Bright Academic Experts

Author: admin

  • PICOT

    instruction attached

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Sample Paper-1_4382111.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Literature Review

    Instructions:

    The purpose of this assignment is to get you thinking about your term paper. You will submit drafts of your paper throughout the semester for brief feedback by the instructor to improve your final term paper. Based on the topic you selected in Week 1 and after beginning to review scholarly sources about your topic, provide a detailed outline of your paper. The outline should include the following sections:

    1. Introduction

    a. Brief summary of the problem and policy:

    2. Literature Review

    a. _________________

    b. _________________

    c. _________________

    d. _________________

    3. Theoretical Explanation for Policy

    4. Recommendation(s)

    5. References

    Where your assignment will look different from your peers will be specific to parts 1a and 2a-2d.

    Part 1a should provide a brief summary of the problem at hand and the policy specific to that issue. This can come verbatim from your paper selection and rationale assignment from week 1.

    Parts 2a-2d should include subsections of what you will discuss related to your specific policy issue. While these sections may change as you begin writing your paper, it is important to have an outline of topics to keep your paper organized and ensure that it includes at least some of the main issues you will discuss.

    For example: If I selected a paper topic on the death penalty I would preliminarily include the following topics to discuss in the literature review:

    2. Literature Review

    a. Creation and Brief History of the Death Penalty

    b. Prevalence and Differences in the Death Penalty in the United States today

    c. Research on the effectiveness of the death penalty

    Issues related to the effectiveness with the death penalty including racial and sex differences

    This assignment is meant to make sure you have explored your topic at least from briefly enough to know the policy, potential issues, and give me an opportunity to point out other factors that you might want to consider. Overall, this is a completion based assignment. However, you should still review the rubric below.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Legalization and Decriminalization Information.docx, Final Module 1 Assignment Decriminalization of Marihuana.docx, Module 2 Assignment Instructions.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Soappeds1

    my similarity score was 12% which is acceptable but the Ai was 41% . Professor is giving me 48hr to revise and resubmit . Same patient and diagnose but as she states too perfect less generic patient visit . Also according to the rubric Im missing somethings for example in the pharmacological section I was suppose to put how much the medication cost . Id like you to look at the rubric see what Im missing revise the whole soap to match the rubric keeping the summarily score at 12% and lowering the ai tremendously . Below is screenshot of what she sent me

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): SOAPNoteTemplate.docx, SOAPNoteRubric.pdf, Soap1peds.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Write a short response of a few paragraphs reflecting on what was learned in the week, paying particular attention to a few topics that you found the most relevant and how this influenced your views on Environmental Health, either in creating new knowledge or resulting in you updating what you knew. In other words, what did you find valuable from this week’s topics and why?

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): 3 reflection.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Discussion 2

    Discussion Board 2 This discussion board covers the information in Chapters 5, 6, 7, and 8. Before posting, be sure to carefully review the instructions and grading rubric in the syllabus and review the feedback left on your last post. For your initiator post, choose just one question from the end of one of the chapters. For example, there are five questions to choose from on page 119 in Chapter 7. Make it clear at the top of your post which question you are answering. Include your opinion if the question asks for it, and feel free to use the first person, such as “I think…” and “I believe…” A strong post will include moral theory in it, such as universal ethics, and make connections to the case study in the chapter. You must also include direct quotes and citations from the chapter(s). Again, review the instructions in the syllabus before posting. You may write your post in Word and copy/paste it into the Canvas text box, but do not use the attachment feature. You must post first to see the posts of your classmates. Your first post will be counted as your initiator post submission whether it is complete or incomplete. After you post your initiator post, don’t forget to come back and post your response posts (see syllabus instructions). You may use A.I. to help you study, but you may not use A.I. to write your post for you. Please email the instructor or teaching assistant if you have any questions. CASE STUDIES (CHOOSE ONE) Chapter 5 (Questions on page 82) Chapter 6 (Questions on page 99) Chapter 7 (Questions on page 119) Chapter 8 (Questions on 138-139)

  • project design

    Draft a one-page informal business proposal in which you first define the venture for which you are seeking investment to complete a proof-of-concept test. You are seeking an investment of $150,000 from a venture capitalist, and you plan to make a diagnostic assay test based on antigen-antibody principles to accomplish a medical diagnostic of your choice. You can choose a medically relevant topic of interest, such as a test for COVID-19 aimed at the detection of particular proteins, as long as the venture seeks to detect the presence or absence of infection in the body.

    Your business proposal should include a high-level explanation of how this concept could work. Develop a schematic using inputs and outputs to show which indicators the assay is reading, and how it uses those indicators to decide the state of the readout being examined. You can use diagrams, figures, flowcharts, and whatever else comes to mind to describe your idea. You will include a breakdown of the budget, which may include several parameters such as product /development, research and development, and manufacturing costs. (Obviously, we’re not working with a lot of information as to how much things will actually cost, so don’t worry too much about being completely accurate with this budget; it is more of an intellectual exercise.)

  • Rhetorical appeals in Michelle Obama’s 2008 Democratic Natio…

    Before completing this discussion activity, review TSIS “Introduction to Rhetoric and Argumentation,” particularly the discussion of ethos, pathos, and logos (pp UT90-UT93.) . For this discussion activity, identify how Michelle Obama utilizes each of the rhetorical appeals ethos, pathos, and logos in her speech for the Democratic National Convention in 2008. Do not forget that in order to be eligible to receive full credit for this discussion post, you must complete the prompt above and cite evidence from the speech, lecture, and readings to support your claims. In addition to your original posting to the discussion prompt, you must also respond to at least two peers postings. Please consult the discussion rubric for grading criteria. Include the word count at the end of each post. Because you must cite evidence from the readings, lectures and the video and create a Works Cited entry, make sure you are familiar with how to cite a lecture Links to an external site. and a video

  • Research Paper

    The research paper should determine your organizational tactical response to a weapon of mass destruction (WMD) terrorism event at a specific location selected by you. You must select your level of government involvement and the various cooperating agencies that might assist you (local, state, tribal, or federal).

    Your final research paper should consist of the components listed below.

    • Present a thorough description of a specific type of WMD threat at your selected event. Determine an incident location in your own city, tribe, or state.
    • Describe the demographics of the affected population, and list possible casualties based on the type of WMD selected.
    • Detail your likely operational emergency medical response, homeland security response, and recovery outcomes.
    • Choose a terrorist organization to use for your scenario. Describe the terrorist organization most likely responsible for the WMD incident at your chosen location. Discuss background information about the organization. Describe how the organization likely acquired the materials to create the WMD.
    • Discuss the potential risks and threats posed by your selected WMD. Describe the development of the WMD, what technology it uses, and what laws regulate materials used in the WMD.
    • Discuss all conceivable response operations at the level of government you have selected (local, state, tribal, or federal).
    • Provide a description of the homeland security/emergency management organizations at all levels that you can coordinate with via the Incident Command System (ICS).

    In addition to the required components, you must include an introduction and a summary of your findings in your paper. The introduction should provide a thesis statement and a brief overview of the paper’s topic. The summary should provide the results of your findings and solutions based on research and best practices.

    You must include at least five scholarly sources, three of which must come from the CSU Online Library. Adhere to APA Style when constructing this assignment, including in-text citations and references for all sources that are used. Please note that no abstract is needed.

  • environmental theory

    Post a 250-300 word reflection supported by a rationale about where you have encountered beauty in the ‘expanded field’ (after Krauss, and Meyer).

    Your rationale needs to connect back to the readings.

    readings are attached***

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Krauss_Rosalind_1979_Sculpture_in_the_Expanded_Field.pdf, Meyer 1997 Expanded Field of LA_ada.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Week 5 grant writing 2 parts what?

    A grant writer works with a team or an agency to conduct grant writing for criminal justice initiatives.

    So far, you have developed some of the components of the grant proposal identified to meet the need for funding the criminal justice initiative that you selected in Week 1. For this assessment, you develop the remaining components, revise previously completed components based on feedback, and compile your final grant proposal. While you are not required to submit your grant proposal to the funding organization you selected, it should be compiled in a way that it would be ready for submission to the organization if you choose to do so.

    Assessment Deliverable

    Write a 700-word executive summary to introduce the grant proposal that you have been compiling throughout the course as if you were a grant writer for an agency that supports the selected initiative. This summary will be the first item included in your proposal, followed by the components developed in Weeks 14.

    In your executive summary, describe the key information from the components of your proposal in the following order:

    • Describe the organization you selected and the project you are applying for. Summarize the needs statement and explain why the project is important to the affected community.
    • Summarize what is included in the project activity and how it will be completed. Describe how you will evaluate the success of the outcome of the project.
    • Summarize the total amount of the anticipated budget for the project and the amount you are requesting from this organization.
    • Explain why your agency would be the best recipient of the funding for this project. Note the credentials of the individuals who will be influential to the project.

    Compile your complete grant proposal. Your proposal should total 4,000 words and include revisions of previously submitted components based on feedback from your prior assessments. Ensure that it includes all of the following components:

    • Executive Summary (600700 words): Recommended to complete in Week 5
    • Organizational Background (word count varies): Recommended to complete in Week 2
    • Needs Statement (175350 words): Completed in Wk 2 Summative Assessment: Grant Proposal Outline
    • Goals and Objectives (word count varies): Recommended to complete in Week 3
    • Timeline (word count varies): Completed in Wk 3 Assessment Prep: Timeline and Project Management Plan
    • Project Management Plan (525700 words): Completed in Wk 3 Assessment Prep: Timeline and Project Management Plan
    • Budget and Budget Narrative (525700 words): Completed in Wk 4 Summative Assessment: Budget Decision Report
    • Evaluation (175350 words): Recommended to complete in Week 5
    • Sustainability Plan (175350 words): Recommended to complete in Week 4
    • Attachments (word count varies): Recommended to complete in Week 5

    Optionally, you may include additional components that are part of the application to the funding source you selected.

    Cite sources and format your citations according to APA guidelines.

    Requirements: part 1 700 words part 2 4000 words