Bright Academic Experts

Author: admin

  • IMPROVEMENT OF THE TEACHER CERTIFICATION PROCESS: ANALYSIS O…

    A survey has been conducted on the ORGANIZATION OF TEACHERS’ CERTIFICATION PROCESS regarding the organization of the certification process for secondary school teachers in Azerbaijan. An article must be written based on the results of this survey. The article should fully comply with the requirements of Scopus-indexed journals.

    The materials titled ‘my own SPSS analysis’, ‘Teacher Certification Model Development’, ‘Leadership’, ‘Quality’ (the model is originally developed by the author and should be presented as a proposal in the article), have been translated from Azerbaijani to English using AI.

    To better understand the core materials related to the topic within the Azerbaijani context, refer to the ‘Azerbaijan_Teacher Management System’ material. Subsequently, in the literature review section, you may discuss the Georgia Teacher Management System, Moldova Teacher Management System, Turkey Teacher Management System, and Kazakhstan Teacher Management System.

    I am uploading the SPSS fileplease examine the analyses and verify their accuracy. Perform interesting inferential statistics and compelling statistical analyses that enhance the article’s appeal and engagement. The material must be completely original and AI-free.

  • International agreement paper

    DHS works closely with international partners, including foreign governments, major multilateral organizations, and global businesses, to strengthen the homeland security of the United States. These agreements involve international trade, security, travel, and global economies. For example, DHS is engaged internationally and has stationed homeland personnel in over 75 foreign nations.

    Select one of DHSs international agreements and provide background, the purpose and benefits of the agreement, the key stakeholders, and the terms of the agreement. In your conclusion, make a recommendation if DHS should remain in the agreement and if so, should the agreement be expanded.

    For background, review

    You will prepare a six- to eight-page paper using the format specified in the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.) with six references.

    Note:

    The link has important information that could be used for the type of agreement I need to choose (United States Department of Homeland security DHS Strengthen International Aviation Security)

    The paper should focus on meeting the instructions above and highlight the agreement on the designated topic with other countries.

    Attached is a copy of the grading rubric for reference.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): International Engagement in Homeland Security – HMLS 416 6381 Homeland Security and International Relations (2262) – UMGC Learning Management System.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Available orders

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): journal class (1).docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Available orders

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): D223(V2) Task 2 template.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Moral and Ethical decisions

    Moral and Ethical Decisions

    While ethical principles guide moral decision-making, legal standards set enforceable rules. Sometimes, ethical obligations may conflict with legal requirements, requiring careful navigation by healthcare professionals.

    Reflect on an ethical or medicolegal experience or issue you have encountered as a nurse or during your nurse practitioner training.

    Describe the situation in detail, including the ethical or legal dilemma involved. Share your personal feelings and thoughts about the topic, and discuss how you addressed or would address such a situation in practice. Consider the principles of ethics, patient rights, legal responsibilities, and cultural sensitivity in your reflection.

    Guide for Writing Your Ethical/Medicolegal Reflection

    1. Describe the Situation Clearly- WILL BE ATTACHED IN A WORD DOCUMENT TO USE

    Briefly explain the clinical scenario or issue you encountered.

    Include brief relevant details such as the setting, patient population, and your role. Do not share any information that violates HIPAA.

    Identify the Ethical or Medicolegal Issue

    1. What specific dilemma or concern arose?
    2. Was there a conflict between patient rights, family wishes, legal obligations, or institutional policies?

    Reflect on Your Feelings and Reactions

    1. How did the situation make you feel? (e.g., confused, frustrated, worried, conflicted)
    2. Why did you feel that way?
    3. Did your feelings change as you thought more about the situation?

    Analyze the Ethical Principles Involved

    1. Consider principles such as autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice.
    2. How did these principles influence your perspective or actions?

    Discuss How You Managed or Would Manage the Situation

    1. What steps did you take or would you take to address the issue?
    2. Did you consult with colleagues, supervisors, or ethics committees?
    3. How did you balance legal responsibilities with ethical considerations?

    Conclude with Personal Insights

    1. What did you learn from this experience?
    2. How has it influenced your approach to similar situations in the future?

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): D223(V2) Task 2 template.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Healthcare Policy and Economics

    These are links provided by my university for this assignment:

    For Federal: https://www.congress.gov/ then click “Legislation”.

    For State: https://www.ncsl.org/health/state-public-health-legislation-database

    https://legiscan.com/

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): D223(V2) Task 2 template.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • 10 th important questions

    Ask 10th English question simply answer so easy

    Requirements:

  • Argumentative essay

    Touchstone 4: Argumentative Essay

    before you start

    Consider revisiting the tutorial . Just like in previous Touchstones, your stance needs to be stated in a thesis statement and your evidence in body paragraphs should work to support your claim. For help citing evidence in body paragraphs, revisit the tutorial to learn how to quote and paraphrase sources using APA style.

    ASSIGNMENT: Write a 4-6 page (approximately 1000-1500 words) argumentative essay arguing one side or stance of an academically appropriate debate using the classical model supported by evidence and research. If the writing exceeds the 1500 word maximum, it will be returned back for revision.

    Helpful Links:

    CopyLeaks Originality Checker: All writing will be checked for originality. Ensure that all references are credible and include page and paragraph numbers if the source is longer than four pages. If a source cannot be accessed by a grader, you might need to provide digital proof that you possess the source (for example, a photo of the print book). Text from any third party source is prohibited, including internet or chatbot searches, without proper APA-style citations. Focus on developing your own ideas and use evidence sparingly to support your own original claims, following the classical model of argumentation.

    A. Directions

    Step 1. Choose a Topic

    Today, there are many different debates being had all around the world about topics that affect our personal, professional, civic, and/or academic lives. Some of these debates have been such hot topics for so long that it has become very difficult to add to the conversation with new and original ideas or stances to take. To move beyond this trend, we have created a list of topics that may not be written about for this Touchstone. This includes example topics that are used in Unit 4. Feel free to access a tutor if you would like support choosing a topic for this essay.

    Please AVOID choosing any of the following topics:

    • Abortion Rights
    • Animal Testing (Unit 4 example)
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Climate Change (Unit 4 example)
    • Belief in God(s) or Afterlife(s)
    • Death Penalty / Capital Punishment
    • Euthanasia / Assisted Suicide
    • Fad Diets (e.g., Keto, etc.)
    • Funding/Defunding Law Enforcement
    • Greatest of All Time Topics
    • Immigration
    • Legal Alcohol/Tobacco Age
    • Legalization of Marijuana
    • Legalization of Sex Work
    • Paying Student Athletes
    • Second Amendment Rights (i.e., Gun Control)
    • Social Medias Impact on Mental Health
    • Universal Healthcare
    • Vaccines

    Choosing to write about any of the above topics will result in returned Touchstone for a single chance to resubmit.

    Step 2. Write an Argumentative Essay

    Remember the word argument does not mean a fight in a writing context. An academic argument is more like a thoughtful conversation between two people with differing viewpoints on a debatable issue. However, you are required to take a position on one side of a debatable issue that is informed by academically appropriate evidence.

    For the purposes of this assignment, expressing or relying on your personal opinion of a debate is discouraged. Rather, the essay must argue one side or stance of the debate using the rhetorical appeals (logos, ethos, and pathos) and be supported by academic or scholarly sources. These include physical sources in public libraries, digital sources in academic libraries, online sources (excludes unreliable sources like procon.org and wikipedia.org, which are discouraged), and published expert reports, preferably peer-reviewed by experts in the field to maintain utmost credibility. Consider revisiting the tutorial for more information on appropriate sources for argumentative writing.

    Your submission must include an APA style in-text citations and a reference page following the essay. In your research, you will need at least 2 and no more than 4 credible primary or secondary sources to use as support in your essay.

    • All sources cited in the writing submitted must be locatable by a grader; include hyperlinks to the sources in the reference page.
    • The use of any source that requires payment for access is strictly prohibited for this assignment.
    • Avoid using sources that exceed 20 pages in length, as they may be overly extensive for the purposes of this assignment.
    • Including more than four sources may cause delays, and you might be asked to provide additional evidence of the credibility for each source.

    Thias will be helpful to you as you work on this assignment.

    Step 3. Think About Your Writing

    On a separate page, below your reference page, include thoughtful answers to the Think About Your Writing questions. References and Think About Your Writing questions are NOT included in the word count for this essay.

    Below your reference page, include answers to all of the following reflection questions.

    1. What have you learned about how to present a strong argument? How could/will you apply this knowledge in your professional or everyday life (3-4 sentences)? Sophia says: Think about the specific skills and techniques that you used while developing and writing your essay. What tools will you take with you from this experience?
    2. Consider the English Composition I course as a whole. What have you learned about yourself as a writer (5-6 sentences)? Sophia says: What did you learn that surprised you? Is there anything that you have struggled with in the past that you now feel more confident about?

    Step 4. Review Rubric and Checklist

    Your composition and reflection will be scored according to the Touchstone 4 Rubric, which evaluates the argumentative topic and thesis statement, argument development and support, organization, flow, research, style, use of conventions (grammar, punctuation, etc.), and your answers to the Think About your Writing questions above.

    Refer to the checklist below throughout the writing process. Do not submit your Touchstone until it meets these guidelines.

    Argumentative Topic and Thesis Statement

    Have you included a thesis that takes a clear, specific position on one side of an academically appropriate, debatable issue?

    Argument Development

    Are all of the details relevant to the purpose of your essay?

    Is the argument supported using rhetorical appeals and credible, academic source material?

    Is your essay 4-6 pages (approximately 1000-1500 words)? If not, which details do you need to add or delete?

    Research

    Have you cited outside sources effectively using quotation, summary, or paraphrase?

    Are the sources incorporated smoothly, providing the reader with signal phrases and context for the source information?

    Are the sources explained with regard to your topic and how they relate to the argument?

    Have you referenced at least 2 and no more than 4 credible sources?

    Have you included an APA style reference page below your essay?

    Have you included a hyperlink to each source in the reference page?

    Organization and Flow

    Is there an introduction, conclusion, adequate body paragraphs, and a counterargument?

    Do the topic and concluding sentences reiterate the argument to maintain a sharp focus on the purpose of the essay?

    Is the argument presented in a logical order and easy for the reader to follow?

    Are there transitions within and between paragraphs?

    Style

    Are the word choices accurate and effective?

    Are the sentence structures varied?

    Conventions and Formatting

    Have you properly cited your sources according to APA style guidelines?

    Have you double-checked for correct grammar, punctuation, spelling, formatting, and capitalization?

    Have you proofread for typos?

    Before You Submit

    Have you answered all of the Think About Your Writing questions on a separate page below your reference page? Are your answers thoughtful and included insights, observations, and/or examples in all responses?

    Does your submission include your essay, followed by your reference page, followed by your Think About Your Writing questions?

  • IMPROVEMENT OF THE TEACHER CERTIFICATION PROCESS: ANALYSIS O…

    A survey has been conducted on the ORGANIZATION OF TEACHERS’ CERTIFICATION PROCESS regarding the organization of the certification process for secondary school teachers in Azerbaijan. An article must be written based on the results of this survey. The article should fully comply with the requirements of Scopus-indexed journals.

    The materials titled ‘my own SPSS analysis’, ‘Teacher Certification Model Development’, ‘Leadership’, ‘Quality’ (the model is originally developed by the author and should be presented as a proposal in the article), have been translated from Azerbaijani to English using AI.

    To better understand the core materials related to the topic within the Azerbaijani context, refer to the ‘Azerbaijan_Teacher Management System’ material. Subsequently, in the literature review section, you may discuss the Georgia Teacher Management System, Moldova Teacher Management System, Turkey Teacher Management System, and Kazakhstan Teacher Management System.

    I am uploading the SPSS fileplease examine the analyses and verify their accuracy. Perform interesting inferential statistics and compelling statistical analyses that enhance the article’s appeal and engagement. The material must be completely original and AI-free.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): The Comparative Analysis of Teaching Profession Laws in Turkey Germany China Canada and Singapore1115334-2422394.pdf, TEACHERPERFORMANCEAPPRAISALINTURKEY-ANALTERNATEMODEL.pdf, TeacherEvaluation.pdf, TALS AZERBAJAN.pdf, Teacher Certification Model Development Leadership Quality.docx, QUESTIONNAIRE ON THE ORGANIZATION OF THE TEACHER CERTIFICATION PROCESS.docx, MY OWN SPSS ANALISE.docx, Moldova_Teacher Management System.pdf, Georgia_Teacher Management System.pdf, Azerbaijan_Teacher Management System.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • U4

    For this assignment, we will read the State of the Union address given by FDR on January 6, 1941, after he had won a third term as president (in the days before the 22nd Amendment limited presidents to two terms). By that time, the U.S. had worked through eight years of the New Deal, and WWII had been raging abroad since September of 1939. Americans were not yet directly involved in the conflict, as the Pearl Harbor attack would not strike Hawaii until December 7th. In the speech you are to read, FDR addresses Congress, discussing how and why the U.S. should develop its military and continue support for allies in the war, but he also introduced the idea of The Four Freedoms. Task Your assignment has two (2) parts to complete. Be sure to address both in your writing. Part 1: Write a response that reflects the presidents 1941 speech and explains, among other things, FDRs Four Freedoms. The primary document is linked here. Do not do outside research or use AI, but just read the speech itself and refer to our regular course readings for historical context. Include a minimum of two (2) mandatory direct quotes (full sentences but not block quotes) from the primary document, aside from the actual list of the four freedoms. Choose two quotes to help explain FDRs thoughts or feelings about these freedoms or anything else in the speech. (Minimum 250 words, and quotes may not comprise more than 20% of your writing) Some might choose to skim much of text and get to the freedoms commentary toward the very end of the speech and stick to just that content. And while thats mandatory, some may choose to read everything carefully and also consider his thoughts on WWII, the military, democracy, and other issues before the Four Freedoms are enumerated. To get you thinking, what were the Four Freedoms and why does he champion them, according to the speech? What do you sense he was feeling and/or fearing, based on what you read? What do you personally think about his Four Freedoms ideas in terms of his own time period and even ours? Perhaps consider what he said about plans for the military and overseas allies. Do not answer these questions directly, as they are just designed to help you think of content for your post. Part 2: Next, choose one New Deal program that is still with us today and one that is not (see list below for options), and conduct light research to learn just what the agency or program accomplished for the American people. Provide intext citations for any quotes or specific facts from your research. No AI, copy-pasted plagiarism, or Wikipedia is allowed. Just write in your own casual, conversational voice and put any quotes from sources in quotation marks with citation to avoid plagiarism. Your explanations cannot simply consist of copied content but must reflect on two programs of your choosing in your own words as well. (Minimum 250 words) * New Deal programs still with us today – choose one (1) from among the seven: SEC (the Securities and Exchange Commission), FDIC (Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation), SSA (the Social Security Administration), TVA (the Tennessee Valley Authority), FCC (Federal Communications Commission), FHA (Federal Housing Administration), FCA (Farm Credit Administration) * New Deal program that once existed but now are gone – choose (1) from among the following: CCC (Civilian Conservation Corps), NIRA Act (National Industrial Recovery Act), WPA (Works Progress Administration), PWA (Public Works Administration), Federal Project #1 (for the arts), Federal Writers Project/ slave narratives (a program to record oral history). Pt 3. In a minimum of 250 words, informally written and in first person (use I), share some key facts you learned about FDRs Four Freedoms speech and/or the New Deal programs you chose. Perhaps you simply relay some important information that you discovered, or perhaps you offer some personal thoughts and opinions. Want some more prompts to get you thinking? What made you choose the two New Deal programs that you did, what do you think these programs have meant to Americans, or what do they mean to you?