Bright Academic Experts

Author: admin

  • post 124 mid 27 maryan

    27. Long Essay Question: There is no specific lengthy here, I want to see how you apply these authors analytically in answer the following prompt.

    Scenario:

    Scenario: It is the year 2021-2022 and a global pandemic in the form of a new strain of the Covid virus has struck the world. This virus has spread around the globe, impacting every country. However, states and their governments have responded differently to this pandemic with some arguing that certain states have responded better than others.

    As political scientists you are asked to provide analysis of what factors are necessary to help us understand how effective a countrys response will be. In other words, how can we begin to understand and analyze how countries will respond differently to this ongoing crisis?

    In order to answer this question, I want you to draw upon the following authors: Fukuyama, Weber, and Robinson and Acemoglu (Why Nations Fail, and the Narrow Corridor). What do these authors say about questions of state power, scope and capacity, institutions, and how do these authors inform the ongoing pandemic crisis? You must use these authors and directly quote from the readings to do well on this question. You must have a minimum of five quotes to be successful on this essay question.

  • Licensure, Regulatory Agencies, and Scope of Practice

    Purpose:

    To reinforce professional development by reading advanced practice nursing research and applying it to NP regulatory expectations.

    Instructions:

    1. Select one advanced practice journal article related to NP regulation or scope.
    2. Summarize the article in 2 pages using APA format.
    3. Discuss how licensure and regulations may impact FNP autonomy and clinical decision-making
    4. What to include:
      • Article purpose and background
      • What regulatory issue is discussed (scope, authority, policy, licensure, credentialing)
      • Key findings/recommendations
      • Practical implications for FNP clinical practice and legal accountability
      • Reflection: What surprised you or changed your understanding?

      Formatting & Submission:Formatting Requirements:

      • APA 7th edition format
      • 12 pt Times New Roman, double-spaced
      • 1-inch margins
      • In-text citations + reference page
      • Minimal 2 pages excluding presentation and references page.

  • Communications Question

    I have this assignment due and I will provide all the information and if you can finish it earlier I will appreciate it and if there is anything let me know. I have this assignment due and have 2 parts and make sure to be your own words not from outside resource the professor will know and add reference at the end of the page.

    Part 1

    Week 9 Discussion: Forming and Maintaining Relationships

    Week 9 Discussion: Forming and Maintaining Relationships

    Primary post due by Friday at 11:59 p.m. | Responses due by Sunday at 11:59 p.m.

    Please remember the adhere to Community Guidelines (see page 9 course syllabus).

    Objective

    • Recall factors of attraction that are influential in the formation of your relationships.
    • Recall strategies for positive and open communication to maintain your relationships.

    Instructions

    Review the the section about forming relationships that include similarity, complementarity, rewards, competency, proximity, and disclosure. (See relationship formation in textbook.)

    Only use textbook and personal examples for this assignment.

    • For this discussion, the “student must post before seeing replies” has been activated, which means that you must contribute your idea before you can see what other have posted.
    • Make sure to post full entry for first posting to get potentially full credit.

    Contribute your initial post to our discussion by Friday, 11:59 p.m. In your post please include the following:

    1. Which and other factors listed in this chapter best describe your most important interpersonal relationships?
    2. What kinds of positive and open communication help you maintain your relationships? (See in textbook.)

    By 11:59 p.m. Sunday, please respond to at least two posts in our discussion.

    Part 2

    Week 9 Review Activity Discussion: Relationship Paper

    Week 9 Review Activity Discussion: Relationship Paper

    Primary post due by Saturday at 11:59 p.m.

    Great, it is time for our second review discussion here in this course. Please remember the adhere to Community Guidelines (see page 9 course syllabus).

    Objective

    • prepare for relationship analysis paper.
    • recognize factors that influence self-concept and esteem.
    • describe how the self-concept is subjective and is shaped by communication with others.

    Instructions

    Use the terms discussed in textbook from this week, , and own examples (not from websites or books) to address the questions. Write complete sentences and not bullet lists. You can anonymize the chosen person for your privacy.

    Contribute your initial post to our review discussion by Saturday, 11:59 p.m. In your post please include the following:

    1. State the person for your relationship analysis paper that is someone you know or once knew who was
      an ego booster- who helped enhance your self-esteem by acting in a way that made you feel accepted,
      competent, worthwhile, important, appreciated. Additionally, state the type of relationship
      you have such as friendship, family, romantic, or workplace. See
    2. Provide an example of how you use empathy and mindfulness in your relationship? See
      from this week and

    While it’s not required, you may also feel free to comment on any posts by your peers: This assignment is graded as an applied exercise, but posted as a discussion to allow us to learn from one another.

    Grading

    Your primary post needs to be 200-220 words and contributes specific ideas to the conversation.

    Student Example DO NOT Copy

    For this assignment, I have chosen to analyze a relationship that occurred in the past between myself and two of my close friends with whom I shared a sisterhood-like friendship. Though my relationship with them drifted quite some time ago, it was an important part of my life in terms of understanding empathy and emotional development. The reason behind this choice is the fact that our relationship involved surviving situations that would break most friendships. Our relationship was based on elevating each others self-respect. If one of us were dealing with emotions, whether due to being hurt by someone close or insecurity towards them, we would make light of the situation while acknowledging our emotions. We uplifted one another in a manner that reaffirmed our value, enabling each other to feel capable, respected, and cherished. While it was not easy to be vulnerable at times, we always displayed empathy, comprehending each others point of view without criticism. We were also mindful of conflict situations, examining both sides and emphasizing effective communication. Though we now take separate ways in life, the friendship has left us with positive memories to remember. It is evident that the end of a friendship does not necessarily need to be negative or end with any bitterness, but should leave room for personal development.

    Another Student Example DO NOT Copy

    For my relationship analysis paper, I have chosen a close friend who has consistently been an ego booster in my life. This friendship has helped enhance my self-esteem because they consistently make me feel accepted, competent, and appreciated. When I share accomplishments or struggles with them, they respond with encouragement and understanding, reinforcing a positive self-concept. Their support shows how our self-esteem is influenced by the feedback and communication we receive from others, illustrating that the self-concept is subjective and shaped socially.

    I practice empathy and mindfulness in this friendship by intentionally listening and trying to understand their perspective without judgment. For example, when my friend faced a difficult decision at work, I focused on their feelings rather than offering solutions. I asked clarifying questions and reflected back their concerns to ensure they felt heard and validated. This process of synchronizing perceptions not only strengthens our communication but also maintains the quality of our relationship over time.

    Differentiation plays a role in our friendship, as we each maintain our individuality while remaining connected. Recognizing our unique strengths and differences has made our relationship more resilient, demonstrating that healthy relationships support both shared connection and personal growth. This combination of empathy, mindfulness, and mutual support continues to enhance our bond and positively impact my self-esteem.

    Another Student Example DO NOT Copy

    For my relationship analysis, I am focusing on my close friend Alonso, who has been a wonderful ego booster in my life. Alonso makes me feel important and capable by always noticing my hard work and giving me sincere compliments. Whenever I feel unsure of myself, Alonso points out my strengths, which helps me feel much more confident and worthwhile. This kind of support is a huge part of why our friendship is so strong and healthy.

    To keep this relationship going, I use mindfulness and empathy every time we talk. Being mindful means I give Alonso my full attention. I put away my phone and really listen to what is being said without judging or interrupting. This helps me understand Alonsos feelings in the moment. I also use empathy to see things from Alonso’s perspective. If Alonso is having a hard day at work, I try to imagine how that stress feels so I can offer the right kind of comfort. By showing that I truly care and understand, I make sure our connection stays deep and positive. These simple habits of listening and caring help us stay “in sync” and ensure that we both feel appreciated and happy in our friendship.

  • Introduction to Forensic Science

    You will need to copy and paste these questions (and all future assignment questions) into a Word document and type in the answers. Use as much space as you need, and please do not put one sentence answers. Make sure you fully answer the question and answer ALL parts of the question or you will not get full points. Once you are finished, you will need to save the document as a WORD DOCUMENT . Please use ch19,20 powerpoints attached PLEASE INCLUDE BOTH THE QUESTION AND THE ANSWER IN YOUR ASSIGNMENT. Please no plagarism, no ai no chat bots

    Assignment

    Chapter 19: Computer Forensics

    Chapter 20: Mobile Device Forensics

    1. What is the forensic examiners main goal when obtaining data from an HDD? Why is this best accomplished by removing the HDD from the system and placing it in a laboratory forensic computer?
    2. What is the difference between visible and latent data? How is latent data viewed?
    3. Define RAM and ROM and explain the difference between the two.
    4. What is the motherboard and why is it central to the functioning of the computer?
    5. What is unallocated space? Name three processes that can cause latent data to be stored in unallocated space.
    6. What is the role of the operating system in a computer? Name three common operating systems.
    7. Why does a forensic examiner take a fingerprint of a drive before and after imaging its contents?
    8. Why should an investigator not unplug a computer that may contain chat or instant message conversations?
    9. What are cookies? What is their basic purpose and how are they used by forensic examiners?
    10. What kind of information can the GPS provide?
    11. Differentiate between physical and logical extraction.
    12. What types of information can the UFED tool extract from the mobile device?
    13. What is geolocation?
    14. Differentiate between an SD card and a SIM card.
    15. What is a cellular system?

  • post 124 mid 22 wjdan

    22. What is the difference between a state and a regime?

    23. When it comes to the defining the concept of democracy, we generally face at least two problems. What are these two problems or challenges?

    24. In one to two paragraphs answer the following question:

    One of the longest and continuing debates within comparative politics is the “agency” vs. “structure” debate. What do we mean by this? Specifically what do we mean by agency and structure and what are the implications for the study of politics.

    25. What was the Treaty of Westphalia of 1648 and what is its significance, which we see even to this day?

    26. In Why Nations Fail, Acemoglu and Robinson are attempting to provide answers to what specific type of political outcome? What is the political outcome they are trying to figure out (in other words, what is the Dependent Variable) and what are the independent variables (the causes of this outcome) that they provide as causes?

  • post 124 mid 27 wijdan

    27. Long Essay Question: There is no specific lengthy here, I want to see how you apply these authors analytically in answer the following prompt.

    Scenario:

    Scenario: It is the year 2021-2022 and a global pandemic in the form of a new strain of the Covid virus has struck the world. This virus has spread around the globe, impacting every country. However, states and their governments have responded differently to this pandemic with some arguing that certain states have responded better than others.

    As political scientists you are asked to provide analysis of what factors are necessary to help us understand how effective a countrys response will be. In other words, how can we begin to understand and analyze how countries will respond differently to this ongoing crisis?

    In order to answer this question, I want you to draw upon the following authors: Fukuyama, Weber, and Robinson and Acemoglu (Why Nations Fail, and the Narrow Corridor). What do these authors say about questions of state power, scope and capacity, institutions, and how do these authors inform the ongoing pandemic crisis? You must use these authors and directly quote from the readings to do well on this question. You must have a minimum of five quotes to be successful on this essay question.

  • computer ethics

    Please respond to wilmer with 150 words please no plagairism, no ai no chat bots

    The thing that stand are how the source was leaked from the Claude code in the first place. Also, how was it accidentin the first place? The person was affected because he took the code with knowledge that it was an accident but he shared it on GitHub anyway for hundreds to use it. It was a small mistake by Claude that led to the person sharing the code and created a chain of events where thousands of innocent people got caught in the crossfire.

    It shapes my understanding of ownership because sometimes you should be careful with your security to make sure stuff like that never happens or ends up on the website. Just because you own something doesn’t mean you can put it anywhere you like. I encountered someone in a painting recreation using AI and claiming they made it themselves. I decided to look and see if the person really did make it themselves. Who really owns this or that in the first place?

    I have seen those fake pictures of GTA VI leaked all over social media. I will respond like be careful dont be fool by those videos and images. The responsibility they have is making sure all there stuff is all secured in the first place before stuff is leaked or taken from them. Responsibility matter because you dont just want any hold important data, code, source or anything else like in the first place

  • Health & Medical Question

    I have this assignment due and I will provide all the information and if you can finish it earlier I will appreciate it and if there is anything let me know. I have this assignment due and have 3 parts and make sure to be your own words not from outside resource the professor will know and add reference at the end of the page.

    Part 1

    Discussion 3: Interventions In Your Community

    Intervention Analysis

    Background

    Focusing your intervention is key to success. This week you will find interventions and analyze them. This is a tricky job and much like advertising, you need to look for clues in the “advertisement” to see who the author is intending to reach.

    This week, you will find and analyze a SIMPLE intervention to see how it is focused. This week it is a discussion!

    Key Points:

    *Interventions work on a group scale, interventions are not health one to one health care

    *Public Health interventions are not free treatment, remember, public health is prevention!

    *Interventions must be tailored to your target group identified in your research of for distribution and determinants.

    *A good question is “Does my intervention find my at risk group where they live, work and play?”

    *Some campaigns are not really PH, especially on social media and the web, are not really campaigns. They are educational or opinion posts functioning as advertisement for services. This is not to say the message is good or bad, but we do want to know how to differentiate between the two!

    Readings

    No readings this week! But you do have a “field trip”!

    Assignment Steps

    1. In your community find a SHORT intervention that addresses any public health problem.
    2. Options are: posters, billboards, commercials, or a flyer. You can use a social media campaign if it is NOT advertising. I Keep it SIMPLE. See my examples below. DO NOT submit an entire website or a huge program or medical care. If you find something NOT from the internet, you get +5 bonus points! My example below would NOT get extra credit as it is from social media.
    3. Provide a short 1-2 sentence summary of the campaign and where you found it.
    4. Tell me who you think the intervention is designed for (demographics). Include age, race, gender and socioeconomics. Analyze the campaign NOT the problem.
    5. Tell me why you think it is focused to that group. Do not analyze the problem. Analyze the intervention.
    6. Reply. You need TWO this week.
      1. Find a campaign that you like. Comment on it and why.
      2. Find a peer that posted a campaign focused on the same or similar topic. Compare and contrast it to your campaign choice OR
      3. Then we will be each other’s detectives. Find a campaign that really is an advertisement, not a true PH a campaign
      4. For the second reply: Vote for the post “spoke to you” and why. Tell them if you think the campaign is an effective one or not.

    Example

    I found this campaign on Instagram after a student used it in an assignment. It is about depression.

    depression post from instagram

    age: this campaign talks about household chores, so I think it is focused on someone over 25 and less than 50 since that is the age to have a busy household.

    race/ethnicity: This is just print so I don’t see any racial or ethnic focus.

    gender: I think this is focused more to women since it talks about household chores and self-care as these are more often terms and things women would be oriented to. Some men may identify with this (or should!), but I think more women do.

    SES: I think this is for middle class and higher focused. People of lower SES don’t often practice “self care” or have the money to do so. There is also some advanced vocabulary that someone of lower education would not know or identify with such as “exhaustion, justify and worthiness”. These terms and “masking” or “self-isolating” are also terms that someone who either reads therapy books or attends therapy would know, another clue to higher SES and access to money and healthcare.

    Example Reply 1:Hey Catherine. I like your post and it is well written. I did some research though and I think this is just someone’s personal instagram account, not Public Health. I looked up the “Igototherapy” account and it says:

    I Go to Therapy
    lets talk about mental health & therapy
    mental health support & education for your journey
    not a therapist
    resources & find a therapist

    I wonder if they get money for referrals? The posts are really good though so that’s nice!

    Example Reply 2: Hi Catherine. I vote for your post. I think this post speaks to my demographic of women who are old enough to manage a household (they mention all those chores!) since I am at the stage in life where I am juggling a lot of the things they are talking about! I also feel like women especially are supposed to smile and act nice like they say so that makes me think it is focused to women.

    What You Need to Accomplish

    • Provide an image of a public health campaign
    • Analyze the campaign for the following clues to focus
      • Age
      • Race
      • Gender
      • Socioeconomics
    • Provide a rationale for your analysis
    • Analyze one peer ad choosing one factor below
      • Compare and contrast a campaign with a similar focus to yours.
      • Find a campaign that you feel might be an advertisement in disguise of a public health campaign.
    • “Vote” for your favorite campaign and state why
    • Have the names of the peer in both replies.
    • Follow the format including bold categories.

    Discussion (Un-Grading) Rubric

    Questions to Ask Before You Post

    • 1.”Does anything an average person doesn’t know have a citation?” (if not put one in)
    • 2. “Is what I put in the assignment relevant, and does it add to the question/purpose of the assignment?” (Dont just dump facts since they sound good)
    • 3 “Can I understand what I wrote?”. (If you can understand it, then you should be good.)
    • 4. What did I learn? Lets hope that’s something good!
    Criteria Accomplished Progressing Revisit & Revise
    Understanding & Voice Shows understanding of the topic using original wording and a conversational tone. Ideas clearly connect to the discussion prompt. Generally on topic but may rely too much on summary or outside phrasing. Some points need more explanation or personal insight. Off topic, mostly copied, or written like a formal paper. Missing authentic student voice.
    Support & Evidence Supports ideas with relevant facts, examples, or personal experiences. Includes references or module materials when appropriate. Some support or examples provided but may be missing a reference or clear connection to evidence. Missing evidence or references. May appear copied, unsupported, or unclear.
    Engagement & Contribution Adds meaningfully to the conversation and invites further discussion or reflection. Responds adequately but does not extend or connect ideas to the larger conversation. Does not contribute to the topic or engage with others ideas.
    Writing Style & Clarity Clear, readable, and conversational. Minor errors do not affect understanding. Some unclear wording or organization; needs light revision for clarity. Difficult to follow, overly formal, or written like an essay instead of a discussion post.
    Missing Assignment missing, is unrelated to the assignment objectives or is flagged for significant academic integrity. If you have 2 or more missing (for missing or significant), you may be dropped from the class or have required office hours so you can get the help you need to be successful in the class.

    Part 2

    Unit 1 Journal

    Watch the video linked below. If the link below does not work, try searching the title directly on YouTube. Psychological Research: Crash Course Psychology #2.

    To turn on closed captioning click on cc on the lower right of the video screen next to the settings wheel.

    Journal Assignment: Understanding Psychological Research

    Instructions:

    For this journal entry, you will watch the video titled Psychological Research: Crash Course Psychology #2. You can find the video through the following link:

    To turn on closed captioning (CC), click the CC icon in the lower-right corner of the video screen, next to the settings wheel.

    Journal Entry Instructions:

    Summarize:

    • Briefly explain the main argument or focus of the video regarding psychological research methods.
    • Identify and summarize at least three key concepts or findings presented in the video. Provide a brief explanation of each and how they contribute to our understanding of psychology.

    Reflect:

    • How does the information presented in the video enhance your understanding of psychological research methods?
    • Reflect on a situation or experience where you have encountered psychological research or its findings. How did this experience shape your perception of psychology as a field?
    • How might this information influence your approach to evaluating psychological studies or conducting your own research in the future?

    Length requirement: 300 words or longer. Type your journal in the text box.

    Part 3

    Unit 1 Discussion

    As we begin this course, its important to get to know each other and create a supportive, engaging environment.

    This first discussion is an opportunity to share a little about yourself and start connecting with your classmates. Please answer the following questions in your post:

    1. Introduction: Share your name, where you’re from, and your current major or area of study. If you’re not pursuing a specific major, feel free to share your interests or career goals.
    2. Hobbies and Interests: What do you enjoy doing in your free time? Do you have any unique hobbies, skills, or experiences youd like to share with the class?
    3. Why This Course?: What inspired you to take this course? Is there something you’re hoping to learn or a specific area of interest you’re excited to explore?
    4. Fun Fact (optional): Share one fun or interesting fact about yourself that might surprise your classmates. It could be something from your personal life, an interesting adventure, or a hidden talent.

    Length Requirement:
    At least 200 words for main post. Feel free to write more if you’d like to elaborate, but this guideline ensures that each student provides enough detail to foster meaningful conversation.

    Response Requirement:
    After sharing your post, respond to at least two classmates. Your responses should be thoughtful and engage with what your peers have shared with at least 3 sentences in each response, asking questions or finding common ground to keep the conversation going.


  • See Question Below

    This is AI generated, but its an outline of how I want it to be. Can you go in and tweak it and make int more original? Thanks

    1. Once the department receives the form, the program director for the relevant program will evaluate the students topic according to the following criteria:
      1. Does research proposal clearly fit within the students chosen program/cognate?
      2. Does student describe a viable research proposal?
      3. Does the research topic comply with the Universitys Research Topic Policy?

  • post 124 mid 22 and up mund

    22. What is the difference between a state and a regime?

    23. When it comes to the defining the concept of democracy, we generally face at least two problems. What are these two problems or challenges?

    24. In one to two paragraphs answer the following question:

    One of the longest and continuing debates within comparative politics is the “agency” vs. “structure” debate. What do we mean by this? Specifically what do we mean by agency and structure and what are the implications for the study of politics.

    25. What was the Treaty of Westphalia of 1648 and what is its significance, which we see even to this day?

    26. In Why Nations Fail, Acemoglu and Robinson are attempting to provide answers to what specific type of political outcome? What is the political outcome they are trying to figure out (in other words, what is the Dependent Variable) and what are the independent variables (the causes of this outcome) that they provide as causes?