Author: admin

  • Summative Assessment: Ethics Motivation Analysis

    As you continue in your studies of environmental science, it is important to consider various stakeholders and their motivations and behaviors with respect to environmental initiatives. A strong understanding of the motivations of stakeholders will support your ability to impact positive environmental outcomes. In this assessment, use your understanding of anthropocentric and biocentric rationale to analyze how different lenses might impact a persons level of engagement in an environmental effort.

    In SUS/300: Environmental Sustainability, you completed a stakeholder environmental motivation analysis. It may be helpful to reference that assessment as a starting point for updating this stakeholder motivation analysis. This analysis could serve as a deliverable to demonstrate to future employers your ability to understand factors that motivate stakeholders in projects.

    Identify and research one (1) sustainability-related effort that interests you.

    Use your reflection, which you created in the Wk 1 Summative Assessment: Meta-analysis Model Construction, to imagine how you, as a stakeholder, would engage in the sustainability effort you identified for this weeks assessment. Try to consider only the knowledge and experiences you had at Week 1.

    Reflect on how your thoughts and ideas about environmental ethics have changed throughout this course. Discuss these changes and imagine how you, as a stakeholder, with all the knowledge and experiences you have gained throughout this course, would engage in the sustainability effort you identified.

    Create a 1,050- to 1,225-word report (essay body content; title and references pages not included in word-count) in which you analyze the different motivations of the stakeholder to engage in your selected sustainability effort. Include the following in your analysis:

    Use the following headings / subheadings and address all bullet points:

    Suggestion / recommendation – Use a separate paragraph for each bullet.

    • Sustainability Effort
    • Describe the sustainability effort you selected.
    • Explain your rationale for selecting that sustainability effort.
    • Your View of Environmental Ethics
    • Analyze your Week 1 selfs view of environmental ethics and how that would impact your ability and motivation to engage in the sustainability effort.
    • Analyze your Week 5 selfs view of environmental ethics and how that would impact their ability and motivation to engage in the sustainability effort.
    • Analyze how the changes in your view of environmental ethics over the five weeks would impact your ability and motivation to engage in sustainability efforts.
    • Reflect on what changed or reinforced your previous views of environmental ethics
    • Recommendations for Supporting Different Ethical Views
    • Provide recommendations for what you, as an environmental scientist, can do to understand people with varied environmental ethical views.
    • Provide recommendations for enhancing their ability and motivation to engage in the sustainability effort.
    • Comparing Differing Rationales
    • Compare anthropocentric and biocentric rationales.
    • Evaluate how anthropocentric and biocentric rationale will impact human motivation to engage in sustainability efforts.

    Use your personal works, as listed above, course textbook, and at least two (5) external resources.

    Use headings and subheadings (see above) for essay organization.

    Use APA formatting, including approved APA font style and size, essay body citations, double line spacing, and title and references pages.

    Submit your assignment as a Word or pdf file.

    = = = = =

    Note: Meet the required word-count to be eligible for an optimized grade.

    Penalties / point deductions: Incomplete/erroneous/missing headings and content (bullet prompts), incorrect line spacing, missing citations, references, and title page.

  • The song “Zombie” by The Cranberries and its historical/soci…

    I need a rewrite for an evaluative annotated bibliography. My professor doesnt want any AI flagging. He will deduct points up to 50% then if it flags as more he will assign a Zero. Even though I only use AI as a tool to enhance my own work and rewrite it still flags. Ive attached my paper along with his feedback.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Professor graded.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Global Studies Question

    Objective: Key Concepts are 4

    Energy governance

    Energy diplomacy

    Energy Security

    Energy Trade

    You can choose one or two concepts only, depending on what your paper focuses on. For any concept you use, you must define it briefly (one sentence is enough, no need for a full paragraph), +plus back it up with references.

    Chosen Challenges

    The two challenges selected for the paper are: (You chose 2 challenges, mentioned below in instructions)

    Each challenge should be clearly explained and connected to the chosen concept(s).

    Personal Reflection

    In the personal reflection section: State whether you agree or disagree with the solutions or approaches

    Give your own opinion, supported by what you learned in the course

    Examples, Evidence, and References

    Every major point must be supported with facts and references

    Use in-text citations with page numbers

    Provide at least 5 references At least 1 reference must be academic

    A recommended academic reference to use:

    ————————————————————————————

    Assignment instructions.

    • **Objective: **This assignment is designed to help you reflect on the key concepts discussed in the first few weeks of the course and apply them to the context of energy governance in the UAE.
    • **Assignment Task:

    **Write a 750-word reflection paper on the current state of energy governance in the UAE. In your paper, you should address the following: Key Challenges: Identify and discuss at least two significant challenges that the UAE faces in its energy governance. Consider aspects like energy security, the transition to renewable energy, or socio-economic impacts. Opportunities: Highlight at least two opportunities that the UAE has leveraged or can leverage in its energy governance. This could include initiatives like the UAEs Clean Energy Strategy, investments in renewable energy, or participation in international energy forums. Examples and Evidence: Support your discussion with specific examples from recent developments, policies, or case studies related to the UAEs energy sector. Personal Reflection: Reflect on how these challenges and opportunities might impact the future of energy governance in the UAE and your own perspective on the importance of energy governance.

    • Structure: Introduction (150 words): Briefly introduce the topic and outline the key points you will discuss.

    Main Body (500 words):Challenges: Discuss the challenges in detail. Opportunities: Highlight the opportunities and provide examples. Personal Reflection: Reflect on the implications for the UAE and your understanding of energy governance. Conclusion (100 words): Summarize your key points and restate the significance of energy governance in the UAE.

    Assessment Criteria:

    -** Understanding of Key Concepts (30%):** Demonstrate a clear understanding of energy governance challenges and opportunities.

    • Application to UAE Context (30%): Effectively apply course concepts to the UAEs energy sector.
    • Clarity and Coherence (20%): Write clearly and coherently, with a logical flow of ideas.
    • Use of Examples and Evidence (10%): Provide relevant and well-supported examples.
    • Formatting and Citations (10%): Adhere to the formatting guidelines and properly cite sources.

    APPLY APA FORMAT FOR THE PAPER.

    STICK TO THE INSTRUCTIONS

    Assignment Information

    Length: 750 word count, excluding the references.

    Learning Outcomes thats going to be graded upon

    • #LO1_EnergySources: Explain, with the correct technical language, both conventional and sustainable sources of energy.
    • #LO2_EnergySecurity: Assess the level of different countries energy security and its effect on the global economy.
    • #LO3_StrategicImportance: Recognize the strategic importance of hydrocarbons and renewable energy sources to global power politics.
    • #LO4_Hydrocarbons: Appraise the impact of the hydrocarbons industry on the environment.
    • #LO5_KeyActors: Discuss the role of key actors and institutions in the energy sector and their influence over time.

    Requirements: 750 words

  • EHR Implementation

    Ask for Help Print ZQM1 ZQM1 Task 1: EHR Implementation Healthcare System Applications C816 PRFA ZQM1 PreparationTask OverviewSubmissionsEvaluation Report Competencies 7035.1.1 : Health Information Systems and Business Process The graduate explains how information systems affect business processes within the healthcare industry. 7035.1.2 : Systems Development The graduate analyzes the different methods of system development for the purpose of recommending an appropriate method for a project. 7035.1.3 : Health Information Systems Management and Security The graduate analyzes the role of management in health information systems and the necessity for security and contingency plans. 7035.1.4 : Healthcare IT Support The graduate justifies the need for information technology support and ways to manage the support processes in healthcare organizations. Introduction In this task, you will identify the needs of a health information management (HIM) department transitioning from a hybrid to a fully digital record. You will need to take into consideration how this transition will affect the documentation process and the roles and responsibilities of the HIM staff. In doing so, you will create a plan for this transition so that these record issues are resolved. Scenario You are the HIM director at Anywhere Memorial Hospital where the stakeholders have gathered to discuss their system-wide electronic health record needs. They currently have an eight-year-old hybrid electronic health record (EHR) system, but they would like to transition into a fully digital record. During the initial EHR implementation, some of the legacy providers expressed their desire to keep some of the records on paper because using a computer on wheels (COW) was not an effective means of patient care. This hybrid system required full-time HIM employees to gather and scan these paper records into the system. This led to a problem of delinquent medical records because healthcare providers did not always get the records completed promptly. Delays also occurred when the document scanning system was down. Providers and healthcare professionals would not always have access to information needed in these paper records, so HIM staff would sometimes have to find the paper documentation and take it back to the patient care unit. This resulted in lost documents and misplaced patient records. Now, there is a new CEO and a new medical director who are both major supporters of a fully digital record, which would require providers to enter patient information directly into the system. This would reduce the number of paper records being scanned into the system. There would be no need for a dedicated staff to retrieve and scan documents into the system. The younger physicians are thrilled at the idea of a record that they can see in real time to provide patient care. Legacy physicians are not happy about the change but realize that change is inevitable. The medical staffing office and medical director have identified a physician champion to advocate for the record transition and collaborate with the implementation team in creating a training plan for all providers. The CEO and medical director have assured the healthcare providers that they will have scribes available to assist with clinical documentation entry into the new system. The main reason for this transition includes reducing the long turnaround times for completed medical records. This greatly affects the revenue cycle; the manual tracking of deficiencies, which is subject to human error; and the disorganization of records, which could lead to ineffective outcomes if all information is not presented. A fully digital record will automate deficiency tracking, alert staff when records are not completed on time, and keep records organized for easy access. A digital record also means that there will be no need for a policy for the destruction of paper records, which will prevent accidental deletion or overwriting of health and financial information. As the HIM director, you are responsible for working with the IT team to streamline the processes to sundown the hybrid record and implement the new digital record. During this process, you will need to take into consideration the needs of the facility and the staff, as well the events that should be included in the System Development Life Cycle (SDLC) for this project. The transition from a hybrid to digital record will no longer require staff to pick up records from the floor post discharge. Neither will staff members be required to manually assign deficiencies. Retrained staff will need a keen eye for detail in order to recognize physician deficiencies and properly route records for correction. These changes mean you will need to revise the responsibilities for the new roles associated with the new digital system. Requirements Your submission must represent your original work and understanding of the course material. Most performance assessment submissions are automatically scanned through the WGU similarity checker. Students are strongly encouraged to wait for the similarity report to generate after uploading their work and then review it to ensure Academic Authenticity guidelines are met before submitting the file for evaluation. See Understanding Similarity Reports for more information. Grammarly Note: Professional Communication will be automatically assessed through Grammarly for Education in most performance assessments before a student submits work for evaluation. Students are strongly encouraged to review the Grammarly for Education feedback prior to submitting work for evaluation, as the overall submission will not pass without this aspect passing. See Use Grammarly for Education Effectively for more information. Microsoft Files Note: Write your paper in Microsoft Word (.doc or .docx) unless another Microsoft product, or pdf, is specified in the task directions. Tasks may not be submitted as cloud links, such as links to Google Docs, Google Slides, OneDrive, etc. All supporting documentation, such as screenshots and proof of experience, should be collected in a pdf file and submitted separately from the main file. For more information, please see Computer System and Technology Requirements. You must use the rubric to direct the creation of your submission because it provides detailed criteria that will be used to evaluate your work. Each requirement below may be evaluated by more than one rubric aspect. The rubric aspect titles may contain hyperlinks to relevant portions of the course. A. Using the information in the scenario, create a plan for the transition to a fully digital record by doing the following: 1. Describe the issues with clinical documentation in the hybrid record. 2. Explain how a fully digital record will address and solve the issues caused by the hybrid record. 3. Describe how the roles of existing staff members in the HIM department will change with the transition from a hybrid record to a fully digital record. 4. Explain the revised roles and responsibilities of two health information management (HIM) professionals in the Systems Development Life Cycle (SDLC) for this implementation project. B. Acknowledge sources, using in-text citations and references, for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized. C. Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your submission. File Restrictions File name may contain only letters, numbers, spaces, and these symbols: ! – _ . * ‘ ( ) File size limit: 200 MB File types allowed: doc, docx, rtf, xls, xlsx, ppt, pptx, odt, pdf, csv, txt, qt, mov, mpg, avi, mp3, wav, mp4, wma, flv, asf, mpeg, wmv, m4v, svg, tif, tiff, jpeg, jpg, gif, png, zip, rar, tar, 7z Rubric A1:ISSUES IN THE HYBRID RECORD Not Evident The submission does not describe the issues with clinical documentation in the hybrid record in the scenario. Approaching Competence The submission does not accurately describe the issues with clinical documentation in the hybrid record in the scenario. Competent The submission accurately describes the issues with clinical documentation in the hybrid record in the scenario. A2:FULLY DIGITAL AND HYBRID RECORDS Not Evident The submission does not explain how a fully digital record will either address or solve the issues caused by the hybrid record in the scenario. Approaching Competence The submission does not accurately explain how a fully digital record will both address and solve the issues caused by the hybrid record in the scenario. Competent The submission accurately explains how a fully digital record will both address and solve the issues caused by the hybrid record in the scenario. A3:STAFFING AND THE TRANSITION TO A FULLY DIGITAL RECORD Not Evident The submission does not describe how the roles of existing staff members in the HIM department, whose job function are described in the scenario, will change with the transition from a hybrid record to a fully digital record. Approaching Competence The submission does not appropriately describe how the roles of existing staff members in the HIM department, whose job function are described in the scenario, will change with the transition from a hybrid record to a fully digital record, or the changes described are not accurate. Competent The submission appropriately describes how the roles of existing staff members in the HIM department, whose job function are described in the scenario, will change with the transition from a hybrid record to a fully digital record, and the changes described are accurate. A4:ROLES OF HIM PROFESSIONALS Not Evident The submission does not explain the revised roles or responsibilities of 2 HIM professionals in the SDLC for the implementation project described in the scenario. Approaching Competence The submission does not accurately explain the revised roles and responsibilities of 2 HIM professionals in the SDLC for the implementation project described in the scenario, or 1 or more of the explained revised roles or responsibilities are inappropriate for either of the professionals. Competent The submission accurately explains the revised roles and responsibilities of 2 HIM professionals in the SDLC for the implementation project described in the scenario, and all of the explained revised roles and responsibilities are appropriate for both professionals. B:SOURCES Not Evident The submission does not include both in-text citations and a reference list for sources that are quoted, paraphrased, or summarized. Approaching Competence The submission includes in-text citations for sources that are quoted, paraphrased, or summarized and a reference list; however, the citations or reference list is incomplete or inaccurate. Competent The submission includes in-text citations for sources that are properly quoted, paraphrased, or summarized and a reference list that accurately identifies the author, date, title, and source location as available. C:PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATION Not Evident This submission includes pervasive errors in professional communication related to grammar, sentence fluency, contextual spelling, or punctuation, negatively impacting the professional quality and clarity of the writing. Specific errors have been identified by Grammarly for Education under the Correctness category. Approaching Competence This submission includes substantial errors in professional communication related to grammar, sentence fluency, contextual spelling, or punctuation. Specific errors have been identified by Grammarly for Education under the Correctness category. Competent This submission includes satisfactory use of grammar, sentence fluency, contextual spelling, and punctuation, which promote accurate interpretation and understanding.
  • Los nmeros naturales, enteros, racionales y mucho ms

    Aqu hay informacin sobre los nmeros naturales, enteros, racionales, irracionales, reales, paso de fracciones a nmero decimal, paso de decimal exacto o peridico a fraccin, y un poco ms.

    Requirements:

  • Einstein’s Physics Compare/Contrast Paper

    see attached

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): PSY 4060 (5).docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Clinical Documentation Training Resource

    see attached

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): HIM 4135 (5).docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • WK 4 NEURO REFLECTION

    SEE ATTACHD

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Xmas-Purgatory.pdf, Reflection Example 1 (1).docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • bibliography

    Writing Assignment #2 Annotated Bibliography

    (125 points; 13 hours of engagement) Due by 11:59 pm on Saturday of Week 4

    The purpose of this assignment is to engage with the research literature about the Program Essential Question. Review the academic databases available through the Concordia University library and find ten peer-reviewed articles about effective or exemplary teaching five about teaching in general and five focused on teaching learners who have experienced trauma in particular. In the paper, provide the APA style reference for each article followed by a brief descriptive and evaluative paragraph the annotation. The annotation aims to inform the reader of the article’s content, the study’s methodology (if applicable), and the article’s relevance, including comments toward answering the Program’s Essential Question.

    Each annotation should be between 125 and 175 words (not counting the reference itself). APA format is required throughout the paper, including a title page, etc. There should be an Introduction but no Conclusion. A reference section should not be included, as the APA-formatted citations are in the body of the paper. An example of an Annotated Bibliography may be found in My Courses.