Bright Academic Experts

Author: admin

  • Check instructions

    check attachments. I need three different answers for three of my classmates. All three should be different. Follow instructions and template for ppt

    Requirements: stated

  • Samaneh Anahid

    HS 333: Comprehensive Case Analysis Written Comprehensive Financial Plan Grading Rubric The grading rubric will be applied to written financial plan presentations. It is divided into nine categories. Each category can earn between four and zero points. (The recommendations category is worth double the points.) The following table presents general guidelines for excellent, good, fair, poor, and unacceptable quality standards. Points Description 4 Excellent: The student includes all required elements and displays mastery of the topic level on par with client expectations of a financial planning professional. 3 Good: The student includes 75% of the required elements and provides understanding of the subject matter and adequately addresses the topic. The student meets the needs of the client and demonstrates accuracy within all legal and ethical frameworks. 2 Fair: The student includes 50% of the required elements and minimally grasps the subject matter. The student demonstrates a minimum level of accuracy within compliance, legal, and ethical frameworks. The students work shows room for improvement. 1 Poor: The student includes 25% of the required elements and does not adequately satisfy the requirements of the category but has made an attempt. The student does not demonstrate an ethical, compliant, or legal framework. 0 Unacceptable: The student has either not completed the assignment or has committed malpractice. Students should use this rubric as a guide to ensure they receive a passing grade. Students may resubmit their written plans until they receive a passing grade (up to 4 weeks after the end of instruction). In order to pass, a student must meet both of the following criteria: 1. Score at least 28 of a possible 40 points from the rubric. 2. Do not score a 0 on any of the 9 categories in the rubric. Note that most resubmissions are because a student has not met the second criterion and, more specifically, because a student has received a 0 in the recommendations category. The following pages provide specific to-do lists and scoring rubric for each category.Introduction and Executive Summary Introduce your business to the client. Establish the scope of the engagement. Describe your method and amount of compensation. Include a statement about the ongoing monitoring of the financial plan. Outline the highlights of the financial plan. Include a SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats) analysis. Address all conflicts of interest and compensation challenges. By commission or omission, do not act in a way that would cause you to be subject to potential lawsuits or regulatory violations. Points Description 4 Excellent: The student includes all EIGHT required elements and displays mastery of the topic level on par with client expectations of a financial planning professional. 3 Good: The student includes at least SIX (75%) of the required elements and provides understanding of the subject matter and adequately addresses the topic. The student meets the needs of the client and demonstrates accuracy within all legal and ethical frameworks. 2 Fair: The student includes at least FOUR (50%) of the required elements and minimally grasps the subject matter. The student demonstrates a minimum level of accuracy within compliance, legal, and ethical frameworks. The students work shows room for improvement. 1 Poor: The student includes at least TWO (25%) of the required elements and does not adequately satisfy the requirements of the category but has made an attempt. The student does not demonstrate an ethical, compliant, or legal framework. 0 Unacceptable: The student includes less than TWO (25%) of the required elements or has either not completed the assignment or has committed malpractice. CommentsGoals and Objectives Briefly state the clients goals and objective. Goals must be SMART (specific, measurable, achievable, reasonable, and time-bound). Goals must not violate relevant ethical or legal standards. Prioritize each goal and objective using your professional opinion. Briefly summarize the recommendation for each goal and objective. Goals and recommendations must integrate across the planning context, especially regarding cash flow, risk management, and the availability of assets. Points Description 4 Excellent: The student includes all SIX required elements and displays mastery of the topic level on par with client expectations of a financial planning professional. 3 Good: The student includes at least FOUR (75%) of the required elements and provides understanding of the subject matter and adequately addresses the topic. The student meets the needs of the client and demonstrates accuracy within all legal and ethical frameworks. 2 Fair: The student includes at least THREE (50%) of the required elements and minimally grasps the subject matter. The student demonstrates a minimum level of accuracy within compliance, legal, and ethical frameworks. The students work shows room for improvement. 1 Poor: The student includes at least TWO (25%) of the required elements and does not adequately satisfy the requirements of the category but has made an attempt. The student does not demonstrate an ethical, compliant, or legal framework. 0 Unacceptable: The student includes less than TWO (25%) of the required elements or has either not completed the assignment or has committed malpractice. CommentsAssumptions Clearly define every assumption made in the financial plan. Assumptions must be relevant, appropriate, and legally defensible. When applicable, assumptions should err on the conservative side. Rates of return must be appropriate for the clients risk tolerance and objectives. Rates of inflation should vary depending on the goal and spending category (such as housing versus medical versus education). Points Description 4 Excellent: The student includes all FIVE required elements and displays mastery of the topic level on par with client expectations of a financial planning professional. 3 Good: The student includes at least FOUR (75%) of the required elements and provides understanding of the subject matter and adequately addresses the topic. The student meets the needs of the client and demonstrates accuracy within all legal and ethical frameworks. 2 Fair: The student includes at least THREE (50%) of the required elements and minimally grasps the subject matter. The student demonstrates a minimum level of accuracy within compliance, legal, and ethical frameworks. The students work shows room for improvement. 1 Poor: The student includes at least TWO (25%) of the required elements and does not adequately satisfy the requirements of the category but has made an attempt. The student does not demonstrate an ethical, compliant, or legal framework. 0 Unacceptable: The student includes less than TWO (25%) of the required elements or has either not completed the assignment or has committed malpractice. CommentsRecommendations (This section is worth double the points.) Recommendations are identified for each client need and goal. The most impactful recommendations are presented alongside alternatives. Recommendations are presented alongside their explicit and implicit costs. Recommendations should be technically accurate. Recommendations must not cause harm to the client. Recommendations must be realistic regarding the clients limited cash flow and assets. Recommendations account for tax consequences. Points Description 4 Excellent: The student includes all SEVEN required elements and displays mastery of the topic level on par with client expectations of a financial planning professional. 3 Good: The student includes at least FOUR (75%) of the required elements and provides understanding of the subject matter and adequately addresses the topic. The student meets the needs of the client and demonstrates accuracy within all legal and ethical frameworks. 2 Fair: The student includes at least THREE (50%) of the required elements and minimally grasps the subject matter. The student demonstrates a minimum level of accuracy within compliance, legal, and ethical frameworks. The students work shows room for improvement. 1 Poor: The student includes at least TWO (25%) of the required elements and does not adequately satisfy the requirements of the category but has made an attempt. The student does not demonstrate an ethical, compliant, or legal framework. 0 Unacceptable: The student includes less than TWO (25%) of the required elements or has either not completed the assignment or has committed malpractice. CommentsImplementation Schedule Address all recommendations from every topic area. Include specific costs and tax consequences. List specific products used. Identify who is responsible for implementing each recommendation. Indicate the time horizon in which the recommendation should be implemented. Points Description 4 Excellent: The student includes all FIVE required elements and displays mastery of the topic level on par with client expectations of a financial planning professional. 3 Good: The student includes at least FOUR (75%) of the required elements and provides understanding of the subject matter and adequately addresses the topic. The student meets the needs of the client and demonstrates accuracy within all legal and ethical frameworks. 2 Fair: The student includes at least THREE (50%) of the required elements and minimally grasps the subject matter. The student demonstrates a minimum level of accuracy within compliance, legal, and ethical frameworks. The students work shows room for improvement. 1 Poor: The student includes at least TWO (25%) of the required elements and does not adequately satisfy the requirements of the category but has made an attempt. The student does not demonstrate an ethical, compliant, or legal framework. 0 Unacceptable: The student includes less than TWO (25%) of the required elements or has either not completed the assignment or has committed malpractice. CommentsAnalysis by Topic Area Include all analyses used to derive financial planning recommendations. Methodologies must be appropriate to address client goals and needs. All appropriate financial planning topic areas are addressed. All analyses have been performed correctly. Include a Monte Carlo or series of sensitivity analyses. Complex analyses are clearly and concisely explained in every-day language. Analyses are clearly referenced (such as with page numbers) in the written portion of the plan. Points Description 4 Excellent: The student includes all SEVEN required elements and displays mastery of the topic level on par with client expectations of a financial planning professional. 3 Good: The student includes at least FOUR (75%) of the required elements and provides understanding of the subject matter and adequately addresses the topic. The student meets the needs of the client and demonstrates accuracy within all legal and ethical frameworks. 2 Fair: The student includes at least THREE (50%) of the required elements and minimally grasps the subject matter. The student demonstrates a minimum level of accuracy within compliance, legal, and ethical frameworks. The students work shows room for improvement. 1 Poor: The student includes at least TWO (25%) of the required elements and does not adequately satisfy the requirements of the category but has made an attempt. The student does not demonstrate an ethical, compliant, or legal framework. 0 Unacceptable: The student includes less than TWO (25%) of the required elements or has either not completed the assignment or has committed malpractice. CommentsSupporting and Appendix Information The source of each assumption is referenced in the plans appendix. The full analysis is included in the plans appendix. All insurance illustrations are included in the plans appendix. Any other supporting documentation is included in the plans appendix. Points Description 4 Excellent: The student includes all FOUR required elements and displays mastery of the topic level on par with client expectations of a financial planning professional. 3 Good: The student includes at least THREE (75%) of the required elements and provides understanding of the subject matter and adequately addresses the topic. The student meets the needs of the client and demonstrates accuracy within all legal and ethical frameworks. 2 Fair: The student includes at least TWO (50%) of the required elements and minimally grasps the subject matter. The student demonstrates a minimum level of accuracy within compliance, legal, and ethical frameworks. The students work shows room for improvement. 1 Poor: The student includes at least ONE (25%) of the required elements and does not adequately satisfy the requirements of the category but has made an attempt. The student does not demonstrate an ethical, compliant, or legal framework. 0 Unacceptable: The student includes less than ONE (25%) of the required elements or has either not completed the assignment or has committed malpractice. CommentsPresentation The financial plan is presented in the same manner it would be presented to the client and has professional design, styling, and formatting. The plan is free of typos and grammatical errors. Recommendations are presented in a manner consistent with the clients personality, learning style, and level of financial literacy. The plan uses text, charts, tables, and graphs to effectively present recommendations. The plan is easy to read and understand. Points Description 4 Excellent: The student includes all FIVE required elements and displays mastery of the topic level on par with client expectations of a financial planning professional. 3 Good: The student includes at least FOUR (75%) of the required elements and provides understanding of the subject matter and adequately addresses the topic. The student meets the needs of the client and demonstrates accuracy within all legal and ethical frameworks. 2 Fair: The student includes at least THREE (50%) of the required elements and minimally grasps the subject matter. The student demonstrates a minimum level of accuracy within compliance, legal, and ethical frameworks. The students work shows room for improvement. 1 Poor: The student includes at least TWO (25%) of the required elements and does not adequately satisfy the requirements of the category but has made an attempt. The student does not demonstrate an ethical, compliant, or legal framework. 0 Unacceptable: The student includes less than TWO (25%) of the required elements or has either not completed the assignment or has committed malpractice. CommentsRelevancy The impact of economic, political, and regulatory issues are evaluated for each section of the plan. Such issues included the fiduciary standard, health care reform, and tax laws. When relevant, in each section of the plan, include information about how the plan would change considering changes in the political or tax environment. Points Description 4 Excellent: The student includes BOTH required elements and displays mastery of the topic level on par with client expectations of a financial planning professional. 2 Fair: The student includes at least ONE (50%) of the required elements and minimally grasps the subject matter. The student demonstrates a minimum level of accuracy within compliance, legal, and ethical frameworks. The students work shows room for improvement. 0 Unacceptable: The student includes less than ONE (25%) of the required elements or has either not completed the assignment or has committed malpractice.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): HS 333 Syllabus.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Advanced Cybersecurity Framework Design for a High-Risk Indu…

    Advanced Cybersecurity Framework Design for a High-Risk Industry

    Objective:

    Students will create a fully customized cybersecurity framework tailored for a specific, high-risk

    industry.

    This will require in-depth research, synthesis of learned concepts, and practical application of NIST

    CSF and MITRE ATT&CK.

    Scenario:

    You are a cybersecurity consultant tasked with developing a cybersecurity framework for a niche

    industry.

    Choose one of the following industries:

    1. Maritime Shipping and Logistics

    2. Smart Agriculture Systems (e.g., IoT in farming)

    Your client recently suffered a data breach and ransomware attack targeting their critical operations.

    Develop a comprehensive cybersecurity plan based on the tasks below.

    Assignment Tasks

    Part 1: Industry Analysis (Research and Manual Data Collection)

    Advanced Cybersecurity Framework Design for a High-Risk Industry

    Requirements:

    1. Research the chosen industry.

    – Describe its unique cybersecurity challenges and risks.

    – Include at least three real-world incidents affecting this industry. Cite original sources.

    2. Summarize findings.

    – Compile your research findings into a concise 2-page report.

    Part 2: Framework Design

    Requirements:

    1. Develop a NIST CSF-Based Plan

    – Using the NIST Cybersecurity Framework, create a customized plan addressing your chosen

    industry’s specific risks.

    – Include four specific actions under each function: Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, and

    Recover.

    2. Analyze MITRE ATT&CK Tactics

    – Choose three real-world attack techniques from MITRE ATT&CK relevant to your industry.

    – Describe the tactic, vulnerabilities it exploits, and countermeasures using NIST CSF functions.

    Advanced Cybersecurity Framework Design for a High-Risk Industry

    3. Create Manual Flow Diagrams

    – Create a manually-drawn or custom visual representation of the framework.

    Part 3: Incident Simulation and Playbook Development

    Requirements:

    1. Simulate a Cybersecurity Incident

    – Create a fictional incident scenario specific to your chosen industry.

    2. Develop an Incident Response Playbook

    – Write a step-by-step playbook for responding to the incident.

    Part 4: Report and Reflection

    Requirements:

    1. Create a Comprehensive Report

    – Include sections for industry analysis, framework design, incident simulation, and the response

    playbook.

    2. Reflection

    – Describe challenges and lessons learned while tailoring the framework for your industry.

    Submission Guidelines:

    – Format: Submit a single PDF document including your research, visuals, and diagrams.

    – Plagiarism Policy: Use of AI tools, templates, or pre-written content is strictly prohibited.

    Advanced Cybersecurity Framework Design for a High-Risk Industry

    Grading Rubric (100 Points)

    – Part 1: Industry Analysis and Research (20 points)

    – Part 2: Framework Design (30 points)

    – Part 3: Incident Simulation and Playbook (30 points)

    – Part 4: Report and Reflection (20 points)

    Demonstrate creativity, critical thinking, and original work.

    I have a sample assignment. get me one for any of the above topic.

    Requirements: answer all questions | Typescript

  • Writing Question

    Requirements: As required

  • Topics

    a general summary of the topic 2 pts why you think it is interesting/important to study 1 pt one question that you would like your research to answer 5 pts one primary source (journal article) reference, summarizing the hypothesis, methods, and results How insect feeding behaviour changes when predators are present how Insects adapt to climate change

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): BIOL445 – Research Paper Guidelines S2026 (1).pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Surrogacy

    I copied the scenario under the questions that Ive answered. the paper has to be 2 to 3 pages with clear purpose statement using the apa templete that I created. it has to be uploaded to Grammarly I have to show 95% on grammarly before I can upload. I will attach the rubric and the APA template. Disregard the reference used on template.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): NU 345 ETHICS MOD 1 part 1.docx, Surrogacy.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • art

    Touchstone 4: Art and Architecture: Uniting Culture, Innovation, and Religious Ideals

    Overview

    What You Will Learn: You will explore how art and architecture intersect with culture, innovation, and religious expression.

    Why It Matters: This paper will demonstrate your ability to put a work of art or piece of architecture in its historical context by

    a. explaining how earlier works of art bring about artistic innovation.

    b. how works reflect the religious culture that produced them.

    What You Will Hand In: A 4 – 5 page (1,000 – 1,200 word) paper saved as a Microsoft Word (.docx or .doc) file.

    Keys to Success:

    • Develop and submit original work.
    • Select four works of art or architecture described in the tutorials; two that exemplify innovation and two that exemplify religious expression.
    • Put the works in an appropriate historical context, two in the context of innovation and two in the context of religious significance.
    • Use only the Sophia tutorials as source material. No external sources are allowed.

    Helpful Links:

    Instructions

    Step 1: Review the Tutorials and Select Four Examples

    • Select two works of art from the list below that exemplify innovation; this innovation may be stylistic, technological, or both.
    • Select two works of art from the list below that exemplify religious expression.

    Step 2: Write the Touchstone

    • Write your paper about the four works, following this basic structure:
    1. Introduction (100-200 words): provide a broad overview of the paper, the claims you will defend, and the works of art you will describe.
    2. Innovation (300-500 words): give the historical and cultural context for each of the works of art you have selected and describe how these works both emerged from existing traditions and introduced new ideas in either style or technology. Compare and contrast the two works.
    3. Religious Expression (300-500 words): give the historical and cultural context for each of the works of art you have selected and describe how these works represent the religious ideals of the culture that produced them. Compare and contrast the two works.
    4. Conclusion (100-200 words): Summarize your analysis and provide closure to the paper.

    hint

    To build the skill of correctly citing your sources in academic writing, you should cite each tutorial with the four examples you describe in your paper. Because all of your sources will be Sophia tutorials, the in-text and reference page citations will look like this:

    • In-text citation: (Sophia Learning, n.d.)
    • Reference: Sophia Learning. (n.d.) Romanesque Architecture [Cathedral of Saint James]. Art History I.

    Adjust to identify the tutorial you are referencing. Visit the resource for more assistance.

    Step 3: Review and Submit Your Work

    • Review your work carefully and check the rubric to make sure you have met all the requirements. Submit as a Microsoft Word (.doc or .docx) file.

    We hope this assignment gives you a chance to reflect further on the works of art and architecture that struck a chord with you. Have fun, and good luck!

  • Necesito realizra una tarea de teatro y ensayo

    Neceisto realizar una tarea de teatro y ensayo donde me respondas la asignacion 1 segun la biografia de Luis Rafael Sancez y La generacion de los posters de Alfredo Bryce

    Requirements:   |   .doc file

  • Data Analytics Question

    Assignment Overview:

    This essay asks that you rewatch a movie that you enjoyed when you were younger. Take careful notes as you watch it, including timestamps of scenes you may want to analyze. Keep these notes.

    Consider the film’s narrative elements: the film’s genre, its characters and their identities, its plot, and the location (or locations) where the action occurs.

    Also take note of the non-narrative elements: the sound, lighting, editing, camera angles and movements, and musical score that contribute to the film’s meaning.

    As you watch, ask yourself who the implicit viewers of the film are and what makes you think this.

    Formulate an argument about the film using your film viewing notes and JCOM 301 course content (readings, lectures, key concepts).

    Analysis Requirements:

    In the essay itself, analyze the film using at least three key concepts from class. When you use a key term from class, highlight it in bold.

    Evidence Requirements:

    Your evidence for the essay should come from two sources:

    1) From the Film Itself

    You should provide specific, detailed examples. These should include precise timestamps and detailed scene descriptions (e.g., “the diner confrontation at 45 minutes into the film” or “the opening sequence at 3:45”). These might include:

    a) Specific camera techniques (e.g., close-up, long shot, crane shot, panoramic shot, over-the-shoulder shot)

    b) Exact dialogue in quotation marks

    c) Specific mise-en-scene elements (costumes, props, setting details, lighting choices)

    d) Sound design or musical score moments

    2) From Course Readings

    You should back up your argument(s) using at least three of the class readings we have done so far. In many instances, these readings will overlap with the key concepts mentioned above. For example, if you discuss the oppositional gaze, you would cite bell hooks.

    When you reference a reading, engage with the author’s specific argument (don’t simply mention that you consulted the source). Use direct quotes or paraphrases that demonstrate your understanding of the theoretical framework.

    How to Cite Film Evidence

    When analyzing scenes from the film, include a timestamp or detailed scene description (e.g., “the birthday party scene approximately 30 minutes in, where the family gathers in the kitchen”). Also include the specific visual or audio element you’re analyzing.

    Example: “In the confrontation scene at the police station (1:23:15), the director uses a low-angle shot to frame the detective, positioning the camera below his eyeline and making him loom over both the suspect and the viewer. This visual choice reinforces the male gaze operating throughout the film by literalizing his position of power.”

    Avoid vague references like “throughout the film,” “in many scenes,” or “the movie shows.” Ground your analysis in specific, observable moments that graders can locate and verify.

    Personal Reflection Component

    While the majority of the essay should be devoted to your analysis, you should also address the following reflection questions (1-2 paragraphs total):

    -What did you originally like and find pleasurable about the film? Be specific about particular scenes, characters, or moments that attracted you as a younger viewer.

    -Is the experience of viewing this movie different now that you’re older? Identify at least two specific moments or elements that you now see differently and explain why your perspective has (or hasn’t) shifted.

    Additionally, in your introduction or early in the essay, briefly mention when and where you first watched the film (your approximate age, the setting, who watched it with you if you remember). This personal context can inform a brief analysis of how you functioned as an implicit viewer then versus now.

    Key Elements:

    Be specific in your analysis. For the film, this means referencing specific scenes that support your arguments. Also, you should provide a brief (one paragraph) description of the film’s plotline for graders who might not have seen the film that you are analyzing. There are no correct or incorrect answers. Instead, you will be graded on your ability to work with class concepts and present evidence to back up your arguments.

    NOTE: it is fine and appropriate to use the first-person “I” in this essay.

    Viewing Process:

    As you rewatch the film, take detailed notes including timestamps of significant scenes you may want to analyze. Keep these notes as you may be asked to reference them or discuss specific scenes in discussion.

    Formatting Requirements:

    -Your essay should be at least 1,200 words

    -It should be typed in 12-point, Times New Roman font, double-spaced, with 1-inch margins

    -It should have a title

    -The word count (minus your works-cited page) should appear in the header

    –Cite any readings, websites, and films you consult using a standard citation style (e.g., MLA, Chicago Style, APA) and include a works cited page at the end of the document.

    Grading:

    Your essay will be graded on content (your command over class material and your ability to apply concepts to real-world examples) and form (your ability to express and organize your ideas). See the rubric for detailed grading criteria.

    Rubric

    Essay Rubric

    Essay Rubric
    Criteria Ratings Pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeKey Concept ApplicationDemonstrates an excellent understanding of at least three key concepts in class and uses them to formulate an argument. Concepts are clearly highlighted in bold. Shows nuanced understanding of theoretical frameworks.

    15 ptsFull Marks0 ptsNo Marks

    15 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTextual Evidence from FilmProvides rich, specific examples from film scenes that strongly support analytical points. Shows careful attention to narrative and non-narrative elements.

    15 ptsFull Marks0 ptsNo Marks

    15 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntegration of Course ReadingsEffectively integrates at least three course readings in a sophisticated way that enhances analysis. Citations are accurate and appropriate. Shows deep engagement with texts.

    15 ptsFull Marks0 ptsNo Marks

    15 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysisOffers insightful analysis. Thoughtfully addresses personal viewing experiences from past and current perspectives. Makes meaningful connections between personal response and theoretical concepts and between the film and theoretical concepts.

    15 ptsFull Marks0 ptsNo Marks

    15 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFilm Context and DescriptionProvides concise one-paragraph film description that effectively orients readers.

    10 ptsFull Marks0 ptsNo Marks

    10 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization and StructureEssay is well-organized with a clear introduction, logical organization, and thoughtful conclusion. Transitions are smooth throughout essay.

    10 ptsFull Marks0 ptsNo Marks

    10 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Quality and ClarityWriting is precise. Ideas are expressed with clarity and nuance. Voice is consistent and appropriate.

    10 ptsFull Marks0 ptsNo Marks

    10 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTechnical RequirementsEssay follows assignment-specific instructions, including using 12-point Times New Roman font, including a title, using correct margins and spacing, including a word count and works-cited page, etc.

    10 ptsFull Marks0 ptsNo Marks

    10 pts

    Total Points: 100

    Requirements: stated

  • Quantitative Analysis: Multiple Regression, Mediation, Moder…

    answers for each upcoming assignment (discussions exempted) must have at least one of the following options: circled, highlighted, or underlined. Your submissions must be visually well-defined due to the complexity of all data entry. No exceptions.

    Furthermore, the IBM SPSS learning software automatically comes with Preloaded and Preformatted numerical content data-entry already installed. If you do not clearly distinguish your own answers as required by the instructor’s grading methods, you will lose grade points.

    This requirement is necessary as most or all the tables already have some form of pre-loaded format within the assignment, including pre-loaded Graphs, Questions, and/or instructions

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): yQuantitative Analysis Multiple Regression Mediation Moderation and Canonical Correlation Assignment Instructions (2).docx, Quantitative Analysis Grading Rubric (15).pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.