Bright Academic Experts

Author: admin

  • A high quality explanation and answer with in your time limi…

    It give us quickly information

  • Psychology Question

    Purpose: This assignment aims to enhance your competency in an additional evidence-based practice (EBP) not extensively covered in this course. To accomplish this task, you will develop a comprehensive essay on an EBP of your choice that will discuss all important aspects of the EBP, including the skills necessary for implementing the chosen intervention effectively.

    Instructions: Select an Evidence-Based Practice for autistic individuals, and thoroughly research the topic utilizing AFIRM modules, IRIS modules, and relevant peer-reviewed research.

    After completing your research, develop an APA-style paper explaining the intervention, including the following components:

    • Select your evidence-based practice- NOT to include discrete trial training (DTT), functional communication training (FCT), naturalistic intervention (NI), response interruption/redirection (RIR), or parent-implemented intervention (PII).
    • Complete the relevant AFIRM module and research review.
    • Develop an APA-style paper detailing the purpose of the intervention, the age range appropriate for the intervention, procedural steps, relevant research results, and intended outcomes.
    • Annotated Bibliography (include relevant sources and articles)
      • Utilize

    _____________________________________________________________________________________________

    Assignment Formatting Instructions

    • File Format: Submit your assignment as a Word Document (.doc or .docx).
    • Font and Size: Use Times New Roman, 12-point font throughout your document.
    • Formatting and Style: Your assignment must follow APA format, which includes:
      • Proper margins, spacing, and section headings.
      • Adherance to the .
      • A proper heading on the first page of your paper.
      • In-text citations and include a reference list to support the methods or procedures you discuss.
    • File Naming Convention: Save your document with the following naming format:
      • Last Name, First Name, ABA509 Assignment 2

    Assignment Submission Instructions

    To submit your assignment, please click on the Add submission button located at the bottom of this page. You will be prompted to select a file to be submitted. (Note that you can drag and drop your file into the Files area or you can use the File picker to navigate to and select your file.) Then, click on the Save changes button. From this point, you have the option to either edit your answers by clicking on the Edit submission button or remove your submission by clicking on the Remove submission button. Please note that your assignment is submitted when you click the Save changes button.

    To view how you will be graded on this assignment, refer to the .

  • Studypool Professional

    (Plastic pollution) .. plastic pollution is a growing environmental concern with significant impacts on marine life.one notable case involves sea turtles which often mistake plastic bag.

  • english 102

    I have a small task i need help with

    please check it out and mk

  • Social media

    Social media has revolutionised the way we communicate, transforming it from a predominantly face to face interaction into a digital exchange that spans the globe. Platform like Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and tik _ tok have integral part of our daily lives .one of the primary benefit of social media is its ability to connect people regardless of geographical boundaries.

  • Communications Question

    Assignment 2 – Final Project Analytical Annotated Bibliography, due Tuesday, Week 4

    This assignment is worth 20% of your final grade.

    For this step of your final projects development, you will report the results of your research into a resolution of your papers workplace* communication problem topic in an Analytical Annotated Bibliography for three authoritative sources that you plan to use in your project to support your thesis.

    Before you begin, review Module 4, “Giving Credit Where Credit is Due: Attribution and Citation,” of the to refresh your understanding of why scholars document their research with in-text citations and references.

    Objective: Your objective is to demonstrate your ability to research and critically analyze information that can support your projects thesis.

    Caution: The three sources you use for this assignment must be different from the three that you wrote about in Assignment 1, your literature review. Focus your research for this step assignment on professional and scholarly business journal research and case studies on possible resolutions to yours or similar workplace communication problems.

    (*Remember, if you are not employed or cannot discuss your workplace, you should be using a communication problem from another organizational setting in which you are involved for your final project, such as school, church, or a community group.)

    Each entry must include a reference formatted according to American Psychological Association (7th edition) style rules and an analysis as described below. You should be able to use the material that you develop here in your final project. Before you tackle this exercise, please make sure you have read the Week 4 course materials.

    Required Research: You must use at least six authoritative sources in your final project, at least three of which must be scholarly, peer-reviewed journal articles about communication research studies from the UMGC librarys databases.

    For this assignment, you will document the research you must do on possible resolutions of your workplace* communication problem by writing an analytical annotated bibliography about three authoritative sources that you found in the UMGC library and plan to use in your project to support your thesis. Look for professional and scholarly business journal research and case studies on possible resolutions to yours or similar workplace communication problems. You can get leads to resources on your research topic right in your email by following the instructions at to receive RSS and email alerts when new newspaper, magazine, and scholarly journal articles are made available by the library.

    To find appropriate resources, use the UMGC librarys portal to communication studies resources at . For help finding academic journal articles, see the UMGC librarys resource, Locate and Evaluate Scholarly Articles, at . Two online sources can be among your resources, but their credibility must be verified. See the librarys handout, ” for help.

    Although you may review the < Encyclopedia of Communication Theory > in our classroom resources to select and come to understand the communication theory or theories that you want to use in your final project, dictionaries and encyclopedias cannot be included in your Analytical Annotated Bibliography or the references for your final project. A relevant YouTube video may be included as one of the internet sources, provided it has been evaluated for credibility.

    Content: Review each resource for answers to as much of the following as possible:

    • Describe each source’s author
    • Analyze each resource’s purpose and audience
    • Summarize each resource’s main arguments and conclusions
    • Assess each resource’s information for relevance to the paper’s research question
    • Evaluate each resource’s strengths, weaknesses and/or biases
    • Explain how each resource’s information will be used in the final research paper

    Format: The Analytical Annotated Bibliography must contain the following information:

    1. Use an APA-style title page.
    2. Repeat the title of your assignment at the top of Page 2.
    3. Provide the name of the communication theory you are using in your final project.
    4. Provide the thesis you are working with at this point in your projects development.
    5. Create an APA-style reference citation for each resource.
    6. Write a paragraph annotation of between 150-200 words (excluding APA-style reference) that answers at least the following questions:
      1. What is the resource about? Summarize its purpose, findings, argument, and/or conclusions.
      2. What is the resources greatest strength in relation to your project’s focus? Assess the resources strengths, weaknesses, or biases.
      3. What role will the resource play in your project? Evaluate the resources relevance to your project.
    7. Repeat Nos. 5 and 6 above for each of your three sources.

    You will find an example below of an APA-style analytical annotation from the UMGC Librarys How to Write an Annotated Bibliography at . While not possible to accomplish here, the reference and the annotation should be double-spaced in documents formatted in word processing software such as MS Word.

    Breeding evil. (2005, August 6). Economist, 376(8438), 9. Retrieved from

    This editorial from the Economist describes the controversy surrounding video games and the effect they have on people who use them. The article points out that most critics of gaming are people over 40 and it is an issue of age not of the games themselves. While the author briefly mentions studies done around the issue of violence and gaming, he does not go into enough depth for the reader to truly know the range of studies that have actually been done in this area, other than to take his word that the research is unsatisfactory. The author of this article stresses the age factor over violence as the real reason for opposition to video games and stresses the good gaming has done in most areas of human life. This article is a good resource for those wanting to begin to explore the controversy surrounding video games; however, for anyone doing serious research, one should actually examine some of the research studies that have been done in this area rather than simply take the author’s word that opposition to video games is simply due to an issue of generational divide.

    Please pay attention to the last sentence of this annotation. It provides an example of a critique of an authors research.

    Resources to support this activity:

    The following resources should be consulted for guidance on how to analyze, write, and format the annotations and citations.

    • Sample APA-style Analytical Annotated Bibliography, in the Week 4 Videos & Readings
    • by UMGC Faculty in the Week 4 Videos & Readings
    • Citations and reference formats: UMGCs guide to the APAs new seventh edition of its style rules can be found on our librarys portal at
    • Citation examples:
    • Our library also has videos on according to the latest APA rules and on .

    Grading: For insight into your instructor’s expectations for this assignment, scroll down here to click on and review its grading rubric. A sample student assignment is attached to this assignment folder.

    Due Date: Submit your analytical annotated bibliography as a Word .doc, .docx, or .rtf attachment only in its assignment folder by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday of Week 4. Do not submit the assignment in .pdf, .Gdoc, .Pages, or other document formats. See the Course Schedule in the syllabus or the interactive calendar in this classroom for the exact date that this assignment is due in Week 4.

    Please let me know if you have any further questions and I can answer. m

  • Studypool Professional

    I am a student of milestone college. I live in dhaka and i read in class 9


  • Benchmark – Due Process Case Study MMS 560

    Special education teachers must remain professional in all situations and are often required to make decisions that involve ethical issues. It is important that special education teachers be aware of the ethical and professional standards as well as special education law. All decisions involved in the IEP process should be data-informed to ensure they align with the students needs. USE THE TEMPLATE PROVIDED.

    Part 1: Case Study – Stephen

    Review the Case Study: Stephen, and complete Part 1 of the Due Process: Stephen Case Study template.

    Part 2: Reflection

    In a reflection of 250-500 words, discuss each of the following:

    • How you plan to participate in learning communities and professional learning activities based on self-reflection and ongoing analysis of student learning to support your professional practice and uphold the legal and ethical expectations of the profession.
    • How you will model effective practices for colleagues, including in the virtual environment, to ensure that all stakeholders are abiding by special education laws, policies, and procedures.
    • How you plan to reflect upon your personal character and professional performance on a regular basis to become more self-aware and grow in your professional practice, including how this reflection will help you recognize potential biases and their effect on expectations for and relationships with students with exceptionalities and their families.
    • Research local organizations in your area or virtually that provide professional development opportunities for special education and describe one opportunity that would support your growth as an advocate of special education.

    Support your findings by citing the Special Education Professional Ethical Principles and an additional 3-5 scholarly resources.

    While APA Style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

    This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

    You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite Technical Support Articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

    Benchmark Information:

    This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies and professional standards:

    MEd Special Education (ITL/NITL); MEd Elementary Education and Special Education (ITL/NITL)

    1.3 Participate in learning communities and professional learning activities based on self-reflection and ongoing analysis of student learning. [CEC 1.3; InTASC 10(f), 10(p), 10(r), 10(s), 10(t), 9(a), 9(b), 9(d), 9(g), 9(k), 9(l); AAQEP 2e; ISTE-E 1b]

    Grad Cert Special Education Mild to Moderate

    7.2: Participate in learning communities and professional learning activities based on self-reflection and ongoing analysis of student learning. [MC1, MC4][AAQEP 2e; CEC 1.3; InTASC 10(f), 10(p), 10(r), 10(s), 10(t), 9(a), 9(b), 9(d), 9(g), 9(k), 9(l); ISTE-E 1b]

  • Nursing Question

    Introduction:

    Identifying analysis techniques for assessing competitive advantage is important for building health care strategy. Sustaining health care competitive advantage requires that leaders understand environmental demands to assist with minimizing weakness and threats from the external environment. This assessment provides you with an opportunity to examine your health care environment to determine whether what is being accomplished in your organization, department, team, community project, or other care setting is making a positive difference.

    Preperation:

    Note: You will use the results of this analysis to develop a strategic plan in Assessment 2.

    You have been asked to conduct an analysis of your care setting that will result in two potential pathways toward a strategic plan to improve health care quality and safety in your organization, department, team, community project, or other care setting. To accomplish this, you will take two approaches to the analysis:

    1. Complete the discovery and dream phases of an appreciative inquiry (AI) project.
    2. Conduct a strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats (SWOT) analysis.

    To help ensure that your analysis is well-received, the requester has suggested that you:

    • Present your analysis results in four parts:
      • Part 1: Appreciative Inquiry Discovery and Dream.
      • Part 2: SWOT Analysis.
      • Part 3: Comparison of Approaches.
      • Part 4: Analysis of Relevant Leadership Characteristics and Skills.
    • Your analysis should be 47 pages in length.

    Note: As you revise your writing, check out the resources listed on the Writing Centers page.

    As you prepare to complete this assessment, you may want to think about other related issues to deepen your understanding or broaden your viewpoint. You are encouraged to consider the questions below and discuss them with a fellow learner, a work associate, an interested friend, or a member of your professional community. Note that these questions are for your own development and exploration and do not need to be completed or submitted as part of your assessment.

    One key aspect to being an effective leader, manager, or administrator is an awareness of your leadership strengths, weaknesses, and style.

    • How would you assess your general leadership, communication, and relationship-building skills?
    • How would describe your leadership style?

    Imagine the future for a care setting that is your place of practice or one in which you would like to work.

    • What aspirational goals can you envision that would lead to improvements in health care quality and safety?
    • How well do these goals align with the mission, vision, and values of your care setting?

    Analysis:

    Note: The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide, so at a minimum, be sure to address each point. In addition, you are encouraged to review the performance level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed.

    Writing, Supporting Evidence, and APA Style

    • Communicate professionally when conducting interviews and collecting data.
    • Write clearly, with professionalism and respect for stakeholders and colleagues.
    • Integrate relevant sources of evidence to support your assertions.
      • Cite at least 35 sources of scholarly or professional evidence.
      • Include relevant interview information.
    • Format your document using APA style. Use the . Be sure to include:
      • A title page and reference page. An abstract is not required.
      • A running head on all pages.
      • Appropriate section headings.
      • Properly formatted citations and references.
    • Proofread your writing to minimize errors that could distract readers and make it more difficult to focus on the substance of your analysis.

    Part 1: Appreciative Inquiry Discovery and Dream

    • Synthesize stories and evidence about times when a care setting performed at its best with regard to quality and safety goals.
      • Collect stories from your care setting. You may collect stories through interviews or conversations with colleagues or provide your own.
      • Explain how your stories are related to quality and safety goals.
      • Describe the evidence you have that substantiates your stories.
      • Identify the positive themes reflected in your stories.
      • Describe other evidence (for example: data, awards, accreditations) that validates your care setting’s positive core.
    • Propose positive, yet attainable, quality and safety improvement goals for your care setting.
      • Explain how accomplishing these goals will lead to ethical and culturally-sensitive improvements in quality and safety.
      • Explain how your proposed goals align with your care setting’s mission, vision, and values.

    Part 2: SWOT Analysis

    • Conduct a SWOT analysis of your care setting, with respect to quality and safety goals.
      • Provide a narrative description of your analysis.
      • Identify the assessment tool you used as the basis of your analysis.
      • Describe your key findings and their relationships to quality and safety goals.
    • Describe one area of concern that you identified in your SWOT analysisrelevant to your care setting’s mission, vision, and valuesfor which you would propose pursuing improvements.
      • Explain how this area of concern relates to your care setting’s mission, vision, and values.
      • Explain why you believe it will be necessary and valuable to pursue improvements related to this area of concern.

    Part 3: Comparison of Approaches

    Compare the AI and SWOT approaches to analysis and reflect on the results.

    • Describe your mindset when examining your care setting from an AI perspective and from a SWOT perspective.
    • Describe the types of data and evidence you searched for when taking an AI approach and a SWOT approach.
    • Describe the similarities and differences between the two approaches when communicating and interacting with colleagues.

    Part 4: Analysis of Relevant Leadership Characteristics and Skills

    Analyze the leadership characteristics and skills most desired in the person leading potential performance improvement projects, taking both an AI and SWOT approach.

    • Explain how these characteristics and skills would help a leader facilitate a successful AI-based project and a successful SWOT-based project.
    • Comment on any shared characteristics or skills you identified as helpful for both AI and SWOT approaches.

  • Exploring Earth and Beyond

    How does Earth stay in orbit around the Sun without falling?