Author: admin

  • Congo

    For this assignment, you will write a short paper in which you analyze one film screened in class from Module 1: Struggle for Independence

    In your report on the film, you should clearly display critical thinking about the issues, concerns and approaches to cinematic representation of/in/from Africa. Consider also the complexities of issues explored in the film and how they connect to others on the continent of Africa, and in relation to the rest of the world. How do the issues manifest in contemporary times? Your essay should also include analysis of the aesthetics and materiality of the film. You must also reference the film and reading materials to which you have been exposed in class. You may refer to course readings, or other reading you have done.

    Tip on making an ‘A’ on this assignment: In addition to all other guidelines and requirements indicated, cite specific scenes in the film to support your analysis, and use concepts from lecture one.

    Guidelines

    • Anonymize your paper (do not add your name or other details that could be used to trace you)
    • Length of your written response should be between 350-500 words;
    • Use Times New Roman, 12-point font size, double space for the paper.
    • Submit your work as a document in a Word (.doc, .docx) format.
    • Remember to provide accurate citations and references. Use proper APA 7th edition.
    • Your paper should be free of grammatical and spelling errors and reflect a professional quality in presentation and proofreading.
  • Membuka Peluang Pekerjaan Sampingan untuk Menambah Uang Saku

    Bagaimana cara menambah hng saku dengan bekerja sampingan?

    Requirements:

  • Paragraphs

    one paragraph on ten of the different terms. Paragraphs dont have to be very long 3-5 sentences can be on the shorter side tk save space. Cite your sources

  • Week 1 stats

    • Review the
    • video.
    • Read Chapters 1, 2, and 3 in the MindTap ebook Essentials of Modern Business Statistics With Microsoft Excel by selecting Getting Ready Read the eBook for each chapter in MindTap.
    • Review the
    • video.
    • Review the BUS308 | Week 01 | Business Schools of the Asia-Pacific video.

    Step 1: Review

    Review the Week 1 Lecture and Case Problem 3: Business Schools of Asia-Pacific from Chapter 3 in the MindTap ebook.

    Step 2: Do

    Run descriptive statistics for the Data File AsiaMBA (Chapter 3). Use the

    video, the Week 1 Lecture, and the

    video for assistance.

    Step 3: Analyze

    Discuss your findings based on the descriptive statistics results you obtained in Step 2 in a one- to two-page managerial report written in Word.

    In your managerial report,

    • Briefly summarize the descriptive statistics results for each variable in the data set (Full-Time Enrollment, Students per Faculty, Local Tuition, Foreign Tuition, Age, %Foreign, and Starting Salary) and provide at least one insight or conclusion you can draw from the descriptive statistics for each variable.
    • Analyze the differences between the following:
    • local and foreign tuition costs
    • mean starting salaries for schools requiring and not requiring work experience
    • starting salaries for schools requiring and not requiring English tests

    Guidelines:

    • Your managerial report should be one to two pages in length, double-spaced, and written in 11- or 12-point Times New Roman, Arial, or similar font.
    • APA formatting is not required for this assignment.

    Submit both your managerial report (Word document) and your descriptive statistics Excel spreadsheet to Waypoint. The activity is worth 5% of your course grade.

  • Social media impact on society

    Persuasive Speech Discussion Assignment Based on Thank You for Arguing (TYFA), Chapters 24, 25, 27, & 28 PURPOSE The purpose of this assignment is to apply rhetorical strategies from Thank You for Arguing to develop a well-organized and persuasive speech using Ciceros classical outline. PART 1: Written Persuasive Speech (Discussion Post) Preparation Read TYFA Chapters 24, 25, 27, and 28. View the trailer for the Netflix documentary The Social Dilemma below. Prompt Use the documentary trailer as a springboard (not a source) to write a persuasive speech responding to the following question: Does social media have more of a positive or a negative impact on society? Clearly choose one side of the debate. Your goal is to persuade your audience using rhetorical strategies discussed in TYFA. Organization (Required) Your speech must be organized using Ciceros Outline. Label each section clearly within your paper to earn full credit: Introduction Narration Division Proof Refutation Conclusion Length & Format 1.52 pages Double-spaced 12-point font 1-inch margins Sources Use at least three credible sources to support your argument. Do not use the Netflix trailer as one of your sources. Cite sources within the speech (see provided citation tips here Links to an external site.). Include a Works Cited page in MLA format at the end of your paper.
  • AI analysis comparison

    AI and the Hofstede Cultural Dimensions Challenge

    The article “Gemini vs ChatGPT: Which AI Wins the Cultural Understanding Challenge?” used Hofstede’s 6-D Model of National Culture to test the cultural competence of both platforms. The authors found that while Gemini showed slight advantages in Nuance and Depth, both models largely failed to accurately reflect complex cultural traits, often relying on stereotypes.

    Your Task:

    1. Select a Hofstede Dimension and a National Identity: Choose one of Hofstede’s six dimensions (e.g., Power Distance, Individualism vs. Collectivism, Uncertainty Avoidance, etc.) and select a country or region known to score highly or lowly on that specific dimension (e.g., Japan for high Uncertainty Avoidance; Denmark for low Power Distance NOTE: Please use your research skills to develop different specific countries/dimensions for your analysis).
    2. Formulate a Scenario-Based Query: Create a question or scenario that requires the AI to produce a response explicitly aligned with the cultural dynamics of your chosen country/dimension (e.g., Draft an introductory email to a new business partner in a highly collectivist culture, making sure to show appropriate respect for group harmony. or Explain how to lead a brainstorm session effectively in a culture with low Power Distance. Again, please develop your own and do not leverage my examples).
    3. Input and Compare: Pose your chosen query to both a Gemini-powered platform and a ChatGPT-powered platform (e.g., ChatGPT-4o, if available).

    In your reflection, address the following points:

    • Analysis of the AI Response vs. Hofstede’s Dimension: Based on the AI-generated responses, analyze how accurately each platform incorporated your chosen Hofstede dimension. Did the AI’s response successfully translate the dimension (e.g., demonstrating formality for high Power Distance) or did it ignore the nuance?
    • Comparative Performance: Which platform (Gemini or ChatGPT) demonstrated greater Nuance (offering deeper, culture-specific explanations) and which was more Accurate (aligning the response directly with the documented characteristics of the dimension and country)?
    • Implications for Global Communication: Given your findings, discuss the risk of using these AI tools to generate communication in a professional, cross-cultural setting. If the AIs rely on stereotypes or fail to accurately model a culture’s core dimensions, what are the potential negative consequences for global business, diplomacy, or academic collaboration?

    Write a 1-2 page reflection (Format using the APA style – 12 pt. Times New Roman/double-spaced) responding to the prompts. Upload your submission to this exercise with either a Word document or a PDF. Use each prompt as a header to organize your work. Use at least two credible references (textbooks, scholarly journal articles, or credible industry publications) to help support your responses. In-text citations and the references page should be formatted using the APA 7th ed. style.

    Individual Reflection Rubric

    Criteria4 – Excellent3 – Proficient2 – Developing1 – UnacceptableSetup & Replication (20%)Clear identification of Hofstede dimension and country. Scenario is complex and directly relevant to the dimension chosen. Full, unedited AI outputs are included.Identifies dimension and country. Scenario is relevant but somewhat simple. AI outputs are included.Dimension or country is vague. Scenario is weakly connected to the dimension. One AI output may be missing or incomplete.Fails to identify a dimension, country, or scenario. Outputs are not included.Hofstede Analysis (30%)Detailed and accurate explanation of the chosen Hofstede dimension and its expected manifestation in the selected culture. Clearly links the expected outcome to the scenario.Accurate explanation of the chosen dimension and its cultural manifestation. Link to the scenario is evident.General or slightly inaccurate description of the dimension. Weakly links the dimension to the cultural scenario.Misunderstands the chosen Hofstede dimension or fails to describe it.Comparative Analysis (30%)Sophisticated comparison of Gemini vs. ChatGPT, explicitly assessing Nuance and Accuracy. Strong, specific textual evidence from both AI outputs supports all claims regarding performance.Clear comparison of the two AIs. Claims about Nuance/Accuracy are supported by relevant, though general, evidence from the outputs.Comparison is superficial or one-sided. Evidence from the AI outputs is minimal or irrelevant to the claims made.No comparison is made, or the analysis is solely descriptive without critical assessment.Implications & Reflection (20%)Thoughtful and critical discussion of the ethical and practical risks of using AI for cross-cultural communication, extending beyond simple observations.Adequate discussion of the ethical and practical risks. Implications are clear and relevant to the findings.Discussion of implications is brief or generic. Fails to directly connect the reflection to the findings of the experiment.Fails to reflect on the implications for global communication or ethics.

  • MRKG HOMEWORK

    Pizza Puzzle Case Study

    Download and read the Pizza Puzzle case study below. Apply the concepts from the chapter and the Supplemental Resource Lecture materials to this Marketing Ethics Case Study in a 2-3 page essay.

    Assignment Question Prompts:

    • Write a brief summary of the case study (1-2 paragraphs)
    • What Are the Relevant Facts?
    • What Are the Ethical Issues?
    • Who Are the Primary Stakeholders? (People who are mainly affected)
    • What Are the Possible Alternatives? (List at least three (3) alternatives).
    • What Are the Ethical implications of each of the Alternatives?
    • What Are the Practical Constraints?
    • Recommend an alternative or combination of alternatives from the ones you listed.
    • Explain how the discussion of the AMA Code of Ethics and the right of free consent has affected their identification and analysis of alternatives.

    Make sure to use proper grammar, punctuation, spelling, paragraphs and complete sentences in this case study write up. Upload your completed WORD document before Midnight on Sunday.

    Requirements: as it supposed to be

  • Discussion Thread: Use of Force

    Discussion Thread: Use of Force

    On November 11, 2009, Ozark Arkansas police officer Dustin Bradshaw was dispatched to a domestic disturbance between a mother and her 10-year-old daughter. When he arrived, the girl was curled up on the floor screaming and kicking. Her mother told the officer the crisis began when the girl refused to take a shower. Officer Bradshaw attempted to take the young girl into custody, but she continued to violently kick at him. It was then that the girl’s mother gave officer Bradshaw permission to use a Conducted Electrical Weapon (TASER, for purposes of this discussion) in an effort to gain control of the girl. According to his report he delivered a very brief stun to her back. It was enough to disable her, and after placing handcuffs on the child, officer Bradshaw carried the 65-pound girl to his squad car. His actions were later determined to be in compliance with department policy, and ultimately, he received a short suspension with pay only for not engaging his video camera during the incident.

    A growing number of children in America are finding themselves on the receiving end of a police officer’s TASER. A 14-year-old in Chicago went into cardiac arrest after being Tased in 2005. In that same year a 6-year-old Florida boy threatening to cut himself with a piece of glass was Tased by police, as well as a 12-year-old girl guilty only of skipping school. And in 2010 two federal lawsuits were filed in Illinois, each seeking $10 million, after a Kankakee police officer Tased two 12-year-olds in their school classroom just to demonstrate how the weapon works. These are just a few of the many reported incidents.

    The idea of using such a weapon on a child continues to be hotly debated. Most police departments allow for its use with children in certain situations, and the makers of the Taser gun argue that it is a safe and effective weapon for gaining control of an unmanageable person, even a child. They argue that although it is painful and disabling, it has no lasting effects, and its use may even prevent the child from harming themselves much more seriously by continuing to struggle.

    Discussion Questions (select one of the following questions and draft a response):

    1. Should there be limits placed on the types of weapons a police officer may use against a child?
    2. Is there an even greater risk of harm or civil liability related to a police officer physically subduing a child with their hands?
    3. Should a childs parents grant or rescind permission to police for Taser use on their uncontrollable child?

    For each thread, students must support their assertions with at least 3 scholarly citations

    in APA format. Each reply must incorporate at least 1 scholarly citation in APA format. Any

    sources cited must have been published within the last five years. Acceptable sources include the

    textbook, the Bible, and peer reviewed journals published within the past five years. Reflects a thorough understanding of Christian Worldview using at least 1 Holy Bible reference. Uses at least 3 references that are relevant and current (5 years)

  • Week 1

    1. Part 1 Discussion Prior to beginning work on this discussion forum,
    • Review Chapters 1, 2, and 3 in the MindTap ebook Essentials of Modern Business Statistics With Microsoft Excel by selecting Getting Ready Read the eBook for each chapter in MindTap.
    • Review the
    • video.
    • Ensure you have completed the learning activity.

    For your initial post, refer to the managerial report you prepared for the Descriptive Statistics Case Problem: Business Schools of AsiaPacific learning activity and discuss the following:

    • What new insights do these descriptive statistics provide concerning Asia-Pacific business schools?
    • What are the differences between the following:
    • local and foreign tuition costs
    • mean starting salaries for schools requiring and not requiring work experience
    • starting salaries for schools requiring and not requiring English tests
    • Part 2- Review Chapter 1: Identifying and Defining Problems of the course textbook One Step at a Time: A Roadmap for Problem Solving & Making a Difference.
    • Review .
    • Read
    • .
    • Select a problem you have personally seen or experienced in your community or workplace.

    In this discussion forum, you will answer a series of questions to help you identify a problem you have personally seen or experienced in your community or workplace. Consider the problem carefully as you will be focused on this problem throughout the course.

    In your discussion post,

    • Briefly describe the problem you have personally seen or experienced in your community or workplace.
    • Answer the following questions, following the 5WH1 method:
    • What are the details of the problem?
    • Who is impacted by the problem?
    • When did this problem begin, and when could it reasonably be resolved?
    • Where is this problem taking place?
    • Why is this problem important?
    • How could you potentially or partially address or resolve this problem?

    NOTE: Carefully choose the problem you wish to address. Avoid selecting a problem that could potentially risk defaming individuals, groups, or companies, or a problem that could possibly lead to negative repercussions on you, either personally or professionally. Focus on problems that bring stakeholders together in a productive way to explore solutions that will make a positive difference.

  • literature search and summary

    AI Not Permitted

    There are several parts to this assignment:1) a literature search to learn how to use search strategies with two databases about a specific nursing topic, 2) locate two primary research studies, and 3) for each of the studies you found, summarize in your own words each of the research elements that are listed as column headings in the assigned table.

    Literature Search

    Conduct a search for articles in both of these Databases: PubMed and Scopus.

    1. Use the Clinical Scenario to develop a search strategy that reflects the use of at least 3 search terms that are synonyms for the nursing intervention, and at least 3 search terms that are synonyms for the outcome impacted by the nursing intervention. Use the database limiters and specific population search terms to narrow your search to your specific population and the type of research design. Read the most promising articles to find the comparison interventions and possible timeframe being used in these studies.
    2. You can post potential search terms on the discussion board to get feedback and suggestions for more words/terms from classmates. You should have many (at least 3) search terms for the intervention that mean the same thing. You should have many (at least 3) search terms just for the measurable health outcome that mean the same thing..
    3. To begin your search of the literature start with PubMed. After you complete the search in PubMed, repeat your search with the same search terms in Scopus.
    4. Use a stepwise approach, ie. use one search term at a time and see how many articles you retrieve. First enter one of the many terms for the nursing intervention as a single search, then search on the next search term (a synonym for your first search term) for the intervention . Next enter one of the many terms for the measurable outcome as a single search, then search on the next search term (a synonym for your first search term) for the outcome). Next cross two or more of intervention searches with two or more of outcome searches by using the word AND to create the intersection of the terms. If you search in PubMed a search history is created that you can use to meet one of the grading rubric criteria by uploading the PubMed Search history to the assignment showing that you used a stepwise approach. A stepwise approach will let you see how many articles are retrieved after each step. If you get too few articles with one search term, revise your search term or compare different words with similar meaning]
    5. Create a document Plan and Record for Searching the Literature (PRSL) (see p. 159; Table 7-2) in Gray & Grove, 2021). (Note you can see all the information you need in PubMed Advanced Search/Search History).
    6. Fill out the PRSL document to plan and record your search of the assigned databases. You will submit this completed document for this Assignment.
    7. Upload the PubMed Search History as an electronic record of your search.

    Literature Summary

    1. Select two peer reviewed primary research articles located during your literature search to display on a Literature Summary Table. The selected articles should NOT be the same as the articles selected by your research partner. The headings of each column are the research elements of a quantitative research study that uses one of several research designs: a randomized controlled trial, a quasi-experimental design, or a cohort design. Your readings will help you understand what information from each study should be placed under each column heading.
    2. Complete the Literature Summary Table (Literature Summary Table, p. 165, Table 7-4 in Gray & Grove, 2021) by paraphrasing the basic elements of a research report for each of the articles you selected. [Note: a side feature is that you are going to make a table in MSWord]
    3. Use APA format (Title page, APA in text citation, Reference list).

    Submission of the Assignment

    1. Submit to the Assignment tab for Literature Search and Summary
    2. Create one MS Word document with two tables 1) PSLR and 2) Literature Summary Table
    3. Upload pdfs of both articles on your literature summary table.
    4. Upload an electronic record of your library search from your PubMed search history.

    Requirements: