Bright Academic Experts

Author: admin

  • 712

    Hello.

    I need you to select 3 research topics in accounting or internal audit.

    For each research topic, please write one page and 3 slides answering the questions What? Why? How?

    Use the format in the Kinney article of the 3 paragraphs of what, why, how. So you do the 3 paragraphs for each of our 3 research topics.

    All sources must be from Scranton University Library

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): ACC 712 Dissertation Design Spring 2026.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Teenage Employment Regulations

    Problem sharing assignment details…you may see the same number on the screenshots to ensure you have all the details. This is a Business class – Enterprise Resource Planning.

  • Stellar Quest Aerospace Launch Project Assignment

    Draw diagram using (PDM) Precedent Diagramming Method

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Module 3 Perusall Readings PMF CH4 w Charter and PMF CH7 w CaseStudy.pdf, Stella Quest Instructions.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Training manual

    i hope you are well. I wanted to let you know that I have received an email from the university regarding my assignment for Module 2284. They are querying the Turnitin AI detection report and have asked me to provide clarification, along with evidence of my research and writing process. As you supported me during this assignment, I wanted to ask if you would be able to help by providing any supporting evidence or confirmation of how the work was developed. This could include guidance you gave me, feedback, drafts, notes, or any information that helps demonstrate that the assignment was researched and written independently. Your support would be greatly appreciated, as it will help me respond clearly and avoid a formal meeting. Thank you very much for your time and help.

  • Podcast Analysis

    Instructions

    You are inching closer and closer to the end of your undergraduate journey. While there is always more to learn and new skills to develop, at this point you know more about human behavior than most people on the planet. You are, to put it simply, an expert. A bourgeoning expert, to be sure, and if you pursue graduate school, youll develop competency as a practitioner and diagnostician, but right now you should have some measure of confidence in your hard-earned psychology expertise.

    For this assignment, youll take a good long walk in your new expert shoes. In doing so, youll prove to yourself that you have rightfully earned your place as a knowledgeable scholar of psychology. No longer a student, but a self-assured graduate who remains curious, humble, and open to learning, but also knows what they are talking about when it comes to human behavior.

    One of the ways we come face to face with our know-how is when we can take a critical, informed view of something most people take at face value. Consider this scenario: You are serving on a jury and the expert medical witness says, there is a 1 in 7 million chance a mother would have two babies experience crib death and therefore this is more likely a case of homicide. Without a background in the psychological sciences, you might fall in line, believing this to be an open and shut case. Of course, it’s homicide…right? 1:7 million? However, given what you have learned about statistical methods, our brains inability to fully understand the nuances of statistical data, and how this misunderstanding has led to false convictions in the past (and having been exposed to Donnellys TED Talk!), you-as-psychology-graduate would see the reasonable doubt.

    But we arent on a jury right now, so we need something else to hold up a mirror to your skillset. The mirrors we will use for this assignment are podcasts common mediums for the dissemination of information to large swaths of the population. From entertainment to news, from fictional stories to education, from sports to music, podcasts infiltrate our ears and our minds and can shift our perspective in meaningful ways. And, because psychology (and human behavior, thought, and emotion) permeates so many topics, just about any podcast out there can be called a psychology podcast; giving us a rich and varied source of content to critically evaluate.

    To engage in this activity…

    STEP 1: Choose 3 (THREE) podcast episodes. They can all three be from the same podcast series, or they can be from different series. Which three you choose is up to you. You can choose episodes from a podcast or podcasts that you already follow/are a fan of. If you arent a big podcast consumer, thats okay. Here is a list of podcasts that should be interesting to a student of psychology and give you plenty of grist for the mill for completing this assignment. You do not have to choose one from the list below this is just to help those for whom this is a new medium. All of these are available on both Apple and Google Podcasts. You can also access many of them for free via Spotify and Pandora. You can also listen to episodes on the websites of these podcast series.

    Most podcasts are ad supported, so they are free to the public. Some podcasters have a paid tier (episodes behind a paywall), but there are so, so many available for free, you should not need to purchase anything to do this assignment. Many podcasters also offer their shows as YouTube videos, which you may use, as long as the video is also packaged in podcast form as well. If a verbatim transcript of a podcast episode is available in written form on the web, you may use that. NPR has many of its podcasts transcribed on the web.

    • Speakeasy
    • The Pivot Podcast
    • The Arena

    these are the 3 podcast I want to use

    The only stipulation on what podcast you choose is that your instructor must be able to access it it must exist somewhere on the web or on a phone/tablet app, for free, right now. Your instructor will be sampling these as part of their evaluation process.

    STEP 2: Listen and take notes. First, listen to (or watch, if you found your podcast on YouTube) one of the three episodes you chose, remembering to do so through the eyes of a psychology graduate. Even if youve listened to them before, listen again carefully through this lens. Choose and identify at least 1 (ONE) psychological theme, concept, principle, hypothesis, construct, or perspective implied within each episode. This can be anything you learned about in your time as a psychology major the possibilities are almost endless. The idea here is for you to use your trained mind to identify these themes on your own. For inspiration, you might look at the that accompanies this exercise.

    Special Note about True Crime Podcasts

    The true crime podcast genre is a very popular one. And certainly, it is appropriate to choose those type of podcasts for this assignment; there are so many psychological concepts to explore in these stories! However, when it comes to choosing psychological concepts from episodes in this genre, branch out from personality disorder issues at play (particularly in the perpetrator). Having that be the focus of one of your choices is fine, just diversify your thinking a bit when it comes to the other two.

    For example, consider factors like jury decision making, the role of groupthink in crimes where multiple perpetrators were involved, the social psychological motivations of folks who had information about the crime but didnt report it, issues of gender, confirmation bias, racism, family dynamics, the role of memory and its limitations, etc. In other words, if you dive into the true crime genre, youll find all sorts of psychological concepts to explore that are perfect for this assignment; lets just not over-focus on the sociopathic tendencies inherent in the perpetrators themselves.

    STEP 3: Compare and Contrast. Once youve identified the theme consider the point of view the podcaster is taking. Then, compare/contrast that point of view with what you know from your academic journey. How does the shows perspective hold up under your scrutiny? Perhaps you end up agreeing 100% – the point of view espoused in the episode or by someone in the episode resonates completely with what you now know. Maybe your points-of-view kind of align, but if you were in the room, youd have a follow up thought or two to share…what would those thoughts be? Or perhaps you disagree completely!

    STEP 4: Repeat. Repeat Steps 2 & 3 twice more, for two more podcast episodes.

    STEP 5: Review and orient. Review the rubric for this assignment and the to orient your thinking prior to jumping into the writing portion of this activity.

    STEP 6: Write your paper. Construct an 1800-word paper where you present your analysis in the following format (note: going a little over the word count is fine):

    INTRODUCTION: (150+ words)

    Introduce the assignment concisely, explaining your objective – which is to showcase your knowledge of psychology in a real-world context (through your analysis of podcast episodes). You might also refer to why you chose these three episodes and how it served your goals with this assignment. Conclude with a clear definition of your papers purpose.

    BODY: (Three Sections, 500+ words each for a total of 1500+ words)

    Episode 1: Name of Podcast – Episode # and Episode Title

    Begin with a summary of the episode’s content, highlighting its plot or theme.

    Identify at least one key psychological concept at play in the episode (see above instructions or for inspiration)

    Discuss the podcaster’s perspective on this concept as presented in the episode. How do they frame or interpret these concepts, and do they provide relevant information or context?

    Offer your critical analysis of the point-of-view offered episode. Do you agree with the podcasts interpretation, or do you a scholar of psychology – have a different perspective? Support your critique or your agreement (or your little of both perspective) with information from your psychology coursework and other credible sources at least one. Be sure to cite your sources properly.

    Repeat the above for Episode 2 and Episode 3.

    CONCLUSION: 150+ words

    In your conclusion, reflect on the experience of this assignment. What did you learn about yourself? After having completed this activity, how confident are you in your ability to analyze and evaluate psychological elements in various real-world contexts? Consider how this assignment has helped you develop a more informed perspective as a consumer of information. What areas for further study did you identify after having done this assignment? Anything you wish youd learned more about in your time at UMGC? How will you go about learning that information moving forward?

    Paper Writing Guidelines:

    • Paper should be written in APA style; this includes title page, heading, citations, reference page, and paper formatting (1-inch margins, double-spaced, 12-point font, etc.). An abstract is not required.
    • Apply sound writing mechanics: write with clarity and pay attention to spelling/grammar
    • Submit completed document by assigned due date.
    • Your final paper should be 1800+ words (excluding title page and reference page):
    • Title page (does not count page towards length requirement)
    • Reference page (does not count page towards length requirement)

    resources:

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Podcast Analysis (Week 5) – Example Paper-2.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Assignment 2

    Summarize the efficiency of cellular respiration and fermentation as methods to harvest cellular energy from the food we eat. Include all the 4 phases of cell respiration and the number of ATP they generate.

    Tasks:

    1. Write in double space with 12 font size in your own words or paraphrase the information.

    2. check for spelling and grammar mistakes

    3. Save the document in a Microsoft word and post as an attached file.

    Criteria:

    This assignment is associated with Turnitin to detect plagiarism. You are expected to paraphrase the information and keep the similarity below 30% to obtain total points.

  • Concept Map

    please help me to review and adjust what need to be adjusted. If you need any information let me know. Thank you

    Requirements: Complete

  • Current Events Proposal paper

    Students will select a current event taking place in Canada that they believe in some way relates to

    SOCIAL POLICY. They will provide a written analysis of this event that draws on one of the

    SOCIOLOGICAL theories covered in the course. Students will be expected to formulate a strong

    and convincing thesis. Detailed assignment instructions will be provided on the first day of class.

    Papers should be no more than seven pages double spaced, Times New Roman

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Sociology.pdf, SOCI 1000 U Current Events (Winter 2026).docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Major Depressive Disorder Concept Map

    For this assessment you will select one of the mental health Sentinel U case study activities and create a concept map that outlines the pathophysiology, pharmacology, and physical assessment of the mental health diagnosis from your chosen case study.

    The key components of a mental health diagnosis concept map include the pathophysiology, pharmacology, and physical assessment of the diagnosis. The concept map should outline the key concepts related to the diagnosis, including risk factors, signs and symptoms, diagnostic procedures, medications, complications, nursing diagnoses, and nursing interventions. The map should be organized using a nursing concept map template, such as spider maps, hierarchical maps, or flow charts, to organize the information. The concept map should be accurate, complete, well-organized, and use appropriate nursing concepts and terminology.

    To complete your concept map, you may wish to follow these steps:

    1. Select one of the mental health Sentinel U scenarios:
    • Ivy Jackson, 61 YO, Female, African American.- I have added a reference page and highlighted the articles that are relevant to this assignment.
    1. Research the pathophysiology, pharmacology, and physical assessment of the chosen mental health diagnosis within the Sentinel-U case study.
    2. Complete the case study simulation and download the simulation report showing the patient you selected and showing 100% complete.
    3. Create a concept map that outlines the key concepts related to the chosen diagnosis, including risk factors, signs and symptoms, diagnostic procedures, medications, complications, nursing diagnoses, and nursing interventions.
    • You may wish to use the , but are also free to create your own.
    1. Organize content with clear purpose/goals and with relevant and evidence-based sources (published within 5 years).

    Your assessment submission will be assessed on the following criteria.

    • Diagnosis: Describe a mental health diagnosis. The diagnosis should be accurate and supported by relevant and evidence-based sources.
    • Make sure that the diagnosis is accurate and includes specific symptoms or criteria that support the diagnosis.
    • Ensure you have downloaded the completed Sentinel-U simulation report showing the patient you selected.
    • Concept Map: Create a concept map that outlines the key concepts related to the chosen diagnosis, including risk factors, signs and symptoms, diagnostic procedures, medications, complications, nursing diagnoses, and nursing interventions.
    • Make sure that your use of evidence to support the concept map is explicit and relevant, and that the relationships between the concepts are clearly defined.
    • Organization: The concept map should be well-organized and easy to follow. The content should be presented in a logical and clear manner, with a clear purpose and goals.
    • Also, you should make sure that your map is visually appealing and easy to read, incorporating appropriate use of colors, shapes, and symbols.
    • Professional Communication: The concept map should demonstrate professionalism and effective communication. The map should be free of errors and typos and should use appropriate terminology and language. The map should effectively communicate the key concepts related to the diagnosis to a professional audience.
    • APA format and style: The reference list should be formatted in APA style. All sources used should be relevant to the topic and evidence-based, published within the last 5 years.

    Additional Requirements

    • Concept Map: 1-page concept map that clearly organizes the 3Ps related to a mental health diagnosis, risk factors, diagnostics, complications, nursing diagnosis, and nursing interventions.
    • SIM Report: Ensure you download the completed SIM report showing the patient selected.
    • Reference List: Create an APA style reference list for all sources that you used to help build and support the information in your concept map. Include this in the same document as your concept map, but on its own page.
    • APA Style: Use current APA style for all in-text citations and any current APA-approved font.

    Competencies Measured

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    • Competency 2: Create evidence based interventions to address the health needs, risks, and resources of individuals from diverse backgrounds and cultures.
    • Describe a mental health diagnosis that is supported by relevant and evidence-based sources.
    • Create a concept map that outlines the key concepts related to the chosen diagnosis, including risk factors, signs and symptoms, diagnostic procedures, medications, complications, nursing diagnoses, and nursing interventions.
    • The concept map is well-organized and easy to follow, with a clear purpose and goals.
    • Competency 4: Perform comprehensive and focused physical assessments using appropriate techniques and tools.
    • Upload the Sentinel-U case study showing the Simulation name OR showing 100% complete.
    • Competency 5: Apply scholarly writing standards to communicate evidence based strategies that support safe and effective patient care.
    • The concept map should demonstrate professionalism and effective communication, use appropriate terminology and language. The map should effectively communicate the key concepts related to the diagnosis.
    • The reference list is formatted in APA style. All sources used should be relevant to the topic, evidence-based, and published within the last 5 years.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): IvyJackson_HealthHistory.pdf, Readiness_Essentials_Reference_Sheet_4 (1).pdf, cf_concept_map_template.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Case Study Paper

    Here is the assignment from the syllabus:

    This will require you to create a detailedcase description for an individual that needs treatment for mental illness. Your case should describe the history, symptoms, treatments and outcomes (both good and bad) for the person. As this is a psycho-pharmacology class, the treatment MUST include the use of medications in some way (even if it is not an optimal or final treatment) and your description of the case should demonstrate your knowledge of the use of the medications. The case may be fictional or may be based on a real case, but, in either case, it should be as realistic as possible. If you base your case on a real one, be sure that your telling of the story is original and not taken from (or directly based on) another written case. I want to see how well YOU understand the ideas! (Also – if based on a real case, be sure to account for the confidentiality of all people involved.) Cite references to support the validity of the information in your report. Be sure that your case covers and demonstrates that you understand ALL of the following elements:

    • Critical signs and symptoms for differentiating diagnoses and ideal treatments
    • Different treatment options (including medications) and decision process in determining treatments
    • Expected benefits and adverse effects of treatment
    • Ways to deal with non-response (or sub-optimal response) to initial treatment
    • Ways to integrate medical and non-medical treatments
    • Role of the counselor in dealing with medical treatments.

    If you are basing your paper on a real case, you may need to add some fictional pieces to make sure that all of these elements are addressed. For example, you might invent information about a side effect or preliminary non-response to illustrate potential problems or you might need to imagine a future for this person (if you are currently working with a case) to show the longer-term outcome of the case.

    The paper should be written in APA format and sources should be cited and of professional quality (written by professionals in the field and, preferably, peer-reviewed). If you are not well-versed on APA format, you might want to check the APA manual or look at these sites:

    a. You can find a good overview of this style here:

    b. Or you can go to the APA site which has FAQs as well as a nifty tutorial:

    The paper should be proof-read carefully! While a mistake or two may creep into anyones report, poorly written paperswill NOT be accepted. If you have concerns on this, you are welcome to submit a draft for review before the due date.

    *The report will be due through SafeAssign on Blackboard by the end of week 7. This will count as 20% of your final grade.

    One final word on the project: I take plagiarism very seriously. (See policy on Academic Dishonesty above.) Please note that you may not use other peoples words without clearly marking AND citing the source of those words. A number of students have problems with this sometimes unintentionally. You must distinguish between words that you write and words that you borrow from other sources. If you take words from another source, you must use quotation marks to show what is copied. If the quote is long (a paragraph), then introduce that paragraph by clearly noting that it comes from another source and then indent that paragraph. In both cases, you must have a citation that tells your source. A citation alone is not sufficient to indicate that something is a quote. You should have citations both for quoted passages AND for material that you have written (in your own words) that is based on information from other sources. One more thing quotes should be rare! APA style, in general, discourages quoting. Only use a quote when it is critical to deal with the original wording (for example, when you are talking about the diagnostic criteria for a disorder then the wording of the DSM would be important.) Otherwise, you should do your own writing, summarizing the main points from the articles that you cite. Summarizing or paraphrasing does NOT mean changing a few words in the original sentence. Your writing should not use the same basic sentence with slightly different wording. Let me know if you have questions on this! One final addition: Use of generative AI (ChatGPT, etc.) is not allowed without specific permission from me.