Author: admin

  • NR436 Wk6-7

    Directions

    You will create a PowerPoint presentation that summarizes the implementation of your health promotion intervention and evaluates its outcomes within your selected population. This assignment builds on the Week 4 Health Promotion Intervention Planning assignment and your practicum experience. The goal is to demonstrate how your intervention was carried out, how the selected population responded, and what impact it had on health outcomes.

    1. Download . Use of the template is required. If the template is not used, a 10% deduction will be applied. See the rubric.
    2. Click the [TYPE HERE] fields on the template, remove the words [TYPE HERE], and provide the key information for each section. You may modify the template boxes, fonts, etc., so that your information fits and is easily readable. The main headings must stay the same to ensure all content is included.
    3. Delete/add fields as necessary.
    4. Select one of two options for completing the presentation:
    5. Use thisfor assistance on how to record a video in PowerPoint.
      • Record your voice narrating each slide using this resource.
      • Make sure your narration explains the key points clearly and adds depth to the content.
      • Speak at a steady pace and use a clear, expressive tone.
      • Save and submit the file with embedded audio.
      • Instead of recording audio, write detailed speaker notes for each slide.
      • Your notes should explain what you would say if you were presenting live.
      • Include explanations, examples, and transitions between ideas.
      • Make sure the notes are complete and easy to follow.
    6. Option 1: Narrated PowerPointOption 2: Speaker Notes

    7. Information from the Week 4 Health Promotion Intervention Planning community resource flyer may be used.
    8. Correctly cite and reference a minimum of three sources that come from scholarly literature. Sources should be no more than five years old unless they are historical references.
    9. Follow rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation consistent with formal, scientific writing.
    10. Abide by Chamberlain Universitys academic integrity policy.

    Include the following sections (detailed criteria listed below and in the grading rubric). Answer the questions under each section with explanation and detail. Information from previous weeks may be used. Complete references should be provided at the end of the presentation.

    Section 1: Health Promotion Intervention Planning Overview

    • Identify and describe the site where the health promotion intervention resource was implemented.
    • Identify and describe the selected population.
    • Identify and describe the health topic addressed.
    • Summarize three to four points of data as it relates to the selected population and site.

    Section 2: Intervention Overview

    • Summarize the educational material provided in the community resource flyer.
    • Provide a rationale for the selected educational material.
    • Summarize the two community resources provided in the community resource flyer.
    • Provide a rationale for the selected community resources.

    Section 3: Implementation Summary

    • Describe how the health promotion intervention was implemented.
    • Identify the total number of participants.
    • Discuss factors that supported the intervention (e.g., supportive staff, receptive audience).
    • Discuss barriers (e.g., time constraints, communication barriers, limited health literacy, emotional sensitivity of the topic) encountered during the implementation.

    Section 4: Outcome Assessment and Evaluation

    • List one goal for the implemented intervention (e.g., increased knowledge among participants)
    • Define at least one measurable outcome from the implemented intervention (e.g., participants will accurately identify two available community resources).
    • Evaluate the measurable outcome from the implemented intervention (e.g., did the participants have an increase in knowledge? Did the intervention meet the outcome?)

    Section 5: Population Feedback

    • Summarize feedback (formal and/or informal) received from participants.
    • Explain any questions or concerns raised (e.g., need for more private support options).

    Section 6: Intervention Improvement

    • Reflect on the planning of the intervention. What would you revise to improve future planning?
    • Reflect on how the intervention was carried out. What strategies could have made the implementation more engaging for the population?
    • Reflect on the outcome of the intervention. What strategies could have made the implementation more effective for the population?
    • Consider how this experience will inform your future nursing practice as a baccalaureate-prepared nurse. What lessons will you carry forward into future assessments, planning, and interventions?

    Part II Wk7

    i-Human Virtual Patient Encounter

    Debriefing: Defuse, Discover, and Deepen

    Complete at least one attempt of the Week 7 i-Human Virtual Patient Encounter prior to participating in the debriefing.

    Paragraph one: Did you feel comfortable and knowledgeable in Mr. Monsoors simulation? What did you learn? What additional information is needed to better care for Mr. Monsoor? What specific questions would you like to ask him?

    Paragraph two: Imagine Mr. Monsoor was in your community. Answer the questions based on the first letter of your last name below. Share what you found, or did not find, for resources.

    Paragraph three: What did you learn from this simulation that you could apply to your nursing practice? How will your new knowledge of resources in your community change the way you practice nursing?

  • R Programming Model Validation L4

    R Programming Model Validation

    For this assignment you will write an R program to complete the tasks given below. You will hand in two files for this assignment.

    • A File with your R program. This file should contain only the code (no output) and must have the typical r extension. No other file extensions will be accepted. The reason is that the assignment be graded based on your R code and not the output file. The output file will be used to verify the code commands. Also, please make sure that all comments, discussion, and conclusions regarding results are also annotated as part of your code.
    • A PDF/DOC file with your output code. We are giving you more flexibility regarding how you want to present your output (tables, plots, etc.). You can either use RMD files that combine code, narrative txt, and plots or you can use word document with copy and paste from the R platform you are using. However, please remember that all output (tables, plots, comments, conclusions, etc.) shown in this file has to be generated by the same R code that you submit. This is important! Output shown that is generated using a separate code or output shown that is not supported by the submitted code will not be graded. Screenshots will not be accepted.
    • R Data Set: HMEQ_Scrubbed.csv (in the zip file attached).
    • The Data Dictionary in the zip file.

    Note: The HMEQ_Scrubbed.csv file is a simple scrubbed file from the previous week homework. If you did more advanced scrubbing of data for last week, you may use your own data file instead. You might get better accuracy! If you decide to use your own version of HMEQ_Scrubbed.csv, please hand it in along with the other deliverables.

    This assignment is an extension of the Week 3 assignment. The difference is that this assignment will now incorporate model validation by using training and testing data sets.

    Step 1: Read in the Data

    • Read the data into R
    • List the structure of the data (str)
    • Execute a summary of the data
    • Print the first six records

    Step 2: Classification Decision Tree

    • Using the code discussed in the lecture, split the data into training and testing data sets.
    • Use the rpart library to predict the variable TARGET_BAD_FLAG
    • Develop two decision trees, one using Gini and the other using Entropy using the training and testing data
    • All other parameters such as tree depth are up to you.
    • Do not use TARGET_LOSS_AMT to predict TARGET_BAD_FLAG.
    • Plot both decision trees
    • List the important variables for both trees
    • Using the training data set, create a ROC curve for both trees
    • Using the testing data set, create a ROC curve for both trees
    • Write a brief summary of the decision trees discussing whether or not the trees are are optimal, overfit, or underfit.
    • Rerun with different training and testing data at least three times.
    • Determine which of the two models performed better and why you believe this

    Step 3: Regression Decision Tree

    • Using the code discussed in the lecture, split the data into training and testing data sets.
    • Use the rpart library to predict the variable TARGET_LOSS_AMT
    • Do not use TARGET_BAD_FLAG to predict TARGET_LOSS_AMT.
    • Develop two decision trees, one using anova and the other using poisson
    • All other parameters such as tree depth are up to you.
    • Plot both decision trees
    • List the important variables for both trees
    • Using the training data set, calculate the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) for both trees
    • Using the testing data set, calculate the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) for both trees
    • Write a brief summary of the decision trees discussing whether or not the trees are are optimal, overfit, or underfit.
    • Rerun with different training and testing data at least three times.
    • Determine which of the two models performed better and why you believe this

    Step 4: Probability / Severity Model Decision Tree (Push Yourself!)

    • Using the code discussed in the lecture, split the data into training and testing data sets.
    • Use the rpart library to predict the variable TARGET_BAD_FLAG
    • Use the rpart library to predict the variable TARGET_LOSS_AMT using only records where TARGET_BAD_FLAG is 1.
    • Plot both decision trees
    • List the important variables for both trees
    • Using your models, predict the probability of default and the loss given default.
    • Multiply the two values together for each record.
    • Calculate the RMSE value for the Probability / Severity model.
    • Rerun at least three times to be assured that the model is optimal and not over fit or under fit.
    • Comment on how this model compares to using the model from Step 3. Which one would your recommend using?

    Essential Activities:

    1. Watch all the training videos
    2. Execute the example code while watching the training videos.

    Notes:

    1. This assignment is due Sunday at 11:59 PM EST

    HMEQ_Scrubbed.zip

    February 4 2026, 3:13 PM

  • Nursing Question

    Directions

    You will create a PowerPoint presentation that summarizes the implementation of your health promotion intervention and evaluates its outcomes within your selected population. This assignment builds on the Week 4 Health Promotion Intervention Planning assignment and your practicum experience. The goal is to demonstrate how your intervention was carried out, how the selected population responded, and what impact it had on health outcomes.

    1. Download . Use of the template is required. If the template is not used, a 10% deduction will be applied. See the rubric.
    2. Click the [TYPE HERE] fields on the template, remove the words [TYPE HERE], and provide the key information for each section. You may modify the template boxes, fonts, etc., so that your information fits and is easily readable. The main headings must stay the same to ensure all content is included.
    3. Delete/add fields as necessary.
    4. Select one of two options for completing the presentation:
    5. Use thisfor assistance on how to record a video in PowerPoint.
      • Record your voice narrating each slide using this resource.
      • Make sure your narration explains the key points clearly and adds depth to the content.
      • Speak at a steady pace and use a clear, expressive tone.
      • Save and submit the file with embedded audio.
      • Instead of recording audio, write detailed speaker notes for each slide.
      • Your notes should explain what you would say if you were presenting live.
      • Include explanations, examples, and transitions between ideas.
      • Make sure the notes are complete and easy to follow.
    6. Option 1: Narrated PowerPointOption 2: Speaker Notes

    7. Information from the Week 4 Health Promotion Intervention Planning community resource flyer may be used.
    8. Correctly cite and reference a minimum of three sources that come from scholarly literature. Sources should be no more than five years old unless they are historical references.
    9. Follow rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation consistent with formal, scientific writing.
    10. Abide by Chamberlain Universitys academic integrity policy.

    Include the following sections (detailed criteria listed below and in the grading rubric). Answer the questions under each section with explanation and detail. Information from previous weeks may be used. Complete references should be provided at the end of the presentation.

    Section 1: Health Promotion Intervention Planning Overview

    • Identify and describe the site where the health promotion intervention resource was implemented.
    • Identify and describe the selected population.
    • Identify and describe the health topic addressed.
    • Summarize three to four points of data as it relates to the selected population and site.

    Section 2: Intervention Overview

    • Summarize the educational material provided in the community resource flyer.
    • Provide a rationale for the selected educational material.
    • Summarize the two community resources provided in the community resource flyer.
    • Provide a rationale for the selected community resources.

    Section 3: Implementation Summary

    • Describe how the health promotion intervention was implemented.
    • Identify the total number of participants.
    • Discuss factors that supported the intervention (e.g., supportive staff, receptive audience).
    • Discuss barriers (e.g., time constraints, communication barriers, limited health literacy, emotional sensitivity of the topic) encountered during the implementation.

    Section 4: Outcome Assessment and Evaluation

    • List one goal for the implemented intervention (e.g., increased knowledge among participants)
    • Define at least one measurable outcome from the implemented intervention (e.g., participants will accurately identify two available community resources).
    • Evaluate the measurable outcome from the implemented intervention (e.g., did the participants have an increase in knowledge? Did the intervention meet the outcome?)

    Section 5: Population Feedback

    • Summarize feedback (formal and/or informal) received from participants.
    • Explain any questions or concerns raised (e.g., need for more private support options).

    Section 6: Intervention Improvement

    • Reflect on the planning of the intervention. What would you revise to improve future planning?
    • Reflect on how the intervention was carried out. What strategies could have made the implementation more engaging for the population?
    • Reflect on the outcome of the intervention. What strategies could have made the implementation more effective for the population?
    • Consider how this experience will inform your future nursing practice as a baccalaureate-prepared nurse. What lessons will you carry forward into future assessments, planning, and interventions?

    Part II Wk7

    i-Human Virtual Patient Encounter

    Debriefing: Defuse, Discover, and Deepen

    Complete at least one attempt of the Week 7 i-Human Virtual Patient Encounter prior to participating in the debriefing.

    Paragraph one: Did you feel comfortable and knowledgeable in Mr. Monsoors simulation? What did you learn? What additional information is needed to better care for Mr. Monsoor? What specific questions would you like to ask him?

    Paragraph two: Imagine Mr. Monsoor was in your community. Answer the questions based on the first letter of your last name below. Share what you found, or did not find, for resources.

    Paragraph three: What did you learn from this simulation that you could apply to your nursing practice? How will your new knowledge of resources in your community change the way you practice nursing?

  • About business

    The question is about accounting and how to the accounting works that you want to know

  • Psychology Question

    Hi, I need help with my organizational psychology assignment, especially with analyzing the case study. The Assignment Expectations is Demonstration of critical thinking,spelling and grammar, comprehensiveness and completeness of your responses, no AI please

    Background:

    TechNova Solutions is a mid-sized technology company that specializes in providing custom software solutions for businesses. Over the past year, the company has faced challenges with customer satisfaction and retention. Despite delivering high-quality products, TechNova has experienced an increase in customer complaints and a decline in repeat business. The companys leadership team is concerned about the negative impact these issues are having on their reputation and revenue.

    Situation: Recently, TechNova conducted a survey that revealed several key issues related to customer relationships:

    Communication Gaps: Customers reported feeling that communication from TechNova was often unclear or delayed. Many felt they were not adequately informed about the status of their projects or changes to timelines.

    Customer Support: Feedback indicated that the customer support team was unresponsive and not sufficiently knowledgeable about the products, leading to frustration among clients who needed timely assistance.

    Personalization: Customers expressed dissatisfaction with the lack of personalized service. They felt that TechNovas approach was too generic and did not take into account their unique needs and preferences.

    Follow-Up and Feedback: There was a lack of follow-up after project completion to ensure customer satisfaction and gather feedback on the services provided.

    Objective:

    TechNovas leadership has decided to implement a new strategy to address these issues and improve customer relationships. They are seeking to create a more customer-centric approach that enhances communication, support, and personalization. As students of organizational psychology, you are tasked with developing a comprehensive plan to help TechNova Solutions address these challenges and improve their customer relationships.

    Assignment:
    Using what youve learned about customer relationships in organizational psychology, analyze the key issues faced by TechNova Solutions.

    1. Identify the potential psychological and organizational factors contributing to these issues.
    2. Develop specific strategies that TechNova Solutions can implement to enhance their customer relationships. Consider the following aspects in your proposals:
      • Communication: How can TechNova improve communication with customers to ensure they feel informed and valued?
      • Customer Support: What changes can be made to the customer support team to enhance their responsiveness and expertise?
      • Personalization: How can TechNova personalize their approach to better meet the unique needs and preferences of their clients?
      • Follow-Up and Feedback: What processes can be put in place to ensure effective follow-up and feedback collection after project completion?
    3. Evaluate Potential Challenges: Consider potential challenges or barriers that TechNova might face in implementing these strategies. Propose solutions to overcome these challenges and ensure successful implementation.
  • Describe hospitality industry departments roles and career o…

    I want to understand the hospitality industry from the beginning. Please explain in a simple and easy way. Cover topics like hotel management, front office, housekeeping, food and beverage services, and customer service. Also explain how hotels operate and what roles employees perform in each department. Include examples and explain career opportunities, required skills, and future scope in the hospitality industry. I am a beginner, so please keep the explanation clear and step-by-step.

  • CYBR525 Module 3 Lab

    In this lab, you will use footprinting techniques to map out a portion of your targets infrastructure. Follow the directions in the

    . Submit your lab report documenting your activities using the assignment link above.

    This assignment is worth 50 points.

    Submission Instructions

    Written assignments help evaluate your cognitive learning, which is a style of learning that encourages students to use their minds more effectively. This method of learning encourages students to fully engage in the learning process; so, learning, thinking, and remembering get easier and easier.

    The paper requirements are meant to guide you in your assignment submission. The most important point is to make it readable, include the authors name, course name, assignment name, date, and cite your sources of information.

    Paper Requirements:

    • Format: Microsoft Word
    • Font: Arial, 12-Point, Double-Space (or equivalent)
    • Citation Style: APA (The point is to use a style that makes your document readable and give credit to the sources you used.)
    • Coversheet
    • List of References Page.
    • Proofread – Edit for spelling, grammar, punctuation, etc.
    • Use only course text, professional journal articles, or other reputable resources.
  • CYBR525 Module 3 Discussion

    Answer this question for the discussion post:

    1. Google hacking is another way to perform reconnaissance on an organization; however, its not covered in the book. Provide information on Google hacking and its use in footprinting. Several examples are given at

    Respond to two classmate discussion post:

    DISCUSSION POST 1:

    John Taylor II

    M3: WHOIS and DIG Commands

    During a penetration test, footprinting is the initial phase where an ethical hacker gathers publicly available information about a target organization to understand its external attack surface. Two commonly used tools in this phase are WHOIS and dig, both of which provide valuable intelligence without directly interacting with or exploiting target systems. I have used WHOIS at work to look up information about domain names and IP addresses when I receive reports of spoofing our website or phishing emails, to report those sites to the ISPs abuse contact.

    The WHOIS command accesses public databases that contain registration details for domain names and IP addresses. When a domain is registered, information such as the registrants name, organization, registrar, contact details, registration and expiration dates, and associated name servers is recorded and publicly available. Performing a WHOIS lookup allows a penetration tester to identify the domain owner, the registrar or hosting provider, and whether multiple domains or IP ranges belong to the same organization. This data helps define organizational boundaries, uncover related infrastructure, and identify third-party dependencies. Since WHOIS queries only use public records and do not generate traffic to the targets servers, they are considered a passive reconnaissance method unlikely to trigger security alarms.

    The dig (Domain Information Groper) command is a DNS query tool that retrieves detailed information about a domain’s configuration in the Domain Name System. Unlike WHOIS, which provides ownership and administrative data, dig focuses on technical DNS records. Using dig, a penetration tester can gather IP addresses (A and AAAA records), mail servers (MX), authoritative name servers (NS), aliases (CNAME), and text records (TXT) like SPF, DKIM, and DMARC settings. These records show how services such as websites and email are hosted, routed, and protected. Additionally, dig can perform reverse DNS lookups and limited subdomain enumeration to help testers map visible services and infrastructure. After learning about the dig commands, I can see an application for this tool in my research into DMARC failures from external senders with inbound email to us. I have been using the MXToolbox site to help me decipher the headers on an email message to provide me with information to send back to the sending domains IT contact that their email server is not configured correctly and when receiving inbound emails from their domain we are not able to verify the message is passing DMARC, and we have to quarantine the message to review.

    WHOIS and dig provide complementary insights during the footprinting stage. WHOIS identifies who owns and manages the infrastructure, whereas dig shows how it is technically configured and exposed. Data from these tools helps penetration testers build a precise profile of the target environment, reduces guesswork in later testing phases, and detects potential security issues such as misconfigurations or information leaks. Consequently, WHOIS and dig are vital tools in ethical hacking, troubleshooting system configuration, penetration testing, and cybersecurity education.

    References

    Chamoli, S. (2025, April 24). What is WHOIS footprinting? DEV Community.

    GeeksforGeeks. (2025, October 3). What is WHOIS footprinting?

    Hands-On Ethical Hacking and Network Defense. (2023). In Hands-On Ethical Hacking and Network Defense. Cengage Learning, Inc. (US/CA).

    DISCUSSION POST 2:

    Angie Retzlaff

    Retzlaff – Module 3 – Discussion Post

    Zone transfers are one of those features in networking that were built for a legitimate purpose but can become a security concern if they are not properly controlled. In simple terms, a DNS zone transfer is how one DNS server shares its records with another so they stay synchronized, usually between a primary DNS server and a secondary backup server. The problem is that if a DNS server is misconfigured and allows anyone to request a zone transfer, it can expose a complete list of systems tied to that domain. Instead of just resolving one hostname at a time, someone can retrieve an entire set of DNS records in a single request, which is what makes zone transfers useful for seeing systems on a network. The DNS zone file can include hostnames, IP addresses, mail servers, name servers, and sometimes additional records that describe how systems are structured. When this information is exposed, it essentially acts like a blueprint of the organizations network, where entries like vpn.company.com, mail.company.com, or dev-server.company.com immediately provide insight into what types of systems exist and how they might be used, even if some of those systems are not directly accessible from the outside.

    The steps to perform a zone transfer are relatively straightforward, which is part of what makes this technique so effective. The first step is to identify the domain and determine its authoritative DNS servers, which can be done using tools like nslookup or dig by querying for NS records. Once those name servers are identified, the next step is to attempt the zone transfer itself using a command such as dig axfr @nameserver targetdomain.com. If the DNS server is properly secured, it will deny the request, but if it is misconfigured, it may respond by sending back the full zone file. There are also automated tools like dnsenum or fierce that can attempt zone transfers as part of a broader reconnaissance effort while organizing results and identifying additional subdomains if the transfer is unsuccessful. In a penetration testing scenario, this step is typically performed early because it can quickly provide a large amount of useful information with very little effort.

    This is considered a strong footprinting step because of how efficient and informative it is. With a single request, it is possible to gather a significant amount of structured data about a targets network, and compared to other methods like port scanning or brute-force discovery, a zone transfer is much quieter and less likely to raise alarms if not actively monitored. It also provides context rather than isolated data points, showing how systems are named and organized, which can reveal patterns and relationships within the network. This makes it easier to prioritize targets, such as authentication servers, databases, or remote access systems, and it can also reveal environmental details like separate development and production systems or how email is handled. From a security perspective, this reinforces the importance of properly securing DNS configurations by restricting zone transfers to authorized servers only, since failing to do so can unintentionally expose sensitive infrastructure details. Overall, zone transfers are a simple but powerful way to discover systems on a network, and when left open, they provide a clear and organized view that makes them an effective step in the footprinting process.

  • How do you properly season and cook vegetables to enhance fl…

    This question highlights the importance of balancing taste and nutrition when cooking vegetables. Proper seasoning and cooking methods, like steaming or sauting, help preserve nutrients while improving flavor and texture.

  • Unit 6: Three-Dimensional Advocacy Approach

    For this assignment you are tasked with developing a three-dimensional advocacy approach to provide nursing leadership for the healthcare or institute of higher education setting, professional, and community arenas aimed at overcoming implicit bias.

    Structure the assignment as a presentation. You may use any presentation platform you prefer – PPT, Prezi, Powtoon, Beautiful.ai, Canva, etc.

    Slide 1 Assignment Title, Your Name, Course Code, and Faculty Name

    Slide 2 Provide a definition of implicit bias and discuss its impact on healthcare disparities and organizational culture. Include your in-text citation.

    Slide 3 – Provide a brief overview that highlights the importance of a nursing leadership approach for addressing implicit bias in the healthcare/institute of higher education, professional, and community settings. Include your in-text citation.

    Slide 4 Identify a specific area within the healthcare system or institute of higher education where implicit bias may manifest, such as in patient-healthcare professional interactions, clinical decision-making, healthcare policy development, and so on. Include your in-text citation.

    Slide 5 Advocacy at the Healthcare Dimension: Outline a strategic advocacy approach of initiatives to mitigate implicit bias within healthcare institutions or institutes of higher education. Such initiatives could include training programs, cultural competence education, diversity recruitment efforts, or other initiatives you identify in the literature, etc. Define the outcome(s) you anticipate these initiatives will result in. Include an in-text citation for the resource that supports each identified initiative.

    Slide 6 Identify key areas where implicit bias may affect professional practice, professional development, and leadership opportunities. Include your in-text citation.

    Slide 7 Advocacy at the Professional Dimension:Propose advocacy strategies aimed at improving awareness, education, and accountability to combat implicit bias within the nursing profession. Such strategies could include diversity training, mentorship programs, policy advocacy, or other strategies you identify in the literature, etc. Define the outcome(s) you anticipate these strategies will result in. Include an in-text citation for the resource that supports each identified strategy.

    Slide 8 Identify instances where implicit bias may impact healthcare access, social determinants of health, and community relationships. Include your in-text citation.

    Slide 9 Advocacy at the Community Dimension:From your nursing leadership lens develop a community focused advocacy plan that addresses implicit bias. Community level strategies could include development of community partnerships, community-based education programs, community policy or legislative initiatives, or other strategies you identify in the literature, etc. Define the outcome(s) you anticipate these strategies will result in. Include an in-text citation for the resource that supports each identified strategy.

    Slide 10 Provide a brief reflection on the potential synergies and challenges of implementing an integrated nursing leadership approach across the different dimensions (settings) described. Include an in-text citation if appropriate.

    Slide 11 Identify strategies for sustaining and evaluating the impact of your three-dimensional advocacy approach. Include an in-text citation if appropriate.

    Slide 12 (and beyond) Include your reference citations consistent with 7th edition APA guidelines and graphics per slide.

    Note: Ensure that you maintain the principles of an effective presentation including, readability, text, and design. The notes section should be used to further explore your subject matter.