Author: admin

  • 3-2-1 reflection ( physchopathic offenders )

    One way to give meaning to our experiences is to reflect on them. The purpose of the 3-2-1 reflection is to give you the opportunity to reflect on what you learned and what you want to learn more about. Remember, these reflections are each worth 5% of your final grade, so I recommend you spend some time reflecting about the content and making sure your answers are detailed and clear. You will submit a 3-2-1 reflection by answering the following questions: 3 things you learned from the module that are meaningful to you. Why are they meaningful? For some examples: Is it something you agree with? Disagree with? Why? Is it something that you connect with real world sources? Which real world sources? Is it something that helps you with your current career? Explain your connections. For reference to the amount of detail, there should be about 1/4-1/2 page for each meaningful thing. 2 things you want to know more about (be specific). These should be directly related to the module and should not be general. As an unrelated example, it is ok to say I want to learn more about research in the justice system but you must elaborate on that what type of research? What is the research question? What area of the justice system? For reference to the amount of detail, there should be about 1/2 page for this entire section . 1 question you have about your topic. This question should again, be specific to your topic and relate to the course objectives. Your topic question can be stated as one or two lines. NOTES BELOW FOR PAPER _ PLEASE USE In this module, we will introduce you to two topics: mentally disordered and psychopathic offenders. For both groups of offenders, we will discuss the following: The various categories and definitions related to these groups of offenders The risk factors and theories that help explain their offending behavior Assessment, treatment, and management of these individuals The DSM-V defines a mental disorder as a syndrome characterized by clinically significant disturbance in an individual’s cognition, emotion, regulation or behavior that reflects a dysfunction in the psychological, biological, or developmental processes underlying mental functioning. Mental disorders are usually associated with significant distress in social, occupational, or other important activities…. Factors related to Mentally Disordered Offenders Symptoms of MD that increase risk of violence Substance Use Disorders MDOs may use substances to self medicate diminished self-control and increased financial need Antisocial Personality Disorder Criminal attitudes and criminal thinking Symptoms of MD that increase risk of violence Minor violence: substance abuse and acute psychotic symptoms (co-morbid) Acute psychotic symptoms, depressive symptoms, childhood conduct problems Threat/Control override delusions and hallucinations increase risk Risk factors for MDOs Meta analysis = MDOs are similar to non MDOs for risk factors BUT: higher rate of MI in prison populations…why? No causal link found between MD and violence (could be other factors associated with MD poverty, unemployment, homelessness) How does the DSM define psychopathy? First things first,psychopathy is not a clinical diagnosis. In the very first edition of the DSM, we used the term sociopath. Sociopaths were characterized as an antisocial person who lacked rational decision-making, was callous and immature, and often rationalized antisocial behavior. Although we still hear the term sociopath in the media today, the second edition of the DSM removed the term. Sociopath was replaced with antisocial personality. In the third edition, antisocial personality was replaced with Antisocial Personality Disorder (ASPD). With this change, the emphasis on assessment and diagnosis changed from personality to behavior because it is easier to assess someones behavior than it is to assess someones personality. In fact, if we were only assessing someones personality, we would have to rely on self-report measures a lot of the time because those who are psychopathic are very good at masking their characteristics so we would not get a very reliable assessment that way. As an example of this ability to mask characteristics, watch the following video of an interview with Kenneth Bianchi, one of the Hillside Stranglers who murdered and raped women with his cousin. Option 1: Vince Li – The Greyhound Bus Killer In 2008, Vince Li stabbed, beheaded, and cannibalized Tim McLean on a Greyhound Canada bus near Manitoba, Canada. Vince Li was found not criminally responsible on account of a mental disorder (NCRMD) which is the Canadian equivalent to NGRI. Bus 1170 : Vince Li and the Greyhound Bus Murder (2011) – the fifth estate (opens in a new tab) For a real-world glimpse into the publics perceptions of the insanity defense, read the comments on the video. For an empirical investigation of perceptions of the insanity defense, read this article.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): treatment of mentally disordered offenders.pdf, Improving mental health for inmates.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Supply and demand model application

    No instructions provided

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): EC 1_D and S (1).docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Indicators and Rubrics

    Develop a set of rubrics based on research from 5 of the 15 indicators developed by Karen Seashore Louis that detail a comprehensive vision of the School as a Community of Professional Practice.

    You will develop 5 separate Rubric Templates, 1 for each of the 5 indicators from the 15 indicators developed by Karen Seashore Louis. Your developed templates should be of quality and based upon your readings. The templates could be something RESA personnel could use to come to your school and evaluate 5 of the 15 indicators of Louis.

    These 5 templates should then be displayed in a PowerPoint presentation

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): 15 Indicators of Professional Learning Communities developed through the Research of.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • epidemiology

    When a disease outbreaks epidemiologists help us to understand the origin of the disease and how it will impact the population. The information gathered will help to control future outbreaks.

    • Provide two examples of how epidemiology is relevant in todays society. Explain how teams or groups of people are used to solve problems in epidemiology.

    Your Discussion should be a minimum of 200 words in length and not more than 300 words. Please include a word count. Following the APA standard, use references and in-text citations for the textbook and any other sources. Refer to the for help with APA citations.

    Read:

    1. Bovbjerg, M. L. (2020, October 1). Oregon State University. https://open.oregonstate.education/epidemiology/chapter/what-is-epidemiology/ licensed under CC BY-NC 4.0

    • Read chapter 1: This chapter introduces epidemiology, providing its context within public health. Several aspects of the disease are discussed, along with determinants of diseases. The role of people, place, and time in epidemiology is also discussed.

    2. Coggon, D., Rose, G. and Barker, D. (2020). In Epidemiology for the Uninitiated. British Medical Journal. https://www.bmj.com/about-bmj/resources-readers/publications/epidemiology-uninitiated/1-what-epidemiology

    • This reading summarizes some of the key concepts in epidemiology along with terminology that is commonly used. The population at risk, target population, and sample are some of the important concepts that are included.

    3. . (2019, July 30). Science museum. https://www.sciencemuseum.org.uk/objects-and-stories/medicine/epidemiology-public-health-science

    • This website provides a history of epidemiology along with some of the important figures from the last several hundred years. The role of John Snow in stopping a cholera outbreak in London is also discussed.

    Watch:

    1. CrashCourse. (2021, October 26). . YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vk6e0pCbh1k

    • This video includes some of the important concepts and terms in epidemiology. Several examples are discussed to highlight these important terms.
  • Women’s wage labor in factories / Bessie Van Vorst’s observa…

    Write me a short essay answering these three questions. What different sorts of women does Bessie Van Vorst meet in the factory, and how and why do their responses to their work vary? What can we learn from her writing about women’s wage labor at this time?
  • Thought I was dead

    So Basically, the instructions were listen to this song,

    Tyler, the Creator

    “Thought I Was Dead”

    And based on the lyrics I’m supposed to describe and write a 300 word essay about what I think the song is about and why

  • Discussion 2 – Application of Content

    Find one recent news article (within the last 6 months) related to a topic from this course. In your post: Briefly summarize the article. Identify at least one specific theory you are applying and cite the chapter or assigned reading where it is covered. Explain how the theory helps analyze or explain what is happening in the article. Reply to two classmates with thoughtful responses that extend their analysis or apply a different relevant theory or reading. Rubric: Article & Summary (20 pts) – Relevant, recent article with a clear summary. Theory & Citation (30 pts) – Correct theory identified with chapter or reading cited. Application (30 pts) – Theory is applied accurately to analyze the article.
  • Programming

    This program draws a simple box using dashes. In the code, there are two errors that result in the program not functioning. Correct the errors so that the program runs.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): programming.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Personal and Professional Integration of Theology and Psycho…

    Write an 8 page APA 7th edition paper on the integration of theology and psychology. This paper should reflect a personal and professional philosophy of integration informed by personal experience, clinical exposure, and scholarly literature. The paper should be ethical, well-researched, and properly cited.

    General Requirements:

    1. APA 7th Edition Compliance
    • Double-spaced, 12-pt Times New Roman font, 1-inch margins
    • Include Title Page, Abstract, and References (not included in page count)
    • Use in-text citations correctly for all sources
    • Minimum 10 sources:
    • The Bible (any translation)
    • At least 9 scholarly or professional sources (books, chapters, journals)
    • Include page numbers for all print sources (verify editions)
    1. Length
    • Final submission: min 8 pages, excluding title, abstract, and references
    1. Structure and Headings
    2. The paper must include the following APA headings:
    3. Title Page
    • Title of paper
    • Student name
    • Course info
    1. Abstract (150250 words)
    • Summary of the papers purpose, key ideas, and approach
    1. Section 1: Personal Background Experience with Integration
    • Personal faith journey (including trauma, teenage pregnancy, homelessness, abuse, church experiences)
    • Clinical/educational exposure to psychology
    • How these experiences shaped your understanding of counseling
    1. Section 2: The Need for and Critical Approach to Integration
    • Reasons integration is necessary
    • Ethical considerations (e.g., Corey, 2006)
    • Tensions between psychology and theology
    • Theological perspectives on the soul, development, and God-image (Greggo, 2005; Moriarty et al., 2006)
    1. Section 3: Personal and Professional Philosophy of Integration
    • How your personal experiences and clinical knowledge inform your philosophy
    • How you incorporate ethics, assessment, and leadership (Frame, 2001; Hodge & Holtrop, 2005)
    • Emphasis on holistic, spiritually informed counseling (Purdy & Dupey, 2005; Strawn, 2004; Tan, 1987)
    • Discussion of hope and future professional goals
    1. References
    • Minimum 10 sources
    • APA 7th formatting
    • Verify DOIs and page numbers

    Specific Instructions for the Rewrite

    1. Use the attached draft as a foundation
    • Keep personal story elements intact (faith journey, trauma, leadership, calling)
    • Remove overly informal language or first-draft redundancies
    • Expand scholarly support for each section
    1. Incorporate quotes and citations
    • Use at least 9 scholarly sources plus the Bible
    • Include short direct quotes and paraphrase where possible
    • Use in-text citations to support integration arguments, e.g., Integration requires respecting both psychological science and theological commitments (Hathaway & Yarhouse, 2021).
    1. Integration Guidance
    • Avoid simply narrating experiences; tie personal experiences to psychological theories and theological concepts
    • Discuss God-image, attachment, spiritual assessment, and moral/affective formation
    • Show how experiences informed your philosophy of integration
    1. Style & Tone
    • Professional, reflective, and academically rigorous
    • Balance personal narrative with scholarly support
    • Avoid over-reliance on quotes; paraphrase mostly
    1. Technical Checks
    • Correct APA 7th edition formatting
    • Ensure double-spacing, proper headings, and reference alignment
    • Verify all sources are accessible and accurate
    • Check for grammar, sentence flow, and clarity
    1. Optional Enhancements
    • Add section subheadings if appropriate for clarity
    • Include examples from clinical experience without violating confidentiality
    • Discuss how integration informs leadership and supervision

    Google link if needed

    https://docs.google.com/document/d/1JpO9xhD-wpYOHxjB28kY36BWhQ1ppUQjW9ClgDEvMNk/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.mk3rb5kyd1l6

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Personal and Professional Integration of Theology and Psychology.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Discussion 2 – Application of Content

    Find one recent news article (within the last 6 months) related to a topic from this course. In your post: Briefly summarize the article. Identify at least one specific theory you are applying and cite the chapter or assigned reading where it is covered. Explain how the theory helps analyze or explain what is happening in the article. Reply to two classmates with thoughtful responses that extend their analysis or apply a different relevant theory or reading. Rubric: Article & Summary (20 pts) – Relevant, recent article with a clear summary. Theory & Citation (30 pts) – Correct theory identified with chapter or reading cited. Application (30 pts) – Theory is applied accurately to analyze the article.