Author: admin

  • 30 second bic commercial

    I have to write a informative outline on a 30 second commercial that martha Stewart and snoop dog did on bic using ethos pathos logos

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Persuasive outline for ethos logos and pathos-1.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Small Group Participation Assignment

    Small Group Participation Assignment

    You are required to attend one support group/small group to observe and assess the leadership skills and the group dynamics. This is NOT to be a group that you already lead or regularly participate in; this is to be a group where you should feel like a newcomer/participant.

    You can attend any small group of your choosing, so long as the discussion is geared toward a particular topic and there is a clear leader. Support groups can be located online. You should request permission from the group leader to attend prior to the group meeting, because some groups are open to anyone while some are not. Upon arrival at the group meeting, you should introduce yourself to the group leader as a student observer. If you choose to attend an AA or NA meeting, you might consider introducing yourself to the group as someone who is a friend or family member to and alcoholic or addict (most of us are). Following attendance at the support group, a written summary of the group meeting along with an assessment of the group leadership skills observed is required.

    In your assignment this week, you will assess group dynamics and the group leader’s skills.

    Please include both the questions below and your responses in your assignment submission.

    • What was the name of, location, date and time of the group you attended?
    • Did the group leader seem prepared for the group? Knowledgeable? Competent and qualified?
    • Did the group leader or members make newcomers feel welcome?
    • Were the goals of the group clear?
    • Did there seem to be an agenda, whether formally written or spoken?
    • Did those participating in the group seem comfortable?
    • Did anyone in particular dominate the group? How did the leader respond to this?
    • Was the discussion flexible?
    • What was the seating arrangement? Was it comfortable? How did the seating arrangement affect how the group interacted?
    • Did the group leader learn your name? Did you feel important as an observer?
    • How did the leader begin the group? Did you observe any rapport-establishing behaviors?
    • Were you able to identify positive group leadership skills?
    • How did the leader end the group? Was the ending effective?
    • What were the strengths of the group?
    • What were the weaknesses of the group?
    • If you were leading the group, what would you change?
    • Any other noteworthy observations?
    • How did this assignment benefit you? If it didnt, explain why it didnt.
  • assignment 7

    Share your experiences identifying pre-appraised, single study, and anecdotal evidence to address your practice question. Be specific and provide concrete examples.If you had difficulty finding pre-appraised, single study, and anecdotal evidence, explain why. Describe what evidence you did find

    Note: Not all practice questions lend themselves to pre-appraised research; however, your goal is to find the most robust evidence to answer your question.

  • Writing Question

    Submit a table which includes 12 different types of codes and an example of each.

    I will provide examples as well as my dissertation.

    Requirements: 1 pg

  • National Organization of Nurse Practitioner Faculties (NONPF…

    The National Organization of Nurse Practitioner Faculties (NONPF) has determined nine broad areas of core competence that apply to all nurse practitioners, regardless of specialty or patient population focus. NONPF created the first set of Nurse Practitioner Competencies in 1990; the most recent updates were incorporated in 2017. This course was designed to prepare you to synthesize knowledge gained throughout the program and to apply each of the nine core competencies within your selected areas of practice and your representative communities.

    The nine areas of competency are:

    • Scientific Foundations
    • Leadership
    • Quality
    • Practice Inquiry
    • Technology and Information Literacy
    • Policy
    • Health Delivery System
    • Ethics
    • Independent Practice

    For each of the nine NONPF competencies, write one paragraph explaining how the program has prepared you to meet the competency (for a total of at least nine paragraphs). Then, propose how you plan to engage in social change in your community as a nurse practitioner. Finally, describe 12 legislative and/or advocacy activities in which your state nurse practitioner organization(s) are involved. Be specific and provide examples.

    resources

    • American Nurses Credentialing Center. (n.d.).
    • (PMHNP-BC) .
    • https://www.nursingworld.org/our-certifications/psychiatric-mental-health-nurse-practitioner/
    • Scroll to ANCC Study Aids Free for sample test questions and study guides to help you prepare for your certification exam.
    • Buppert, C. (2021).
    • Links to an external site.
    • (7th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.
    • Chapter 12, Lawmaking and Health Policy
    • Chapter 14, Standards of Care for Nurse Practitioner Practice
    • Chapter 15, Measuring Nurse Practitioner Performance
    • The National Organization of Nurse Practitioner Faculties. (2017).
    • Links to an external site.
    • . https://cdn.ymaws.com/www.nonpf.org/resource/resmgr/competencies/20170516_NPCoreCompsContentF.pdf
    • The National Organization of Nurse Practitioner Faculties. (n.d.).
    • Links to an external site.
    • . https://www.nonpf.org/
    • DeNisco, S. M. (2023). Role development for the nurse practitioner (3rd ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.
    • Chapter 18, Professional Employment: Preparing for Licensure, Certification, and Credentialing (pp. 431-445)
    • Zakhari, R. (2021). The psychiatric-mental health nurse practitioner certification review manual . Springer Publishing Company.
    • Chapter 1, Preparing to Pass the Psychiatric-Mental Health Nurse Practitioner Certification Exam (for review as needed)
    • Chapter 16, Practice Test
    • Document:
    • APRN Central. (2019, October 27).
    • Links to an external site.
    • [Video].
    • YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=STAT1WpQgSM
    • DrRegisteredNurse. (2020, February 16).
    • Links to an external site.
    • [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=81E3dAxrO2c
    • Walden University, LLC. (2024). State laws and NPs [Video]. Walden University Canvas. https://waldenu.instructure.com
    • Walden University, LLC. (2024). Obtaining an NP license [Video]. Walden University Canvas. https://waldenu.instructure.com
    • Walden University, LLC. (2024). NP certification [Video]. Walden University Canvas. https://waldenu.instructure.com
    • Walden University, LLC. (2024). NP scope of practice [Video]. Walden University Canvas. https://waldenu.instructure.com
    • Walden University, LLC. (2024). Credentialing [Video]. Walden University Canvas. https://waldenu.instructure.com
    • Walden University, LLC. (2024). DEA and NPI [Video]. Walden University Canvas. https://waldenu.instructure.com
    • Walden University, LLC. (2024). Requesting a verification of education [Video]. Walden University Canvas. https://waldenu.instructure.com
    • Walden University. (2020).
    • [Video]. https://event.on24.com/wcc/r/3640795/98D4198C2B42D16C50C4F0A5D13122B6?partnerref=fac2022
  • The importance of attribution, referencing and citation in a…

    This is the feedback I got, take this into account as well as the instructions, thank you The following issues were noted with your paper: You did not follow the formatting requirements. Your paper was not the required length. Many of your references were deemed falsified/fabricated due to significant amounts of incorrect information in them. This is considered academic misconduct. ANY issues with information in your references in your second submission that would be considered misconduct will make the paper inadmissible and will result in expulsion. In addition to these issues, it was noted that your paper came back 100% AI generated. This combined with the issues noted in your paper support that you used AI. Please refrain from using digital tools to format your references. use these references – “The Complete Guide to Referencing and Avoiding PlagiarismNeville, Colin ( ), – Academic writing : process and product Johnson, Andrew P. (Andrew Paul), author. 2016 ( &;c=RVBVQg&ppg=1), – The Impact of Proper Citation on Academic Integrity and Scholarship Panjaitan, Ani Oranda ; Novelyn, Silphia ; Angreni, Frisca ( ), Plagiarism and attribution: an academic literacies approach? – Magyar, Anna Eva ( ), Linking academic performance to optimistic attributional style: attributions following positive events matter most -Gordeeva , Tamara ; Sheldon, Kennon ; Sychev, Oleg ( &;par
  • Discussion: your favorite brand 645

    In this discussion, you will first introduce yourself to your peers. Tell us a little about yourself. You are also asked to share your thoughts on the importance of brands to you as a consumer. What comes to your mind when you hear the word brand? In this discussion you will share your thoughts about a favorite brand of yours and why you chose the brand. Also, you will discuss how the emotional connection with a brand develops.

    In your initial post, answer the following:

    • Introduce yourself to your peers. Where are you from? What is your educational and/or professional background? What are your hobbies or interests?
    • Share your initial thoughts on what brand means to you. How do brands impact your spending decisions?
    • Choose one of your favorite brands from an industry such as e-commerce, automobiles, shopping, restaurants, technology, etc., to answer these questions.
    • When making a purchasing decision, is the brand important to you? What about the brand resonates with you?
    • Determine whether your favorite brand has a stated “brand promise.” If so, what is it? If not, identify one from another company of your choice. Remember the brand promise is usually different than a tagline or slogan.
    • Do you have an emotional connection with the brand? If so, can you describe it briefly? Consider factors such as trust, respect, and other strong feelings.
    • When considering a purchase, do you look first for your favorite brand? This may be considered top-of-mind awareness or the first brand to come to mind. Provide an example of a brand that is on top of your mind.

    In response to at least two of your peers, address the following:

    • Compare your views on how important a brand is to you when making purchasing decisions with the views of your peers. In what ways do your views differ from those of your peers? How might they be aligned?
    • Share your thoughts on the importance of an emotional connection with the brand.
    • Share your thoughts on how companies should handle customer concerns related to the brand.

    Rubric:

    Comprehension: Develops an initial post with an organized, clear point of view or idea using rich and significant detail (100%)

    Engagement; Provides relevant and meaningful response posts with clarifying explanation and detail (100%)

    Critical Thinking; Draws insightful conclusions that are thoroughly defended with evidence and examples (100%

    Clear Communication: Exceeds expectations with an intentional use of language that promotes a thorough understanding (100%)

    Citations and AttributionsUses: citations for ideas requiring attribution, with few or no minor errors (100%)

  • Business Question

    Submit a table which includes 12 different types of codes and an example of each.

    I will provide examples as well as my dissertation.

    Requirements: 1 pg

  • TOPIC 7 DQ1

    Compare three different methods of disseminating evidence related to health care improvement.

    Requirements: 150-200

  • TOPIC 7 DQ2

    Compare the strategies used when disseminating evidence related to health care outcomes.

    Requirements: 150-200