Author: admin

  • Essay Module 1

    Part 1: (10%)

    For this first learning journal, write a two-page reflection (single space, 3+ pages double space) on what you have read and thought about for Module 1, focusing on the intertwined issues of agriculture (food production), environment, power and authority in the river societies of Mesopotamia, Egypt, the Indus Valley and the Yellow and Yangzi Rivers.

    Each module has an overarching set of themes, and in this first module, we have discussed agriculture, climate and food production, new technologies, social organization and leadership, and religious belief not as individual ideas/concepts, but as interrelated issues. As you read and think and review resources, you are making meaning of how you understand these issues, and where you see points of connection within a module, and as the course progresses, points of connection between modules.

    Learning journals are not formal essays. You may write in the first person if you wish. You have two pages approximately to explore the ideas that you have found interesting in this first module, based on what you have read/reviewed and what we have discussed in class. Your journal is a place for you to think about the new ideas and issues that you are exploring, and what you are curious to know more about.

    You should cite specific sources of information from the textbook and other resources (online sources, articles from databases) as footnotes, and a brief list of what youve read and watched. For this first journal, you may choose any format for the list of resources, but be consistent in the way that you list the resources. Please use simple footnotes in the first assignment (page number is required). This is a short video illustration of how to add footnotes:

    This learning journal is not being evaluated on whether you can summarize the module or simply repeat the lecture contents. Narrative containing “void talk” (full of big ideas without concrete, detailed cases and explanations) will result in a very low grade. Avoid the following example:

    1. I did not know A before

    2. Now I understand A, B, and C after the module

    3. A, B, and C are important because they changed the history

    A Strong journal does not show conclusions as if they were obvious from the start. A Strong journal tells readers the process of your thinking, including moments of confusion or tension. You may refer to specific lecture content or questions raised in the lecture, and explain why certain puzzles stood out to you and how you worked through them. In short, you should “show your thinking” in your journal.

    The grading criteria for this assignment are heavily based on the depth and specificity of your reflection, particularly in the following areas: how clearly you integrate specific lecture materials and examples, how specific your discussion of course details, and how thoroughly you demonstrate your own thought process rather than simply repeating course content.

    Part 2: (5%)

    In this second part of the learning journal, compare the structure of the textbook with my lecture module organization.

    Consider how the textbook structures regions, themes, or periods, and how the course lectures reorganize or rearrange those materials. For example, you might think about why certain regionssuch as Asiaare treated as separate sections in the textbook, but in my lectures, they were included in a large picture of Eurasia.

    Please answer these points:

    Your goal is not to tell which structure is correct” or better (Of course, you have the total freedom to express your idea on this). Instead, analyze: What is each version trying to teach?

    What is the advantage of the textbooks way? What is the advantage of the lectures way?

    What kind of history is easier to understand in the textbook? What becomes easier to see when you use the “big picture” lecture style?

    What is my module-based structure trying to emphasize?

    Which way is helping you learn better right now? Don’t just say I like A or B. Explain how that specific structure helps you understand the history more clearly.

    Use specific examples (like a certain chapter or a specific lecture topic) to back up your points/argument.

    Attention: AI is NOT ALLOWED in this assignment.

    Your first learning journal is due on February 1 and is worth 15% of your final grade.

    Please submit the learning journal as a PDF to the Blackboard assignment dropbox.

  • Essay Module 1

    Part 1: (10%)

    For this first learning journal, write a two-page reflection (single space, 3+ pages double space) on what you have read and thought about for Module 1, focusing on the intertwined issues of agriculture (food production), environment, power and authority in the river societies of Mesopotamia, Egypt, the Indus Valley and the Yellow and Yangzi Rivers.

    Each module has an overarching set of themes, and in this first module, we have discussed agriculture, climate and food production, new technologies, social organization and leadership, and religious belief not as individual ideas/concepts, but as interrelated issues. As you read and think and review resources, you are making meaning of how you understand these issues, and where you see points of connection within a module, and as the course progresses, points of connection between modules.

    Learning journals are not formal essays. You may write in the first person if you wish. You have two pages approximately to explore the ideas that you have found interesting in this first module, based on what you have read/reviewed and what we have discussed in class. Your journal is a place for you to think about the new ideas and issues that you are exploring, and what you are curious to know more about.

    You should cite specific sources of information from the textbook and other resources (online sources, articles from databases) as footnotes, and a brief list of what youve read and watched. For this first journal, you may choose any format for the list of resources, but be consistent in the way that you list the resources. Please use simple footnotes in the first assignment (page number is required). This is a short video illustration of how to add footnotes:

    This learning journal is not being evaluated on whether you can summarize the module or simply repeat the lecture contents. Narrative containing “void talk” (full of big ideas without concrete, detailed cases and explanations) will result in a very low grade. Avoid the following example:

    1. I did not know A before

    2. Now I understand A, B, and C after the module

    3. A, B, and C are important because they changed the history

    A Strong journal does not show conclusions as if they were obvious from the start. A Strong journal tells readers the process of your thinking, including moments of confusion or tension. You may refer to specific lecture content or questions raised in the lecture, and explain why certain puzzles stood out to you and how you worked through them. In short, you should “show your thinking” in your journal.

    The grading criteria for this assignment are heavily based on the depth and specificity of your reflection, particularly in the following areas: how clearly you integrate specific lecture materials and examples, how specific your discussion of course details, and how thoroughly you demonstrate your own thought process rather than simply repeating course content.

    Part 2: (5%)

    In this second part of the learning journal, compare the structure of the textbook with my lecture module organization.

    Consider how the textbook structures regions, themes, or periods, and how the course lectures reorganize or rearrange those materials. For example, you might think about why certain regionssuch as Asiaare treated as separate sections in the textbook, but in my lectures, they were included in a large picture of Eurasia.

    Please answer these points:

    Your goal is not to tell which structure is correct” or better (Of course, you have the total freedom to express your idea on this). Instead, analyze: What is each version trying to teach?

    What is the advantage of the textbooks way? What is the advantage of the lectures way?

    What kind of history is easier to understand in the textbook? What becomes easier to see when you use the “big picture” lecture style?

    What is my module-based structure trying to emphasize?

    Which way is helping you learn better right now? Don’t just say I like A or B. Explain how that specific structure helps you understand the history more clearly.

    Use specific examples (like a certain chapter or a specific lecture topic) to back up your points/argument.

    Attention: AI is NOT ALLOWED in this assignment.

    Your first learning journal is due on February 1 and is worth 15% of your final grade.

    Please submit the learning journal as a PDF to the Blackboard assignment dropbox.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): HISt 1101 week 3.pdf, Week 4territorial Kingdom.pdf, HIST 1101 lecture 2.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • U.S History 1865

    Requirements: Very Detailed

  • BA 360 Organizational Fundraising Case for Support Course Pr…

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Final Project Guidance – BA 360 Organizational Fundraising V2.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Policing

    Each paper must confirm to APA guidelines. This is a very strict requirement and can constitute a possible 20% deduction on the paper if not followed. The paper should be 10-12 pages in length. Your work must be in Times New Roman or Ariel, 12-point font, and double spaced.

    Incorporate seven (7) peer reviewed journal articles into the paper. In order to get points for incorporating these articles, you must discuss them. Simply citing the article along with your writing is NOT sufficient. You may use books, other court cases, government reports, etc., but they do not count toward the seven (7). For your own protection, you may wish to incorporate more than 7 to be sure you cover this requirement. Students must use APA appropriate reference citations and sources must be listed in a reference page. The reference and title pages will not count toward the length requirement.

  • Journal Article Review Grading

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Journal Article Review Assignment Instructions.docx, Journal Article Review Grading Rubric.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Analysis assignment

    Data Analysis Assignment

    (Do not be alarmed by the size of this assignment: I try to break down the steps as much as possible and explain everything you may need to know!)

    The purpose of this assignment is to give you hands-on experience with the research process and working with data. Since PSYC220 (Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences) is a prerequisite for Experimental Psychology, you should have been introduced to the skills necessary to complete this assignment.

    In order to analyze the data, you may use one of the following methods. Please note that everything I ask of you can be completed by hand! The other software listed will simply expedite the process if you have used them before.

    SPSS

    -Excel

    -Rstudio

    -Calculations by hand

    The excel file provided for this assignment is formatted for easy SPSS use. If you do not have a subscription to SPSS, the software is available for free on campus or through a remote browser (Citrix: while I do not have experience using the remote PC, I have included a PDF about it). If you do the calculations by hand please submit a picture/scan of your calculations this helps me grant partial credit if necessary. Generative AI is not an option for this assignment.

    The study: Your professor wants to study how personality impacts book preferences. They randomly sampled five members of their local book club and asked them to complete a personality inventory (The Big Five Inventory BFI). Then, your professor recorded each participants book ratings over the course of twelve months.

    The files you will need:

    -2026bookdata – the data your professor recorded from the five participants. This could be imported into SPSS or used as is.

    Coding information:

    SUBJECT: For confidentiality, each participants name is replaced with an ID

    GENDER: The gender of each participant. Coded as 0=Female and 1=Male

    AGE: Self Explanatory

    FORMAT: How a participant consumes each book. Coded as follows:

    1-Paper/kindle

    2-Audio

    GENRE: Each participants favorite book genre. Coded as follows:

    1-Fantasy/Sci-Fi

    2-Romance

    3-Historical Fiction

    4-Horror

    5-Nonfiction

    BOOK1-12: 12 months of book ratings

    BFI1-44: The 44 BFI items in order. These items have not been reverse scored yet.

    -Personality-BigFiveInventory- an explanation and coding guide for the personality data. Item numbers correspond with the number presented as the column header in the excel sheet.

    Note about reverse scoring: When the scoring guide says 6R or any number with R after it, it is asking you to reverse score the item. This means you will need to change the calculation to the opposite answer from what the participant recorded. Here is a guide:

    What the participant said -> reverse scored item

    1 ->5

    2->4

    3->3

    4->2

    5->1

    -Citrix-for-Students- Only if you need to use the remote PC for SPSS.

    THE ACTUAL ASSIGNMENT (Answer the questions below):

    HYPOTHESES

    1.Before we begin, do you spot any issues with the study design? If so, what are they? Consider any potential confounding variables or sampling strategies.

    2.As stated, your professor is looking at personality traits and book ratings. First, your professor wants to know if there is a relationship between the demographic variable of age and their average book rating.

    HYPOTHESIS 1

    A. What is the null hypothesis?

    B. What is the alternative/research hypothesis?

    C. Is this research hypothesis directional or nondirectional?

    D. What is the predictor (IV) and the criterion (DV)?

    E. Which statistical test would you use to answer this hypothesis? Why? (OPTIONS: Independent t-test, One-Way ANOVA, Correlation, or Regression)

    HYPOTHESIS 2

    Next, your professor is curious to see if there is a significant difference in average book ratings based on the participants format for reading.

    A. What is the null hypothesis?

    B. What is the alternative/research hypothesis?

    C. What are the independent and dependent variables?

    D.Which statistical test would you use to answer this hypothesis? Why? (OPTIONS: Independent t-test, One-Way ANOVA, Correlation, or Regression)

    HYPOTHESIS 3

    Finally, your professor also wants to know if each of the different BFI Personality traits are related their overall book ratings. While we ideally would be investigating all five traits, for the purposes of the question below please focus on the trait of neuroticism.

    A. What is the null hypothesis?

    B. What is the alternative/research hypothesis?

    C. Is this research hypothesis directional or nondirectional?

    D. What is the predictor (IV) and the criterion (DV)?

    E. Which statistical test would you use to answer this hypothesis? Why? (OPTIONS: Independent t-test, One-Way ANOVA, Correlation, or Regression)

    DATA CLEANING & VISUALIZATION

    3.In order to run our analyses, you will need to make average scores and scale scores. Recode the necessary items and fill in the chart below. You will need these columns in your excel sheet as well.

    Subject

    Age

    Format

    Avg. Book Rating

    BFI- Extraversion

    BFI- Agreeableness

    BFI- Conscientiousness

    BFI- Neuroticism

    BFI- Openness

    1001

    1002

    1003

    1004

    1005

    3.Look at these average scores and scale scores:

    A. Which participant is the most critical of book selections?

    B. Which participant is the most extroverted?

    C. On average, what score does each book club book receive? Is this number surprising to you? Why or why not?

    D. On average, how open is this book club to new potential books? How much does this impact results?

    E. Are there any outliers that may impact the overall data? What would you hypothetically do to handle this data?

    4.Create a bar chart showing the average book rating separated by favorite genre (creative freedom is allowed so long as the chart is interpretable). What information can you glean from this data visualization?

    ANALYSIS

    5.Compute the test statistic for Hypothesis 1

    A. Please report the test statistic and p-value like you would in an academic paper.

    B. Based on this result, what decision would you make regarding the null hypothesis? How do you know?

    C. Create a scatterplot of the results.

    D. If I told you that your professor rejected the null hypothesis then did they make the correct decision or make an error? If they made an error, which one did they make?

    6.Compute the test statistic for Hypothesis 2

    A. Please report the test statistic and p-value like you would in an academic paper.

    B. Based on this result, what decision would you make regarding the null hypothesis? How do you know?

    C. If I told you that your professor rejected the null hypothesis then did they make the correct decision or make an error? If they made an error, which one did they make?

    7.Compute the test statistic for Hypothesis 3

    A. Please report the test statistic and p-value like you would in an academic paper.

    B. Based on this result, what decision would you make regarding the null hypothesis? How do you know?

    C. Create a scatterplot of the results.

    D. If I told you that your professor rejected the null hypothesis then did they make the correct decision or make an error? If they made an error, which one did they make?

    8.Do these results surprise you? Why or why not?

    9.If you were to replicate this experiment, what would you do the same/differently? Why?

    10.What did you learn from this assignment and the data cleaning/analysis process? What did you find easy/difficult?

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Podcast Response 2.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Analysis assignment

    Data Analysis Assignment

    (Do not be alarmed by the size of this assignment: I try to break down the steps as much as possible and explain everything you may need to know!)

    The purpose of this assignment is to give you hands-on experience with the research process and working with data. Since PSYC220 (Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences) is a prerequisite for Experimental Psychology, you should have been introduced to the skills necessary to complete this assignment.

    In order to analyze the data, you may use one of the following methods. Please note that everything I ask of you can be completed by hand! The other software listed will simply expedite the process if you have used them before.

    SPSS

    -Excel

    -Rstudio

    -Calculations by hand

    The excel file provided for this assignment is formatted for easy SPSS use. If you do not have a subscription to SPSS, the software is available for free on campus or through a remote browser (Citrix: while I do not have experience using the remote PC, I have included a PDF about it). If you do the calculations by hand please submit a picture/scan of your calculations this helps me grant partial credit if necessary. Generative AI is not an option for this assignment.

    The study: Your professor wants to study how personality impacts book preferences. They randomly sampled five members of their local book club and asked them to complete a personality inventory (The Big Five Inventory BFI). Then, your professor recorded each participants book ratings over the course of twelve months.

    The files you will need:

    -2026bookdata – the data your professor recorded from the five participants. This could be imported into SPSS or used as is.

    Coding information:

    SUBJECT: For confidentiality, each participants name is replaced with an ID

    GENDER: The gender of each participant. Coded as 0=Female and 1=Male

    AGE: Self Explanatory

    FORMAT: How a participant consumes each book. Coded as follows:

    1-Paper/kindle

    2-Audio

    GENRE: Each participants favorite book genre. Coded as follows:

    1-Fantasy/Sci-Fi

    2-Romance

    3-Historical Fiction

    4-Horror

    5-Nonfiction

    BOOK1-12: 12 months of book ratings

    BFI1-44: The 44 BFI items in order. These items have not been reverse scored yet.

    -Personality-BigFiveInventory- an explanation and coding guide for the personality data. Item numbers correspond with the number presented as the column header in the excel sheet.

    Note about reverse scoring: When the scoring guide says 6R or any number with R after it, it is asking you to reverse score the item. This means you will need to change the calculation to the opposite answer from what the participant recorded. Here is a guide:

    What the participant said -> reverse scored item

    1 ->5

    2->4

    3->3

    4->2

    5->1

    -Citrix-for-Students- Only if you need to use the remote PC for SPSS.

    THE ACTUAL ASSIGNMENT (Answer the questions below):

    HYPOTHESES

    1.Before we begin, do you spot any issues with the study design? If so, what are they? Consider any potential confounding variables or sampling strategies.

    2.As stated, your professor is looking at personality traits and book ratings. First, your professor wants to know if there is a relationship between the demographic variable of age and their average book rating.

    HYPOTHESIS 1

    A. What is the null hypothesis?

    B. What is the alternative/research hypothesis?

    C. Is this research hypothesis directional or nondirectional?

    D. What is the predictor (IV) and the criterion (DV)?

    E. Which statistical test would you use to answer this hypothesis? Why? (OPTIONS: Independent t-test, One-Way ANOVA, Correlation, or Regression)

    HYPOTHESIS 2

    Next, your professor is curious to see if there is a significant difference in average book ratings based on the participants format for reading.

    A. What is the null hypothesis?

    B. What is the alternative/research hypothesis?

    C. What are the independent and dependent variables?

    D.Which statistical test would you use to answer this hypothesis? Why? (OPTIONS: Independent t-test, One-Way ANOVA, Correlation, or Regression)

    HYPOTHESIS 3

    Finally, your professor also wants to know if each of the different BFI Personality traits are related their overall book ratings. While we ideally would be investigating all five traits, for the purposes of the question below please focus on the trait of neuroticism.

    A. What is the null hypothesis?

    B. What is the alternative/research hypothesis?

    C. Is this research hypothesis directional or nondirectional?

    D. What is the predictor (IV) and the criterion (DV)?

    E. Which statistical test would you use to answer this hypothesis? Why? (OPTIONS: Independent t-test, One-Way ANOVA, Correlation, or Regression)

    DATA CLEANING & VISUALIZATION

    3.In order to run our analyses, you will need to make average scores and scale scores. Recode the necessary items and fill in the chart below. You will need these columns in your excel sheet as well.

    Subject

    Age

    Format

    Avg. Book Rating

    BFI- Extraversion

    BFI- Agreeableness

    BFI- Conscientiousness

    BFI- Neuroticism

    BFI- Openness

    1001

    1002

    1003

    1004

    1005

    3.Look at these average scores and scale scores:

    A. Which participant is the most critical of book selections?

    B. Which participant is the most extroverted?

    C. On average, what score does each book club book receive? Is this number surprising to you? Why or why not?

    D. On average, how open is this book club to new potential books? How much does this impact results?

    E. Are there any outliers that may impact the overall data? What would you hypothetically do to handle this data?

    4.Create a bar chart showing the average book rating separated by favorite genre (creative freedom is allowed so long as the chart is interpretable). What information can you glean from this data visualization?

    ANALYSIS

    5.Compute the test statistic for Hypothesis 1

    A. Please report the test statistic and p-value like you would in an academic paper.

    B. Based on this result, what decision would you make regarding the null hypothesis? How do you know?

    C. Create a scatterplot of the results.

    D. If I told you that your professor rejected the null hypothesis then did they make the correct decision or make an error? If they made an error, which one did they make?

    6.Compute the test statistic for Hypothesis 2

    A. Please report the test statistic and p-value like you would in an academic paper.

    B. Based on this result, what decision would you make regarding the null hypothesis? How do you know?

    C. If I told you that your professor rejected the null hypothesis then did they make the correct decision or make an error? If they made an error, which one did they make?

    7.Compute the test statistic for Hypothesis 3

    A. Please report the test statistic and p-value like you would in an academic paper.

    B. Based on this result, what decision would you make regarding the null hypothesis? How do you know?

    C. Create a scatterplot of the results.

    D. If I told you that your professor rejected the null hypothesis then did they make the correct decision or make an error? If they made an error, which one did they make?

    8.Do these results surprise you? Why or why not?

    9.If you were to replicate this experiment, what would you do the same/differently? Why?

    10.What did you learn from this assignment and the data cleaning/analysis process? What did you find easy/difficult?

  • What is Philosophy

    Philosophy is a HUGE area of study and it has been going on for at least two THOUSAND years. In universities in the United States and Europe, there is definitely a fixed idea of the history of philosophy.To say the history of philosophy is Euro-Centric would be an understatement. Huge areas of philosophy in China, India, Africa, Indigenous Americas, and elsewhere are often seen as secondary. And even in the “Western” canon, women and minority groups are still deeply under-represented. Things are getting a bit better (in the last 20 years or so) but they are still not great.But in my view, we still need to understand the standard history of philosophy EVEN if it does need to be fixed. It is the water we are swimming in ALL OF THE TIME. Politics, economics, and pretty much everything began with a philosophical ideal. And we should know what they are.So watch this short overview of philosophy video ( Video link: ) And for our FIRST WRITTEN assignment :Pick one of the areas of philosophy (about 30 are listed in the video) from the video (What is Philosophy from the youtube link above ) and do a LITTLE extra research. THENWrite a short (2 Pages, Double Spaced) paper explaining what you learned.
  • Carbonfootprints

    A script writing for a two minute video that speaks about carbon accountability and global supply chain

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): video script.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.