Author: admin

  • Surrogate pregnancy: Should it be used ondemand or due to he…

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Argument20Research20Paper20Outline20Worksheet 2.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Protecting Human Subjects.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): PHRP (2) (3).pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Critical Family Timeline

    Critical Memory Work In this part of the course, youll reflect on your own life and family story to explore how who you are has been shaped by history, community, and larger systems around you. Through assignments like the Critical Self-Autobiography and the Critical Family Timeline, youll think about memory not just as something personalbut as something that connects you to bigger questions were exploring in class about identity, justice, and belonging. Detailed descriptions and instructions for this course assignment, including the Critical Family Timeline Planning Table and Student Checklist,

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Doing a Timeline FamilyTreecom.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Health Affairs Paper

    Here are the details and everything I wrote initially

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Health Affairs Paper.docx, Health Affairs Paper.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Philosophy

    Assignment Instructions

    Download and complete the worksheet provided below. In this 2-part worksheet, you will:

    Write a well-developed paragraph comparing fallacy and validity.

    Find two examples of formal fallacy and two examples of informal fallacy.

    Please read the worksheet carefully to ensure you meet all requirements.

    PHI 350 Module 6 WorksheetDownload PHI 350 Module 6 Worksheet

    Must be submitted as a Word file.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): PHI 350 Module 6 Worksheet.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Effecting Change

    In Module 1, we looked at the Complexity Theory and its influence on Nursing Leadership. In Module 2 we looked at how organizational structure influences nursing leadership in complex health care environments. Building on this previous content, in this major assignment you will apply both the Complexity theory and MagnetTM principles to impact sustained change in complex healthcare environments. Choose a prompt below and in your own words, write a 5-6 paged paper answering the questions provided. Papers must be essay style using APA format, including Title Page and references. In addition to your textbook and the ANCC Magnet Model, use at least one other relevant source, less than five years old for this major assignment. The use of I is allowed. Post your work to the DropBox by the date listed in the Course Calendar.

    Select a prompt below:

    You are the nurse manager in a large urban hospital with a highly diverse patient population. Currently, your units are experiencing high readmission rates, medication errors and staff burnout. Pick one of these issues and analyze it using the questions below.

    OR

    You are the nurse manager of a large urban hospital-affiliated outpatient oncology clinical with a highly diverse patient population. Currently, your clinic is experiencing long wait times, inconsistent patient education, and sub-optimal follow-up on treatment plans. Pick one of these issues and analyze it using the questions below.

    Answer the following questions:

    Using your own words provide a thorough explanation of the Complexity theory. How does interaction influence behavior, process, and outcomes in the ever-changing complex health care environment.

    In your own words explain the MagnetTM framework? Pick three forces of magnetism that could assist in the issue you selected. How do these three forces support change in a health care system?

    Does the Complexity theory compliment the MagnetTM framework? If so, how do they complement one another? If not, how are they different?

    How does integrating either the Magnet TM framework or the Complexity theory assist the nurse in disseminating new ideas related to the issue you selected in the healthcare environment?

    What strategies can be implemented to encourage sustained change? What realistic methods can be used to engage all areas of nursing in the change?

    Identify and discuss three strategies that would support implementation of new ideas and for each strategy propose detailed and effective methods to engage nursing.

  • POST CONFERENCE EVENT

    TOPIC

    Moral distress in nursing practice in LTC

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Sheridan PN Professional Practice Conference Poster Event W261.docx, Sheridan PN Professional Practice Conference Poster Event – Rubric W261.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Management Question

    Module 5 Assignment Instructions: TOWS and SFAS

    The TOWS matrix is the most important step to move into the formulation of strategies. It is based on the SFAS table and requires thinking on strategies that for example uses strengths to take advantage of opportunities or strengths to minimize threats.

    You have already completed the SFAS table from BUS485A. Use that table to create the TOWS. The template for TOWS Matrix is TemplateSA-EXH7-TOWS.docx available in Course Resources and the attachments here.

    The TOWS matrix supports the writing of Section V.

    Review of how the SFAS table was built for BUS485A

    The SFAS (Strategic Factors Analysis Summary) table is Exhibit 3 of your SA.

    Complete the SFAS. Focus on identifying the 10 most important strategic factors. Be sure to keep your SWOT tags on each SF.

    Revise the weights to add to 1.0 and the ratings as needed.

    You must complete the Comments Column in the table. Repeat or revise your comments for each strategic factor from the previous EFAS and IFAS tables.

    Be sure to explain WHY it is a strategic factor; a quantified estimate of the potential impact (QPI) in the future of the SF; how you assigned the weight; and how you assigned the rating; and for Internal SF identify the Core Competencies (CC) and Distinctive Competencies (DC). Use the same quantitative analysis that you did for the EFAS and IFAS to estimate and quantify the potential impacts in the future; the impact on the firms future survival; and how well or how badly the firm is handling the SF right now.

    Use the SFAS Template provided in Module 5. These are just templates with words of reference. Use your own thinking and words.

    How to Create a TOWS Matrix

    A good explanation to transition from SFAS to TOWS is in reading TOWS Matrix Handout.docx.

    Using the SFAS you submitted for BUS485A, create a 2×2 matrix for the TOWS matrix as it is shown in TemplateSA-EXH7-TOWS.docx.

    Make sure you have at least 2 strategies in each cell of the 2×2 matrix.

    Download SA-WritingTemplate-BUS485B.docx

    If you have not downloaded yet SA-WritingTemplate-BUS485B.docx from Course Resources/The Strategic Audit, do it from the attachments here. This writing template must be used to write all sections of the Strategic Audit in this capstone. Drafts of your writing are shared as part of Discussion One in each module, and you will get feedback from other students and the instructor there.

    The TOWS matrix supports the writing of Section V.

    Requirements: See Instructions

  • Critical analysis of research methodology and strategic devi…

    CRITICAL ANALYSIS: STRATEGIC DEVIATION ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS Please forgive the long letter; I didnt have time to write a short one. Blaise Pascal, French mathematician, religious philosopher, and physicist. (1623 1662) OVERVIEW This assignment requires you to critically analyze the provided peer reviewed scholarly journal article in this weeks reading drawing on the knowledge you have acquired regarding Paul and Elders Pathway for Critical Thinking and adopting the terminology of Blooms Taxonomy: In critiquing theory and methods to evaluate the studys conclusions which will involve researching additional peer reviewed scholarly journal articles to present a balanced 360o view of the arguments; Synthesize independently researched peer reviewed scholarly journal articles for a coherent response that challenges and supports the main line of thinking and identifies any gaps in the literature. Consider and reflect on a critique of the research methods to examine the quality of the findings or conclusions of the author(s). This involves examining the methodological strengths and limitations of the research and how they might affect the arguments. Consider the rigor of the studys design – any sampling errors, the quality of any instruments used to measure or gather primary data, and the appropriateness of the statistical procedure. To synthesize your critiques findings, consider broader related themes, any apparent inconsistencies, and patterns or trends that align with or contradict mainstream thinking. INSTRUCTIONS Once you have analyzed and evaluated the peer reviewed journal article, complete the table addressing each prompt provided and within the stipulated word/sentence requirements. As with all academic writing at the doctoral level, be selective, direct and succinct to demonstrate a deeper understanding of the key issues. Length of assignment: One to two pages plus the completed Critical Analysis: Strategic Deviation Template. The Critical Analysis: Strategic Deviation Template can be found in the assignment prompt. Format of assignment: Current APA format and style Double line spacing with no additional spaces between paragraphs. No block or direct quotes Submit only a word document (no pdf files) 1-inch margins Acceptable Sources for References/Citations: Three peer-reviewed scholarly journal articles published within 5 years. BUSI 710 Page 2 of 2 Do not include books, blogs, professional or trade magazines, websites, etc. Prepare a one-two page narrative style paper to discuss the peer reviewed journal article incorporating your answers to each template prompt (found in the assignment prompt). Your completed template should be placed in the appendix to support the narrative portion of the assignment. Submit as a single document. Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool. Template CRITICAL ANALYSIS: STRATEGIC DEVIATION TEMPLATE Research problem. One sentence Purpose statement. One sentence Overarching research question and/or hypothesis. One-two sentences Population/sample. Two sentences Leading theory through which the problem and results are framed and interpreted. Provide lead descriptor and its main premise. One-two sentences. Research approach/design/method, e.g., quantitative/correlational/survey methodology for a multiple regression analysis; qualitative case study utilizing semi- structured open-ended interviews, archival data, and observation; mixed methods utilizing a quantitative survey data and case study semi-structured interviews for deep contextual data. (20-50 words). Constructs provide lead descriptor. Variables, if any. For each variable, identify the type i.e., dependent, independent, mediating, or moderating. (20-50 words). Main limitations and assumptions (Two to three sentences). Recommend follow up research or related problem to expand on or close gaps in knowledge in the broad topic area. Cite at least two supporting peer reviewed research articles single sentence. Cite at least one peer reviewed journal article that presents an alternative view single sentence. (Three supporting scholarly articles in total)
  • Week 7 – Discussion: Short-term Financing & Mergers

    In this Discussion, please reflect on the week’s topics. Choose a topic from Chapters 18, 19, or 21.

    Your research should provide a measure of information about the topics significance to the current business climate. At least two reference sources should be used to support a substantive and detailed response. Make sure to give credit to your sources, though formal citations are not required. Please be thorough and respectful on the discussion board. Check your grammar, punctuation and spelling before posting.

    Reference sources must be limited to the Wall Street Journal, Financial Times, New York Times, Barrons, Investors Business Daily, The Economist, or an academic journal article from a respected accounting or finance journal.

    See attached for the topic

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): topic.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.