Author: admin

  • Discussion Board: Self Leadership

    In this course, the discussion board functions differently from those in your other classes. Instead of providing specific topics, I encourage you to generate discussion points based on the readings and engage with your peers. Think of the discussion board as a virtual classroom where I ask, “What are your thoughts on this week’s reading? What do you want to discuss?” Your posts should reflect your answers to these questions.

    Active participation in the discussion forums is crucial for this online class. Your involvement will be graded on a scale from 0 to 10 points per reading, emphasizing the importance of dialogue over monologue.

    To earn full credit, you must post at least three times: an initial post reacting to the reading, followed by two responses to your classmates’ posts. Your contributions should be relevant, substantive, and demonstrate engagement with the reading. When responding to others, aim to provoke further thought through questions or challenges rather than simply agreeing.

    While there is no strict word count, posts under 250 words are unlikely to receive full credit because it is challenging to demonstrate thorough engagement with the material in such a brief post. I am looking for evidence of deep reflection on the material.

    Possible questions to answer this week:

    • How do you currently practice self-leadership in your personal and professional life?
    • What challenges do you face in leading yourself?
    • What strategies from this week’s materials do you find most applicable to your situation?

    Primary Post (Due Friday by 11:59 p.m.)

    Your primary post should respond to the provided questions with an analytical approach, rather than merely summarizing information or sharing personal anecdotes. Ensure your response:

    • Analyzes the topic, drawing connections to relevant personal experiences
    • Demonstrates clear, grammatically correct writing, utilizing complete sentences
    • Is submitted by the specified deadline

    Two Reply Posts (Due Sunday at 11:59 p.m.)

    To receive full points, reply posts should:

    • Thoughtfully engage with the content of two classmates’ primary posts
    • Focus on the analysis presented by your classmates, rather than introducing new personal experiences
    • Be well-written, adhering to standard grammar, spelling, and punctuation rules

    Requirements: 400

  • Time Diary Project

    Assignment Instructions

    i do not have a job, i have class on tuesday and thursday

    TIME DIARY PROJECT

    For this project, you will keep a diary of how you use your time. The diary should cover a 5-day period and focus on your workday at your current place of employment. It doesn’t need to cover a full 24-hour period; instead, it should focus on your work hours (typically 8-10 hours). If you are not currently employed, your diary should focus on the part of your life most closely related to a vocation or your academic career.

    After completing your time diary, download the time diary questions from Blackboard and answer them thoroughly. Once you have finished the project, submit it electronically online. It is recommended to start this project early in the semester.

    Requirements: 400

  • Outline rough draft

    Required Resources

    Read/review the following resources for this activity:

    • Textbook: Chapter that pertains to your chosen topic
    • Lesson
    • Minimum of 4 scholarly sources (these can be the same as from Week 5, or you can add four new sources)
    • (Must use this template to complete the assignment.)

    Introduction

    This week, you will craft the Week 6 Final Outline assignment. You will use the Week 5 Rough Draft Outline and add the last parts that will be used in the Week 7 PowerPoint presentation.

    PowerPoint Project Timeline

    Due Description
    Week 4 PowerPoint Topic
    Week 5 PowerPoint Outline Rough Draft
    Week 6 PowerPoint Outline Final Draft, Images, and Sources
    Week 7 PowerPoint Presentation
    Week 8 PowerPoint Evaluation

    Instructions

    For the Week 6 Final Outline, build upon the Week 5 Rough Draft Outline by including and submitting the following components:

    Final Outline Components:

    • General topic
    • Specific topic
    • Thesis statement (the three main ideas of your presentation in one sentence)
    • Introduction paragraph (written out as you plan to narrate and record it)
    • The body of the outline needs to be in outline format, using a complete sentence for each main point and one complete sentence for each bullet point under each main point.
    • Conclusion paragraph (written out as you plan to narrate and record it)

    Slide Visuals:

    • Find five of the images you plan to use in your PowerPoint presentation.
      • Paste the images onto the document. Do not simply provide a URL for each image.
      • Beneath each visual, describe why you selected this visual and how you plan to use this visual in your PowerPoint.

    Four Outside Scholarly Sources:

    References page with a minimum of 4 authoritative, outside scholarly sources

      • These sources can be the sources referenced during Week 5, but you are free to change those sources if they are no longer serving as support for your PowerPoint.
        • Anonymous authors or web pages are not acceptable.
        • References must be written in APA format with hanging indents, in alphabetical order, and with everything double-spaced. The word “references” should be centered.
        • Include copyrighted image resources in this list. You can copy and paste these citations to use as the last slide in your PowerPoint.

    Presentation Note

    Do not copy and paste your table of contents, final outline, or visual description plan into your PowerPoint slides in your Week 7 submission. Your speech slides must be created as a meaningful presentation.

    • Use a few bullets for each slide, with one phrase or one sentence for each bullet.
    • Do not put any paragraphs into the slides.

    Writing Requirements

    • Must use the integrated template
    • Length: Minimum of 450-500 words (including the title page and references page)
    • 1-inch margins
    • Page numbers
    • Double-spaced
    • Minimum of four outside scholarly sources (can be the same as Week 5)
    • 12-point Times New Roman font
    • References page

    Grading

    This activity will be graded based on the Week 6 Outline Final Draft Grading Rubric.

    Course Outcomes

    • CO 1: Examine the communication model and factors that influence perception.
    • CO 3: Deliver a presentation with a specific communication intent.

    Rubric

    W6 Outline Final Draft Grading Rubric

    W6 Outline Final Draft Grading Rubric

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLength

    5 ptsMeets the minimum length requirement of 450 to 500 words.0 ptsFalls short of the minimum length requirement (under 450 words).

    5 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThe General Topic, Specific Topic, Thesis (3 Main Points of the Presentation) and Introductory Content

    25 ptsThe general topic, specific topic, thesis statement, and introduction paragraph indicate the appropriate focus of the paper.21 ptsThe general topic, specific topic, thesis statement, and introduction paragraph need minimum clarity regarding the focus of the paper.

    17 ptsThe general topic, specific topic, thesis statement, and introduction paragraph need some clarity regarding the focus of the paper.15 ptsThe general topic, specific topic, thesis statement, and introduction paragraph need significant clarity regarding the focus of the paper.0 ptsThe general topic, specific topic, thesis statement, and introduction paragraph does not provide any direction for the paper.

    25 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOutline Organization and Body of the Outline

    25 ptsPoints are logically organized and sequenced in outline format for the body of the presentation.21 ptsMost points are logically organized and sequenced in outline format for the body of the presentation. Some restructuring is needed.

    17 ptsSome points are logically organized and sequenced in outline format for the body of the presentation. Much restructuring is needed15 ptsLimited points are logically organized and sequenced in outline format for the body of the presentation. Significant restructuring is needed.0 ptsNo effort

    25 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummary/Conclusion

    25 ptsThe conclusion provides a sense of closure by restating the thesis and summarizing the main points without adding new topics that were not covered in the main content.22 ptsThe conclusion restates the thesis and summarizes most of the main points but needs additional work to have a stronger sense of closure.

    18 ptsThe conclusion is lacking several summary points or restatement of thesis that provide a weak closure and/or introduces new points.15 ptsThe conclusion is lacking most of summary points or restatement of thesis that does not provide a sense of closure and/or introduces new points.0 ptsThe conclusion omits the restatement/summary of the thesis and main points, and/or it introduces new points.

    25 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeVisuals

    25 ptsImages and explanations align with the content of the outline and provide a logical visual sequence for the presentation22 ptsImages and explanations mostly align with the content of the outline and provide a logical visual sequence for the presentation, but there may be some areas that need to be rearranged or changed for alignment and clarity.

    18 ptsSome images and explanations align with the content of the outline and provide a logical visual sequence for the presentation, but more work is needed in this area to provide a well-synthesized presentation.15 ptsFew images and explanations align with the content of the outline and provide a logical visual sequence for the presentation, but significant work is needed in this area to provide a well-synthesized presentation.0 ptsImages and explanations do not align with the content of the outline, nor do they provide a logical visual sequence for the presentation.

    25 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources

    10 ptsSubmission includes at least 4 scholarly sources. The citations and entire submission are in APA format that would be suitable for each main point.8 ptsSubmission includes 3 scholarly sources. The citations and entire submission are in APA format that would be suitable for each main point.

    7 ptsSubmission includes 2 scholarly sources. The citations and entire submission are in APA format that would be suitable for each main point.6 ptsSubmission has 1 scholarly source in APA format. The citations and entire submission are in APA format that would be suitable for each main point.0 ptsSubmission has 0 scholarly source in APA format or does not include any sources.

    10 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting: Mechanics & Usage

    5 ptsThe writing is free of errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation that would detract from a clear reading of the paper.4 ptsThe writing contains a few errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation, but the errors do not detract from a clear reading of the text.

    3 ptsThe writing contains some errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation that need to be addressed for a clearer reading of the paper.2 ptsThe writing contains several errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation that impede a clear reading of the paper.0 ptsSubmission has 1 scholarly source in APA format or does not include any sources.

    5 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA guidelines are followed, including: Title Page, Headings, Citations, Reference Formatting, Reference page, Page Numbers, Font, and the Template is used.

    5 ptsIncludes all of the following: following APA guidelines, such as a title page, headings, citations, reference formatting, a reference page, page numbers, font, and the use of the template.4 ptsIncludes 4 of the following: following APA guidelines, such as a title page, headings, citations, reference formatting, a reference page, page numbers, font, and the use of the template.

    3 ptsIncludes 3 of the following: following APA guidelines, such as a title page, headings, citations, reference formatting, a reference page, page numbers, font, and the use of the template.2 ptsIncludes 2 of the following: following APA guidelines, such as a title page, headings, citations, reference formatting, a reference page, page numbers, font, and the use of the template.0 ptsIncludes less than 2 of the following: following APA guidelines, such as a title page, headings, citations, reference formatting, a reference page, page numbers, font, and the use of the template.

    5 pts

    Total Points: 125

    Requirements: provided above

  • Session 4, Ch. 4 DB

    This says “there is no due date;” however, you must follow the due dates in the course syllabus. NO excuses for late submissions.

    Find two examples of bylaws; use your hometown’s recreation agency and one of the cities in Collin, Dallas or Tarrant County. Compare and contrast the contents of each. In your post, discuss how each agency elects board members, and discuss the term lengths and term limits for those board members. Respond to two other classmates posts. *You are not to use AI on this assignment.

    To receive full credit, you must reference where you obtained your information for this assignment.

    *Refer to the syllabus to see how this class handles AI: Cheating and/or plagiarism, including the unauthorized use of generative artificial intelligence including but not exclusive to Audio and video generators, Code generators, Image Generators, and/or Large Language Models is not tolerated at Dallas Baptist University and may result in academic discipline up to and including suspension or expulsion.

    We are not using any generative artificial intelligence in this course, unless I the professor permits it! I will be doing spot checks. If you are guilty of submitting an AI-written paper, I will check your submission every time, and if need be, I will contact you by phone or TEAMS to discuss your infraction(s).

    Requirements: 400

  • Week 7

    Page 1 should be to answer the questions on the screenshot. page 2 should be attached separately, it is the summary tool that needs to be completed per instructions . please/thank you

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Appendix G – Individual Evidence Summary Tool (1)-1.docx, nr716 practice question from week 3.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Discussion 4: Creation

    Discussion Topic: [Creation]

    Overview

    Having explored the previous modules on [Creation], we now turn our attention to [Creation]. This discussion is designed to be an academic and intellectual exercise. Your contributions should reflect logical reasoning, rational inquiry, and a level of depth appropriate for scholarly discourse, moving beyond casual interaction to explore the nuanced complexity of this field.

    Requirements

    1. Summarization & Intellectual Reflection (300-500 words)

    Note: To ensure academic integrity and reflect personal growth, this section must be authored by the student without the use of generative AI.

    • Summarize: Provide a concise yet comprehensive summary of the key concepts, theories, or historical shifts regarding [Creation] as discussed in the course materials.
    • Resonate: Critically analyze how this knowledge resonates with your current understanding. Reflect on how these specific concepts integrate with, conflict with, or refine your personal worldview or professional perspective.

    2. Original Questions & Evidence-Based Investigation

    Formulate two original, thought-provoking questions that arise from your reflection on [Creation].

    • Investigation: Attempt to answer these questions by investigating a variety of scholarly and technological resources, including academic texts, peer-reviewed journals, and primary source documents.
    • Selection: Note that exceptional questions and well-researched investigations will be selected for presentation and further in-class discussion.

    3. Academic Peer Dialogue

    Respond to at least two of your peers. Your replies must go beyond simple agreement or “good post” comments. To foster a rigorous intellectual environment, you must:

    • Engage directly with the logic of their arguments.
    • Provide evidence-based counter-perspectives or alternative interpretations.
    • Ask clarifying questions that push the dialogue toward deeper inquiry.

    Requirements: 400

  • Presentation on Major Depressive Disorder

    Major Depressive Disorder

    Requirements: Long

  • Case Study 1

    Using the case study provided from the course textbook, respond to the critical thinking question using a Microsoft Word document. Each response should be original (in your own words) and a minimum of two sentences in length.

    Case Study

    Tom is a 3-year-old boy who is being flown to the United States from a small village in Nigeria to correct a birth defect, spina bifida occulta. The flight and surgery were arranged through a local church missionary whose members travel to underserved regions worldwide.

    One of the missionary members is a pediatric neurosurgeon who arranged for the surgery to be conducted at a large metropolitan hospital where he is chief of surgery. The surgery will be performed at no cost from either the physician or the hospital. The hospitals immediate postoperative follow-up care and inpatient rehabilitation will also be provided by the hospital at no cost to the patient or his family.

    The nursing staff at the hospital have begun to refer to these types of patients as medical tourists because they fly in and then leave to go back to their countries. Most nurses believe that they have the same responsibilities for care when treating foreign nationals without immigration status in the United States.

    However, one of the nurses, Becky, strongly believes that these medical tourists are using resources that could be much better used for the underserved in the United States. She often expresses her opinion whenever the opportunity arises. She is on the hospitals Policy and Procedure Committee. She has been insisting that these foreigners be required to provide proof of sufficient medical coverage and ability to pay before undergoing treatment in her hospital. She quotes many studies that show that the U.S. healthcare system has a difficult time providing adequate services to a large portion of its population. She stresses that even the Affordable Care Act has no provision for the care of noncitizens.

    She also notes that there seems to be no one responsible for long-term care when these patients return to their country of origin. Often they live in poverty in their rural villages, where there is an underdeveloped healthcare system. Who will provide for Toms future care? What if he has a shunt placed to treat increased intracranial pressure, a common complication of the surgery, by draining the excess cerebrospinal fluid? Who in his village knows enough to provide care if the shunt becomes blocked? Small villages in the rural areas of Nigeria lack even basic sanitary conditions and qualified health care providers.

    Critical Thinking Questions

    1. How do you feel about expending limited resources on those who are not U.S. citizens and live in other countries when they cannot afford their care? Do you agree with Becky or the other nurses? Why?
    2. Should the hospital concentrate on allocating its resources to U.S. citizens, the population for which they are most responsible?
    3. What ethical principles are involved in limiting care to foreign nationals without insurance? What if they did have insurance or a source of funding that could pay for their care?

    Each response should be 23 sentences in length, clear, concise, and grammatically correct.

    Evidence of critical thinking and rationale are provided, as well as examples and specific details.

    Submission to Turnitin (AI detection & Similarity score)- cite even if using AI to fix grammar

  • Technology to enhance quality and safety standards in nursin…

    Write a 4 page annotated bibliography where you identify peer-reviewed publications that promote the use of a selected technology to enhance quality and safety standards in nursing. Review and select ONE of the technology options to use as the focus for this assignment: 1. Smartwatch 2. Videoconference screen or smartphone 3. Digital sensory enabled inhaler 4. Spirometer (mobile) 5. Smart stethoscope Prepare a 4 page paper in which you introduce your selected technology and describe at least five peer-reviewed publications that promote the use of your selected technology to enhance quality and safety standards in nursing. You will conclude your paper by summarizing why you recommend a particular technology by underscoring the evidence-based resources you presented. Be sure that your paper includes all of the following elements: Introduction to the Selected Technology Topic o What is your rationale for selecting this particular technology topic? What is interesting about it? o What research process did you employ? Which databases did you use? Which search terms did you use? Note: In this section of your bibliography, you may use first-person since you are asked to describe your rationale for selecting the topic and the research strategies you employed. Use third person in the rest of the bibliography, however. Annotation Elements o For each resource, include the full reference followed by the annotation. o Explain the focus of the research or review article you chose. o Provide a summary overview of the publication. According to this source, what is the impact of this technology on patient safety and quality of care? According to this source, what is the relevance of this technology to nursing practice and the work of the interdisciplinary health care team? Why did you select this publication to write about out of the many possible options? In other words, make the case as to why this resource is important for health care practitioners to read. Artificial Intelligence (AI) o How can AI be used with your chosen technology to improve patient care, nursing workflow, or efficient healthcare delivery. Be sure one of your journal articles supports this. Summary of Recommendation o How would you tie together, or integrate, the key learnings from each of the five publications you examined? o Describe which organizational factors influence the selection of a technology in a health care setting? Consider such factors as organizational policies, resources, culture/social norms, commitment, training programs, and/or employee empowerment. o How would you justify the implementation and use of the technology in a health care setting? This is the section where you will justify (prove) that the implementation of the patient care technology is appropriate or not. The evidence should be cited from the literature that was noted in the annotated bibliography. Consider the impact of the technology on the health care organization, patientcare/satisfaction, and interdisciplinary team productivity, satisfaction, and retention. Additional Requirements Written communication: Ensure written communication is free of errors that detract from the overall message. Length: 4-typed, double-spaced pages. Number of resources: Cite a minimum of five peer-reviewed publications, not websites. At least four for the annotation elements and at least one for your justification of AI. (Publications may be research studies or review articles from a professional source. Newspapers, magazines, and blogs are not considered professional sources). Your selections need to be currentwithin the last five years. Include a title and reference page in APA format. Font and font size: Use Times New Roman, 12 point. APA: Follow APA style and formatting guidelines for all bibliographic entries. Please also refer to the attached rubric.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Instructions.docx, Rubric.docx, Instructions.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Ethics Cases

    You will find two cases:

    1. A Clinical Ethics Case: ICU Triage During the COVID-19 Pandemic (June 2020, Georgia context)
    2. An Administrative / Organizational Ethics Case: Medical Error, Disclosure, and Safety Culture

    What you are required to do:

    • Write one (1) page per case (approximately 400600 words each).
    • Use APA format, double-spaced, 12-point font, 1-inch margins.
    • Apply ethical frameworks and principles from the course to analyze each case.
    • Depth of analysis is more important than length. Avoid lengthy case summaries and focus on ethical reasoning, justification, and professional standards.
    • Instructions for submission will follow

    The document includes the full case backgrounds and specific instructions for each case. Please read it carefully before you begin writing.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): HA8190_Ethics_Exam_Cases_and_Instructions_v2.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.