Bright Academic Experts

Author: admin

  • Multiple Intelligences and Learning Styles

    Module 2 Learning Styles, Multiple Intelligence and Technology Discussion Review the following resources on Multiple Intelligences and Students Varied Learning Styles: Smart Teaching: The Synergy of Multiple Intelligences and … How to help online students with different learning styles Adapting to Different Learning Styles with Technology Lastly, read the following article: Morgan, H. (2021). Howard Gardners Multiple Intelligences Theory and his ideas on promoting creativity. In F. Reisman (Ed.), Celebrating giants and trailblazers: A-Z of whos who in creativity research and related fields (pp.124-141). London, UK: KIE Publications available at Original Post: Reflect on Gardner’s Theory of Multiple Intelligences and other resources discussing different learning styles. Then think of an example of how someone can manifest these intelligences and different learning styles. In this post, describe someone you know who has one or more of these intelligences and/or styles. In your description, discuss a technology-based or technology-enhanced activity that may appeal to someone with this learning style.

  • discussion

    After reading the Michello article about inequities in education comment on whether you agree or disagree with some of the statements made. How does your view of public education in NYC compare with your educational experience. Did you attend public school, private school, attend outside of NYC, attend outside the USA? How would you assess the quality of your education and whether it prepared you for college

  • Chapter 1 review

    -masters level work -complete sentences -must answer all questions -in text citations/references -plagiarism under 2% 1. On page 22, there are ten leadership skills for the future. What skills would be most helpful in your life now and then in the future? Why? 2. What is your perspective on the role and responsibility of followers in the leader-follower relationship? 3. What leadership theories presented in this chapter may be most applicable to the sport organization to which you currently belong or that you aspire to be part of in the future? Why?

  • social cognition and social perception

    Carefully read the below instructions and all information in the provided links. Then choose ONE of the following prompts for your Initial Thread Post:

    • SCHEMAS: Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of schemas.
    • IAT: Discuss Harvards Implicit Association Test (IAT), with a supporting view or critical disagreement.
    • JUDGMENTAL HEURISTICS: Discuss one of the judgmental heuristics people use, and the advantages and disadvantages of its automatic use.
    • NONVERBAL COMMUNICATION: Discuss an aspect of nonverbal communication of interest to you.
    • ATTRIBUTIONS: Discuss attributions in relation to one of the following: first impressions, the fundamental attribution error, Kelleys covariation mode, the two-step attribution process, or the bias blind spot.
    • CULTURE AND THOUGHT PROCESSES: Discuss a specific cultural difference in social cognition or social perception.

    DISCUSSION FORUM INSTRUCTIONS

    Discussion Forums in this course are designed to: (i) promote deeper critical thinking on topics introduced in the course; (ii) teach students how to obtain artificial intelligence (AI) through ChatGPT and critically assess information produced by AI; (iii) enable each student to learn more about a topic of interest to them involving social psychology; (iv) use scientific journal articles to back up thoughts and opinions, which broadens knowledge and gives opinions credibility; (v) learn how to cite and reference sources in APA format (the international format for scientific writing, published by the American Psychological Association); and (vi) enter into discourse on topics involving social psychology with classmates.

    After finishing readings in the related Learning Module(s) and thinking about the concepts introduced, you will:

    1. USE CHAT GPT TO MAKE AN INITIAL THREAD POST. Begin a conversation with ChatGPT to obtain NEW information on one of the prompts in a Discussion Forum (not information already clearly addressed in lecture or our textbook), in an effort to expand your knowledge in an area of personal interest. Obtaining good ChatGPT output is an iterative process, which means if you dont like what you see on the first try you can continue a conversation with ChatGPT to improve the prior output (you can also always clear the conversation and begin again). Continue the conversation until you are satisfied with the output.

    When you are satisfied with your ChatGPT output, make an Initial Thread Post in the Forum by clicking on Reply directly underneath these instructions. The Initial Thread Post should be formatted as shown below and include the indicated information:

    Title: Here you should type a unique short title that describes the prompt topic you chose. Please be diligent in creating a short descriptive title; there are a lot of students in this class and a good title will help students quickly find topics of interest (or avoid topics that may trigger a negative reaction).

    ChatGPT Output: After typing ChatGPT Output: to identify the source, copy and paste 200-300 words from the GPT output (whatever portions of the AI you would like to share with the class). DO NOT ADD ANY OF YOUR OWN WORDS HERE, COPY AND PASTE ONLY WHAT AI HAS PROVIDED; YOU WILL HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO ADD YOUR OWN THOUGHTS IN STEP 2. Include an APA-compliant citation and reference for the ChatGPT information.

    Reference: Provide a formal reference for the ChatGPT source of information, which should take the form shown below. The ChatGPT http link provided in the reference should be the unique link to your ChatGPT conversation so that anyone interested can see your entire conversation with ChatGPT and how you improved the output through an iterative process. [Check the link to make sure it works!]

    Reference

    OpenAI. (2025). ChatGPT (Aug 7 version 5) [Large multimodal model]. https://chatgpt.com/share/…

    [Note: The reference and cite will change, based on the version of ChatGPT you are using and the date it was trained.

    1. for more information. The inoperable link in blue in the above reference example will be unique for your ChatGPT conversation and should be operable in your post Reference. See Instructions on How to Get Started in ChatGPT to learn how to obtain an operable link for your conversation. Centering of the Reference title and a hanging indent in the reference, to make this reference totally APA compliant, was omitted because this formatting is not available in Canvas Discussion Forums.]FIRST RESPONSE – RESPOND TO YOUR OWN INITIAL THREAD POST IN YOUR OWN. Post a response that either supports or disagrees with the ChatGPT information by clicking on Reply underneath your own Initial Thread Post. Your response to your own Initial Thread Post should include the indicated information:

    New Contribution to Own Initial Thread Post: Find a scientific journal article that supports your agreement or disagreement. Briefly describe the selected article in your own words (do not use direct quotes) and include an APA-compliant citation for the article in your text with a complete reference at the end of the text.

    Attach PDF: Attach a pdf of the complete study cited and referenced in the post.

    Steps 1 and 2 must be completed before the published deadline to be eligible for full credit. This deadline before the Forum closes is critical to give everyone plenty of posts to respond to in Step 3 below, to successfully complete the assignment before the Forum closes.

    1. SECOND RESPONSE – RESPOND TO A CLASSMATES INITIAL THREAD POST. Before the Forum closes, comment on someone elses Initial Thread Post and First Response that you find of interest, that is on a different prompt than your initial thread post, and to which you can add new perspective (to be eligible for full credit new information must be added to a thread that is on a different prompt than the one you explored in Steps 1-2). Click on Reply directly underneath the post to which you wish to respond. The Response to a classmates Initial Thread Post should be formatted as shown below and include the indicated information:

    Title: Provide the name of the classmate you are replying to, and the title of their post. This is critical in the event the TA grading your work needs to find/see the context you are responding to in the Discussion Forum (when grading each student in Canvas grades, only the students posts can be seen).

    Evaluation and New Contribution: Agree or disagree with some aspect of the selected Initial Thread Post or First Response ChatGPT, and when doing so make it clear why you agree or disagree through the addition of new information on the topic obtained from a scientific journal article. Include an APA-compliant citation for the source of information in your text with a complete reference at the end of the text. Do not plagiarize a human or ChatGPT hereparaphrase (put everything into your own words).

    Attach PDF: Attach a pdf of the complete study cited and referenced in the post.

    NOTE: ChatGPT sometimes hallucinates and provides false information. If you identify false information generated by ChatGPT on the topic, are the first to do so, and successfully refute the false information with a credible cite and reference, you will receive a 12-point bonus (yes, that means extra credit!). You may add an additional post to do this if after making the required posts you find false information that was not previously addressed by another student.

  • Debunking the Learning Styles Myth

    1. Paper Assignment: Debunking the Learning Styles Myth
    2. Points: 25
    3. Length: 23 pages (double-spaced, 12-pt font)
    4. Purpose: Analysis and application of course concepts
    5. Assignment Overview
    6. One of the most persistent myths in education is the belief that students learn best when instruction is matched to their preferred learning style (e.g., visual, auditory, kinesthetic). Despite its popularity, research consistently shows little to no evidence that teaching to learning styles improves learning outcomes. In this paper, you will critically examine the learning styles myth, explain why it remains so widespread, and propose more accurate, research-based ways educators can think about and support student learning.
    7. Paper Requirements
    8. In your paper, address the following components:
    9. Explain the Learning Styles Myth. Clearly describe what the learning styles theory claims and how it is commonly used in educational settings. Explain what it means to teach to learning styles and why this approach appears appealing to teachers, students, and parents.
    10. Debunking the Myth Using Evidence. Explain why learning styles are considered a myth by cognitive scientists and educational psychologists. Summarize key findings from research discussed in the course that challenge the idea that matching instruction to learning styles improves learning.
    11. Why the Myth Persists. Analyze why the learning styles belief is so common and difficult to eliminate. Consider factors such as:
    • Intuitive appeal and personal experience
    • Confirmation bias
    • Oversimplification of complex learning processes
    • Teacher preparation and popular educational culture
    1. Evidence-Based Alternatives. Propose more accurate and effective ways educators should think about student learning instead of learning styles. These may include:
    • Multiple means of representation and practice
    • Cognitive load and memory processes
    • Retrieval practice, spacing, and feedback
    • Differentiation based on readiness, not preference
    1. Expectations for Writing
    • Organize your paper clearly with logical flow
    • Original work. Evidence of AI will result in 0 points.
    • Use evidence from course readings and discussions
    • Write in a professional, academic, and reflective tone
    • Proofread for grammar, clarity, and accuracy

  • Jonestown documentary and sociological analysis of religion

    No instructions provided

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Jim Jones essay.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Assignment #5

    Please Review Instructions

  • Journal Article review

    The purpose of the Journal Article Review Assignment is to get you to begin to analyze recent

    and relevant research in your field. The journal article review is a way to dissect research

    conducted by scholars and experts. Solid, empirical research is the basis for a doctoral degree

    and should be regarded as having the utmost importance. The ability to read, interpret, critically

    analyze, and integrate content from an article to a problem is a hallmark of those graduating with

    a doctoral degree as you will be expected to publish, at least occasionally, once you finish your

    degree.

    INSTRUCTIONS

    In this assignment, you will critically review 1 recent peer-reviewed article per topic published in

    the last 7 years in a minimum of 5 pages.

    The paper must follow current APA guidelines.

    There should be a minimum of 2 references (the selected article and Snipes:

    Volds Theoretical Criminology).

    The page count does not include the title page, abstract, reference section, or any extra

    material.

    See the grading rubric for additional guidance.

    You must follow the article focus prompt closely.

    o The topic of the article must be related to managing or working with mentally ill

    offenders.

    Microsoft Word is the only acceptable upload format.

    At a minimum, your review should have 3 sections with headings. Those three sections include:

    the identification of the premise and supporting points of the article,

    a synthesis of the article and the corresponding material in the textbook or a synthesis of

    the article with your personal experience with the topic, and

    a critical evaluation of the premise(s) and supporting points of the article.

  • Logic Model for Group Project

    I have attached the instructions for this assignment, along with the proposal for the logic model. I am only requesting that you do the logic model section. I attached just those instructions separately. I also attached the instructions for the entire group assignment just for reference if needed.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Logic Model Instructions for group project.docx, Reilly_Individual Dream Agency Conceptualization Worksheet.docx, Dream Agency Project Worksheet-Submitted in One Document- 2026.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • The Relationship Between Frequency of Case Manager Contact a…

    As discussed on Week 2, throughout the term, you will work on portions of a Research Proposal which will be submitted as a completed assignment in the last week of the course. The purpose of the Research Proposal is to provide learners with the opportunity to apply course learnings while designing an original research study and conducting a literature review. You will apply your understanding of research design concepts to your research study idea and compile a completed proposal, though you will not actually conduct the study. As a reminder from Week 2: A few important things to keep in mind: You research proposal must be some type of quantitative research study. DO NOT design a qualitative or mixed-methods study. Your proposed study can be an experimental or nonexperimental study. You’ll be learning about specific types of quantitative designs in your chapter readings. THIS WEEK: You will complete your Research Proposal Introduction section by combining your literature review (from Week 2) with an overview of your topic and your proposed study. 1) You will begin your proposal introduction by identifying the specific problem area (what it is, why it is important) and the prevalence/scope of the problem. 2) You should then lead into your literature review which you completed in Week 2. 3) Then, at the end of each summary/critique (for each article you reviewed) add a sentence or two explaining how it relates to your research proposal/proposed idea and/or how you will use the article in your research. 4) Lastly, at the very end of your introduction, you should state the purpose of your study and research question(s), including hypotheses if applicable. *Your response should be 750 words or more (with the inclusion of you Week 2 literature review), and should be submitted in APA format. *You must submit a Word document only (do not submit a PDF or any other format – I cannot give annotated feedback on these formats on blackboard) *Remember, only use direct quotes when absolutely necessary. For this assignment, there should be 1-2 quotes at maximum (if any).

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Reflection.docx, ResearchProposalPart1MarkUp.pdf, Research Proposal Part 1.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.