I attached file and I want you to make an introduction on one page.
Author: admin
-
Answer the following questions from Chapter 3
Use MLA guidelines for in-text citation as you answer these questions. I have modeled this for you throughout the questions, but you should read “Strategies for Documenting Sources (MLA Format)” in the textbook (begining on page 185). Focus on the MLA in-text citation section. You don’t have to create a Works Cited for this assignment. Failure to use in-text citations will result in a zero on this assignment.
Answer the following questions from Chapter 3.
- Schilb and Clifford describe several reasons to study and write about literature in “Why Study Literature in a College Writing Course?” (45). What are those reasons? Explain each one in your own words.
- Schilb and Clifford include Jamaica Kincaid’s story, “Girl,” to use as a touchstone for their discussion of arguing about literature. Read “Girl” and answer these questions in the “Thinking about the Text” section:
2A: Is Girl a story? What characteristics of a story come to mind as you consider this issue?
2B: Describe the culture depicted in Girl as well as the role of females in that culture. Is either the culture or the role of females in it different from what you are familiar with? Explain.
2C: Do you think that the instructions to this girl are all given on the same occasion? Why, or why not? Who do you suppose is giving the instructions? Would you say that the instructor is oppressive or domineering? Identify some of the assumptions behind your position.
2D: In Girl, the title character speaks just twice, and briefly. What do you conclude about her at these moments?
At one point, the girl is shown how to make a good medicine to throw away a child before it even becomes a child (lines 3536). What do you think of the instructors willingness to give such advice? What do you conclude from where its positioned in the text: between how to make a good medicine for a cold (lines 3435) and how to catch a fish (line 36)? - Now, complete the “Writing Exercise”: Once you have read Kincaids story, write a brief response to it. You might jot down things you especially notice about it, feelings it evoked in you, and questions you have about it. You might also note experiences of your own that the story leads you to recall. Try freewriting for ten minutes without stopping.
- Shilb and Clifford discuss how we must identify issues when we argue about literature, and they discuss how one issue in “Girl” might be how the mother feels about the girl in the story. Then, they make a claim that “you’re really more likely to think of questions if you consider the writer’s options (49). What do they mean by this statement?
- What are the ten kinds of issues that arise in literature courses, according to Schilb and Clifford?
- In your own words, what is an issue of fact?
- How do Schilb and Clifford define “theme”?
- In your own words, what is an issue of theme?
- In your own words, what is an issue of definition?
- In your own words, what is an issue of symbolism?
- In your own words, what is an issue of pattern?
- Issues of evaluation, according to Schilb and Clifford, can be divided into three parts. What are those three parts? Explain each one in your own words.
- In your own words, what are issues of historical and cultural context?
- In your own words, what are issues of genre?
- In your own words, what are issues of social policy?
- In your own words, what are issues of cause and effect?
- What is a thesis, according to Schilb and Clifford?
- True or false: Schilb and Clifford assert that you should assume your audience has not read the text.
- You’ll find four groups of readers listed on page 54: “readers you disagree with,” “hasty, superficial readers,” “puzzled readers,” and “your own divided self.” Why do Schilb and Clifford share this list? And what do each of these refer to, in your own words?
- What’s the best evidence in an argument about literature?
- What is willful selection of quotes?
- What do you have to do with evidence in order to support your argument?
- How do you know which warrants you should mention in your argument?
- In your own words, explain what Schilb and Clifford have to say in “Make Use of Appeals” (56).
- What is Ann Schumwalt’s thesis in the student essay on page 57?
- Why does Schumwalt refer to puzzled readers?
- Why does Schumwalt begin her essay with the ending of “Girl”?
- Give an example of where Schumwalt makes a qualification in her essay.
- Where does she make a concesssion?
- For what reason do Schilb and Clifford include “So Mexicans Are Taking Jobs from Americans” by Jimmy Santiago Baca?
- Why do they include Robert Frost’s “Mending Wall”?
- Why do they include Ted Chiang’s “The Great Silence”?
- What about Jane Hirshfield’s “Let Them Not Say”? Why do they include this one?
- What about Rena Priest’s “The Index”? Why do they include it?
- What about “Dear Matafele Peinem” by Kathy Jetnil-Kijiner. Why do they include this one?
-
Management Question
Brief Summary of the File’s Requirements:
The file outlines a full project structure divided into three main parts:
- Part 1- deadline 3 April (17 Marks): Focuses on selecting a local or international company to investigate its IT infrastructure. It requires an Executive Summary, Organizational Profile, competitive strategies, IT Infrastructure (Hardware, software, networks, security), Data Management methods (with 1 advantage and 1 disadvantage), and identifying 1 major stakeholder.
- Part 2 – deadline 9 April (13 Marks): Focuses on analyzing the existing systems (like TPS, ERP, or DSS) used by the company, identifying their problems, evaluating the system’s success or failure, and suggesting a system or solutions with specific features.
- Part 3 – deadline 12 April (10 Marks): Outlines the requirements for a PowerPoint presentation with a minimum of 10 slides covering all the above points.
My Request:
Please help me write the solution for Part 1 and Part 2 based on the following rules specified in the file:
- Target Company: Tesla – –
- Word Count: Part 1 must be between $1500$ to $2200$ words, and Part 2 must be between $1000$ to $2000$ words.
- Formatting: Use Times New Roman, size 12, with 1.5 line spacing, and justified paragraphs.
- References: At least 3 references for each part, formatted in strict APA style.
Please provide the solution in a structured, academic way that directly answers all the bullet points in the prompt. Thank you!
-
Law Question
Use this link for some of the vocab
-
A story of hard work
One should always work hard. It is only through hard work that a person achieves success; for instance, if I put in the effort on this app today, I am bound to succeed sooner or later
Starting small, let’s move forward and set up a bigger umpire.
This is you
This is your Empire
-
Communications Question
Attached are the instructions for this paper. The culture of focus id like to use is Japan, and the three course concepts Id like to use are Cultural Pragmatics and Social Interactions, Embodied and non-verbal communication and Worldviews and Cultural Patterns.
-
Speech outline
Create a speech outline just like the example I have provided below.
The topic will be, How to Prevent the Spread of Infection
Tie this into public health
You can demonstrate mask use, coughing technique, washing hands as examples
– make sure to list refrences and the end.
-Use the same format the outline is in that I have provided.
-wherever the outlines says “I will demonstrate” make sure you leave that included and say the demonstration.
-in the speech when you citation, make sure it can be a verbal citation.
!!! I want turn it in.com proof of no ai or plagiarism used !!!
-
Please work on the Linear Regression Practice
Please work on the
-
Crit Commentary 1
Critical Commentary Instructions
A critical commentary is a short essay that introduces a historical document. It provides basic information about what the document is, what cultural and historical context influenced its author in creating it, and why youthe historianbelieve it was important, convincing, effective, or ineffective.
Note: You will be writing this essay in Turnitin Clarity’s online word processor as part of a pilot program. Clarity will automatically save your work as you go, provide feedback, and check for plagiarism. For more information, refer to the Getting Started page and FAQ provided by your course.
TEXTBOOK LINKS MUST USE!!!!!
Selected Document
For this critical commentary, we will be using:
Getting Started
If you are having trouble figuring out where to start, the questions and prompts on the historical thinking chart may be helpful.
Your commentary should include a thesis statement and make an argument about the source.
Requirements and Scoring (100 points total)
STYLE (15 points)
Requirements:
- 700900 words
- Plain 11- or 12-point font
- Identify the name, author, and date of the document
- Consist of multiple readable paragraphs
- Include at least three direct quotations, properly quoted
- Clear thesis statement near the beginning of the essay
- You may use outside sources but cite
Helpful resources include guides on thesis statements and analytical writing provided in class materials.
IDENTIFICATION (25 points)
Provide a clear and accurate summary of the document, including:
- Date and place of origin
- Authorship
- Type of document (speech, article, etc.)
- Argument or purpose
- Intended audience
CONTEXT (30 points)
Explain the broader historical context:
- What was happening at the time?
- What major social or political issues relate to this document?
- What is the big picture needed to understand it?
- What was the authors purpose?
Use evidence such as:
- Quotes from the document
- Information from textbook, lectures, or course materials
Tip: Each document corresponds to a chapter in the textbook, which can help you understand the context.
ANALYSIS (30 points)
Analysis means explaining the meaning and significance of the source.
In your essay:
- Clearly evaluate the authors argument in your thesis
- Explain what the author is trying to accomplish
- Identify the intended audience
- Discuss why the source is historically significant
- State whether you agree or disagree and explain why
- Identify any missing perspectives or limitations
Support your ideas with specific evidence from both:
- The document
- Its historical context
Important: Historical analysis is different from literary analysis. Do not focus on techniques like ethos, pathos, or logos. Instead, focus on what the document reveals about history on both:
- A micro level (individuals and events)
- A macro level (larger historical patterns or themes)
Additional Resources
You may use:
- Guides on understanding perspective in primary sources
- Historical thinking charts
- Sample student papers (high-scoring examples from past classes)
Sample Outline (Optional)
Paragraph 1: Introduction
- Who created the document and when
- Type of document
- Intended audience
- Historical significance
- Relevant historical context
- Your thesis
Paragraph 2: Summary
- Main points of the document
- Authors message and perspective
- Include quotations
Paragraph 3: Analysis
- Evaluate the authors argument
- Discuss reliability and limitations
- State whether you agree or disagree and why
Conclusion
- Why the document matters
- How it contributes to our understanding of history
-
college application
Hi, I hope youre doing well!
I wanted to ask if you could help me refine my application for Hotelschool The Hague. I already have a portfolio prepared, but Ive received feedback that it doesnt clearly align with what they are looking for in their Masters programme.
Would you be able to:
- Review the Hotelschool The Hague website and understand what they expect from applicants
- Identify the key qualities, skills, and motivations they are looking for
- Help me revise my portfolio so it clearly connects my background, goals, and interest in the hospitality (hotel) industry
- Restructure my answers so they strongly reflect their programme focus (like hotel innovation, digital transformation, and guest experience)
I am particularly interested in the event management side of hospitality within the hotel industry, which is also reflected in my resume. I would like this interest to come through more clearly in my application.
My goal is to present myself as a strong and well-aligned candidate for their programme, so Id really appreciate your guidance in shaping my responses accordingly.
I am applying for the masters program