Bright Academic Experts

Author: admin

  • CUL135 out of class assignment

    Assignment:

    People around the world follow different rules and customs when eating meals. What may be considered polite in one country could be seen as rude in another. Dining etiquette often reflects a cultures values, traditions, and way of life.

    Your task:

    Write an informative essay explaining dining room etiquette in at least two different countries or cultures. Describe the rules people follow while eating and explain why these customs are important in each culture.

  • World literature

    World literature annotated bibliography and thesis statement mla format

  • Branding Strategy

    Context

    As part of your upcoming assignment in Week 7, you will develop a branding strategy that includes designing a logo for your hypothetical company. A logo should grab a customer’s attention and distinguish a company from its competitors. In fact, a logo is often the foundation of a brand’s identity.

    Read the

    post provided by your professor to help you get started.

    Post a Response

    Please respond to the following:

    For this discussion, view :

    1. Choose one of the brands from the list and tell us about the first element of that brands logo that caught your eye.
    2. As you analyze this logo, describe all the visual elements of the logo you selected such as the color or symbols/pictures.
    3. How do these visual elements create the personality of this brand.
    4. How can you use one visual element of this logo as inspiration in developing your own logo for your hypothetical business?

    Response Instructions

    • Respond to the discussion with at least four good sentences per discussion question. Make sure you address all points of each bullet, (this includes text, audio, and video responses.)
    • Respond in audio and video using complete and coherent statements.
    • Remember to post early, so you have an opportunity to engage with peers and faculty to share ideas and create meaningful dialogue.
    • Do not copy and paste content from the web. This is a violation of Strayer’s Academic Integrity policy.
    • Include academic sources that are credible, relevant, and appropriate at the end of the post. Cite each source listed in the body of the post. For help with research, writing, and citation, access the or review. For citing social media resources refer to
    • This course requires the use of Strayer Writing Standards (SWS). The library is your home for SWS assistance, including citations and formatting. Please refer to the for all support. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
    • Video: How to View the
    • .

    Respond to a Peer

    Be sure to respond to at least one of your classmates posts.

    1. Read a post by one of your peers and provide a substantive response, making sure to extend the conversation by asking questions, offering rich ideas, or sharing personal connections.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): EBSCO-FullText-01_29_2026.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • cece

    summarize the book romitte and julio using MEAL (make a claim, evidence, analyze, and how to it link)and summarize only chapter 7 chat room

  • NU332: Week 2 Discussion Board Prompt

    Week 2 Discussion Board Prompt

    Instructions: Please respond to the course faculty prompt in scholarly writing with 150-200 words (about the length of 1 well-developed paragraph). Your response should reflect the readings, VoiceThreads and videos in the course content for the week. Your response should provide further evidence to support, examine, or respectfully refute the prompt. Your response should conclude with 1 thoughtful question to advance the discussion. Your response must include at least 1 reference using APA formatting.

    Week 2 Prompt: Consider the VT, readings, and video for Week 2 about values and moral development, values clarification and transcultural and spiritual issues in nursing care. We are reminded that different systems of values and morals can collide in healthcare. As nursing professionals, we may be confronted with different systems of values. We can feel conflicted about the cultural values of our patients, our employing institutions, other social institutions and the ways in which they view health and healing. The YouTube video, Nurse dragged from hospital by police, is a stark example of an ethical situation with conflicting systems of values faced by a nurse, her reaction based on her values, morals and ethics, and the police response. After reflecting on the video, what are your thoughts about how you can best prepare yourself to manage everyday ethics and ethical situations in nursing? After reflecting, where did you develop your values about health and health care? What strategies can you use in your nursing practice to manage differences between your own values, the values of your patients and the values of the institution you work for? Use the readings to guide you in developing your responses. Provide examples as needed.

    The YouTube video, Nurse dragged from hospital by police:

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Moral Development and Values.pdf, Eliminating Explicit and Implicit Biases in Health Care- Evidence and Research Needs.pdf, APA Quick Guidelines and Grammar.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Corrections for task 1 and 2

    I have completed Task 1 and Task 2, it needs edits based on professor’s feedback and to see if all guidelines have been followed
    the first two assignments were approved, but still there are some feedback to fix. This was her feedback and I resolved it.”There are many areas that are keeping this Task 1 from moving forward. You must use all scholarly peer-reviewed sources (less than 5 years old), and you did not. Please see the guide; you did not submit enough Annotated Bibliographies as stated to meet the requirements. There are also references listed that are not used in your submission. Please see the other comments for details. “

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Sediqi Ahmadullah Task 1- 01-28-2026.docx, Sediqi_Task 2 Research Questions Methodology _12-04-2025.docx, Assignment Instructions 4 tasks.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Reflection on Doctoral Competency Growth

    As this dissertation companion course comes to a close, take some time to reflect on your growth in the key doctoral competency areas. For this Assignment, think about how you felt at the beginning of this dissertation companion course and how you feel now. Use the worksheet provided below to document your thoughts on your personal growth in each of the key competency areas. Here are the competencies again for your convenience. Review and think about your skills in each area prior to completing the Assignment. Click on the image below, then click on each competency area to view the details. In the Learning Resources, open the “Competency Development Tracker” worksheet and save it to your computer and use it to document your growth in each of the competency areas Use the worksheet to reflect on what you have discovered about yourself with regard to each of the following competency areas: Competency Area 1: Scholarly Process & Identity Competency Area 2: Technology Competency Area 3: Library/Reading Competency Area 4: Scholarly Writing Competency Area 5: Research/Dissertation Competency Area 6: Career/Professional Competency Area 7: Dispositions Also reflect on the following: In which areas do you feel confident? In which areas do you need to continue developing your skills. What steps might you take to ensure continued development in these growth areas? Reflect on your growth in Competency Area 1 and discuss what you have discovered about yourself with regard to this competency area. 12.85 to >11.49 pts EXCELLENT Fully developed, insightful, credible, and scholarly discussion of what you have discovered about yourself regarding Competency Area 1. 11.49 to >10.21 pts GOOD Thorough and well-organized discussion of what you have discovered about yourself regarding Competency Area 1. 10.21 to >8.89 pts FAIR Adequate discussion of what you have discovered about yourself regarding Competency Area 1. 8.89 to >0 pts POOR Missing, unoriginal, or does not adequately discuss what you have discovered about yourself regarding Competency Area 1. 12.85 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflect on your growth in Competency Area 2 and discuss what you have discovered about yourself with regard to this competency area. 12.85 to >11.49 pts EXCELLENT Fully developed, insightful, credible, and scholarly discussion of what you have discovered about yourself regarding Competency Area 2. 11.49 to >10.21 pts GOOD Thorough and well-organized discussion of what you have discovered about yourself regarding Competency Area 2. 10.21 to >8.89 pts FAIR Adequate discussion of what you have discovered about yourself regarding Competency Area 2. 8.89 to >0 pts POOR Missing, unoriginal, or does not adequately discuss what you have discovered about yourself regarding Competency Area 2. 12.85 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflect on your growth in Competency Area 3 and discuss what you have discovered about yourself with regard to this competency area. 12.86 to >11.5 pts EXCELLENT Fully developed, insightful, credible, and scholarly discussion of what you have discovered about yourself regarding Competency Area 3. 11.5 to >10.22 pts GOOD Thorough and well-organized discussion of what you have discovered about yourself regarding Competency Area 3. 10.22 to >8.9 pts FAIR Adequate discussion of what you have discovered about yourself regarding Competency Area 3. 8.9 to >0 pts POOR Missing, unoriginal, or does not adequately discuss what you have discovered about yourself regarding Competency Area 3. 12.86 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflect on your growth in Competency Area 4 and discuss what you have discovered about yourself with regard to this competency area. 12.86 to >11.5 pts EXCELLENT Fully developed, insightful, credible, and scholarly discussion of what you have discovered about yourself regarding Competency Area 4. 11.5 to >10.22 pts GOOD Thorough and well-organized discussion of what you have discovered about yourself regarding Competency Area 4. 10.22 to >8.9 pts FAIR Adequate discussion of what you have discovered about yourself regarding Competency Area 4. 8.9 to >0 pts POOR Missing, unoriginal, or does not adequately discuss what you have discovered about yourself regarding Competency Area 4. 12.86 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflect on your growth in Competency Area 5 and discuss what you have discovered about yourself with regard to this competency area. 12.86 to >11.5 pts EXCELLENT Fully developed, insightful, credible, and scholarly discussion of what you have discovered about yourself regarding Competency Area 5. 11.5 to >10.22 pts GOOD Thorough and well-organized discussion of what you have discovered about yourself regarding Competency Area 5. 10.22 to >8.9 pts FAIR Adequate discussion of what you have discovered about yourself regarding Competency Area 5. 8.9 to >0 pts POOR Missing, unoriginal, or does not adequately discuss what you have discovered about yourself regarding Competency Area 5. 12.86 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflect on your growth in Competency Area 6 and discuss what you have discovered about yourself with regard to this competency area. 12.86 to >11.5 pts EXCELLENT Fully developed, insightful, credible, and scholarly discussion of what you have discovered about yourself regarding Competency Area 6. 11.5 to >10.22 pts GOOD Thorough and well-organized discussion of what you have discovered about yourself regarding Competency Area 6. 10.22 to >8.9 pts FAIR Adequate discussion of what you have discovered about yourself regarding Competency Area 6. 8.9 to >0 pts POOR Missing, unoriginal, or does not adequately discuss what you have discovered about yourself regarding Competency Area 6. 12.86 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflect on your growth in Competency Area 7 and discuss what you have discovered about yourself with regard to this competency area. 12.86 to >11.5 pts EXCELLENT Fully developed, insightful, credible, and scholarly discussion of what you have discovered about yourself regarding Competency Area 7. 11.5 to >10.22 pts GOOD Thorough and well-organized discussion of what you have discovered about yourself regarding Competency Area 7. 10.22 to >8.9 pts FAIR Adequate discussion of what you have discovered about yourself regarding Competency Area 7. 8.9 to >0 pts POOR Missing, unoriginal, or does not adequately discuss what you have discovered about yourself regarding Competency Area 7. 12.86 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Communication: … Extent to which writing is professional, appropriate, clear, properly formatted, grammatically and structurally correct, synthesized, and scholarly AND the correct template is used. 10 to >8.9 pts EXCELLENT Writing is fully developed, exceptionally well organized, synthesized, scholarly, and free of writing errors. Ideas are connected throughout with appropriate transitions AND the correct template is used. 8.9 to >7.9 pts GOOD Writing is generally thorough and grammatically correct, with proper formatting and minimal concerns. Synthesis is demonstrated and ideas are clearly stated AND the correct template is used. 7.9 to >6.9 pts FAIR Writing adequately meets expectations for writing and synthesis but with infrequent and minor issues AND the correct template is used. 6.9 to >0 pts POOR Writing does not meet basic expectations (e.g., clarity, tone, organization, grammar, spelling, punctuation, source citation and references (if applicable), synthesis material, insufficient originality, etc.) OR the correct template is not used. 10 pts Total Points: 100

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): FPSY_8991_Competencies Transcript (1).pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Discussion Board Essay: Mental Health and Creativity

    Just what is “normal” for a creative person? The ancient Greeks believed that various forms of divine madness were the leading source of creativity in poetry, art, and performance (Ludwig, 1995). Even today, many people expect the creative geniuses to be psychologically disturbed or mentally ill.

    Discuss and explain the possible connection between creativity and psychological disorders. You are invited to read this . Please provide examples of famous creative people.

    Respond to at least one of your classmates.

    Your discussion should demonstrate your understanding of the content you read. In addition, you should use personal experiences, current events, or prior knowledge as examples to connect with the main points you are discussing.

    This post should not be about agreeing or disagreeing with the readings but about demonstrating your understanding of the readings.

    The Discussion Board Essays must be at least 300 words. Essays greater than 300 words are acceptable. Essays should be well organized with complete sentences and minimal grammar/spelling errors.

    Instead of writing an essay, you can create an infographic or record yourself using a video or audio recorder.

    What I am looking for:

    Minimum 300-word discussion board essay.

    Well laid out essay that demonstrates your understanding of the readings.

    For this paper, you may use AI to brainstorm topics, generate search terms, check grammar, and summarize your own notes. You may NOT use AI to write any portion of the paper, summarize sources you haven’t read, or generate arguments. Include a brief statement describing your AI use at the end.

  • Module 5 -Post

    Instructions

    • Complete Module 5 Post-Test Writing Assignment (100 points)
    • Written Paper Submission: Past Conflict and Resolution
    • For this Module 5 Writing Assignment, you will identify one recent conflict that you have had to navigate yourself.
    • This must be a conflict that has happened within the past month (the more recent, the better!)
    • You will write a paper describing your past conflict, and how you resolved the conflict. Describe the conflict resolution strategies that you used. Include details about your conflict from multiple angles, your emotions about it, and effectively communicate your concerns that helped you reach a resolution.
    • Reference any relevant conflict resolution strategies from the course that you used to resolve your conflict. I.E., if you happened to use a strategy from the course content when you resolved your past conflict, please reference this in your paper.
    • This paper will be 2-3 pages long (double spaced, 12 pt font, Times New Roman).
    • Use APA 7TH Edition as the format guideline for your paper and for listing/citing all references. (Navigate to CID Studio The Write Path: Effective Writing Resources Scroll to FAQs Links to APA 7th Edition and APA Formatting).
    • Where relevant, include a reference list in your paper for any conflict resolution strategy we learned about in class that you did use for your past conflict.
    • Correctly cite the reference within the body of your paper.
    • Use of AI is prohibited for this assignment. The purpose of the assignment is for you to critically analyze and write about your own personal conflict style.
    • It is important to write clearly and succinctly. Please use Grammarly, spelling check, or other tools to ensure you have no misspellings or grammar errors. You may also navigate to effective writing resources in the CID Studio.
    • Reading 5.3. The HR Digest (2024, May 5).

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): ProQuestDocuments-2026-01-29 (1).pdf, 905__Negotiations.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Advise the governor

    Purposes of this assignment:

    1. Practice evidence-based decision making.
    2. Practice choosing between abstinence-based and harm reduction options
    3. Practice advocating for just policies.
    4. Help your state set good policies.

    Context:

    Bills (new laws) are passed through the state’s House of Representatives and the state’s Senate.

    is involved in proposing, approving, or rejecting legislation. That includes any legislation about the legality of buying, selling, possessing, and using vaping products. As a resident of the state, you have every right to inform and persuade any of these elected officials. (And it doesn’t matter whether you are a citizen, or voter, or not.)

    Tasks:

    1. Research the current state regulations on vaping products or electronic cigarettes. The states
    3. a summary.
    4. Review the evidence on outcomes related to vaping. The internet and your
    6. can both help.
    7. Complete this worksheet:
    8. Based on your worksheet, write the governor of our state a
    10. recommending a course of action on the legality of vaping products. an
    11. Send the letter. Send it to the governor, by snail mail or by email. (FYI, postal letters carry more weight with politicians (are more influential) than emails.) Save evidence of this, such as a screenshot or a photo.
    12. Submit three things: your worksheet, your letter (exactly as written), and evidence of having sent it.

    Grading criteria: Please see this

    . The instructor is not looking for you to take a particular stance. You get to make your judgment as to what would serve our state well. You will be graded, however, on your ability to support your suggestion with good reasoning or evidence.

    Note: This is a letter, not an academic paper, so citations are not expected. Feel free to model your work after this example

    .

    Help available: The

    about how to best format a persuasive letter to an elected official. I encourage you to be direct in your request (say just what you want done) and then to back it up with an explanation.

    AI use rules for this assignment: For this assignment, students MAY USE generative artificial intelligence (AI) but ONLY in the following ways:

    • Only for steps 1 and 2 (researching our regulations/laws and the effects of vaping)
    • Find information sources: Students may use AI as they would Google Scholar or a library database to generate suggestions of information sources that the student can use for research on the subject.
    • Information gathering: Students may use AI to generate answers in the same way that they might use Google or books to do so.