Bright Academic Experts

Category: Business

  • 5CO02_CIPD L5 (Evidence-Based Practice) _ High Pass Target

    I am looking for someone experienced with CIPD Level 5 assignments, specifically Unit 5CO02 Evidence-Based Practice, to complete the full assessment based on the official Assessment Brief, Case Study (Technivara), Assessment Guidance, and Grading Descriptors.

    Assessment Requirements

    Task 1 Written Responses (Approx. 2,900 words 10%)

  • Answer all 7 questions (AC 1.11.5 and AC 3.13.2)
    Apply answers directly to the Technivara case study
    Demonstrate evidence-based practice, analysis tools, critical thinking, decision-making models, ethics, performance measures, and people-practice value
    Include relevant theory, CIPD insights, recent academic research, and practical organisational examples
    Use UK English and Harvard referencing
    Include recent references (preferably within the last 5 years) and at least one quality reference per AC
    Structure answers clearly using Q1Q7 subheadings

    • Task 2 Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis Review (Approx. 1,000 words 10%)

  • Complete all percentage calculations for Table 1
    Present findings using three different diagrammatic forms (different chart/graph types required)
    Analyse Table 2 qualitative L&D feedback by identifying patterns, themes, and trends
    Provide at least two justified evidence-based recommendations linked to Technivara
    No written explanation required for AC 2.1 and AC 2.2 beyond the calculations and charts
    References only required for AC 2.3

    • General Requirements

  • Total word count approximately 3,900 words (within CIPD word count policy) STAY WITHIN THE MINIMUM
    Strong alignment with the official assessment brief, assessment guidance, and grading descriptors
    Professionally written and clearly structured
    High Pass standard required, including:
    • extensive wider reading
    • excellent application to the case study
    • strong critical analysis
    • recent and credible academic/professional sources
    • accurate Harvard referencing throughout

    • Thank you in advance.

  • Business ethic exercise analyse a caricature

    You are required to read the slides explaining how to analyse a caricature and complete your understanding through personal research if necessary.

    Then you are required to analyse one of the caricature below by following the required 3 steps.

  • dalam dunia bisnis kalian harus memahami apa itu, roi, arus…

    berikan saya contoh arus kas yang tepat

  • How to make a personal brand

    How can I make a personal brand and earn profit from it

  • Business Question

    1. To express ideas clearly

    Essays help you organize your thoughts and communicate them in a structured way. Instead of random opinions, you present clear arguments or explanations.

    2. To inform or explain

    Many essays are written to teach somethinglike explaining a topic, giving background information, or breaking down a complex idea so others can understand it.

    3. To persuade others

    Some essays aim to convince readers. For example, you might argue why a rule should change or why a certain opinion is better supported by evidence.

    4. To develop thinking skills

    Writing essays trains your brain to think critically, analyze information, and connect ideas logically. Thats why schools assign them so often.

    5. To prepare for real-life communication

    In real life, youll need to write emails, reports, proposals, and more. Essays build the foundation for those skills.

    6. To reflect and understand yourself

    Personal essays help you explore your experiences, feelings, and beliefs. This can improve self-awareness.

    7. Because it’s required (school/work)

    Lets be honestsometimes the main reason is simply because teachers or jobs require it. But even then, it still builds useful skills.

  • Business best idea

    Here is the step-by-step guide to starting a business, explained in clear English:

    The best way to start a business is to **solve a real problem that people are willing to pay for.**

    To build a successful and sustainable business, you should follow this structured approach:

    ### 1. Market Research and Idea Validation

    Having a great idea is a good start, but there must be a genuine demand for it in the market.

    * **Problem Identification:** Does your product or service make someones life easier, save them time, or cut their costs?

    * **Competitor Analysis:** Look at what your competitors are doing. Figure out your **Unique Selling Proposition (USP)**what makes you better or different?

    ### 2. Build a Minimum Viable Product (MVP)

    Never test the depth of the river with both feet. Avoid investing all your capital upfront.

    * Launch a **basic version** or prototype of your product/service first.

    * Gather feedback from real customers. This minimizes your financial risk and helps you refine your product based on actual market data.

    ### 3. Business Planning and Budgeting

    Create a clear, realistic roadmap for your finances and operations.

    * **Revenue Model:** How exactly will you make money? (e.g., direct sales, subscriptions, freemium, or commissions?)

    * **Expense Forecasting:** Map out your initial setup costs, operational expenses, marketing budget, and emergency reserves.

    ### 4. Marketing and Sales

    Even the best product won’t sell if people don’t know it exists.

    * **Digital Presence:** Utilize social media platforms, search engine optimization (SEO), and targeted ads to reach your audience.

    * **Word of Mouth:** Provide exceptional customer service early on. Happy initial customers are your best marketers.

    > **Pro Tip:** In the business world, **Execution** is worth millions; ideas are only worth pennies. Start small, learn fast, and scale up as you grow.

    >

    What specific business idea or industry are you thinking about exploring?

  • do all comment in file + proofreading + in text citation + r…

    I attached the file, chapters 1-5. Please make sure to cover all comments in the file I write for each paragraph. If a comment is missing or not done correctly, the file will be rejected make suer write any answer in red color

    What is the main problem I face with the file?

    The problem from the writing center regarding this file from chapters 1-5 is the focus in standard for each paragraph. The writing center uses, like an AI tool + expert, the reading of each word and each reference, if not meet the standard of the university + APA, is rejected. Check your work fully, plus the comment I attached in the file; the main point for any paragraph focuses on it and the writing center. In these points, if I find any mistakes, the rejected the file, so make sure to cover all these points

    • Proofreading for any grammatical or writing mistakes, fragmentation, and repetition.
    • Citations in text, paragraphs, and tables should be APA 7th edition
    • APA format in-text + last pages’ reference should be APA 7th edition; they have a lot of mistakes inside the last reference page + in citation
    • If you do not follow the template of the university guideline APA
    • Tables of contact and figures, the page numbers, and APA if correct

    But make sure you dont write from AI because they check it in Turnitin, and if they catch you, you get zero and rejected, so you should give me two files: Turnitin plagiarism less than 15% + AI should be zero

    So what files do I need to receive

    File chapters 1-5 with reference

    File chapter 5 separately with reference

    Two plagiarism reports (Turnitin plagiarism less than 15% + AI should be zero)

  • Critique PowerPoint

    Course Objectives:

    • Critique a peer’s e-portfolio and pitch by providing feedback using the assigned grading criteria.

    Prompt

    Examine the work of one of the peers from the discussion area of Week 6. You will be looking at the following elements:

    1. Completeness of Portfolio profile
    2. Correctness (absence of errors such as typos or spelling errors)
    3. Incorporation of quality artifacts that relate an analysis of complex organizations from a variety of perspectives, including individual, interpersonal, group, and organization level.
    4. Your own research on the basics of e-portfolios and importance today of networking sites

    Instructions:

    Create a PowerPoint presentation to relay findings to your classmate. Your presentation should be 8-10 slides in length.

    In your presentation you must include the following:

    • Title slide
    • Agenda slide
    • At least four content slides
    • Reference slide with a minimum of 5 sources
    • Questions slide

    Detailed speaker notes should be provided in the speaker notes section of the slide, or you can do a video of yourself giving the presentation. If you are unaware of how to do the notes pages on the slide, please follow the following link provided in Supporting Materials

    Supporting Materials

    • Add S
    • : (scroll down the page to access the free version)

    Grading Criteria:
    A grading criteria is provided here for your convenience that details how this assignment will be graded. Please review it carefully before submitting your work.

  • Discussion Thread: Variables, Research Questions and Data Co…

    The student must then post 1 reply to another students post. The reply must summarize the students findings and indicate areas of agreement, disagreement, and improvement. It must be supported with scholarly citations from the textbook in the latest APA format and a corresponding list of references, including any additional scholarly sources. The textbook remains the only required source, and citations are only necessary if you are referencing specific material. Additional scholarly sources are optional, not required. The minimum word count for the 8 short-answer discussion replies is 100 words to ensure meaningful engagement.

    Ricardo Pena

    BUSI820: Quantitative Research Methods

    May 24, 2026

    Variables, Research Questions and Data Coding

    D1.1. Compare the terms active independent variable and attribute independent variable. What are the similarities and differences?

    The terms active independent variable and attribute independent variable are both variables (an item being considered) researchers assign to their participants. They are similar in that they both help with categorically assigning participants to a specific group within a research (Morgan et al., 2025). Where they differ are that some may be given or assigned (active), such as an individual and the group they may be assigned during the research study, while other groupings are more static (attributed) and are less likely to change during the research period (race, race, gender) as less likely to change (Morgan et al., 2025, p. 2).

    D1.2. What kind of independent variable (active or attribute) is necessary to infer cause? Can one always infer cause from this type of independent variable? If so, why? If not, when can one infer cause, and when might causal inferences be more questionable?

    Morgan et al. (2025, p. 3) posit that active independent variables are the only variable able to infer cause and effect within the research. The authors assert that an attribute independent variable alone has no merit on causation to the dependent variable being researched. However, when active is the main focal point, those studies that are quasi-experimental in nature invite the biggest questions about the validity of data (Morgan et al., 2025, p. 3).

    D1.3. What is the difference between the independent variable and the dependent variable?

    Morgan et al. (2025) in simple terms, assert that the independent variables are the cause being researched, while a dependent variable is the subject being measured or observed for an effect. For example, if a researcher believes a specific treatment will create a determined outcome, they may have a treatment group and a control group as their active independent variable to verify their assumption on the dependent variable (Morgan et al., 2025, p. 4).

    D1.4. Compare and contrast associational, difference, and descriptive types of research questions.

    Associational questions are those that seek to answer if two or more groups are related, difference seek to answer how two or more groups are different, and descriptive are types that provide informational value, but have no statistical value (Morgan et al., 2025, p. 5).

    D1.5. Write a research question and a corresponding hypothesis regarding variables of interest to you but not in the HSB dataset. Is it an associational, difference, or descriptive question?

    Hypothesis: Regular manager engagement with software developers can increase employee retention rates.

    Question: What is the retention rate of software developers whose manager meets with them on a bi-weekly cadence, versus a manager who does not meet with their employees on a regular cadence?

    Question Type: This question is a difference-type question and aims to quantify employee retention rates between two different manager engagement methods.

    D1.6. Using one or more of the following HSB variables: religion, mosaic pattern test, and visualization score

    D1.6.a. Write an associational question.

    Is there a relationship between mosaic pattern scores and an individuals stated religious preference?

    D1.6.b. Write a difference question.

    Do individuals with different religions differ in their visualization score?

    D1.6.c. Write a descriptive question.

    What is the average mosaic pattern score?

    References

    Morgan, G. A., Barrett, K. C., Leech, N. L., & Gloeckner, G. W. (2025). IBM SPSS for introductory statistics use and interpretation. Routledge.

  • Business Question

    Can you verify the attached completed assignment and make sure it scores low on turnitin and also make sure the responses align with the instructions below as well as formatting.

    Quantitative Analysis: Data Coding, Entry, and Checking

    Interpretation Questions

    Chapter 2

    A1. 2.1. What steps or actions should be taken after you collect data and before you run the analyses aimed at answering your research questions or testing your research hypotheses?

    A1. 2.2. Why should you label the values of nominal variables?

    A1. 2.3. Why would you print a codebook or dictionary?

    A1. 2.4. What do you do if you look at your data file and see words or letters instead of numbers? Why is this important to do?

    A1. 2.5. Why would you use the Mean function to create a variable, as we did for the pleasure scale?

    A1. 2.6. (a) Why is it important to check your raw (questionnaire) data before and after entering them into the data editor? (b) What are ways to check the data before entering them? After entering them?

    SPSS Problems

    Chapter 2

    Using the CollegeStudentData.sav file (see Appendix A in the Morgan, Barrett, Leach and Glockner) do the following problems. Print your outputs and circle the key parts for discussion.

    Compute the N, minimum, maximum, and mean for all the variables in the College StudentData.sav file. How many students have complete data? Identify any statistics on the output that are not meaningful. Explain.

    What is the mean height of the students? What about the average height of the same-sex parent? What percentage of students are males? What percentage have children?

    Make Sure to:

    1.Attach your word document for review and grading. Other file formats are not accepted and will not be graded. Use the following filename format: LastName_BUSI820_AssignmentX.docx

    2.Include an APA title block with your name, class title, date, and the assignment number.

    • Include a table of contents and a reference section. Number your pages in the footer along with the date. Include a header starting on page 2 with the Course and assignment number.
    • Write the problem number and the problem title as a level one heading (Example A.1.1: Chapter 2, Problem 2.1, and then provide your response.
    • Use level two headings with short titles for multi part questions (Example A1.1.a, Short Title, A1.1.b, Short Title II, etc.)

    6.Use appropriate level headings for key elements of your discussion such as Research Questions, Hypotheses, Descriptive Statistics, Assumptions & Conditions, Interpretation, Results, and others. Your goal is to make your analysis easy to follow and logical.

    7.Ensure that all tables and graphs are legible and include a figure number.

    8.Carefully review your document prior to submission for formatting, flow, and readability. Keep in mind that running the statistical tests is only the first half of the challenge; you must be able to clearly communicate your findings to the reader.

    Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.