are included. References do not reflect the content of this scenario. Appropriate clinical practice guideline is not include. Contains many ( 5) APA format errors.

    4 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 2: Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

    3 ptsExcellentUses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.2 ptsGoodContains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

    1 ptsFairContains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.0 ptsPoorContains many ( 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the readers understanding.

    3 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 3: Appropriate medication is prescribed or changed. Rationale provided and includes current literature to support decision. All aspects of the patient history are considered in making the medication selection.

    15 to >11.0 ptsExcellentMedication selected is appropriate and considers all of the unique patient characteristics. Rationale for selection is clear, complete, and appropriate.11 to >7.0 ptsGoodMedication selected might be appropriate but conflicts with the unique patient characteristics. Rationale for selection is clear but lacks discussion about potential prescribing issues.

    7 to >3.0 ptsFairMedication selected is not appropriate for this patient unique characteristics. Rationale provided is not correct or is flawed in applying the medication to this patient.3 to >0 ptsPoorMedication selected is inappropriate or would not be provided based on patient unique characteristics.

    15 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 3: Written medication orders include all 5 aspects required for a valid order. The order is complete, accurate, and appropriate.

    3 ptsCompleteWritten medication orders includes all 5 aspects required for a valid order. The order is complete, accurate, and appropriate.0 ptsPoorThe prescription is incomplete. Aspects of a complete order are missing. The order is either incomplete, inaccurate, or inappropriate.

    3 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 3: References for the scenario are within past 5 years and include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable.

    4 ptsExcellentReferences for the scenario are within past 5 years and include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Correct APA format is used.3 ptsGoodReferences for the scenario are within past 5 years but do not include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.

    2 ptsFairReferences for the scenario are not from within the past 5 years or do not reflect the content of this scenario and do not include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.0 ptsPoorNo references are included. References do not reflect the content of this scenario. Appropriate clinical practice guideline is not include. Contains many ( 5) APA format errors.

    4 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 3: Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

    3 ptsExcellentUses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.2 ptsGoodContains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

    1 ptsFairContains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.0 ptsPoorContains many ( 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the readers understanding.

    3 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 4: Appropriate medication is prescribed or changed. Rationale provided and includes current literature to support decision. All aspects of the patient history are considered in making the medication selection.

    15 to >11.0 ptsExcellentMedication selected is appropriate and considers all of the unique patient characteristics. Rationale for selection is clear, complete, and appropriate.11 to >7.0 ptsGoodMedication selected might be appropriate but conflicts with the unique patient characteristics. Rationale for selection is clear but lacks discussion about potential prescribing issues.

    7 to >3.0 ptsFairMedication selected is not appropriate for this patient unique characteristics. Rationale provided is not correct or is flawed in applying the medication to this patient.3 to >0 ptsPoorMedication selected is inappropriate or would not be provided based on patient unique characteristics.

    15 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 4: Written medication orders include all 5 aspects required for a valid order. The order is complete, accurate, and appropriate.

    3 ptsCompleteWritten medication orders includes all 5 aspects required for a valid order. The order is complete, accurate, and appropriate.0 ptsPoorThe prescription is incomplete. Aspects of a complete order are missing. The order is either incomplete, inaccurate, or inappropriate.

    3 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 4: References for the scenario are within past 5 years and include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable.

    4 ptsExcellentReferences for the scenario are within past 5 years and include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Correct APA format is used.3 ptsGoodReferences for the scenario are within past 5 years but do not include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.

    2 ptsFairReferences for the scenario are not from within the past 5 years or do not reflect the content of this scenario and do not include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.0 ptsPoorNo references are included. References do not reflect the content of this scenario. Appropriate clinical practice guideline is not include. Contains many ( 5) APA format errors.

    4 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 4: Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

    3 ptsExcellentUses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.2 ptsGoodContains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

    1 ptsFairContains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.0 ptsPoorContains many ( 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the readers understanding.

    3 pts

    Total Points: 100

  • Critically analyze how the “Neutral Stuff” theory challenges…

    Explain how the “Resource Paradox” proves that resources are a function of human ability, not nature.

  • Hindi Question

    Explain the law of conservation of mass with an example.

  • find the meadian to the following data .

    A teacher recorded the marks obtained by 10 students in a mathematics test. The marks are given below:

    45, 50, 55, 60, 65, 70, 75, 80, 85, 90

  • Advance pathophysiology week 7

    NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS

    In this exercise, you will complete a MindMap to gauge your understanding of this weeks content. Select one of the possible topics provided to complete your MindMap assignment.

    • Stroke
    • Multiple sclerosis
    • Transient Ischemic Attack
    • Myasthenia gravis
    • Headache: May choose migraine, cluster, tension
    • Seizure disorders: Adults or Children
    • Brain injury
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • Neuroblastoma
    • Parkinson’s Disease
    • Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS)
    • Degenerative Disorders of the Spine: May choose Low back pain, Degenerative Disc Disease

    RESOURCES

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    BY DAY 7 OF WEEK 7

    Submit your MindMap by Day 7 of Week 7.

    Rubric

    NURS_6501_Week 3, 7, 9_Mind Map Assignment_Rubric

    NURS_6501_Week 3, 7, 9_Mind Map Assignment_Rubric
    Criteria Ratings Pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSelect one of the possible topics provided and complete the MindMap.Describe the Pathophysiology and Etiology of the primary diagnosis. List risk factors related to the primary diagnosis.

    30 to >27.0 ptsExcellentA thoroughly completed MindMap with a selected topic was submitted. The response accurately and thoroughly describes in detail the pathophysiology at the cellular level and shows understanding of the primary diagnosis. The response accurately and thoroughly identifies etiology for the diagnosis and lists appropriate risk factors.27 to >23.0 ptsGoodA completed MindMap with a selected topic was submitted. The response describes the pathophysiology at the organ level of the primary diagnosis. The response does not identify specific etiology for the diagnosis and some risk factors are not linked to diagnosis.

    23 to >19.0 ptsFairAn inaccurately complete or vague MindMap with a selected topic was submitted. The response inaccurately or vaguely describes the pathophysiology of the primary diagnosis. The response inaccurately or vaguely identifies etiology for the diagnosis and all risk factors are not linked to diagnosis.19 to >0 ptsPoorAn incomplete MindMap with a selected topic was submitted, or is missing. The response does not describe the pathophysiology of the primary diagnosis. The response does not identify etiology for this diagnosis and risk factors are missing.

    30 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWhat are the patients signs and symptoms for this diagnosis? How does the diagnosis impact other body systems and what are the possible complications?

    20 to >17.0 ptsExcellentThe response accurately and thoroughly describes in detail the patient’s signs and symptoms for this diagnosis. The response accurately and thoroughly describes in detail how this diagnosis might impact other body systems and their possible complications.17 to >14.0 ptsGoodThe response accurately describes the patient’s signs and symptoms for this diagnosis. The response accurately describes how this diagnosis might impact other body systems and their possible complications.

    14 to >12.0 ptsFairThe response inaccurately or vaguely describes the patient’s signs and symptoms for this diagnosis. The response inaccurately or vaguely describes how this diagnosis might impact other body systems and their possible complications.12 to >0 ptsPoorThe response inaccurately and vaguely describes the patient’s signs and symptoms for this diagnosis, or is missing. The response inaccurately and vaguely describes how the diagnosis might impact other body systems and their possible complications, or is missing.

    20 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWhat diagnostic tests or labs would you order to confirm the primary diagnosis?

    20 to >17.0 ptsExcellentThe response accurately and thoroughly describes in detail the diagnostic tests and labs to order for primary diagnosis and are appropriately linked within the Mind map.17 to >14.0 ptsGoodThe response accurately and thoroughly describes in detail the diagnostic tests and labs to order for primary diagnosis but are not appropriately linked within the Mind map.

    14 to >12.0 ptsFairThe response inaccurately or vaguely describes the diagnostic tests and labs to order for primary diagnosis and are not linked within the Mind map.12 to >0 ptsPoorThe response inaccurately and vaguely describes the diagnostic tests and labs to order for primary diagnosis.

    20 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWhat treatment options would you consider? Include possible referrals and medications.

    20 to >17.0 ptsExcellentThe response accurately and thoroughly describes in detail the treatment options they would consider. The response accurately and thoroughly describes potential referrals and medications.17 to >14.0 ptsGoodThe response accurately describes the treatment options they would consider. The response accurately describes potential referrals and medications.

    14 to >12.0 ptsFairThe response inaccurately or vaguely describes the treatment options they would consider. The response inaccurately or vaguely describes potential referrals and medications.12 to >0 ptsPoorThe response inaccurately and vaguely describes the treatment options they would consider, or is missing. The response inaccurately and vaguely describes possible referrals and medications, or is missing.

    20 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResources and Mind map formatting/writing

    10 to >7.0 ptsExcellentThe response is articulate with demonstration of advanced terms and knowledge in writing style with no grammatical or spelling errors. Appropriate electronic mind mapping format. Reference list included with at least two research articles that are within last 5 years. Research articles are also cited and linked within mind map.7 to >4.0 ptsGoodThe response is efficient with correct spelling and no gross grammatical and/or spelling errors. Appropriate electronic mind mapping format. Reference list included with at least two research articles within last 5 years but not cited or linked within mind map.

    4 to >2.0 ptsFairThe response is fair with a few spelling and grammatical errors. Appropriate electronic mind mapping format. Reference list included with at least two research articles but not within last 5 years and not cited or linked within mind map.2 to >0 ptsPoorThe response is poor with gross grammatical and spelling errors. Did not use appropriate electronic mind mapping format. Did not include reference list with at least two research articles.

    10 pts

    Total Points: 100

  • Real explanation and quick response

    I manage to do my math homework prepretty well and give a concise answer

  • Geography Question

    Natural resources are those that are taken from nature. They are used without modifying them, i.e. in the same form as they exist in. Rivers lakes, air, soils, minerals, trees, mountains, etc. are natural resources roads, telephone, etc. been provided to us by nature. Human beings have used their intelligence to manufacture them for their own use Examples include vehicles, buildings Human-made resources have not

    Human resources include people

    who serve us in any way Teachers, doctors, carpenters, cobblers, etc. are human resources

    On the basis of level of development, a resource can be actual or potential. An actual resource is one which is used currently. We know their quantity. A potential resource is one whose utility is not known at present or is not used despite having utility; instead it may be useful at some time in future. It means that it has the potential to have utility, although it does not have any today. Examples include uranium deposits in ladakh.

    On the basis of origin, a resource can be abiotic or biotic. A biotic resource is one that has life. An abiotic resource is non-living.

    Natural resources may also be classified as renewable and non-renewable.

  • Support Program Discussion

    Select two Florida school districts. Based on your reading about the school districts language education programs for ELL students and/or ESL/EAL/ESOL support programs, discuss the following:

    • What model program(s) is/are offered to ELL students in these school districts?
    • Based on what you have learned in this module, compare and contrast the two school districts programs. What is your opinion of these programs? I need 1 more to add, preferably Duval or St. Johns county in Florida.
    • This is what I have so far:
    • The increasing diversity in the student population necessitates school districts like Nassau County to implement ESOL programs that bridge the gap between native language and academic success. Nassau County achieves this through a Mainstream-Inclusion model that is focused on differentiated instruction and specialized ESOL support (Nassau County Schools, 2017). Nassau County Schools utilizes a mainstream-inclusion model or content-based programs that prioritize English-dominant instruction for all grade levels. The Countys ESOL program is structured around a Sheltered English framework that ensures ELL learners are integrated into general education classrooms, and at the same time receiving specific linguistic support (Nassau County Schools, 2017). More specifically, at the elementary level, the district provides specialized ESOL instruction delivered by trained teachers who focus on second language acquisition techniques aimed to enable students grasp foundational concepts. For high schoolers (9-12), the district emphasizes differentiated instruction. Teachers modify their lesson delivery and materials so that ELL can participate in the same grade-level content as their ENL speakers. Nassau Countys model is focused on inclusion. Some models adopt a dual-language approach where students learn in two languages; Nassaus model aims for rapid immersion into the English language to facilitate immediate participation. This policy ensures the students are not held back due to language barriers.Reflecting on the Nassau County ELL Plan, its reliance on English-dominant inclusion models has its strengths and limitations. On the plus side, the plan utilizes various staff to support ELL students, this includes bilingual paraprofessionals, teachers, counselors, and an ELL coach. Further, placement is determined by test scores, students prior academic history, interviews (in home language-Spanish to accommodate non-English speaking population), and social experiment. Some of its limitations include that the materials are provided in Spanish, but for other languages, a translator is provided only if available. Bilingual paraprofessional is prioritized for district schools where the ELL population is largest, possibly leaving students in smaller programs with minimal support (Nassau County, 2017). From the perspective of our textbook, Nassau Countys model is English-dominated. This means the goal is for students to become proficient in English. This is an efficient assimilation approach, but it misses the cognitive, linguistic, and social benefits of dual-language programs cited by proponents in Chapter 3 of Why Tesol? theories and issues in teaching English to speakers of other languages in K-12 classrooms. Overall, the various program models for dual language to transitional bilingual are beneficial in supporting language and literacy development; at the same time, they benefit teachers as they value the cultural identities of their students. ReferencesAriza, E., & Coady Bedard, M. (2024). Why Tesol? theories and issues in teaching English to speakers of other languages in K-12 classrooms.Nassau County Schools. (2017). District English Language Learners (ELL) plan. Florida Department of Education.