Bright Academic Experts

Author: admin

  • National Council on Public History (NCPH)

    we focus on public history as a form of public culture, not just as a set of historical topics, but as a way knowledge, memory, and authority are produced for and with publics. You will explore the website of the National Council on Public History (NCPH), the primary professional organization for public historians in the United States.


    Prompt 1: Public History as Institutional Practice

    Using the NCPH website as your primary source, write 600800 words analyzing:

    • How public history is framed as a field, profession, or practice
    • What assumptions are made about publics, expertise, and ethics
    • How authority is claimed, shared, or negotiated

    Support your analysis with specific references to site language and structure, and connect your observations to course concepts.

    Prompt 2: Professionalization, Public Culture, and Power

    Professional organizations shape public culture in important ways.

    In 600800 words, discuss:

    • How NCPH formalizes public history (through standards, language, resources, or advocacy)
    • What this formalization enables
    • What it may constrain or leave unaddressed

    Ground your analysis in close reading of the website.

    Prompt 3: Reflexive Analysis

    Approach the NCPH website as both an object and a method.

    In 600800 words, reflect on:

    • How the site teaches visitors how to think about public history
    • What kinds of responsibility, urgency, or affect it produces
    • How this shapes your understanding of public-facing scholarship or work

    This should be reflective and analytical, grounded in the site itself.

    Three section each section need to be 600-800 words

    Requirements: 2.5p   |   .doc file

  • Bureaucracy Paper

    The goal of this assignment is for you to use your life experience as data to understand the nature and function of a bureaucracy.

    In a paper of 1,000 words, describe an organization with which you have direct personal experience and which appears to fit the characteristics of a bureaucracy, as listed in Chapter 6 of Our Social World: An Introduction to Sociology.

    Your essay should incorporate the five items listed below and show that the organization bureaucracy meets each characteristic:

    1. Clear hierarchical levels of authority with the work assignments flowing downward
    2. A division of labor
    3. Written rules
    4. Written communications and records
    5. Impersonality

    Use the attached outline to complete this assignment. Be sure to provide a conclusion paragraph to your paper.

    You must use a minimum of three scholarly sources, including the textbook.

    Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

    This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Bureaucracy rubic.pdf, SOC-102-RS-T4-BureaucracyOutline.docx, Our social world an introduction to sociology book.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Other Question

    • Submit 2-3 paged, typewritten and double-spaced pages addressing the following:
      • What do you know about MSMU and the ABSN program?
      • What personal qualities and life experiences have prepared you for a successful career in nursing?
      • How do you handle stress, especially when you have multiple tasks to complete in a short period of time?

      I am applying to Mount Saint Mary university and I need to do a personal essay, I can tell you more about me so you can use my personal experience when writing this essay.

    Requirements: 3 pages

  • Olivia Pepper Case Study Analysis and Intervention Plan.0201…

    For this assignment, you will analyze a client or client system that you worked with during your internship. Your analysis will include demographic information; ethical dilemmas you encountered and their resolution; ways that anti-racism, diversity, equity, and inclusion (ADEI) principles were applied; your assessment of the client or client system; and an intervention plan based on your assessment.

    Instructions

    After you have selected a client or client system that you worked with during your internship, create your case study analysis and intervention plan by completing the following steps:

    1. Describe the client or client system.
    • Include the biopsychosocialspiritual assessment.
    • Offer specific examples wherever possible.
    1. Describe how anti-racism, diversity, equity, and inclusion (ADEI) principles were applied to this client situation.
    • Offer specific examples wherever possible.
    1. Describe how an intervention was applied to this client situation.
    • Offer specific examples wherever possible.
    1. Describe ethical challenges encountered when working with this client or client system.
    • Explain how these challenges were resolved.
    • Offer specific examples wherever possible.

    Case Study Analysis and Intervention Plan

    Case Study Analysis and Intervention Plan Criteria Ratings Pts: Describe the client or client system, including the biopsychosocial assessment.

    50 to >42.5 pts

    DISTINGUISHED

    Describes the client or client system, including the biopsychosocial assessment with specific examples.

    42.5 to >35 pts

    PROFICIENT

    Describes the client or client system, including the biopsychosocial assessment.

    35 to >0 pts

    BASIC

    Identifies the client or client system.

    0 pts

    NON_PERFORMANCE

    Does not identify the client or client system.

    / 50 pts

    Describe how anti-racism, diversity, equity, and inclusion (ADEI) principles were applied to this client situation.

    50 to >42.5 pts

    DISTINGUISHED

    Describes how anti-racism, diversity, equity, and inclusion (ADEI) principles were applied to this client situation with specific examples.

    42.5 to >35 pts

    PROFICIENT

    Describes how anti-racism, diversity, equity, and inclusion (ADEI) principles were applied to this client situation.

    35 to >0 pts

    BASIC

    Identifies anti-racism, diversity, equity, and inclusion (ADEI) principles applied to this client situation.

    0 pts

    NON_PERFORMANCE

    Does not identify anti-racism, diversity, equity, and inclusion (ADEI) principles applied to this client situation.

    / 50 pts

    Describe how an intervention was applied to this client situation.

    50 to >42.5 pts

    DISTINGUISHED

    Describes how an intervention was applied to this client situation with specific examples.

    42.5 to >35 pts

    PROFICIENT

    Describes how an intervention was applied to this client situation.

    35 to >0 pts

    BASIC

    Identifies an intervention that was applied to this client situation.

    0 pts

    NON_PERFORMANCE

    Does not identify an intervention that was applied to this client situation.

    / 50 pts

    Describe potential ethical challenges.

    50 to >42.5 pts

    DISTINGUISHED

    Describes ethical challenges and explains how they were resolved.

    42.5 to >35 pts

    PROFICIENT

    Describes potential ethical challenges.

    35 to >0 pts

    BASIC

    Identifies ethical challenges.

    0 pts

    NON_PERFORMANCE

    Fails to identify ethical challenges.

    / 50 pts

    Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for members of the social work profession.

    50 to >42.5 pts

    DISTINGUISHED

    Communicates in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for members of the social work profession consistently with no errors.

    42.5 to >35 pts

    PROFICIENT

    Communicates in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for members of the social work profession.

    35 to >0 pts

    BASIC

    Inconsistently communicates in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for members of the social work profession.

    0 pts

    NON_PERFORMANCE

    Does not communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for members of the social work profession.

    / 50 pts

    Total Points: 0

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Olivia Pepper SWK 5013 Biopsychosocial Assessment01232022.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • W5

    Once you have implemented your organizational and leadership development plans, you need to apply strategies for improving employee relations as well as performance. This means your leadership team should be ready to address any type of issue that arises with employees, including the relationship between productive and counterproductive behaviors. The development of a final piece to your organizational culture puzzle is the development and implementation of an employee relations plan to address such issues before they become a problem within an organizations culture.

    Imagine ACME Industries has a final assignment for you after the success of your previous projects. With an organizational and leadership development plan now both in place, the CEO asks you to analyze the relationship between productive and counterproductive behaviors in the company and assess the benefits of implementing an employee relations plan.

    Research employee relations plans.

    Prepare a 1,050- to 1,400-word employee relations analysis, assessment, and plan.

    Include the following in your analysis, assessment, and plan:

    • From your point of view, identify the top 5 productive and top 5 counterproductive behaviors in an organization.
    • Analyze the relationship between your identified behaviors.
    • Identify potential issues that might arise from these behaviors.
    • Explain what an employee relations plan for ACME will look like, addressing all elements such a plan might include.
    • Assess the impact that implementing an employee relations plan would have on ACMEs overall culture.
    • Recommend strategies to implement an employee relations plan at ACME Industries.
    • How will these strategies eliminate a toxic work environment?
    • How will these strategies ensure a fair and equitable place to work for all employees at ACME?

  • Clinical case study analysis in abdominal symptoms and diffe…

    Instructions It is anticipated that the initial discussion post should be in the range of 250-300 words. Response posts to peers have no minimum word requirement but must demonstrate topic knowledge and scholarly engagement with peers. Substantive content is imperative for all posts. All discussion prompt elements for the topic must be addressed. Please proofread your response carefully for grammar and spelling. Do not upload any attachments unless specified in the instructions. All posts should be supported by a minimum of one scholarly resource, ideally within the last 5 years. Journals and websites must be cited appropriately. Citations and references must adhere to APA format. Classroom Participation Students are expected to address the initial discussion question by Wednesday of each week. Participation in the discussion forum requires a minimum of three (3) substantive postings (this includes your initial post and posting to two peers) on three (3) different days. Substantive means that you add something new to the discussion supported with citation(s) and reference(s), you are not just agreeing. This is also a time to ask questions or offer information surrounding the topic addressed by your peers. Personal experience is appropriate for a substantive discussion, however should be correlated to the literature. All discussion boards will be evaluated utilizing rubric criterion inclusive of content, analysis, collaboration, writing and APA. If you fail to post an initial discussion or initial discussion is late, you will not receive points for content and analysis, you may however post to your peers for partial credit following the guidelines above. Initial Response Instructions: Read the following case study and answer the posed questions Case #1: A 64-year-old man presents to the emergency department with abdominal pain and distention, as well as constipation of 8 days duration. He denies vomiting, fever, diarrhea, or dysuria. Except for hypertension, he is otherwise healthy with no prior surgeries. His vital signs are normal except for a borderline pulse of 99 bpm. His physical examination is unremarkable except for his abdomen, which is large, rotund, and tympanitic. There is diffuse tenderness everywhere in the abdomen. What history would you want to obtain? What differential diagnoses would you consider? List and describe the specific diagnostic tests you might order to determine cause of his concern? Case #2: Kyle is a 58-year-old man who is experiencing lower abdominal discomfort nausea and diarrhea lasting 2 days. He thought he had eaten something that disturbed his stomach but since this has lasted so long, he is afraid its something serious. As you obtain a history from this patient what differential diagnoses are you considering. Give rational for your choices. Discuss the pathophysiologic relationship between nausea and vomiting? Cite current research findings, national guidelines, and expert opinions and controversies found in the medical and nursing literature to support your position and suggestions. Responses need to address all components of the question, demonstrate critical thinking and analysis, and include peer reviewed journal evidence to support the students position. Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format.

  • Simplify the following equtions

    1. If 2x+3=13, find the value of x.

    Requirements:   |   .doc file

  • TikTok and Big Tech Crackdown

    read the case study and answer the questions. be sure it has a introduction, conclusion, subheadings and empirical articles at least 3-4 and it is very unique and human y

  • Leadership

    1a. For this course, I chose Radical Candor by Kim Scott. This book strongly aligns with my current and desired leadership style because it emphasizes leading with both empathy and accountability. Scott introduces the concept of caring personally while challenging directly, which resonates with how I view effective leadership, particularly in healthcare. In high-stakes environments, leaders must balance compassion with clarity to maintain trust, safety, and performance. What I hope to gain from this book is a deeper understanding of how to provide honest feedback without damaging relationships. Authentic leadership requires transparency and integrity, but it also requires emotional intelligence. Radical Candor reframes difficult conversations as an act of care rather than confrontation, which is especially important in healthcare settings where mistakes, stress, and burnout are common. I want to strengthen my ability to address issues directly while still supporting and valuing my team members as individuals. One of the most influential ideas I have encountered so far is Scotts assertion that being nice but avoiding honesty can be more harmful than being direct. This challenged my previous assumptions about leadership, as I often equated kindness with avoiding discomfort. The book reinforces that respect is earned through consistency, fairness, and clear expectations, not avoidance. My perspective on healthcare leadership has been shaped by observing leaders who were trusted because they were transparent, approachable, and held themselves to the same standards as their teams. Radical Candor affirms that authentic leadership is not about authority, but about earning respect through honesty, empathy, and accountability. 1b. Hi class, The leadership book I selected for this course is The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People by Stephen R. Covey. This book strongly aligns with my desired leadership style because it emphasizes principle-centered leadership, personal responsibility, and long-term effectiveness rather than quick results. Coveys focus on self-awareness, integrity, and collaboration reflects the type of leader I strive to become in healthcare, where trust and ethical decision-making are essential. Through this book, I hope to gain new knowledge about authentic leadership, particularly how leading oneself effectively is the foundation for leading others. Coveys emphasis on habits such as being proactive and seeking first to understand before being understood highlights the importance of emotional intelligence and empathy, which are critical in healthcare leadership roles. One of the most influential ideas in the book so far is the concept of being proactive. Covey explains that effective leaders take responsibility for their actions and responses rather than reacting to circumstances. This idea resonated with me because healthcare environments are often fast-paced and stressful, requiring leaders to remain calm, accountable, and solutions-focused. My experience working in patient access has shaped my views on healthcare leadership. I have seen how clear communication, empathy, and accountability directly affect patient experiences and team morale. Leaders who listen, support their teams, and model professionalism create a positive environment that ultimately improves patient care. Covey, S. R. (1989). The 7 habits of highly effective people. Free Press.

  • Extra Credit Option 2

    This documentary looks at specific species in the United States that are endangered including many in California.

    You need to provide a college level paragraph analysis for each question using appropriate grammar, punctuation, and spelling. Your paragraph answers need to be double-spaced using 12 points font. Just watching the documentary and providing one or two sentences will not receive the full 5 points. Since you can’t answer most of the questions without using information learned from the video, you must provide the time stamp citation in your writing. You will be uploading your typed up answers at the link below just like we did for Homework 2 & 3. Your document must be saved in one of the following formats: .rtf, .pdf, .doc, .docx, or .odt. To watch the documentary, click on the title of it above.

    Bibliography

    National Geographic. America’s Endangered Species: Don’t Say Goodbye. 2010. Accessed through Saddleback College Library.

    Citation Information

    For your paraphrasing citation at the end of your paragraph, please provide the time stamp from where within the video you learned the information. For example: (National Geography 9:50). The time stamp, here shown as 9:50, provides where in the video you heard/learned the information.

    Your paragraph answers need to be double-spaced using 12 points font. Similar to Discussion 3, you must provide the time stamp citation in your paragraph answers. You will be uploading your typed up answers at the link below just like we did for Homework 2. Your document must be saved in one of the following formats: .rtf, .pdf, .doc, .docx, or .odt. To watch the documentary, click on the title of it above. Absolutely no extra credit will be accepted after the due date, no exceptions.

    Bibliography

    National Geographic. America’s Endangered Species: Don’t Say Goodbye. 2010.

    Citation Information

    For your paraphrasing citation at the end of your paragraph, please provide the time stamp from where within the video you learned the information. For example: (National Geography 9:50). The time stamp, here shown as 9:50, provides where in the video you heard/learned the

    Questions

    Based on the information learned from watching the documentary:

    1. What endangered species were you not aware of that were discussed in the documentary (discuss at least three)? You are required to provide a citation in this paragraph based on where in the video the species are discussed.
    2. Prior to watching the video, what endangered species were you already aware of?
    3. What aspects of the video surprised you? (Citation in the form of a time stamp is required).
    4. What topics did not surprise you in the video? (Citation in the form of a time stamp is required).
    5. What are some of the endangered species in California? Did you already know about these endangered species? What are your thoughts on how many endangered species there are in California? (Citation in the form of a time stamp is required).
    6. Has information in this video changed the way you look at how humans interact and affect the environment and the rest of the biosphere?
    7. What if any of the information you have learned in the video will you share with other people?

    Important Reminder: If any portion of your submitted extra credit is flagged for using any apps, software, or programs to assist in your writing, it is an automatic zero.

    FILM LINK:

    https://www.google.com/search?sca_esv=ac8dc95cd3d12e0a&rlz=1C5CHFA_enUS936US936&udm=7&fbs=ADc_l-aN0CWEZBOHjofHoaMMDiKpmAsnXCN5UBx17opt8eaTXz9awvmwbLijfri5gfg3jJCJPQ0h4oA7srHripsC9qMhOaJO871LC9_g9gX8FjjC7RPAmkv67J21gFVFSnPy-yL0ohL_NUv54foBIdSL7vC30VmJEn64E30Jh2USIu4iRrr8bAl_GKO5YhtCc2_bDQ0FH7Ugy0DOG7PofcUySKbew-hWPw&q=america%27s+endangered+species+don%27t+say+goodbye&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiYl-qK06ySAxUsATQIHfXrAl4QtKgLegQIDhAB&biw=1440&bih=718&dpr=2&aic=0#fpstate=ive&ip=1&vld=cid:a596fb72,vid:Fh4kXukWiEM,st:0