admin - Bright Academic Experts

Author: admin

Math Practice Questions: Ratios, Fractions, and Word Problem…

I need help reviewing basic mathematics concepts.

Please provide clear, step-by-step solutions for the following practice questions:
The ratio of boys to girls in a class is 3 : 5. If there are 24 boys, how many girls are there?
Simplify the fraction 18/24 and show the steps clearly.
A box contains 45 pencils. If 2/5 of them are red, how many red pencils are there?
Sarah bought 3 notebooks and 2 pens for a total of 16 dollars. Each notebook costs 4 dollars. Find the cost of one pen.
A car travels 180 kilometers in 3 hours. What is its speed in kilometers per hour?

Please explain each answer clearly and simply.

Requirements:

Grade 8 Math Practice: Ratios, Fractions, and Word Problems

I am a Grade 8 student and I need help reviewing basic mathematics.

Please provide clear step-by-step solutions for the following practice questions:

The ratio of boys to girls in a class is 3 : 5. If there are 24 boys, how many girls are there?

Simplify the fraction 18/24 and show the steps.

A box contains 45 pencils. If 2/5 of them are red, how many red pencils are there?

Sarah bought 3 notebooks and 2 pens for 16 dollars. Each notebook costs 4 dollars. Find the cost of one pen.

A car travels 180 kilometers in 3 hours. What is its speed in kilometers per hour?

Please explain each answer clearly and simply.

Requirements:

cyb 400 journal entry

First, complete the assigned readings for the week. Then read the journal prompt and write a reflection. Your journal entry should be two paragraphs long and address the prompt provided in each module.

Auditing plays a critical role in ensuring the security and efficiency of computing environments. Inherent complexities and vulnerabilities within the infrastructures leave the potential for unauthorized access, data breaches, and performance bottlenecks.

Describe why auditing each of these environments (User, Workstation, and LAN) is essential for identifying and mitigating security risks, optimizing network performance, and ensuring compliance with regulatory standards.Submit journal assignments as Word documents with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. Responses should be at least two paragraphs long and address the points indicated in the journal prompt for each module.

Requirements: see above (2 paragraphs)

Epidemiology of a Mental Disorder

1. Chose a mental disorder that has a prevalence of at least 1% of the US population. Accurately described the mental disorder in terms of diagnostic criteria and associated consequence.

2. Three types of disparities clearly explored: age, gender, racial/ethnic, cultural, socioeconomic, geographic, educational, religious, and social support vs. social isolation disparities. Detailed and accurate description demonstrates clear understanding of the target group and their significant concerns regarding quality of life.

3. Descriptive Epidemiology-Provide relevant and credible sources of epidemiological data regarding the significance of the quality of life issues identified in the priority population. Data are very accurately applied to the defined community and interpreted correctly. Very relevant risk factors or conditions are included and very clearly prioritized (e.g., 2×2 matrix).

4. Clearly stated the risk factors and how the risk factors were determined. Critiqued the methods.

5. Clearly described the comorbidities and the implications

6. 5-6 pages APA format with references

Requirements: 5-6 pages

reading response

Each reading response will include one short essay question of one and a half pages, 12pt font, 1-inch margin, double-space. long answer maximum (525 words approximately). Reading responses will cover the class material for the weeks.

Reading Response #1.

According to Allaine Cerwonka and Liisa Malkki (2007), how does knowledge production, through ethnographic work, get done? More precisely, in your own words, mention the required techniques, skills, abilities, performances, and approaches, a good researcher, in Cerwonka and Malkkis work (2027), must have while conducting fieldwork (either in anthropological or interdisciplinary research). Use both readings in your response.

Requirements: 525

Epidemiology of a Mental Disorder

Choose one mental disorder that is prevalent in at least 1% of the US population .Accurately described the mental disorder in terms of diagnostic criteria and associated consequences.
Three types of disparities clearly explored: age, gender, racial/ethnic, cultural, socioeconomic, geographic, educational, religious, and social support vs. social isolation disparities. Detailed and accurate description demonstrates clear understanding of the target group and their significant concerns regarding quality of life.
Descriptive Epidemiology provide very relevant and credible sources of epidemiological data regarding the significance of the quality of life issues identified in the priority population. Data are very accurately applied to the defined community and interpreted correctly. Very relevant risk factors or conditions are included and very clearly prioritized (e.g., 2×2 matrix).
Clearly stated the risk factors and how the risk factors were determined. Critiqued the methods.
Clearly described the comorbidities and the implications
The paper must be double-spaced, 5 pages, and in AP

Requirements: 5-6 pages

Science Question

When you observe a piece of art, your response is influenced by who you are as a human being: your life experience, your temperament, your preferences, your worldview, your feelings, values, and beliefs even your mood that particular day. All of these factors can all influence how you respond to an artwork.

Because of this, a work of art can have very different, but equally valid, meanings for different people.

This essay will give you an opportunity to observe, consider, and interpret what an artwork means for you.

You do not need to know anything about art. You are considering it as a thoughtful observer, and sharing your views with your reader.

NOTE: I do not care nor do I want to hear what a chatbot has to say about it. I am not interested in an art history analysis. I want to understand how you, as a human being, interpret it from your own point of view. ETA: Because of this, you absolutely can and will use the first person “I” instead of the more distanced third person typical of some academic writing.

The artwork well use for this essay is the untitled work, often called Your Body Is a Battleground (1989) by American artist Barbara Kruger.

Barbara Kruger – Your Body Is a Battleground

Your audience

Your reader will be someone interested in art that is open to interpretation. (They may or may not be familiar with this particular piece.) They are curious to hear what this artwork means for you and why; i.e. what has led you to your personal understanding of it.

Process: how to prepare:

1. Guided brainstorm:

This brainstorm will exercise your critical thinking by making inferences based on observation.

Consider whether you will approach this brainstorm using deductive reasoning (having a broad first impression then looking at details that support it) OR inductive reasoning (examining the details first to form a more holistic impression.

Look at the above image (on a laptop or other computer, not your phone) and write down the following by hand (handwritten brainstorming is strongly preferred):

What stands out to you? What basic elements comprise the design? What seems significant about them? When you look closer, or for a longer time, what new details do you notice? What connections can you make, either among the elements or with your ideas and inferences? What do these elements remind you of? How do you relate to them personally?

Gather your thoughts in your brainstorm (free write, list, journaling clustering, etc., whatever works for your purpose) and set them aside. Come back later with a fresh mind and review. Collectively, what do your notes point to as a core idea? In other words, what is a central point you want to make about how you interpret and relate to this piece? That idea will lead to your draft thesis.

NOTE: You have several options in terms of the lens through which you interpret this image. Your inferences can be personal (i.e. about your own direct life experience), or your take on this might be political, or social, or psychological, etc. It’s up to you which interpretation you find most compelling, but ultimately focus on one in particular for your essay.

You will post your brainstorm as your Essay 1 Prep 1: Brainstorm assignment.

2. Draft thesis:

Your thesis draft will be a sentence that expresses the main point you want the reader to understand about what this artwork means for you. See the module lesson on thesis statements here: Intro to Thesis Statements

3. Outline:

Based on your thesis, think about the key points you want to make to expand on your main idea. Look again at your initial brainstorm from when you were closely observing the artwork. (You can do a follow-up brainstorm too.)

In your outline, each supporting claim / topic sentence (one per body paragraph) will express a thought you have about the specific visual or word-based elements you noticed and how they led to your interpretation of this piece and how you relate to it.

In one paragraph youll also compare what you believe may have been the artists original intent versus how youre interpreting it. (See next section.)

NOTE: You will post your draft thesis & outline as your Essay 1 Prep 2: Thesis & Outline assignment.

4. Consider the original context:

After youve come to your own conclusions / interpretations of the artwork and drafted your main thesis and outline, read more about the artist and context for this piece here: The Broad Museum: Barbara Kruger: Untitled (Your body is a battleground)

Consider what the artist may have intended by making this artwork. (Its fine if its different from your take!) In one paragraph of your essay, youll compare your interpretation vs. what the artist may have intended.

However, WAIT to look up the original context until after youve formed your own interpretation. You need your own unfiltered impressions first for your essay to be authentically you.

No other research is necessary for this essay.

5. Draft essay:

Using your outline as a map, draft an introduction, body paragraphs, and a brief conclusion. See the lessons in this module for guidelines on these basic essay elements.

As you draft, here are three questions to ask yourself (and clarify):

What does my reader need to know or understand at this point?

What am I trying to say?

Why does it matter? (i.e. what are the implications?)

6. Review, revise & format:

Review your draft and revise as needed to ensure: your intro sets up your topic for your reader; your thesis and supporting claims are clear and consistent; and each body paragraph develops its focused point in a thoughtful way with supporting details and elaboration. (Again, see the module lesson content for tips.)

Format your paper in MLA format, do a final proofread, then submit. Your Works Cited will consist of the artist and artwork information; see our textbook A Writer’s Reference, section MLA 4-b, #51 (which includes an example of how to format and what to include).

Resources

For more guidance on your essay, in our textbook A Writer’s Reference review:

C1: Planning

C2: Drafting (especially the section on argumentation thesis statements)

C3: Writing paragraphs

C4: Reviewing, revising, editing

For full specifications (page length, etc.) and to submit the assignment, click here: Essay 1: Interpretive argument

AI Policy

This essay is based on your own perceptions, experiences, and opinions. Only you can write this. AI cannot do it for you, at least not convincingly, and your grade will reflect any attempt at taking a shortcut. Do your own work independent of AI from the brainstorm through producing and revising the paper. Your essay should be based entirely on your own insights and the voice should be exclusively your own.

Click NEXT to continue in the module.

Requirements:

TELEHEALTH

Consider the following scenario:

During the COVID-19 pandemic, Central Healthcare System (CHS) integrated telehealth services within several facilities, including their health education center and several outpatient practices, and many patients took advantage of these services. With the decrease in pandemic-related hospitalizations and case numbers, functions within CHS started returning to normal, but administrators are considering continuing telehealth services and potentially expanding into other practices. During the pandemic, surveys were conducted with all patients and providers after telehealth visits, and focus groups were conducted with smaller groups of patients and providers across a range of sites. A CHS analyst analyzed the data from the surveys and focus groups and provided CHS healthcare leaders with the following condensed summaries. CHS administrators plan to synthesize and analyze this information along with data from scholarly literature to help inform their decision.

Central Health System Telehealth Survey Highlights:

Percent of Patient and Provider Ratings of Agree or Strongly Agree on Telehealth Survey Questions by Category

Telehealth Characteristics	CHS Patients	CHS Providers
Convenience	91%	76%
Ease of Use	67%	94%
Effectiveness	78%	75%
Overall Satisfaction	83%	81%

Overall patient and provider perceptions of telehealth were very positive. Ease-of-use ratings were lower among patients than providers, with the lowest ratings among patients ages 65 and older. Effectiveness ratings were largely favorable, but were lower among surgical patients and providers.

Central Health System Telehealth Focus Group Highlights:

Themes and Subthemes of Patient and Provider Perceptions of Telehealth. Patient and provider responses centered around acceptance of telehealth, convenience of telehealth, and barriers to telehealth. Overall, patients and providers cited a high acceptance of telehealth and felt visits were useful and of high quality. Providers found that visits were highly efficient, and patients noted that the lack of travel reduced their time away from work and other obligations. Providers and patients were concerned that some visits could not adequately capture the same information yielded from in-person physical exams. Inexperience with technology also negatively impacted some patients’ perceptions of telehealth.

How might a telehealth expansion benefit CHS patients or providers? How could an expansion be advantageous to the organization as a whole? Alternatively, what are some of the possible risks or drawbacks of a CHS telehealth expansion? CHS leaders recognize that a telehealth expansion is a major decision that would require a significant investment of time and resources, and they want to use evidence to drive decision-making around if and how they might expand these services.

In this two-part Final Project, you will apply your understanding of the Data-Driven Decision-Making Framework to CHSs decision-making process. In the first part of your Final Project, you will focus on the Data, Information, and Knowledge phases of the framework that precede a decision as you integrate available data to inform a decision recommendation. The second part of the project will concentrate on the steps that follow a decision, including plans for implementation, impact evaluation, and communication with stakeholders.

For this first portion of your Final Project, you will search for scholarly literature on telehealth service delivery and use a Literature Review Matrix to organize the conclusions. Then, you will use the data from the literature, along with the provided CHS data summaries, to analyze and synthesize your findings to support a decision about a possible expansion of telehealth services.

Part 1: Literature Review Matrix

Use the Literature Review Matrix to organize the two telehealth articles that were provided, as well as three additional articles that will help support the decision.

Part 2: Draft a 7- to 8-page paper providing a synthesis of your information and your data-driven decision. Within your paper, include the following:

Briefly describe the decision that was proposed within the scenario.
Organize the provided CHS data summaries and the five scholarly articles from your Literature Review Matrix to support a decision.
Analyze the literature and consider the evidence available to help inform the decision. Include an explanation of the significance of the findings.
Explain the additional types and sources of data that may be needed to support the decision.
Synthesize the data, information, and knowledge to support a decision.

Note: You will submit both the Literature Review Matrix and paper to meet the requirements for this Assignment.

Requirements: 7 PAGES

Computer Science Question

Governance, Quality, Compliance and Ethics: EIS852

Unit 8 – Discussion Board 1 (75 points)

Due: Thu, Jan 22 |

Description

Primary Response is due by Thursday (11:59:59pm Central), Peer Responses are due by Saturday (11:59:59pm Central).

Primary Task Response: Within the Discussion Board area, write 400-600 words that respond to the following questions with your thoughts, ideas, and comments. This will be the foundation for future discussions by your classmates. Be substantive and clear, and use examples to reinforce your ideas.

Compare and contrast other acts, either from the present or the past, that are similar to the SarbanesOxley Act (SOX). Identify 1 or 2 acts that would be comparable, and answer the following questions about each act:

How are they alike?
How are they different?
Are they successful?
In your opinion, is the act comparable, better, or worse than SOX?

Responses to Other Students:

Respond to at least 2 of your fellow classmates with at least a 200-word reply about their Primary Task Response regarding items you found to be compelling and enlightening. To help you with your discussion, please consider the following questions:

How would you justify a different perspective from your classmates on the topic?
How, additionally, would you defend your classmates position?
What critique do you offer your classmate in regard to clarity and thoroughness of their post?
Please address all prompts. When offering counterargument or justification, consider practice, theory, and examples from your own experience, reading, or current events in presenting your position.

For assistance with your assignment, please use your textbook, all course resources, and any external research and resources you have gathered.

Discussion Board Rubric

Expectation	Points Possible	Points Earned	Comments
Application of Learning Material Content: Initial post demonstrates understanding of Learning Material content.	25
Application of Course Knowledge: Initial post contributes unique perspectives or insights gleaned from text/learning resources, or specified by assignment.	25
DB Responses: Responds substantively to two posts. Responses encourage interaction in the Discussion Board and classroom community.	10
Academic Writing: Initial post presents information logically and is clearly relevant to discussion topic. Posts contain accurate grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation with few or no errors. All resources should be cited in current APA format.	15
Total Points	75
Total Points Earned

Unit 8 – Individual Project (125 points)

Due: Sun, Jan 25 |

Description

Assignment Details

In a paper of 46 pages (not including title and reference pages), outline the key components of the SarbanesOxley Act (SOX) and provide the supported impact for each significant area. During your outline development, the following key areas must be identified:

Describe the key points that make up SOX.
Explain any sub-areas of importance.
Identify any areas that play a key role in policy development (minimum of 2).
Identify any areas that play a role in ethical conduct description (minimum of 2).
Give a short description for both ethics and policy identification.

Please submit your assignment.

For assistance with your assignment, please use your textbook, all course resources, and any external research and resources you have gathered.

Individual Project Rubric

The Individual Project (IP) Grading Rubric is a scoring tool that represents the performance expectations for the IP. This Individual Project Grading Rubric is divided into components that provide a clear description of what should be included within each component of the IP. Its the roadmap that can help you in the development of your IP.

Expectation	Points Possible	Points Earned	Comments
Assignment-Specific: Describes the key points that make up the SarbanesOxley Act (SOX) and explains any sub areas of importance	23
Assignment-Specific: Identifies any areas that play a key role in policy development (minimum of 2)	23
Assignment-Specific: Identifies any areas that play a role in ethical conduct description (minimum of 2)	23
Assignment-Specific: Gives a short description for both ethics and policy identification	23
Assignment-Specific: Demonstrates the utilization of the course readings and other scholarly or professional materials to complete the assignment.	23
Professional Language: Assignment contains accurate grammar, spelling, and punctuation with few or no errors. (APA formatting is required or style specified in assignment).	10
Total Points	125
Total Points Earned

Security Management: EIS854

Unit 8 – Discussion Board (75 points)

Due: Thu, Jan 22 |

Description

Primary Response is due by Thursday (11:59:59pm Central), Peer Responses are due by Saturday (11:59:59pm Central).

Discuss the following:

Does the body of security policies in an organization provide information security?
What is the contribution of security policies to the security of the computing environment? Be specific, and support your position.

Responses to Other Students:

How would you justify a different perspective from your classmates on the topic?
How, additionally, would you defend your classmates position?
What critique do you offer your classmate in regard to clarity and thoroughness of their post?
Please address all prompts. When offering counterargument or justification, consider practice, theory, and examples from your own experience, reading, or current events in presenting your position.

For assistance with your assignment, please use your textbook, all course resources, and any external research and resources you have gathered.

Discussion Board Rubric

Expectation	Points Possible	Points Earned	Comments
Application of Learning Material Content: Initial post demonstrates understanding of Learning Material content.	25
Application of Course Knowledge: Initial post contributes unique perspectives or insights gleaned from text/learning resources, or specified by assignment.	25
DB Responses: Responds substantively to two posts. Responses encourage interaction in the Discussion Board and classroom community.	10
Academic Writing: Initial post presents information logically and is clearly relevant to discussion topic. Posts contain accurate grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation with few or no errors. All resources should be cited in current APA format.	15
Total Points	75
Total Points Earned

Unit 8 – Individual Project (125 points)

Due: Sun, Jan 25 |

Description

Assignment Details

You are the chief information security officer (CISO) of a federal civil agency and have become quite concerned lately that personal identifying information (PII) is not being protected or handled appropriately. Complete the following:

Write an appropriate policy that defines PII; establishes responsibility for protecting PII; explains how you will identify and protect elements of PII; and describes auditing, reporting, and incident requirements.
You may review published policies and use them as sources, but you should create your own as well.

Ensure that your paper meets the following requirements:

Format your submission using APA formatting.
Your submission should include a title page, body, and reference list. There is no need for an abstract for this assignment.
The body of your submission should be a minimum of 4 double-spaced pages.
All submissions should include at least 2 authority references other than your textbook.
Cite all references using APA format.
Save your assignment as a new Word document, and name the file using the convention “Unit8_IP_Lastname.”

Please submit your assignment.

For assistance with your assignment, please use your textbook, all course resources, and any external research and resources you have gathered.

Individual Project Rubric

Expectation	Points Possible	Points Earned	Comments
Assignment-Specific: Writes an appropriate policy that defines PII and establishes responsibility for protecting PII	35
Assignment-Specific: Writes an appropriate policy that explains how it will identify and protect elements of PII	35
Assignment-Specific: Writes an appropriate policy that describes auditing, reporting, and incident requirements	35
Assignment-Specific: Includes all required components as outlined in the assignment instructions	10
Professional Language: Assignment contains accurate grammar, spelling, and punctuation with few or no errors. (APA formatting is required or style specified in assignment).	10
Total Points	125
Total Points Earned

Requirements:

Studypool Professional

ACADEMIC WRITING COMMISSION

Two Term Papers + Required Research Artefacts

I am hiring a writer to complete two academic term papers AND the required supporting artefacts used in the research and problem-based learning process.

All work must be undergraduate (Bachelor) level, written in formal academic English, with APA referencing only.

—

PAPER 1 AI IN EDUCATION

(Critical Academic Paper)

Length

4,000 words

Topic

Artificial Intelligence in Education, with focus on Generative AI.

—

REQUIRED OUTPUTS (ALL MUST BE DELIVERED)

1? Main Academic Paper (4,000 words)

Must include:

Introduction (clear scope + problem focus)

Literature review based on two core peer-reviewed papers

Critical analysis (benefits, risks, limitations, implications)

Explicit academic reflection section

Conclusion

APA reference list

—

2? Problem Definition

A clear, written problem statement, explaining:

What specific issue in AI + education is being examined

Why it is relevant

How the chosen literature relates to the problem

(Short section or separate document is fine.)

—

3? Mind Map (REQUIRED)

A visual or structured mind map showing:

The problem space

Key concepts

Sub-themes

Relationships between ideas

Can be delivered as:

Image (PNG/JPG), or

Structured outline clearly labelled as a mind map

—

4? Research Process Documentation

A short document describing:

How sources were found

Databases / search strategies used

Why the two main papers were selected

How the topic was narrowed/refined

This does not need to be long but must exist.

—

PAPER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW

Book Chapter Topic: ChatGPT and Cyber Security

—

Length

4,000 words

—

REQUIRED OUTPUTS (ALL MUST BE DELIVERED)

1? Literature Review Paper

Must include:

Introduction (topic + relevance)

Methodology (how literature was selected)

Thematic analysis (grouped research themes)

Critical discussion (gaps, disagreements, weaknesses)

Conclusion

APA reference list

—

2? Scope Definition

A clear written explanation of:

What aspects of ChatGPT & cybersecurity are included

What is excluded

Why this scope was chosen

—

3? Mind Map (REQUIRED)

A mind map showing:

Core themes

Sub-themes

How research areas connect

Same format rules as Paper 1.

—

4? Literature Selection Rationale

Short explanation of:

Search terms used

Databases used

Inclusion/exclusion criteria

How sources were evaluated for quality

—

RULES (NON-NEGOTIABLE)

APA referencing only

Peer-reviewed academic sources only

No blogs, news sites, or opinion articles

Academic tone throughout

No plagiarism

No AI-detectable generic writing

Clean formatting, ready to submit

—

FINAL DELIVERABLES CHECKLIST

The writer must deliver:

Two separate 4,000-word papers

Two mind maps (one per paper)

Problem + scope definitions

Research process documentation

APA-compliant reference lists

Editable files (DOCX + images if applicable)

Ps. A pdf file can be provoded later.

Requirements: