Bright Academic Experts

Author: admin

  • Journal 4

    Reflect on your experiences with literacy/numeracy issues in healthcare settings. Explain any personal examples you have seen where poor literacy and numeracy skills prevented attainment of good health. What recommendations would you make to improve communication where literacy and numeracy limitations are evident?

  • Professional portfolio learning and professional self-concep…

    Find the best answer to each question based on your Gray and Grove (2021) assigned readings and on what you have read in the instructor assigned research article. Some of the questions in the appraisal assignment below will seem unfamiliar to you. Look up key terms from the questions in your textbook. Some examples of these terms might be problem statements, hypotheses, or variables. You can also look in Chapter 18 for an example of a critical appraisal of a quantitative research article. Keep the questions on the template and type your answers for this assignment onto the template using the paper guideline found below. Leave the questions in your assignment and answer them accordingly. Do not write as a paper. Use complete sentences and correct grammar. NO QUOTES ARE ALLOWED IN THIS ASSIGNMENT as this is to be your appraisal of the content. Refer to APA to assist you. Answer every question.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): s12909-023-04097-4 (1).pdf, Article Appraisal Part Two rev0821-1.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Standard commentary

    Write a standard commentary. Using PEEL. 1st body paragraph foucs on form the 2nd focus on language the 3rd foucs on structure

  • Ethical Considerations in Psychological Research

    Analyzing your learning is a crucial component of being active. Short reaction papers that use the material you are reading and discussions in class are a great way to accomplish that. You can integrate the readings with (a) class discussions, (b) something you read in the news, (c) something you are learning in another course, or (d) something that actually happened to you in the reaction papers. Each paper should have at least 3 journal sources. An empirical study can be created to test a hypothesis. You may look up Alabama laws and report on what you find. You can present two arguments on different sides of an issue. Critical thinking must be clearly through your presentation of the dilemma and your argument. Each reaction paper should be between 750-1000 words, double-spaced, and typed in a 12-point Times New Roman font using APA formatting. Choose one of the topics below: A. Ethical Considerations in Psychological Research: Discuss the importance of ethical guidelines in conducting psychological research, highlighting cases where unethical practices have led to negative consequences. Explore the balance between the benefits of research and the potential harm to participants. B. Professional Competence and Continuous Learning: Explore the ethical obligation of psychologists to maintain and enhance their professional competence through ongoing education and training. Discuss the potential consequences of inadequate training on client well-being. Grading Guide Content: Topic Background (10 points): __________ Topic background and connection to course content (lecture notes, text) are covered thoroughly, clearly, and accurately 3 peer-reviewed journal articles pertaining to reaction paper used Content: Opinions & points of view (10 points): __________ At least three key points addressed thoroughly, clearly, and accurately Content: New info learned (10 points): __________ At least three new pieces of information were described Personal opinion/reactions to journal articles or the question, along with reasons for your opinion Writing (10 points): __________ Grammar, punctuation, and spelling are correct Logical progression of sentence structure and paragraph structure Format (10 points): __________ APA Formatting & Style (Paper is typed, 12-point font, 1-inch margins, etc.) Paper is at least 2 pages (excluding title, name, etc.) Total (50 points): __________

  • Case Study 740

    Overview This week there is a focus on the objective of a supply chain and achieving a strategic fit in a supply chain. The goal of a supply chain should be to increase the difference between the value generated for customers and the total cost incurred across the supply chain. Supply chain decisions have a large impact on the success or failure of each firm. Strategic fit requires that all functions within a firm and stages in the supply chain target the same goal, one that is consistent with customer needs. Instructions Each question must be answered thoroughly, and the responses must be supported by the concepts introduced in the reading/study materials. Each question/answer must be delineated under a heading in current APA format. The overall format of the assignment should include an appropriate introduction (or abstract) and a conclusion. Provide well-supported ideas and relate the course content to practical examples and applications. Include a title page and reference page also in current APA format. Incorporate a minimum of 5 peer-reviewed sources with at least 1 source per question. All

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): first.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • TV Essay

    I want it to be on I love Lucy

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): FTV 375 Essay General Instructions.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Counselling a Minority or Non-dominant Cultural Group in Can…

    Learning Objectives: * illustrate a thorough understanding of the information about and experiences of a non-dominant or minority group in Canada; * determine which culturally competent counselling practices to bring into counselling work with clients; and * analyze how their own personal factors may influence their counselling work with these clients. Purpose: The purpose of this assignment is to assist students in exploring and understanding information about a non-dominant or minority group in Canada and how they may bring this knowledge to their counselling work clients who may be in this group. * Instructions 1. Write a paper about counselling a specific cultural group that is clearly identified in the literature as a cultural group and that is in Canada. Your paper needs to be eight (8) double-spaced pages long (or 2000 words, +/- 100 words), excluding the cover page and the reference list. Do not exceed the upper word limit for the paper. The minimum requirement for recent (last 7 years, 20182025), peer-reviewed sources is eight (8), in addition to any peer-reviewed required course readings that you may cite. There is no upper limit for the number of recent, peer-reviewed sources although about 16 is recommended. Remember that the course textbooks, other textbooks, and books, are not peer-reviewed sources. If you cite from course texts, edited books, or books, make sure that you correctly cite the original source and not the editor(s) of the book. Avoid citing original sources from secondary sources unless the source is not in the YU library or is unavailable online and the information is either foundational or critical to a particular point in your paper. Remember that you must include a live hyperlink for all DOIs and URLs for each reference entry that must go to the correct source. 2. Title the report “Counselling X,” where X is the specific cultural group being reported on and focus on cultural groups in Canada. You must include Canada or Canadian in the title. Examples of appropriate titles are * Counselling Turkish-Canadian Clients, * Counselling Greek-Canadian Clients, * Counselling Eastern-European Canadian Clients * Counselling Indigenous Youth in Canada 3. Papers on counselling a specific Indigenous group of bands (such as the Inuit, prairie dwellers, youth, women, urban dwellers, adolescents living on reserves, etc.) are encouraged, as are reports on an Indo-Canadian or Chinese-Canadian subculture, such as children, adolescents, or women. Make sure to clearly define the group and delineate the age range for groups such as youth, children, or adolescents. 4. Reports on other specific groups or subcultures are also welcome. Examples include * Counselling Muslim Immigrant Clients in Canada, * Counselling Syrian Refugees in Canada, * Counselling Bicultural Adolescents in Canada, * Counselling Interethnic Couples in Canada, and * Counselling Deaf Clients in Canada. 5. Do not write on a topic that is too general such as Counselling Asian, Latino, African, European, Indigenous, Refugee, or Immigrant Clients in Canada. 6. Include a brief introduction (support your thesis statement) as well as a brief conclusion with a maximum of about 100 words for each. Do not include an abstract. Complete these four sections. A. Socio-cultural and demographic background (20%) In this section, include descriptive information about the specific cultural group that you have researched, such as demographics, history, social and cultural customs, traditions, belief systems and values, as well as epidemiological data on the prevalence of certain conditions, if such data exist. Make sure to be as specific as possible in your description. For example, if you write about youth in a particular group, make sure to define what age range you mean and what researchers have noted. The minimum requirement for this section is two (2) recent (last seven (7) years, 20182025), peer-reviewed sources. Exceeding the minimum will help illustrate wider reading and ability to integrate multiple sources and increase the strength of themes and main points. Remember that the course texts are not peer-reviewed although you may find many of the original peer-reviewed sources cited in the course texts in the library. Write about 450 words for this section. B. Counselling strategies (30%) In this section, include information about how you would conceptualize a presenting concern or concerns brought into counselling by someone in the cultural group. For illustrative purposes, you may develop a hypothetical client. The focus in this section is on considerations of therapeutic alliance and experiences that a client in this group may have had such as intergenerational trauma, personal trauma such as adverse childhood experiences, or experiences that may have contributed to them becoming migrants who are now refugees or immigrants in Canada, experiences of oppression and/or marginalization or anything that you believe may have contributed to them seeking counselling. You may make references to the theoretical material covered in the course, such as influences of individualism and collectivism, models of cultural identity formation, acculturation, or any other topic area that you think is relevant to the cultural group. The minimum requirement for this section is three (3) recent (last seven (7) years, 20182025), peer-reviewed sources. Exceeding the minimum will help illustrate wider reading and ability to integrate multiple sources and increase the strength of themes and main points. Remember that the course texts are not peer-reviewed although you may find many of the original peer-reviewed sources cited in the course texts in the library. Look for sources that are about the particular cultural group in Canada. If you cite sources that are about the cultural group in other countries than Canada, explain how you think the information fits the cultural group in Canada. Remember to include your voice in what you are writing and note what you think about the research that you have read about the cultural group. Write about 700 words for this section. C. Counselling interventions (20%) In this section, address specific practical techniques that you believe would be appropriate and effective in working with clients in the cultural group. The minimum requirement for this section is two (2) recent (last seven (7) years, 20182025), peer-reviewed sources. Exceeding the minimum will help illustrate wider reading and ability to integrate multiple sources and increase the strength of themes and main points. Remember that the course texts are not peer-reviewed although you may find many of the original peer-reviewed sources cited in the course texts in the library. Describe which interventions you may already utilize or would most likely utilize when you work with clients in the cultural group and why you think that they would be effective. Write about 450 words for this section D. Directions for future research (10%) In this section, identify existing gaps in the current research on and knowledge of diversity and cross-cultural counselling theory and practice related to the cultural group and/or areas of research that need to be expanded or improved and provide an agenda for future research. Make sure to describe what area or areas that you think are most important for researchers to focus on and how this may be useful to counselling work with clients from the cultural group. The minimum requirement for this section is one (1) recent (last seven (7) years, 20182025), peer-reviewed source. Exceeding the minimum will help illustrate wider reading and ability to integrate multiple sources and increase the strength of themes and main points. Remember that the course texts are not peer-reviewed although you may find many of the original peer-reviewed sources cited in the course texts in the library. Write about 200 words for this section. The minimum requirement for recent (last 7 years, 20182025), peer-reviewed sources is eight (8), in addition to any peer-reviewed required course readings that you may cite. Although there is no upper limit for the number of recent, peer-reviewed sources, the recommended maximum is about 16. Students who plan to counsel/practice in a country other than Canada after graduation are welcome to contact the instructor for help to identify a relevant topic. If you are unsure that the cultural group in Canada that you want to discuss meets the criteria, discuss it with your instructor so that they can approve your choice. Structure * Required components: Title page and reference page(s) * Length of Assignment: The text body of paper (i.e., not including references and title page; do NOT include an abstract) should consist of approximately 2000 (+/- 100) words, (Times New Roman font size: 12) * Format: Please, format your assignment in Word (files with extension .doc or .docx) * References: A minimum total of eight (8) recent (last 7 years, currently 2018-2025), peer-reviewed sources and no maximum with a recommended upper limit of 16 recent, peer-reviewed sources. Resources Any sources used to support your Written Narrative should, of course, be cited using the correct APA format. Although it can be a useful starting place to gather very general information, to later verify it with more substantial sources, no Wikipedia references will be accepted as scholarly citations. Here’s just one reason why:

  • Project Questions/Supporting evidence

    Use your Project Plan Template and guide to complete the following:

    Supporting Evidence

    • Explain how the proposed study will add or contribute to a better understanding of the theoretical foundation of the problem or contribute to a better understanding of practice.
    • Explain the proposed gap supported by scholarly literature or the practical implications of the proposed study.
    • Synthesize a review of the scholarly literature to expose, explain, and analyze previous scholarly efforts to address the project or problem.

    Project Questions

    • List one or more project questions that align with the topic, problem, and supporting evidence within the program.
    • Include a list of terms and definitions that relate to the program, topic, problem, gap, program, and project framework.
    • Describe your target population.
    • Describe the background for your study and how your question relates to the background of the study. Discuss previous studies and demonstrate exactly how your project (answering the question, applying to practice) will advance the scientific knowledge base on this topic. Consider the following guidance:
    • Questions should be appropriate for the knowledge gap and current state of knowledge (supporting evidence).
    • Questions are cast using the variables or phenomena under study. The variables or phenomena in the questions are identical to the variables discussed in the problem and specific theory gap.
    • Questions are explicit in naming the type of relationship or phenomenon under study.
    • When answered, questions will make a contribution to theoretical or practical foundations. The contribution to the academic field and to the theoretical foundation must speak to how the relationship among the variables or to the phenomenon addresses the knowledge gap previously identified.

    Additional Requirements

    • Written communication: Written communication is free of errors that detract from the overall message.
    • Continue to use your Project Plan Template to structure your paper. Refer to the
    • Campus page for your PhD or Professional Doctorate program’s Project Plan Guide.
    • Resources: 610 scholarly references, including seminal works, listed in References section at the end of the paper.
    • APA guidelines: Double-spaced paragraph formatting in the body of the paper. When appropriate, use APA-formatted headings. Resources and citations are formatted according to current APA style and format. Refer to
    • as needed.
    • Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 points.
    • Microsoft Editor: Use
    • to help correct errors with grammar, usage, and writing mechanics.
    • Turnitin: Use the Turnitin results to revise your work before submitting your assignment for grading.
    • Synchronous Session Confirmation: When submitting your assignment, include this comment in the comments section “I attended and participated in the required synchronous session.”

    Review the Supporting Evidence and Project Questions scoring guide before submitting to ensure that you have met all criteria.

    Portfolio Prompt: Consider adding this assignment to your personal ePortfolio. This assignment demonstrates your ability to address the theoretical foundations or practice orientation for your proposed Project Plan. You will want to organize your course assignments to easily support future work on your dissertation or doctoral project and to showcase your knowledge with employers after graduation. For more information on ePortfolio, visit the Campus

    page.

    Competencies Measured

    By successfully completing this assignment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    • Competency 1: Apply advanced critical thinking skills to develop a researchable topic.
    • Explain how the proposed study will contribute to a better understanding of the theoretical foundation of the problem or of practice.
    • Describe the target population.
    • Explain the proposed gap supported by scholarly literature or the practical implications of the proposed study.
    • Competency 2: Synthesize ideas and concepts from literature and in practice to develop a researchable topic.
    • Synthesize literature to illuminate, explain, and analyze previous scholarly efforts to address the problem.
    • Competency 4: Develop research questions that align with an identified problem.
    • Describe the studys background and how the question relates to the background of the study.
    • Competency 5: Articulate a theoretical framework for the proposed study.
    • List project questions aligned with the topic, problem, and supporting evidence within the program.
    • Competency 8: Write in accordance with the academic and professional requirements of the discipline during the research process ensuring appropriate structure, grammar, usage, and style.
    • Convey purpose in a well-organized text, incorporating appropriate evidence and tone in grammatically sound sentences.
    • Apply APA style and formatting to scholarly writing.

    View RubricWeek 4 Assignment: Supporting Evidence and Project Questions

    Week 4 Assignment: Supporting Evidence and Project QuestionsCriteriaRatingsPtsExplain how the proposed study will contribute to a better understanding of the theoretical foundation of the problem or of practice. -RSCH-V8926>

    14 to >11.9 pts

    DISTINGUISHED

    Explains how the proposed study will contribute to a better understanding of the theoretical foundation of the problem or of practice. Discusses the practical implications of how the study results will benefit practitioners. -RSCH-V8926>

    11.9 to >9.8 pts

    PROFICIENT

    Explains how the proposed study will contribute to a better understanding of the theoretical foundation of the problem or of practice -RSCH-V8926>

    9.8 to >0 pts

    BASIC

    Identifies, but does not explain how the proposed study will contribute to a better understanding of the theoretical foundation of the problem or of practice -RSCH-V8926>

    0 pts

    NON_PERFORMANCE

    Does not identify how the proposed study will contribute to a better understanding of the theoretical foundation of the problem or of practice. -RSCH-V8926>

    / 14 pts

    Describe the target population. -RSCH-V8926>

    13 to >11.05 pts

    DISTINGUISHED

    Describes the target population and aligns it with the proposed topic. -RSCH-V8926>

    11.05 to >9.1 pts

    PROFICIENT

    Describes the target population. -RSCH-V8926>

    9.1 to >0 pts

    BASIC

    Identifies, but does not describe the target population. -RSCH-V8926>

    0 pts

    NON_PERFORMANCE

    Does not identify the target population. -RSCH-V8926>

    / 13 pts

    Explain the proposed gap supported by scholarly literature or the practical implications of the proposed study. -RSCH-V8926>

    14 to >11.9 pts

    DISTINGUISHED

    Analyzes the proposed gap supported by scholarly literature or the practical implications of the proposed study, using a descriptive narrative. -RSCH-V8926>

    11.9 to >9.8 pts

    PROFICIENT

    Explains the proposed gap supported by scholarly literature or the practical implications of the proposed study. -RSCH-V8926>

    9.8 to >0 pts

    BASIC

    Identifies, but does not explain the proposed gap supported by scholarly literature or the practical implications of the proposed study. -RSCH-V8926>

    0 pts

    NON_PERFORMANCE

    Does not identify the proposed gap supported by scholarly literature or the practical implications of the proposed study. -RSCH-V8926>

    / 14 pts

    Synthesize literature to illuminate, explain, and analyze previous scholarly efforts to address the problem. -RSCH-V8926>

    13 to >11.05 pts

    DISTINGUISHED

    Synthesizes literature to illuminate, explain, and analyze previous scholarly efforts to address the problem. Summarizes most pertinent scholarly literature informing what is being proposed and aligns with topic, problem, and gap. -RSCH-V8926>

    11.05 to >9.1 pts

    PROFICIENT

    Synthesizes literature to illuminate, explain, and analyze previous scholarly efforts to address the problem. -RSCH-V8926>

    9.1 to >0 pts

    BASIC

    Describes, but does not synthesize literature to illuminate, explain, and analyze previous scholarly efforts to address the problem. -RSCH-V8926>

    0 pts

    NON_PERFORMANCE

    Does not describe literature to illuminate, explain, and analyze previous scholarly efforts to address the problem. -RSCH-V8926>

    / 13 pts

    List project questions aligned with the topic, problem, and supporting evidence within the program. -RSCH-V8926>

    13 to >11.05 pts

    DISTINGUISHED

    Lists project questions aligned with the topic, problem, and supporting evidence within the program. Explains terms and definitions relative to the program, topic, problem, gap, and framework. -RSCH-V8926>

    11.05 to >9.1 pts

    PROFICIENT

    Lists project questions aligned with the topic, problem, and supporting evidence within the program. -RSCH-V8926>

    9.1 to >0 pts

    BASIC

    Lists project questions that are not aligned with the topic, problem, or supporting evidence within the program. -RSCH-V8926>

    0 pts

    NON_PERFORMANCE

    Does not list project questions. -RSCH-V8926>

    / 13 pts

    Describe the studys background and how the question relates to the background of the study. -RSCH-V8926>

    13 to >11.05 pts

    DISTINGUISHED

    Describes the studys background and how the question relates to the background of the study. Cited references support how the questions are appropriate and contribute to the academic field, theoretical foundation and the relationship among variables or the phenomenon addresses the knowledge gap. -RSCH-V8926>

    11.05 to >9.1 pts

    PROFICIENT

    Describes the studys background and how the question relates to the background of the study. -RSCH-V8926>

    9.1 to >0 pts

    BASIC

    Identifies, but does not describe the studys background and how the question relates to the background of the study. -RSCH-V8926>

    0 pts

    NON_PERFORMANCE

    Does not identify the studys background and how the question relates to the background of the study. -RSCH-V8926>

    / 13 pts

    Convey purpose in a well-organized text, incorporating appropriate evidence and tone in grammatically sound sentences. -RSCH-V8926>

    10 to >8.5 pts

    DISTINGUISHED

    Conveys clear purpose, in a tone and style well suited to the intended audience. Supports assertions, arguments, and conclusions with relevant, credible, and convincing evidence. Exhibits strict and nearly flawless adherence to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards, including APA style and formatting. -RSCH-V8926>

    8.5 to >7 pts

    PROFICIENT

    Conveys purpose in a well-organized text, incorporating appropriate evidence and tone in grammatically sound sentences. -RSCH-V8926>

    7 to >0 pts

    BASIC

    Conveys purpose in an appropriate tone or style. Clear, effective communication is inhibited by insufficient supporting evidence and/or minimal adherence to applicable writing standards. -RSCH-V8926>

    0 pts

    NON_PERFORMANCE

    Does not convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and writing scholarly standards. -RSCH-V8926>

    / 10 pts

    Apply APA style and formatting to scholarly writing. -RSCH-V8926>

    10 to >8.5 pts

    DISTINGUISHED

    Applies APA style and formatting to scholarly writing. Exhibits strict and nearly flawless adherence to stylistic conventions, document structure, and source attributions. -RSCH-V8926>

    8.5 to >7 pts

    PROFICIENT

    Applies APA style and formatting to scholarly writing. -RSCH-V8926>

    7 to >0 pts

    BASIC

    Applies APA style and formatting to scholarly writing incorrectly and/or inconsistently, detracting noticeably from good scholarship. -RSCH-V8926>

    0 pts

    NON_PERFORMANCE

    Does not apply APA style and formatting to scholarly writing. -RSCH-V8926>

    / 10 pts

    Total Points: 0

    Choose a submission type

    Select submission type Text

    Text

    Select submission type Upload

    Upload

    I agree to the tool’s

    This assignment submission is my own, original work

    *

  • Mental Health Leadership groups to generate interest and buy…

    8-12 slide PowerPoint presentation for one or more stakeholders or leadership groups to generate interest and buy-in for the plan proposal you developed

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): albright-et-al-2025-feasibility-and-acceptability-of-an-adapted-evidence-based-team-training-approach-from-health-care.pdf, out.pdf, EBSCO-FullText-01_27_2026.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • discussion 4

    A discussion question response is considered to be a 250 word answer to each discussion question. A response to a classmate should be 100 words. Less than this will automatically result in a significant reduction in ones grade. One initial response and one response to a classmate’s posting are required for each question within your group’s question.

    In addition to required discussion question responses, you could post substantive comments and respond in a thoughtful and constructive way to class members. Substantive comments should add to the class discussion in a way that enhances knowledge. Responses such as, I agree, are not considered to be substantive.

    Please be aware, when you post to a forum you have 5 mins to edit your post in case there is anything you would like to change. During this 5 minute period you won’t be able to reply to your classmates posts. After 5 minutes have passed, you will be able to see and reply to your classmates.

    Discussion Activity (Choose Two):

    1. Identify the three main pathways to entering business for a prospective entrepreneur.
    2. In evaluating whether or not to buy a franchise operation, the potential investor should ask a series of questions. What questions should the potential investor ask about the franchisor, the franchise, the market, and the potential investor themselves?
    3. Why would a venture capitalist be more interested in buying a convertible debenture for $500,000 than lending the new business $500,000 at a 4 percent interest rate?