I have a small task i need help with
please check it out and mk
I have a small task i need help with
please check it out and mk
Social media has revolutionised the way we communicate, transforming it from a predominantly face to face interaction into a digital exchange that spans the globe. Platform like Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and tik _ tok have integral part of our daily lives .one of the primary benefit of social media is its ability to connect people regardless of geographical boundaries.
This assignment is worth 20% of your final grade.
For this step of your final projects development, you will report the results of your research into a resolution of your papers workplace* communication problem topic in an Analytical Annotated Bibliography for three authoritative sources that you plan to use in your project to support your thesis.
Before you begin, review Module 4, “Giving Credit Where Credit is Due: Attribution and Citation,” of the to refresh your understanding of why scholars document their research with in-text citations and references.
Objective: Your objective is to demonstrate your ability to research and critically analyze information that can support your projects thesis.
Caution: The three sources you use for this assignment must be different from the three that you wrote about in Assignment 1, your literature review. Focus your research for this step assignment on professional and scholarly business journal research and case studies on possible resolutions to yours or similar workplace communication problems.
(*Remember, if you are not employed or cannot discuss your workplace, you should be using a communication problem from another organizational setting in which you are involved for your final project, such as school, church, or a community group.)
Each entry must include a reference formatted according to American Psychological Association (7th edition) style rules and an analysis as described below. You should be able to use the material that you develop here in your final project. Before you tackle this exercise, please make sure you have read the Week 4 course materials.
Required Research: You must use at least six authoritative sources in your final project, at least three of which must be scholarly, peer-reviewed journal articles about communication research studies from the UMGC librarys databases.
For this assignment, you will document the research you must do on possible resolutions of your workplace* communication problem by writing an analytical annotated bibliography about three authoritative sources that you found in the UMGC library and plan to use in your project to support your thesis. Look for professional and scholarly business journal research and case studies on possible resolutions to yours or similar workplace communication problems. You can get leads to resources on your research topic right in your email by following the instructions at to receive RSS and email alerts when new newspaper, magazine, and scholarly journal articles are made available by the library.
To find appropriate resources, use the UMGC librarys portal to communication studies resources at . For help finding academic journal articles, see the UMGC librarys resource, Locate and Evaluate Scholarly Articles, at . Two online sources can be among your resources, but their credibility must be verified. See the librarys handout, ” for help.
Although you may review the < Encyclopedia of Communication Theory > in our classroom resources to select and come to understand the communication theory or theories that you want to use in your final project, dictionaries and encyclopedias cannot be included in your Analytical Annotated Bibliography or the references for your final project. A relevant YouTube video may be included as one of the internet sources, provided it has been evaluated for credibility.
Content: Review each resource for answers to as much of the following as possible:
Format: The Analytical Annotated Bibliography must contain the following information:
You will find an example below of an APA-style analytical annotation from the UMGC Librarys How to Write an Annotated Bibliography at . While not possible to accomplish here, the reference and the annotation should be double-spaced in documents formatted in word processing software such as MS Word.
Breeding evil. (2005, August 6). Economist, 376(8438), 9. Retrieved from
This editorial from the Economist describes the controversy surrounding video games and the effect they have on people who use them. The article points out that most critics of gaming are people over 40 and it is an issue of age not of the games themselves. While the author briefly mentions studies done around the issue of violence and gaming, he does not go into enough depth for the reader to truly know the range of studies that have actually been done in this area, other than to take his word that the research is unsatisfactory. The author of this article stresses the age factor over violence as the real reason for opposition to video games and stresses the good gaming has done in most areas of human life. This article is a good resource for those wanting to begin to explore the controversy surrounding video games; however, for anyone doing serious research, one should actually examine some of the research studies that have been done in this area rather than simply take the author’s word that opposition to video games is simply due to an issue of generational divide.
Please pay attention to the last sentence of this annotation. It provides an example of a critique of an authors research.
Resources to support this activity:
The following resources should be consulted for guidance on how to analyze, write, and format the annotations and citations.
Grading: For insight into your instructor’s expectations for this assignment, scroll down here to click on and review its grading rubric. A sample student assignment is attached to this assignment folder.
Due Date: Submit your analytical annotated bibliography as a Word .doc, .docx, or .rtf attachment only in its assignment folder by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday of Week 4. Do not submit the assignment in .pdf, .Gdoc, .Pages, or other document formats. See the Course Schedule in the syllabus or the interactive calendar in this classroom for the exact date that this assignment is due in Week 4.
Please let me know if you have any further questions and I can answer. m
I am a student of milestone college. I live in dhaka and i read in class 9
Special education teachers must remain professional in all situations and are often required to make decisions that involve ethical issues. It is important that special education teachers be aware of the ethical and professional standards as well as special education law. All decisions involved in the IEP process should be data-informed to ensure they align with the students needs. USE THE TEMPLATE PROVIDED.
Part 1: Case Study – Stephen
Review the Case Study: Stephen, and complete Part 1 of the Due Process: Stephen Case Study template.
Part 2: Reflection
In a reflection of 250-500 words, discuss each of the following:
Support your findings by citing the Special Education Professional Ethical Principles and an additional 3-5 scholarly resources.
While APA Style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite Technical Support Articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
Benchmark Information:
This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies and professional standards:
MEd Special Education (ITL/NITL); MEd Elementary Education and Special Education (ITL/NITL)
1.3 Participate in learning communities and professional learning activities based on self-reflection and ongoing analysis of student learning. [CEC 1.3; InTASC 10(f), 10(p), 10(r), 10(s), 10(t), 9(a), 9(b), 9(d), 9(g), 9(k), 9(l); AAQEP 2e; ISTE-E 1b]
Grad Cert Special Education Mild to Moderate
7.2: Participate in learning communities and professional learning activities based on self-reflection and ongoing analysis of student learning. [MC1, MC4][AAQEP 2e; CEC 1.3; InTASC 10(f), 10(p), 10(r), 10(s), 10(t), 9(a), 9(b), 9(d), 9(g), 9(k), 9(l); ISTE-E 1b]
Introduction:
Identifying analysis techniques for assessing competitive advantage is important for building health care strategy. Sustaining health care competitive advantage requires that leaders understand environmental demands to assist with minimizing weakness and threats from the external environment. This assessment provides you with an opportunity to examine your health care environment to determine whether what is being accomplished in your organization, department, team, community project, or other care setting is making a positive difference.
Preperation:
Note: You will use the results of this analysis to develop a strategic plan in Assessment 2.
You have been asked to conduct an analysis of your care setting that will result in two potential pathways toward a strategic plan to improve health care quality and safety in your organization, department, team, community project, or other care setting. To accomplish this, you will take two approaches to the analysis:
To help ensure that your analysis is well-received, the requester has suggested that you:
Note: As you revise your writing, check out the resources listed on the Writing Centers page.
As you prepare to complete this assessment, you may want to think about other related issues to deepen your understanding or broaden your viewpoint. You are encouraged to consider the questions below and discuss them with a fellow learner, a work associate, an interested friend, or a member of your professional community. Note that these questions are for your own development and exploration and do not need to be completed or submitted as part of your assessment.
One key aspect to being an effective leader, manager, or administrator is an awareness of your leadership strengths, weaknesses, and style.
Imagine the future for a care setting that is your place of practice or one in which you would like to work.
Analysis:
Note: The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide, so at a minimum, be sure to address each point. In addition, you are encouraged to review the performance level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed.
Compare the AI and SWOT approaches to analysis and reflect on the results.
Analyze the leadership characteristics and skills most desired in the person leading potential performance improvement projects, taking both an AI and SWOT approach.
How does Earth stay in orbit around the Sun without falling?
i already have my english survey done on google form and i want an arabic version on google form made this is my survey
What is a botony
Important questions for you