Bright Academic Experts

Author: admin

  • Saya pendidikan karakter

  • Pentingnya Pendidikan Karakter bagi Peserta Didik
  • Konsep dan Penerapan Pendidikan Karakter di Sekolah
  • Peran Pendidikan Karakter dalam Dunia Pendidikan

    • Requirements:

  • Someone pleas answer these questions that have to do with ma…

    All directions are provided in the photo I uploaded!

    Requirements: as needed

  • Case study 2

    Read the case study provided and answer the questions in a Microsoft Word document. Each response should be a minimum of 5 sentences in length, clear and concise, and use correct grammar.

    Case Study

    Meet Mark.

    Mark is excited to begin training as an emergency department nurse. On his first day, the nurse training him makes multiple negative remarks about the physician on duty. Dont ever make a suggestion, or shell ream you out. You have to walk on eggshells around her. Later, another nurse is showing Mark where the supplies are kept. She tells him, If you cant find things, dont call Central Supply because theyll get on your back about wasting resources. Its better to keep a few key things like IV start kits hidden so you can grab them when you need them.

    Edit

    Toward the end of his shift, a nurse assistant tells Mark a patient is vomiting violently in one of the examination rooms. However, Mark walks in to find the patient sitting up smiling and only a small amount of emesis in the basin. He hears muffled laughter coming from the hallway. Later in the shift, the nurse who is training Mark comments, Hope you dont mind a little kidding around. This job can get to you, and its good to laugh when we can.

    The remainder of his training is free of other incidents and, overall, goes well.

    Case Study Questions

    1. What kind of culture best describes this department based on the scenario? Support your reasoning.
    2. What appears to be the implicit rules of the emergency department of this organization?
    3. Mark used respectful communication to optimize his relationships with the Central Supply staff, the nurse assistants, and the nurse training him. What barriers might exist in building respectful dialogue?
    4. In what ways are you like Mark? In what ways are you different?

    Submission and Assessment Guidelines

    • Submit your Microsoft Word document with the questions clearly listed and answered. All of the questions MUST be answered in your document.
    • It is expected that your answers are free of grammatical errors and in complete sentences, where appropriate.
    • Turnitin is enabled for this assignment.
    • Review the Case Study Rubric for grading criteria.
    • This activity is worth 100 points.

    Rubric

    NUR 218 – Case Study Rubric

    NUR 218 – Case Study Rubric
    Criteria Ratings Pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConnections

    70 ptsOutstandingEvidence of critical thinking and provides rationale, as well as examples and specific details.50 ptsGoodEvidence of critical thinking and details, mostly specific.

    30 ptsProficientEvidence of critical thinking and details but usually of a generalized nature.10 ptsNeeds ImprovementIdea presence is limited or not supported.0 ptsUnacceptableIdea presence is limited and not supported.

    70 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent

    15 ptsOutstandingExceptionally well-presented; ideas are detailed and well-developed.12 ptsGoodWell-presented; ideas are detailed and mostly well developed.

    8 ptsProficientContent is sound and solid; ideas are present but not particularly developed or supported.4 ptsNeeds ImprovementContent is slightly reasonable.0 ptsUnacceptableContent is not sound.

    15 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAcademic Language

    5 ptsOutstandingExcellent use and control of language. Superior use of style and variety provided in a professional tone.4 ptsGoodGood use and control of language. Minor (<2) errors with use of style with some variety provided. Professional tone maintained throughout.

    3 ptsProficientAverage use and control of language. Some (3-5) errors or misuse of style with minimal variety. Professional tone maintained throughout.2 ptsNeeds ImprovementBelow average use and control of language. Significant (>5) errors or misuses of style with no variety. Professional tone not maintained throughout assignment.0 ptsUnacceptableSignificant issues with use and control of language. Style and variety unable to be determined with no professional tone.

    5 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormatting

    5 ptsOutstandingFormatting follows assignment directions (APA as required) used with no errors. Citations provided (if necessary) with no errors.4 ptsGoodFormatting follows assignment directions (APA as required) with minimal (<2) errors. Citations provided (if necessary) with minimal (<2) errors.

    3 ptsProficientFormatting mostly follows assignment directions (APA as required) with some (3-5) errors. Citations (if necessary) provided with some (3-5) errors.2 ptsNeeds ImprovementFormatting (APA as required) errors (>5) make following the assignment difficult. Citations (if necessary) mostly provided with significant (>5) errors.0 ptsUnacceptableFormatting does not follow assignment directions. Significant errors make formatting illegible. Citations (if necessary) do not follow APA format.

    5 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScholarly/Professional Composition

    5 ptsOutstandingExpert level of writing with little to no errors.4 ptsGoodGood level of writing with minimal (<2) errors.

    3 ptsProficientAverage level of writing with some (3-5) errors.2 ptsNeeds ImprovementBelow average level of writing with significant (>5) errors.0 ptsUnacceptableLevel of writing is far below what is expected for scholarly/professional composition.

    5 pts

    Total Points: 100

    Requirements: Each response should be a minimum of 5 sentences in length

  • Weighing the evidence

    This week’s WTE assignment can be found on pages 138 – 145 of your textbook. This assignment focuses on the Zenger Trial.


    Instructions

    1. Identify the question(s) being asked. Each WTE assignment asks you to consider an overarching question and supporting questions. They are typically located under the Your Turn heading. Keep these questions in mind during Step 2. To access the WTE and sources online:
      1. Go to the module reading assignment. Click the assignment to open, and then load in a new tab. On the left hand side, click on “Table of Contents” and then click “Open full eBook.”
      2. Locate the correct chapter at left and click the right arrow to expand the chapter contents. Scroll to the bottom and click on “Weighing the Evidence” to begin reading the key context and provided sources.
    2. Prepare and Assess: After reading the associated chapter and using the related lecture(s) for context, read the primary evidence provided in your textbook.
      • Use the questions listed after each document to guide your assessment of each individual document.
      • Decide how each document addresses the larger question.
      • No outside sources or research is necessary. All the necessary documents are provided for you.
    3. Organize and Outline: Organize your analysis of each document by placing the documents into categories or groups based on how each one addresses the larger question(s). Outline your paper to organize your evidence. Your essay should include:
      • an introduction with a thesis statement,
      • evidence in support of your position,
      • acknowledgement of the alternative position, and
      • a conclusion which summarizes your position.
    4. Write: Write a brief paper of no more than 750 words (about two pages). Your final paper must:
      • Have a clear thesis statement which communicates your response to the question(s) asked.
      • Include specific, cited evidence.
        • Evidence does NOT mean using only direct quotations. Summary is welcome and demonstrates a greater understanding of the document contents. Summarize the document information for your evidence when possible.
        • Any information from the provided sources should be cited immediately after use. You can cite the individual documents simply by identifying their evidence number and page number in parentheses. Example citation: (Document 13.2, 610)
      • Be well-organized and coherent. Your writing should be purposeful and succinct. Avoid tangents and unnecessary filler words.
      • Be original. Your paper should reflect your own analysis and conclusions. Using AI or online essay generators to complete this assignment violates the Code of Academic Integrity and can have serious consequences.

    General Reminders

    1. Read the Question Carefully: Ensure you understand what is being asked before writing your answer. If you are unsure or the question is unclear, ask for help!
    1. Address All Parts of the Question: Many questions have multiple parts. You must address them all adequately.
    2. Be Concise: Stick to the point and avoid unnecessary elaboration. Do not use excessive quotations from the documents. Summarize where possible.
    3. Be Specific: Generalizations are not helpful. The more specific your answer and your evidence, the more convincing it will be.
    4. Stay On Topic: Going off on a tangent can be easy. Always bring your answer back to what is directly relevant.
    5. Check Your Grammar and Spelling: Small errors can significantly impact how your answer is received. Proofread your work carefully.
    6. Review and Revise: If time allows, set your answers aside for a short period and then review them with fresh eyes for any errors or areas for improvement.

    Assessment Criteria

    Your submission will be assessed on the following:

    1. Thesis (10 points): Your paper should include a clear and concise thesis statement which answers the question and previews the points of your paper.
    2. Conceptual and Contextual Understanding (35 points): Your paper should reflect a clear and accurate understanding of the documents and the context of the period during which they were created.
    3. Documentary Evidence (30 points): Your paper should utilize the provided sources as the basis for your argument.
    4. Writing Quality (Organization and Coherence) (15 points): Your paper should be logically structured and easy to follow. It must include an introduction, body, and conclusion section.
    5. Citations (10 points): Your paper should include properly formatted citations for both direct quotes and summaries.

    Requirements: at least 750 words, about two pages

  • Case study Justin

    Client Information

    Meet your client, Justin Jones.

    Justin Jones has just been admitted to an orthopedic unit after an automobile accident in which he was driving. He is 80 years old and has been living at home alone. Justin Jones has a history of Type 2 DM and osteoarthritis. He has casts and traction on both legs and a cast on one arm. He is receiving morphine sulfate intravenously via PCA pump. The admitting nurse wrote the following diagnoses and goals on the plan of care.

    The nursing diagnosis is acute pain secondary to musculoskeletal trauma (arms, legs, body) and muscle spasmsrisk for Peripheral Neurovascular Dysfunction secondary to casts/traction.

    GOALS/EXPECTED OUTCOMES

    • Demonstrates correct use of PCA pump
    • Rates pain not higher than 4 on a scale of 1 to 10 at all times
    • Peripheral pulses palpable
    • Fingers and toes warm
    • Fingers and toes without pallor or cyanosis
    • No edema of fingers and toes
    • Capillary refill less than 3 seconds

    Critical Thinking Questions

    1. What general knowledge will you need to care for this client?
    2. What is one thing you could do to ensure Justin Jones safety while managing his acute pain? List two more things you need to know about Mr. Jones to begin his discharge planning.
    3. What is another nursing diagnosis you might want to include for Justin Jones?
    4. Rewrite the goals/expected outcomes for Acute Pain so that they will have all the required components. Assume that todays date is November 10.
    5. What beliefs, values, biases, or emotional responses might interfere with your ability to provide the best care to Justin Jones?

    Submission and Assessment Guidelines

    • Submit your Microsoft Word document with the questions clearly listed and answered.
    • Each response should be clear, concise, and use correct grammar. All of the questions MUST be answered in your document.
    • Turnitin is enabled for this assignment.
    • Review the Full-Spectrum Nursing Rubric for grading criteria.
    • This activity is worth 60 points.

    Rubric

    NUR 211 – Full-Spectrum Nursing Rubric (4)

    NUR 211 – Full-Spectrum Nursing Rubric (4)
    Criteria Ratings Pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConnections

    45 ptsOutstandingEvidence of critical thinking, provides rationale, as well as examples and specific details.35 ptsGoodEvidence of critical thinking and details, mostly specific.

    25 ptsProficientEvidence of critical thinking and details, but usually of a generalized nature.15 ptsNeeds ImprovementIdea presence is limited or not supported.0 ptsUnacceptableIdea presence is limited and not supported.

    45 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent

    15 ptsOutstandingExceptionally well-presented; ideas are detailed and well-developed.12 ptsGoodWell-presented; ideas are detailed and mostly well-developed.

    8 ptsProficientContent is sound and solid; ideas are present but not particularly developed or supported.4 ptsNeeds ImprovementContent is slightly reasonable.0 ptsUnacceptableContent is not sound.

    15 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCourse Outcome 2Apply the clinical judgement model

    threshold: 3.0 pts

    4 ptsExceeds Mastery3 ptsMastery

    2 ptsNear Mastery1 ptsBelow Mastery0 ptsNo Evidence

    —

    Total Points: 60

    Requirements: complete sentences 3 sentences for each question

  • discussion post

    Scenario

    Mr. Johnson is a 70-year-old male complaining of shortness of breath for the past three weeks. Mr. Johnson is complaining that he has chest pain, and this pain increases when he coughs. He also reports thick green/yellow sputum for the past week. His current weight was stable at 100 kg from his previous visit six months ago. He admits to occasionally smoking cigarettes.

    Mr. Johnsons assessment is as follows:

    • Inspection upper respiratory system: Nasal and mouth mucosa is pink; no bleeding, masses, or deformities are noted in the upper respiratory system.
    • Inspection lower respiratory system: The client has a respiratory rate of 20 with even and unlabored respirations.
    • During the history, the client is speaking freely and does not report any shortness of breath while talking.
    • The client has skin appropriate for his ethnic background, with no skin integrity issues noted during the inspection.
    • Palpation: No masses, deformities, or crepitus are noted. Trachea is midline and nontender.
    • The client has equal lung expansion anterior and posterior; the client reports pain that increases with inspiration.
    • Percussion: Dullness over right lower lobe, otherwise hyper resonance.
    • Auscultation: Fine crackles in the right lower lobe with inspiration and expiratory wheezes and diminished breath sounds noted throughout.
    • Vital signs: Temperature: 100F (38C); Respiratory rate: 22; Pulse oximetry on room air: 91% to 93%; Heart rate: 90 bpm; and Blood pressure: 130/80 mm Hg

    As the nurse, you have determined the priority problem is impaired gas exchange related to the mucus collection in the airways, as evidenced by fine crackles in the right lower lobe.

    Instructions

    Using the assessment and nursing diagnosis provided in the scenario, write 200250 words identifying goals for Mr. Johnson in your initial post. Then, respond to at least two of your peers posts.

    Discussion Prompts

    • Identify two measurable short-term goals for Mr. Johnson. Explain why you chose these goals.
    • Consider what possible outcomes would change the priority problem.
    • Define one of these possible outcomes and explain how (and why) it would change the priority problem. Then, identify at least one new measurable goal related to the newly identified problem.

    Requirements: 200 words minimum

  • What is the number of bone in a human body?

    What is the number of bone in a human body?

    Requirements:

  • pain judgement map

    For this assignment, you will complete a Basic Concept Map based on an exemplar condition, disorder, or disease process. The Concept Map will include the following:

    • Assessment Data
      • Recognizing cues, consider subjective and objective data.
      • Analyze cues
    • Prioritize hypothesis
      • Should be prioritized based on the most urgent/important
    • Generate solutions for each prioritized problem
    • Take action
      • Interventions with Rationale
        • Must cite rationale
    • Evaluation

    • Required ComponentsYour concept map must follow the Nursing Process and include the following sections:
      1. Assessment Data
      • Identify and list both subjective and objective data related to your chosen disease.
      • This includes recognizing and documenting relevant cues.
      1. Analyze Cues
      • Interpret the assessment findings.
      • Identify patterns and relationships among the data.
      1. Prioritize Hypotheses
      • Determine the most urgent and important problems based on the assessment data.
      • Problems must be prioritized appropriately.
      1. Nursing Diagnosis
      • After analyzing and prioritizing your cues, you must create at least one appropriate NANDA nursing diagnosis.
      • The diagnosis must be correctly formatted and supported by your assessment data.
      • In-text citation is required for the nursing diagnosis.
      1. Planning
      • You must develop at least one SMART goal.

      Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound

      • Each SMART goal must directly relate to the nursing diagnosis.
      1. Implementation Take Action
      • Provide interventions with rationales for each SMART goal.
      • Interventions must be evidence-based.
      • All rationales must be cited using APA format.
      1. Evaluation
      • In the evaluation phase, you must determine whether each SMART goal was met or not met.
      • Provide clear reasoning based on expected patient outcomes.

      APA Format RequirementsThis assignment must be submitted in full APA format and include:

      • APA formatted cover page
      • Proper in-text citations for:
        • Nursing diagnosis
        • Interventions and rationales
      • An APA formatted reference page

      Failure to use APA format will result in point deductions.Important Formatting TipThe fillable PDF has limited space. To ensure all of your information fits and does not get cut off: Use very small font (size 6 or 7) when typing into the concept map form.This will help maintain readability and ensure nothing is missing when you submit.

    Template

    Please see template below:

    Submission and Assessment Guidelines

    • For help on how to submit your assignment, see .
    • Upload the completed document in one of the following formats: .DOCX, .PDF, .JPG, .GIF, or .PNG.
    • NUR 215 Concept Map (2)
      NUR 215 Concept Map (2)
      Criteria Ratings Pts
      This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical thinking skills 15 ptsLevel 4Questions are logically answered with feasible and acceptable interventions backed by literature.12 ptsLevel 3Questions are answered with feasible and acceptable interventions. Mostly linked with literature9 ptsLevel 2Questions are answered however interventions are unfeasible or not acceptable. Literature not fully linked or inappropriate.6 ptsLevel 1Questions are mostly unanswered or interventions do not apply.0 ptsLevel 0Assignment not turned in/past due date. 15 pts
      This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent 12 ptsLevel 4Responded to assignment questions with knowledge and insight from literature.9.6 ptsLevel 3Responded to assignment questions with knowledge and insight. Some details missing or 1 question not fully answered.7.2 ptsLevel 2Responded to questions with insight not linked to literature. 2-3 questions not answered completely.4.8 ptsLevel 1Used opinion to answer questions rather than facts from literature. 4+ questions left unanswered or incomplete.0 ptsLevel 0Assignment not turned in/past due date. 12 pts
      This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAcademic Language 1 ptsLevel 4Excellent use and control of language. Superior use of style and variety provided in a professional tone.0.75 ptsLevel 3Good use and control of language. Minor (<2) errors with use of style with some variety provided. Professional tone maintained throughout.0.5 ptsLevel 2Average use and control of language. Some (3-5) errors or misuse of style with minimal variety. Professional tone maintained throughout.0.25 ptsLevel 1Below average use and control of language. Significant (>5) errors or misuses of style with no variety. Professional tone not maintained throughout assignment.0 ptsLevel 0Significant issues with use and control of language. Style and variety unable to be determined with no professional tone. 1 pts
      This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormatting 1 ptsLevel 4Formatting follows assignment directions (APA as required) used with no errors. Citations provided (if necessary) with no errors.0.75 ptsLevel 3Formatting follows assignment directions (APA as required) with minimal (<2) errors. Citations provided (if necessary) with minimal (<2) errors.0.5 ptsLevel 2Formatting mostly follows assignment directions (APA as required) with some (3-5) errors. Citations (if necessary) provided with some (3-5) errors.0.25 ptsLevel 1Formatting (APA as required) errors (>5) make following the assignment difficult. Citations (if necessary) mostly provided with significant (>5) errors.0 ptsLevel 0Formatting does not follow assignment directions. Significant errors make formatting illegible. Citations (if necessary) do not follow APA format. 1 pts
      This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScholarly/Professional Composition 1 ptsLevel 4Expert level of writing with little to no errors.0.75 ptsLevel 3Good level of writing with minimal (<2) errors.0.5 ptsLevel 2Average level of writing with some (3-5) errors.0.25 ptsLevel 1Below average level of writing with significant (>5) errors.0 ptsLevel 0Level of writing is far below what is expected for scholarly/professional composition. 1 pts

      30

    Requirements: complete sentences

  • Accountong Homework (Ethical Issue)

    Grant Film Productions wishes to expand and has borrowed $100,000. As a condition for making this loan, the bank requires that the business maintain a current ratio of at least 1.50.

    Business has been good but not great. Expansion costs have brought the current ratio down to 1.40 on December 15. Rita Grant, owner of the business, is considering what might happen if she reports a current ratio of 1.40 to the bank. One course of action for Grant is to record in December of this year $10,000 of revenue that the business will earn in January of next year. The contract for this job has been signed.

    Requirements

    1. Journalize the revenue transaction and indicate how recording this revenue in December would affect the current ratio.
    2. Discuss whether it is ethical to record the revenue transaction in December. Identify the accounting principle relevant to this situation and give the reasons underlying your conclusion.

    Requirements: as it supposed to be

  • Case study

    Please finish this weeks discussion prior to starting this case study. The discussion will provide sufficient information and background of chef Jos Andrs philosophy.

    Jos Andrs Case Study: Humility in Crisis Leadership
    Jos Andrs exemplifies Level 5 leadership through personal humility paired with fierce resolve, particularly in high-stress crisis response.

    Case Overview
    After Hurricane Maria devastated Puerto Rico in 2017, Andrs bypassed slow federal aid by personally arriving on the island. He transformed parking lots into makeshift kitchens, rallied chefs and volunteers, and delivered 3.7 million hot meals directly to survivorsdemonstrating hands-on humility by serving alongside his team rather than directing from afar.
    In Ukraine amid the 2022 Russian invasion, he again deployed to front lines, cooking meals in bomb shelters and challenging bureaucratic hurdles to prioritize speed and community dignity over protocol.

    Humility in Action
    Food Preparation
    Andrs rejects hierarchical “chef ego” norms, crediting brigades publicly while focusing on empowering line cooks and volunteers. He describes arriving early to kitchens “before anybody else” to watch them “come to life,” modeling quiet preparation that builds team ownership.

    Guest Interactions
    His World Central Kitchen (WCK) serves over 200 million meals across 60 countries by listening to disaster victims’ needs firstcooking familiar foods with dignity, not charity handouts. “Leadership is 51 percent empathy,” he states, flattening structures so “best ideas… do not always come from the top.”

    Crisis Response
    In disasters, Andrs embodies “no-strings-attached” giving: flying into chaos, minding “the fire” (controlling chaos without dominating), and rejecting finger-pointing for collaborative problem-solving. He adapts family lessonslike tending paella fires humblyto scale humanitarian kitchens.
    Connection to Leadership Frameworks
    Framework Andrs Example Humility Link (Morris et al.)
    Level 5 (Collins) Personal humility (cooks in trenches) + Professional will (3.7M meals despite obstacles) Quiet power fosters team learning under stress
    Servant (Northouse) Empowers others first; rejects org charts for agile response Reduces ego-driven conflict in high-pressure “brigades”
    Transformational Inspires via empathy (51% leadership); builds psychologically safe cultures Enhances resilience in toxic kitchen/service stress

    Topics to be discussed in the case study
    How does Andrs’ “leading quietly” counter traditional “screaming chef” culture in your kitchen experiences?
    Propose one practice (e.g., daily team huddles crediting all roles) linking his humility to Morris et al.’s stress-reduction findings.
    In a service rush or crisis, would you prioritize empathy or speed first? Justify using Level 5 traits.
    Follow rubric for your answer

    Last Steps
    Copy the case study with your response (solution) in any AI and ask for the solutions in 150 words each from the top three (3) business consulting companies MBB McKinsey, Boston Consulting Group, Bain & Company.
    Provide a short reflection (100 words) of your and the consulting companies findings, difference?
    Then upload and submit your case study answer.

    Requirements: NA