Pregnancy surveillance is not merely a routine schedule,it is a critical strategy for safeguarding both maternal and fetal health. An optimized rhythm of antenatal monitoring allows early detection of complications, among which preeclampsia remains one of the most serious and unpredictable. This condition can evolve silently yet rapidly, leading to severe outcomes if not identified in time. By examining how the frequency and quality of prenatal follow-up influence the early diagnosis and management of preeclampsia, this subject highlights the essential role of timely interventions. Understanding this relationship is key to improving clinical outcomes and ensuring safer pregnancies.
Category: Health & Medical
-
Marketing services engagement letter
Overview
In this assignment, you will write a one-page engagement letter to your new client. The Engagement Letter defines the business relationship and introduces fundamental aspects of health care marketing. Take a look at this as an example of the structure of the letter.
Scenario
You are a health care marketing executive who is under contract to help your client market to their target audience. You are tasked with writing a Letter of Engagement that summarizes your working relationship with the client.
Preparation:
- Reflect on the scenario above, choose your provider type from the table below, and select one corresponding service and goal that is to be achieved through marketing.
- Review chapters 25 of your textbook. These chapters provide excellent information on basic health care marketing, so make sure to study these chapters carefully.
- Research two healthcare providers that offer services similar to your client. Study how these providers market their services.
- Research the service they are providing so that you understand how services should be marketed, and to whom.
Business Example of Services Goal Small Dental/Medical Practice General services, oral surgery, orthodontics, orthopedics, pediatrics, etc. Gain new patients. Department within a hospital Women’s reproductive services, outpatient dialysis, laser treatments, etc. Announce a new service. Health Care Specialty Clinic Disabled veterans, people seeking cosmetic enhancements, physical therapy, or occupational therapy, etc. Reach a new target market. Home Health Care Service Mobility, wound care, therapy, etc. Expanding services to a new area. Government or Non-Government Organization Mental Health, HIV, domestic abuse, anti-smoking, addiction, etc. Educate the public on a health care topic. Instructions
Write a one-page letter (one-page single-spaced) to your new client that you selected from the list. The letter should be professionally written and formatted. In the letter, be sure to do the following:
- Introduce yourself and describe your role as a healthcare marketing executive.
- Summarize the proposed marketing engagement including:
- Provider name
- Brief description of the client.
- Goal(s) for engaging your marketing services, duration, and payment.
- Explain two aspects of marketing that are unique to the healthcare industry.
- Discuss the marketer’s role through the lens of the 4 P’s of marketing and the context of the client’s business.
Additional Requirements
Resources: Use two sources in addition to your textbook to support your writing. Choose sources that are credible, relevant, and appropriate. Cite each source listed on your source page at least one time within your letter of engagement. For help with research, writing, and citation, please use Strayer Library Services or review library guides.
This course requires the use of Strayer Writing Standards (SWS). The library is your home for SWS assistance, including citations and formatting. Please refer to the for all support. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
-
Clinical Judgment Plan Packet- Fill out the packet according…
I will provide you with the clinical scenario, and I need you to fill out the pages based on the information that I give you. I will attach the packet to fill out. All references need to be cited in APA format, 7th edition, and use the book
use the template i gave you
Use:Fundamentals for Nursing Edition 11.0 ATI Review Module Content Mastery Series
Clinical Judgment Plan Draft Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeHistory of present illness (HPI) and Admitting Diagnosis
2 ptsProficientExplains 1) HPI and 2) admitting pathophysiology in detail with clear and accurate and in-depth understanding of chief complaint. 3) Evidence-based rationales clearly and accurately support the HPI.1.5 ptsAcceptableExplains 1) HPI and 2) admitting pathophysiology in some detail with adequate understanding of chief complaint. 3) Evidence-based rationales adequately support the HPI.
1 ptsNeeds ImprovementExplains 1) HPI and 2) admitting pathophysiology in limited detail with limited understanding of chief complaint. 3) Evidence-based rationales vaguely support the HPI or are not present.0 ptsUnsatisfactoryFai
ls to explain 1) HPI or 2) admitting pathophysiology with poor understanding of chief complaint. 3) Evidence-based rationales do not support the HPI or are not present. 2 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePathophysiology of past medical/surgical/social histories
2 ptsProficientIncludes 1) all past medical, surgical, and social history detailed with 2) full explanation of pathophysiology for each diagnosis. 3) Thoroughly describes potential complications for each diagnosis and the indications for surgery. 4) Clearly and accurately relates the client’s past history and current signs/symptoms with evidence-based citations.1.5 ptsAcceptableInc
ludes 1) most past medical, surgical, and social history detailed with 2) partial explanation of pathophysiology for each diagnosis. 3) Adequately describes potential complications for each diagnosis and the indications for surgery. 4) Adequately associates specific details related to the client’s history and signs/symptoms with evidence-based citations. 1 ptsNeeds ImprovementIncludes 1) some past medical, surgical, and social history detailed with 2) minimal explanation of pathophysiology for each diagnosis. 3) Vaguely describes potential complications for each diagnosis and the indications for surgery. 4) Vaguely associates specific details related to the client’s history and signs/symptoms with limited to no evidence- based citations.0 ptsUnsatisfactoryN
o 1) past medical, surgical, or social history or given without 2) explanation or pathophysiology. 3) Does not describe potential complications for each diagnosis or the indications for surgery. 4) Does not associate specific details related to the client’s history and signs/symptoms with limited to no evidence- based citations. 2 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSocial Determinants of Health
1 ptsProficientClearly and accurately 1) describes socioeconomic and psychosocial background in detail 2) with evidence-based citations to support social determinants of health. 3) Identifies at least 3 or more psychosocial concerns with interventions/ recommendations.0.75 ptsAccept
ableAdequately 1) describes socioeconomic and psychosocial background in detail 2) with evidence-based citations to support social determinants of health. 3) Identifies at least 2 psychosocial concerns with interventions/ recommendations. 0.5 ptsNeeds ImprovementVaguely 1) describes socioeconomic and psychosocial background in detail 2) with limited to no evidence-based citations to support social determinants of health. 3) Identifies at least 1 psychosocial concern with interventions/recommendations.
0 ptsUnsatisfactoryFails to 1) describe socioeconomic and psychosocial background 2) with limited to no evidence- based citations or social determinants of health. 3) Identifies no psychosocial concerns or interventions/ recommendations. 1 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEriksons Developmental Stages
1 ptsProficient1) Identifies and 2) defines correct stage 3) with examples of meeting/not meeting tasks 4) supported by evidenced-based citations.0.75 ptsAcceptable1) Identifies and 2) defines correct stage 3) with vague examples of meeting/not meeting tasks 4) supported by evidenced citations.
0.5 ptsNeeds Improvement1) Identifies correct stage 2) without adequate definition and 3) without examples of meeting or not meeting tasks. 4) No citations0 ptsUnsatisfactory1) Identifies incorrect stage 2) without definition or 3) without examples of meeting/not meeting tasks 4) without citations.
1 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTeaching Assessment & Client Education
1 ptsProficientClearly and accurately 1) identifies areas of instructional needs, 2) learning preference, and 3) learning barriers. 4) Provides clear and concise client education related to their condition that will aid in health promotion, health maintenance and self-care activities. 5) Client education is supported by evidence-based practice.0.75 ptsAcceptableAde
quately 1) identifies areas of instructional needs, 2) learning preference and 3) learning barriers. 4) Provides adequate client education related to their condition that aids in health promotion, health maintenance and self-care activities. 5) Client education is supported by evidence-based practice. 0.5 ptsNeeds ImprovementVaguely 1) identifies areas of instructional needs, 2) learning preference and 3) learning barriers. 4) Provides minimal and vague client education that will aid in health promotion, health maintenance and self-care activities. 5) Client education is supported by evidence-based practice.0 ptsUnsatisfactoryFa
ils to 1) identify areas of instructional needs, 2) learning preference and 3) learning barriers. 4) Does not provide client education that will aid in health promotion, health maintenance and self-care activities. 5) Client education is not supported by evidence-based practice. 1 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInterprofessional Consults and Multidisciplinary Plan
1 ptsProficient1) Lists at least 3 appropriate collaborative issues/concerns. 2) Identifies 3 interdisciplinary consults to support patient well-being. 3) Evidence- based rationales demonstrate clear and accurate understanding of consults and interventions.0.75 ptsAcceptab
le1) Lists at least 2 appropriate collaborative issues/concerns. 2) Identifies 2 interdisciplinary consults to support patient well-being. 3) Evidence- based rationales demonstrate adequate understanding of consults and interventions. 0.5 ptsNeeds Improvement1) Lists at least 1 appropriate collaborative issue/concern. 2) Identifies 1 interdisciplinary consult to support patient well-being. 3) Evidence-based rationales demonstrate vague understanding of consults and interventions or may be missing.0 ptsUnsatisfactory1) Fails to list collaborative issues/concerns or lists issues/concerns that are inappropriate. 2) No interdisciplinary consults identified. 3) Evidence- based rationales demonstrate unsatisfactory understanding of consults and interventions or may be missing.
1 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDischarge Planning
1 ptsProficientClearly and accurately 1) describes issues/concerns related to discharge planning 2) with evidence-based rationales.0.75 ptsAcceptableA
dequately 1) describes issues/concerns related to discharge planning 2) with evidence- based rationales. 0.5 ptsNeeds ImprovementVaguely 1) describes issues/concerns related to discharge planning 2) with limited to no evidence-based rationales.0 ptsUnsatisfactory
Fails to 1) describe issues/concerns related to discharge planning 2) with limited to no evidence-based rationales. 1 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLabs
1 ptsProficientClearly and accurately 1) identifies admission and current pertinent laboratory tests with applicable indications, 2) addresses abnormal values, and 3) recognizes trends related to a clients disease process 4) with evidence-based rationales.0.75 ptsAcceptableA
dequately 1) identifies pertinent laboratory tests with applicable indications, 2) addresses abnormal values, and 3) recognizes trends related to a clients disease process 4) with evidence- based rationales. 0.5 ptsNeeds ImprovementVaguely 1) identifies pertinent laboratory tests with applicable indications, 2) addresses abnormal values, and 3) recognizes trends related to a clients disease process 4) with limited to evidence-based rationales.0 ptsUnsatisfactory
Fails to 1) identify pertinent laboratory tests with applicable indications, 2) address abnormal values, or 3) recognize trends related to a clients disease process 5) with limited to no evidence-based rationales. 1 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiagnostics/procedures
1 ptsProficientClearly and accurately 1) describes the clients diagnostic criteria and indications 2) with evidence- based rationales that clearly support the chief complaint and presenting signs/symptoms.0.75 ptsAccepta
bleAdequately 1) describes the clients diagnostic criteria and indications 2) with evidence-based rationales that adequately support the chief complaint and presenting signs/symptoms. 0.5 ptsNeeds ImprovementVaguely 1) describes the clients diagnostic criteria and indications 2) with limited to no rationales which vaguely support the identified chief complaint and presenting signs/symptoms.0 ptsUnsatisfac
toryFails to 1) describe the clients diagnostic criteria and indications 2) with limited to no rationales and does not support the identified chief complaint and presenting signs/symptoms. 1 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMedications
3 ptsProficientClearly and accurately 1) identifies all components of the medication list, including name, class, route, dose, frequency, mechanism of action, applicable indication(s), side and adverse effects, interactions, and nursing considerations relevant to the clients current health condition, 2) with evidence-based citations.2 ptsAcceptableAdequ
ately 1) identifies some components of the medication list, including name, class, route, dose, frequency, mechanism of action, applicable indication(s), side and adverse effects, interactions, and nursing considerations relevant to the client, 2) with evidence-based citations. 1 ptsNeeds ImprovementVaguely 1) identifies few components of the medication list, including name, class, route, dose, frequency, mechanism of action, applicable indication(s), side and adverse effects, interactions, and nursing considerations relevant to the client, 2) with limited to no evidence-based citations.0 ptsUnsatisfactoryF
ails to 1) identify all components of the medication list, including name, class, route, dose, frequency, mechanism of action, applicable indication(s), side and adverse effects, interactions, and nursing considerations relevant to the client, 2) with limited to no evidence-based citations. 3 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssessment & Review of Systems
5 ptsProficient1) Documents thorough Head-to-Toe physical assessment with relevant information to the patient/client as performed by the student. 2) Utilizes an organized format and appropriate terms to describe both normal and abnormal assessment findings.3 ptsAcceptable1) Documents Head-to-Toe physical assessment with more than 75% relevant information to the patient/client as performed by the student. 2) Utilizes an organized format and appropriate terms to describe both normal and abnormal assessment findings.
1.67 ptsNeeds Improvement1) Documents full Head-to-Toe physical assessment with approx. 50% -75% relevant information to the patient/client as performed by the student. 2) Format may be moderately disorganized with mostly appropriate terms to describe both normal and abnormal assessment findings.0 ptsUnsatisfactory1) Documents full Head-to-Toe physical assessment with less than 50% relevant information to the patient/client missing information – as performed by the student. 2) Format is mostly disorganized and may be lacking appropriate terms to describe both normal and abnormal assessment findings.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRecognition of cues (Assessment)
2 ptsProficientIdentifies all imperative cues taken from the environment, patient assessment/observation, medical record, other resources, time pressures, task complexity, and cultural considerations. Minimum of 15 cues required.1.5 ptsAcceptableIden
tifies most imperative assessment cues. Some cues are relevant. cues taken from the environment, patient assessment/observation, medical record, other resources, time pressures, task complexity, and cultural considerations. Less than 15 cues. 1 ptsNeeds ImprovementIdentifies some assessment cues. Few cues are relevant. cues taken from the environment, patient assessment/observation, medical record, other resources, time pressures, task complexity, and cultural considerations. Less than 10 cues.0 ptsUnsatisfactoryFails to identify imperative assessment cues. Cues are not relevant. Less than 5 cues.
2 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis of cues (Analysis)
2 ptsProficient1) Links and clusters recognized cues to the client’s clinical presentation. Accurately 2) establishes prioritized client needs based off the patients clinical presentation. Clearly and accurately clusters cues to establish probable patient needs, concerns, or problems.1.5 ptsAcceptable1) Links and clusters recognized cues to the client’s clinical presentation. Adequately 2) establishes prioritized client needs based off the patients clinical presentation. Clearly and accurately clusters cues to establish probable patient needs, concerns, or problems.
1 ptsNeeds ImprovementDoes not 1) link and cluster recognized cues to the client’s clinical presentation. Vaguely 2) establishes prioritized client needs based off the patients clinical presentation. Clearly and accurately clusters cues to establish probable patient needs, concerns, or problems.0 ptsUnsatisfactoryFa
ils to 1) analyze cues or does not support the prioritized client needs and plan of care. 2) Fails to link and cluster cues to a patients clinical presentation in establishing probable patient needs, concerns, or problems. 2 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePrioritization of hypotheses (Analyze)
3 ptsProficient1) Establishes 4 priorities of care based on the client’s health problems (i.e., environmental factors, risk assessment, urgency, signs/symptoms, diagnostic tests, lab values). 2) The clinical decision is clear, accurate, and presents correlation from the recognized cues. 3) Identifies the framework used to identify priority order (ABCs, Maslow, safety, acute v chronic, unstable v stable, urgent v non-urgent).2 ptsAcceptable1) Establishes 3 priorities of care based on the client’s health problems (i.e., environmental factors, risk assessment, urgency, signs/symptoms, diagnostic tests, lab values). 2) The clinical decision is mostly clear, accurate, and presents correlation from the recognized cues. 3) Identifies the framework used to identify priority order (ABCs, Maslow, safety, acute v chronic, unstable v stable, urgent v non-urgent).
1 ptsNeeds Improvement1) Establishes 2 or less priorities of care based on the client’s health problems (i.e., environmental factors, risk assessment, urgency, signs/symptoms, diagnostic tests, lab values). 2) The clinical decision is vague or incorrect, and presents little correlation from the recognized cues. 3) Identifies the framework used to identify priority order (ABCs, Maslow, safety, acute v chronic, unstable v stable, urgent v non-urgent).0 ptsUnsatisfactor
y1) Fails to establish priorities of care based on the client’s health problems (i.e., environmental factors, risk assessment, urgency, signs/symptoms, diagnostic tests, lab values). 2) Fails to identify clinical decisions with no correlation from the recognized cues. 3) Does not identify the framework used to identify priority order (ABCs, Maslow, safety, acute v chronic, unstable v stable, urgent v non-urgent). 3 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGeneration of solutions (Planning)
4 ptsProficientClearly and accurately 1) establishes one expected outcome to address each hypothesis that can be achieved with nursing assistance to ensure a clients needs are met. Outcomes are specific, measurable, realistically attainable, and appropriately timed. 2) Identifies 4 solutions for each outcome supported by evidence-based practice. Clearly and accurately identifies at least 16 solutions that are independent nursing interventions supported by scientific rationale and evidence-based practice.3 ptsAcceptableAdequa
tely and accurately 1) establishes one expected outcome to address each hypothesis that can be achieved with nursing assistance to ensure a clients needs are met. Outcomes are mostly specific, measurable, realistically attainable, and appropriately timed. 2) Identifies 3 solutions for each outcome supported by evidence-based practice. Clearly and accurately identifies at least 12 solutions that are independent nursing interventions supported by scientific rationale and evidence-based practice. 1.5 ptsNeeds ImprovementVaguely and accurately 1) establishes one expected outcome to address each hypothesis that can be achieved with nursing assistance to ensure a clients needs are met. Outcomes are somewhat specific, measurable, realistically attainable, and appropriately timed. 2) Identifies 2 solutions for each outcome supported by evidence-based practice. Clearly and accurately identifies at least 8 solutions that are independent nursing interventions supported by scientific rationale and evidence-based practice.0 ptsUnsatisfactoryFa
ils to 1) establish one expected outcome to address each hypothesis that can be achieved with nursing assistance to ensure a clients needs are met. Outcomes are not specific, measurable, realistically attainable, and appropriately timed. 2) Identifies no solutions for each outcome supported by evidence-based practice. Clearly and accurately identifies at least 4 solutions that are independent nursing interventions supported by scientific rationale and evidence-based practice. 4 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTake actions (Implementation)
2 ptsProficient1) Implements appropriate interventions in priority order based on nursing knowledge, priorities of care, and planned outcomes to promote, maintain, or restore a client’s health. 2) Nursing actions are always aimed at the expected outcomes and directed at the stated health deviation based on the nursing assessment and Eriksons stages of development.1.5 ptsAcceptable1
) Implements adequate interventions in priority order based on nursing knowledge, priorities of care, and planned outcomes to promote, maintain, or restore a client’s health. 2) Nursing actions are aimed at the expected outcomes and directed at the stated health deviation based on the nursing assessment and Eriksons stages of development. 1 ptsNeeds Improvement1) Implements vague interventions that are not prioritized based on nursing knowledge, priorities of care, and planned outcomes to promote, maintain, or restore a client’s health. 2) Nursing actions are vaguely aimed at the expected outcomes and are directed at the stated health deviation based on the nursing assessment and Eriksons stages of development.0 ptsUnsatisfactor
yDoes not 1) implement appropriate interventions in priority order based on nursing knowledge, priorities of care, and planned outcomes to promote, maintain, or restore a client’s health. 2) Nursing actions do not address expected outcomes and are not directed at the stated health deviation based on the nursing assessment and Eriksons stages of development. 2 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvaluate Outcomes (Evaluation)
2 ptsProficientClearly and accurately 1) identifies criteria for evaluation, effectiveness of interventions, and measurement of goal completion. 2) Evaluation is clearly and accurately linked to the generated solutions and overall plan of care. 3) Modifies, revises, and recommends alternative solutions with evidence-based citations as applicable.1.5 ptsAcceptableAd
equately 1) identifies criteria for evaluation, effectiveness of interventions, and measurement of goal completion. 2) Evaluation is adequately linked to the generated solutions and overall plan of care. 3) Modifies, revises, and recommends alternative solutions with evidence-based citations as applicable. 1 ptsNeeds ImprovementVaguely 1) identifies criteria for evaluation, effectiveness of interventions, and measurement of goal completion. 2) Evaluation is vaguely linked with generated solutions and overall plan of care. 3) May or may not modify, revise, or recommend alternative solutions with limited to no evidence-based citations as applicable.0 ptsUnsatisfactory
Fails to 1) identify criteria for evaluation, effectiveness of interventions, and measurement of goal completion. 2) Evaluation is not linked with generated solutions and overall plan of care. 3) Does not modify, revise, or recommend alternative solutions with limited to no evidence- based citations as applicable. 2 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGeneral Organization
1 ptsProficient1) Clear and accurate APA format. 2) Concisely appropriate citations and references. 3) No spelling or grammar errors.0.75 ptsAcceptable1) Adequate APA format. 2) Adequate appropriate citations and references. 3) Few spelling or grammar errors.
0.5 ptsNeeds Improvement1) Inadequate APA format. 2) Inappropriate citations and references. 3) Some spelling or grammar errors.0 ptsUnsatisfactory1) Fails to utilize APA format. 2) No appropriate citations and references. 3) Many spelling or grammar errors.
1 pts
Total Points: 35
-
Clinical Judgment Plan Packet- Fill out the packet according…
I will provide you with the clinical scenario, and I need you to fill out the pages based on the information that I give you. I will attach the packet to fill out. All references need to be cited in APA format, 7th edition, and use the book
Fundamentals for Nursing Edition 11.0 ATI Review Module Content MAstery Series
Clinical Judgment Plan Draft Rubric
Clinical Judgment Plan Draft Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeHistory of present illness (HPI) and Admitting Diagnosis
2 ptsProficientExplains 1) HPI and 2) admitting pathophysiology in detail with clear and accurate and in-depth understanding of chief complaint. 3) Evidence-based rationales clearly and accurately support the HPI.1.5 ptsAcceptableExplains 1) HPI and 2) admitting pathophysiology in some detail with adequate understanding of chief complaint. 3) Evidence-based rationales adequately support the HPI.
1 ptsNeeds ImprovementExplains 1) HPI and 2) admitting pathophysiology in limited detail with limited understanding of chief complaint. 3) Evidence-based rationales vaguely support the HPI or are not present.0 ptsUnsatisfactoryFai
ls to explain 1) HPI or 2) admitting pathophysiology with poor understanding of chief complaint. 3) Evidence-based rationales do not support the HPI or are not present. 2 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePathophysiology of past medical/surgical/social histories
2 ptsProficientIncludes 1) all past medical, surgical, and social history detailed with 2) full explanation of pathophysiology for each diagnosis. 3) Thoroughly describes potential complications for each diagnosis and the indications for surgery. 4) Clearly and accurately relates the client’s past history and current signs/symptoms with evidence-based citations.1.5 ptsAcceptableInc
ludes 1) most past medical, surgical, and social history detailed with 2) partial explanation of pathophysiology for each diagnosis. 3) Adequately describes potential complications for each diagnosis and the indications for surgery. 4) Adequately associates specific details related to the client’s history and signs/symptoms with evidence-based citations. 1 ptsNeeds ImprovementIncludes 1) some past medical, surgical, and social history detailed with 2) minimal explanation of pathophysiology for each diagnosis. 3) Vaguely describes potential complications for each diagnosis and the indications for surgery. 4) Vaguely associates specific details related to the client’s history and signs/symptoms with limited to no evidence- based citations.0 ptsUnsatisfactoryN
o 1) past medical, surgical, or social history or given without 2) explanation or pathophysiology. 3) Does not describe potential complications for each diagnosis or the indications for surgery. 4) Does not associate specific details related to the client’s history and signs/symptoms with limited to no evidence- based citations. 2 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSocial Determinants of Health
1 ptsProficientClearly and accurately 1) describes socioeconomic and psychosocial background in detail 2) with evidence-based citations to support social determinants of health. 3) Identifies at least 3 or more psychosocial concerns with interventions/ recommendations.0.75 ptsAccept
ableAdequately 1) describes socioeconomic and psychosocial background in detail 2) with evidence-based citations to support social determinants of health. 3) Identifies at least 2 psychosocial concerns with interventions/ recommendations. 0.5 ptsNeeds ImprovementVaguely 1) describes socioeconomic and psychosocial background in detail 2) with limited to no evidence-based citations to support social determinants of health. 3) Identifies at least 1 psychosocial concern with interventions/recommendations.
0 ptsUnsatisfactoryFails to 1) describe socioeconomic and psychosocial background 2) with limited to no evidence- based citations or social determinants of health. 3) Identifies no psychosocial concerns or interventions/ recommendations. 1 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEriksons Developmental Stages
1 ptsProficient1) Identifies and 2) defines correct stage 3) with examples of meeting/not meeting tasks 4) supported by evidenced-based citations.0.75 ptsAcceptable1) Identifies and 2) defines correct stage 3) with vague examples of meeting/not meeting tasks 4) supported by evidenced citations.
0.5 ptsNeeds Improvement1) Identifies correct stage 2) without adequate definition and 3) without examples of meeting or not meeting tasks. 4) No citations0 ptsUnsatisfactory1) Identifies incorrect stage 2) without definition or 3) without examples of meeting/not meeting tasks 4) without citations.
1 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTeaching Assessment & Client Education
1 ptsProficientClearly and accurately 1) identifies areas of instructional needs, 2) learning preference, and 3) learning barriers. 4) Provides clear and concise client education related to their condition that will aid in health promotion, health maintenance and self-care activities. 5) Client education is supported by evidence-based practice.0.75 ptsAcceptableAde
quately 1) identifies areas of instructional needs, 2) learning preference and 3) learning barriers. 4) Provides adequate client education related to their condition that aids in health promotion, health maintenance and self-care activities. 5) Client education is supported by evidence-based practice. 0.5 ptsNeeds ImprovementVaguely 1) identifies areas of instructional needs, 2) learning preference and 3) learning barriers. 4) Provides minimal and vague client education that will aid in health promotion, health maintenance and self-care activities. 5) Client education is supported by evidence-based practice.0 ptsUnsatisfactoryFa
ils to 1) identify areas of instructional needs, 2) learning preference and 3) learning barriers. 4) Does not provide client education that will aid in health promotion, health maintenance and self-care activities. 5) Client education is not supported by evidence-based practice. 1 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInterprofessional Consults and Multidisciplinary Plan
1 ptsProficient1) Lists at least 3 appropriate collaborative issues/concerns. 2) Identifies 3 interdisciplinary consults to support patient well-being. 3) Evidence- based rationales demonstrate clear and accurate understanding of consults and interventions.0.75 ptsAcceptab
le1) Lists at least 2 appropriate collaborative issues/concerns. 2) Identifies 2 interdisciplinary consults to support patient well-being. 3) Evidence- based rationales demonstrate adequate understanding of consults and interventions. 0.5 ptsNeeds Improvement1) Lists at least 1 appropriate collaborative issue/concern. 2) Identifies 1 interdisciplinary consult to support patient well-being. 3) Evidence-based rationales demonstrate vague understanding of consults and interventions or may be missing.0 ptsUnsatisfactory1) Fails to list collaborative issues/concerns or lists issues/concerns that are inappropriate. 2) No interdisciplinary consults identified. 3) Evidence- based rationales demonstrate unsatisfactory understanding of consults and interventions or may be missing.
1 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDischarge Planning
1 ptsProficientClearly and accurately 1) describes issues/concerns related to discharge planning 2) with evidence-based rationales.0.75 ptsAcceptableA
dequately 1) describes issues/concerns related to discharge planning 2) with evidence- based rationales. 0.5 ptsNeeds ImprovementVaguely 1) describes issues/concerns related to discharge planning 2) with limited to no evidence-based rationales.0 ptsUnsatisfactory
Fails to 1) describe issues/concerns related to discharge planning 2) with limited to no evidence-based rationales. 1 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLabs
1 ptsProficientClearly and accurately 1) identifies admission and current pertinent laboratory tests with applicable indications, 2) addresses abnormal values, and 3) recognizes trends related to a clients disease process 4) with evidence-based rationales.0.75 ptsAcceptableA
dequately 1) identifies pertinent laboratory tests with applicable indications, 2) addresses abnormal values, and 3) recognizes trends related to a clients disease process 4) with evidence- based rationales. 0.5 ptsNeeds ImprovementVaguely 1) identifies pertinent laboratory tests with applicable indications, 2) addresses abnormal values, and 3) recognizes trends related to a clients disease process 4) with limited to evidence-based rationales.0 ptsUnsatisfactory
Fails to 1) identify pertinent laboratory tests with applicable indications, 2) address abnormal values, or 3) recognize trends related to a clients disease process 5) with limited to no evidence-based rationales. 1 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiagnostics/procedures
1 ptsProficientClearly and accurately 1) describes the clients diagnostic criteria and indications 2) with evidence- based rationales that clearly support the chief complaint and presenting signs/symptoms.0.75 ptsAccepta
bleAdequately 1) describes the clients diagnostic criteria and indications 2) with evidence-based rationales that adequately support the chief complaint and presenting signs/symptoms. 0.5 ptsNeeds ImprovementVaguely 1) describes the clients diagnostic criteria and indications 2) with limited to no rationales which vaguely support the identified chief complaint and presenting signs/symptoms.0 ptsUnsatisfac
toryFails to 1) describe the clients diagnostic criteria and indications 2) with limited to no rationales and does not support the identified chief complaint and presenting signs/symptoms. 1 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMedications
3 ptsProficientClearly and accurately 1) identifies all components of the medication list, including name, class, route, dose, frequency, mechanism of action, applicable indication(s), side and adverse effects, interactions, and nursing considerations relevant to the clients current health condition, 2) with evidence-based citations.2 ptsAcceptableAdequ
ately 1) identifies some components of the medication list, including name, class, route, dose, frequency, mechanism of action, applicable indication(s), side and adverse effects, interactions, and nursing considerations relevant to the client, 2) with evidence-based citations. 1 ptsNeeds ImprovementVaguely 1) identifies few components of the medication list, including name, class, route, dose, frequency, mechanism of action, applicable indication(s), side and adverse effects, interactions, and nursing considerations relevant to the client, 2) with limited to no evidence-based citations.0 ptsUnsatisfactoryF
ails to 1) identify all components of the medication list, including name, class, route, dose, frequency, mechanism of action, applicable indication(s), side and adverse effects, interactions, and nursing considerations relevant to the client, 2) with limited to no evidence-based citations. 3 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssessment & Review of Systems
5 ptsProficient1) Documents thorough Head-to-Toe physical assessment with relevant information to the patient/client as performed by the student. 2) Utilizes an organized format and appropriate terms to describe both normal and abnormal assessment findings.3 ptsAcceptable1) Documents Head-to-Toe physical assessment with more than 75% relevant information to the patient/client as performed by the student. 2) Utilizes an organized format and appropriate terms to describe both normal and abnormal assessment findings.
1.67 ptsNeeds Improvement1) Documents full Head-to-Toe physical assessment with approx. 50% -75% relevant information to the patient/client as performed by the student. 2) Format may be moderately disorganized with mostly appropriate terms to describe both normal and abnormal assessment findings.0 ptsUnsatisfactory1) Documents full Head-to-Toe physical assessment with less than 50% relevant information to the patient/client missing information – as performed by the student. 2) Format is mostly disorganized and may be lacking appropriate terms to describe both normal and abnormal assessment findings.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRecognition of cues (Assessment)
2 ptsProficientIdentifies all imperative cues taken from the environment, patient assessment/observation, medical record, other resources, time pressures, task complexity, and cultural considerations. Minimum of 15 cues required.1.5 ptsAcceptableIden
tifies most imperative assessment cues. Some cues are relevant. cues taken from the environment, patient assessment/observation, medical record, other resources, time pressures, task complexity, and cultural considerations. Less than 15 cues. 1 ptsNeeds ImprovementIdentifies some assessment cues. Few cues are relevant. cues taken from the environment, patient assessment/observation, medical record, other resources, time pressures, task complexity, and cultural considerations. Less than 10 cues.0 ptsUnsatisfactoryFails to identify imperative assessment cues. Cues are not relevant. Less than 5 cues.
2 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis of cues (Analysis)
2 ptsProficient1) Links and clusters recognized cues to the client’s clinical presentation. Accurately 2) establishes prioritized client needs based off the patients clinical presentation. Clearly and accurately clusters cues to establish probable patient needs, concerns, or problems.1.5 ptsAcceptable1) Links and clusters recognized cues to the client’s clinical presentation. Adequately 2) establishes prioritized client needs based off the patients clinical presentation. Clearly and accurately clusters cues to establish probable patient needs, concerns, or problems.
1 ptsNeeds ImprovementDoes not 1) link and cluster recognized cues to the client’s clinical presentation. Vaguely 2) establishes prioritized client needs based off the patients clinical presentation. Clearly and accurately clusters cues to establish probable patient needs, concerns, or problems.0 ptsUnsatisfactoryFa
ils to 1) analyze cues or does not support the prioritized client needs and plan of care. 2) Fails to link and cluster cues to a patients clinical presentation in establishing probable patient needs, concerns, or problems. 2 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePrioritization of hypotheses (Analyze)
3 ptsProficient1) Establishes 4 priorities of care based on the client’s health problems (i.e., environmental factors, risk assessment, urgency, signs/symptoms, diagnostic tests, lab values). 2) The clinical decision is clear, accurate, and presents correlation from the recognized cues. 3) Identifies the framework used to identify priority order (ABCs, Maslow, safety, acute v chronic, unstable v stable, urgent v non-urgent).2 ptsAcceptable1) Establishes 3 priorities of care based on the client’s health problems (i.e., environmental factors, risk assessment, urgency, signs/symptoms, diagnostic tests, lab values). 2) The clinical decision is mostly clear, accurate, and presents correlation from the recognized cues. 3) Identifies the framework used to identify priority order (ABCs, Maslow, safety, acute v chronic, unstable v stable, urgent v non-urgent).
1 ptsNeeds Improvement1) Establishes 2 or less priorities of care based on the client’s health problems (i.e., environmental factors, risk assessment, urgency, signs/symptoms, diagnostic tests, lab values). 2) The clinical decision is vague or incorrect, and presents little correlation from the recognized cues. 3) Identifies the framework used to identify priority order (ABCs, Maslow, safety, acute v chronic, unstable v stable, urgent v non-urgent).0 ptsUnsatisfactor
y1) Fails to establish priorities of care based on the client’s health problems (i.e., environmental factors, risk assessment, urgency, signs/symptoms, diagnostic tests, lab values). 2) Fails to identify clinical decisions with no correlation from the recognized cues. 3) Does not identify the framework used to identify priority order (ABCs, Maslow, safety, acute v chronic, unstable v stable, urgent v non-urgent). 3 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGeneration of solutions (Planning)
4 ptsProficientClearly and accurately 1) establishes one expected outcome to address each hypothesis that can be achieved with nursing assistance to ensure a clients needs are met. Outcomes are specific, measurable, realistically attainable, and appropriately timed. 2) Identifies 4 solutions for each outcome supported by evidence-based practice. Clearly and accurately identifies at least 16 solutions that are independent nursing interventions supported by scientific rationale and evidence-based practice.3 ptsAcceptableAdequa
tely and accurately 1) establishes one expected outcome to address each hypothesis that can be achieved with nursing assistance to ensure a clients needs are met. Outcomes are mostly specific, measurable, realistically attainable, and appropriately timed. 2) Identifies 3 solutions for each outcome supported by evidence-based practice. Clearly and accurately identifies at least 12 solutions that are independent nursing interventions supported by scientific rationale and evidence-based practice. 1.5 ptsNeeds ImprovementVaguely and accurately 1) establishes one expected outcome to address each hypothesis that can be achieved with nursing assistance to ensure a clients needs are met. Outcomes are somewhat specific, measurable, realistically attainable, and appropriately timed. 2) Identifies 2 solutions for each outcome supported by evidence-based practice. Clearly and accurately identifies at least 8 solutions that are independent nursing interventions supported by scientific rationale and evidence-based practice.0 ptsUnsatisfactoryFa
ils to 1) establish one expected outcome to address each hypothesis that can be achieved with nursing assistance to ensure a clients needs are met. Outcomes are not specific, measurable, realistically attainable, and appropriately timed. 2) Identifies no solutions for each outcome supported by evidence-based practice. Clearly and accurately identifies at least 4 solutions that are independent nursing interventions supported by scientific rationale and evidence-based practice. 4 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTake actions (Implementation)
2 ptsProficient1) Implements appropriate interventions in priority order based on nursing knowledge, priorities of care, and planned outcomes to promote, maintain, or restore a client’s health. 2) Nursing actions are always aimed at the expected outcomes and directed at the stated health deviation based on the nursing assessment and Eriksons stages of development.1.5 ptsAcceptable1
) Implements adequate interventions in priority order based on nursing knowledge, priorities of care, and planned outcomes to promote, maintain, or restore a client’s health. 2) Nursing actions are aimed at the expected outcomes and directed at the stated health deviation based on the nursing assessment and Eriksons stages of development. 1 ptsNeeds Improvement1) Implements vague interventions that are not prioritized based on nursing knowledge, priorities of care, and planned outcomes to promote, maintain, or restore a client’s health. 2) Nursing actions are vaguely aimed at the expected outcomes and are directed at the stated health deviation based on the nursing assessment and Eriksons stages of development.0 ptsUnsatisfactor
yDoes not 1) implement appropriate interventions in priority order based on nursing knowledge, priorities of care, and planned outcomes to promote, maintain, or restore a client’s health. 2) Nursing actions do not address expected outcomes and are not directed at the stated health deviation based on the nursing assessment and Eriksons stages of development. 2 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvaluate Outcomes (Evaluation)
2 ptsProficientClearly and accurately 1) identifies criteria for evaluation, effectiveness of interventions, and measurement of goal completion. 2) Evaluation is clearly and accurately linked to the generated solutions and overall plan of care. 3) Modifies, revises, and recommends alternative solutions with evidence-based citations as applicable.1.5 ptsAcceptableAd
equately 1) identifies criteria for evaluation, effectiveness of interventions, and measurement of goal completion. 2) Evaluation is adequately linked to the generated solutions and overall plan of care. 3) Modifies, revises, and recommends alternative solutions with evidence-based citations as applicable. 1 ptsNeeds ImprovementVaguely 1) identifies criteria for evaluation, effectiveness of interventions, and measurement of goal completion. 2) Evaluation is vaguely linked with generated solutions and overall plan of care. 3) May or may not modify, revise, or recommend alternative solutions with limited to no evidence-based citations as applicable.0 ptsUnsatisfactory
Fails to 1) identify criteria for evaluation, effectiveness of interventions, and measurement of goal completion. 2) Evaluation is not linked with generated solutions and overall plan of care. 3) Does not modify, revise, or recommend alternative solutions with limited to no evidence- based citations as applicable. 2 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGeneral Organization
1 ptsProficient1) Clear and accurate APA format. 2) Concisely appropriate citations and references. 3) No spelling or grammar errors.0.75 ptsAcceptable1) Adequate APA format. 2) Adequate appropriate citations and references. 3) Few spelling or grammar errors.
0.5 ptsNeeds Improvement1) Inadequate APA format. 2) Inappropriate citations and references. 3) Some spelling or grammar errors.0 ptsUnsatisfactory1) Fails to utilize APA format. 2) No appropriate citations and references. 3) Many spelling or grammar errors.
1 pts
Total Points: 35
-
Professional PowerPoint Presentation on Sertoli Cell-Only Sy…
Hello,
I need help preparing a professional academic PowerPoint presentation for my Practical Molecular Biology course.
The presentation topic is:
Sertoli Cell-Only Syndrome: Y-linked / Y-chromosome-related genetic basis
Before preparing the presentation, please first find a strong, recent, peer-reviewed article from PubMed / PMC / OMIM / NCBI / or another reliable medical database.
The article can be either an original research article or a literature review / review article. It should be directly related to Sertoli Cell-Only Syndrome and its genetic or molecular basis, preferably involving:
- Y chromosome microdeletions
- AZF region
- Male infertility
- Non-obstructive azoospermia
- Sertoli cell-only phenotype
After selecting the article, please send me the article title and PubMed/PMC link first so I can review and approve it before the presentation is prepared. Please do not start the PowerPoint until I approve the selected article.
Once the article is approved, please prepare a professional PowerPoint presentation that summarizes the article and connects it to Practical Molecular Biology / Molecular Genetics.
The presentation should include:
- Title slide
- Background about Sertoli Cell-Only Syndrome
- Genetic basis and Y-chromosome involvement
- Main aim or purpose of the article
- Key molecular/genetic mechanisms
- Main findings or important points from the article
- Clinical relevance
- Connection to Practical Molecular Biology
- Conclusion / Take-home message
- References
Please make the presentation visually professional, modern, and easy to explain. Use relevant scientific images such as Y chromosome, AZF region, seminiferous tubules, Sertoli cells, spermatogenesis, azoospermia/male infertility diagrams, and molecular genetics or chromosome-related figures.
The presentation should not be crowded with text. Please use clear bullet points, diagrams, and a speaker-friendly structure.
The final presentation should be suitable for an academic university-level course and should be approximately 10 minutes long.
Thank you.
-
CRJ101the schedule of pregnancy monitoring be optimized, and…
Pregnancy surveillance is not merely a routine schedule,it is a critical strategy for safeguarding both maternal and fetal health. An optimized rhythm of antenatal monitoring allows early detection of complications, among which preeclampsia remains one of the most serious and unpredictable. This condition can evolve silently yet rapidly, leading to severe outcomes if not identified in time. By examining how the frequency and quality of prenatal follow-up influence the early diagnosis and management of preeclampsia, this subject highlights the essential role of timely interventions. Understanding this relationship is key to improving clinical outcomes and ensuring safer pregnancies.
-
Health & Medical Question
In you short paper, include the following critical elements:
- Compare the major burden of disease that you have chosen to other types of burdens. You only need a cursory overview of other burdens here; consider that this comprises about 25% of your paper, so it should only consume about half a page or a long paragraph at most.
- Assess how the major burden of disease fits into the epidemiologic transition and approximately where the country is in the transition.
- Describe what the population looks like in terms of age and distribution, as well as poverty levels.
- Analyze one intervention that has successfully addressed this burden of the disease in the country. What, in your opinion, made the intervention successful?
Note: When writing this paper, you should include not just the burden of disease, but statistics that help put that burden of disease into perspective. For example, what is the population of the country? What are poverty levels? The (WHO) and have great examples of interventions that have been successful. Do not feel limited to peer-reviewed sources; feel free to browse and explore these other websites to find examples of successful interventions. Other possible sources include and the website.
What to Submit
Your short paper submission should be 2 to 3 pages in length. It will be double-spaced, using 12-point Times New Roman font, one-inch margins, and APA style for citations and formatting. You will need to include at least two resources, one to support your statistics on the burden of disease and one that provides evidence of a successful intervention.
-
husain 506
Critical Thinking Assignment (110 points)
This week we are learning about ordinal/categorical, continuous, and dichotomous variables. Using the Gestation Demographics SEU dataset that is located in the tabs at the bottom of the provided, perform the following problems using R Studio or Excel.
- Create a simple distribution graph (histogram) where we will explore the age of women after giving birth to their first child. Remember that a histogram consists of parallel vertical bars that show the frequency distribution of a quantitative variable in the graph. See the example in Introductory Statistics with R on pages 71-7 or pages 123-124 in EXCEL statistics A quick guide. The area of each bar is equal to the frequency of items found in each class.
- Determine the mean age of the women in the Gestation Demographics SEU dataset.
- We will be testing the hypothesis that the mean age ( = 0) for women is 37 years in the Gestation Demographics SEU dataset. The topic of hypothesis testing was introduced in HCM505. If you need a review see Chapter 7 of our text.
H0 The mean age of women giving birth is 37 years old. (Null Hypothesis)
H1 The mean age of women giving birth is not 37 years old. (Alternative Hypothesis)
Ensure to submit the following requirements for the assignment:
- Present your findings in a Word document, by copying and pasting the histogram into the document.
- After your analysis state whether you accept or reject the null hypothesis and your reasoning why.
- Always use a title page, an introduction, a discussion where you interpret the meaning of the histogram, and a conclusion should be included.
- Your submission should be 23 pages to discuss and display your findings.
- Provide support for your statements with in-text citations from a minimum of two scholarly, peer-reviewed articles. One of these sources may be from the class readings, textbook, or lectures, but the others must be external. The Saudi Digital Library is a good place to find these sources and should be your primary resource for conducting research.
- Follow APA 7th edition and Saudi Electronic University writing standards.
Review the grading rubric to see how you will be graded for this assignment.
You are strongly encouraged to submit all assignments to the Originality Check prior to submitting them to your instructor for grading.
-
Clinical Judgment Plan Packet- Fill out the packet according…
I will provide you with the clinical scenario, and I need you to fill out the pages based on the information that I give you. I will attach the packet to fill out.
All references need to be cited in APA format, 7th edition, and use the book
Fundamentals for Nursing Edition 11.0 ATI Review Module Content MAstery Series
Clinical Judgment Plan Draft Rubric
Clinical Judgment Plan Draft Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeHistory of present illness (HPI) and Admitting Diagnosis
2 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePathophysiology of past medical/surgical/social histories
2 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSocial Determinants of Health
1 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEriksons Developmental Stages
1 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTeaching Assessment & Client Education
1 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInterprofessional Consults and Multidisciplinary Plan
1 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDischarge Planning
1 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLabs
1 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiagnostics/procedures
1 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMedications
3 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssessment & Review of Systems
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRecognition of cues (Assessment)
2 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis of cues (Analysis)
2 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePrioritization of hypotheses (Analyze)
3 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGeneration of solutions (Planning)
4 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTake actions (Implementation)
2 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvaluate Outcomes (Evaluation)
2 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGeneral Organization
1 pts
Total Points: 35
-
helping with my homework
Scenario
You are a consultant hired by Inclusive Strategies, Inc., a firm that advises Fortune 500 companies on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) practices. Your task is to analyze Social Identity Theory and then create an Executive Summary evaluating the role of diverse segments within a company and the impact of cultural backgrounds on innovation, employee engagement, and market success.
Objectives
- Break down Social Identity Theory and explain its relevance to DEI.
- Research and assess the DEI strategies, initiatives, and outcomes of both companies.
- Compare and contrast their approaches, successes, and areas for improvement.
- Synthesize your analysis into a clear, concise Executive Summary tailored for corporate stakeholders.
Instructions
Step 1: Analyze Social Identity Theory
- Define Social Categorization and provide two examples of how it could be used in a professional setting.
- Define Social Comparison and provide two examples how it could be used in a professional setting.
- Define Social Identification and provide two examples of challenges using this in a professional setting.
Step 2: Importance of Diverse Segments & Cultural backgrounds
Create an Executive Summary on the importance of diverse segments and different cultural backgrounds for any company. You can find a template online or create one yourself. Include the following in your Executive Summary:
- Introduction
- Topic of Discussion (importance of diverse segments and different cultural backgrounds for any company).
- The role of diverse segments (e.g., race, gender, generations, disability), including examples from your research.
- The impact of cultural backgrounds on innovation and employee engagement, and market success, including examples from your research.
Step 3: Real-World Evidence
(Paragraphs can be added below the Executive Summary).
- Provide at least one real-world example or article (within the past five years) of a company that has publicly shown the importance of diverse segments to them.
- Describe the company and the industry they are in (Banking, Retail, etc.).
- Describe what this company has done to show how important its diversity is and how it has benefited the company as a whole.
- Provide at least one real-world example or article (within the past five years) of a company that has benefited from the different cultural backgrounds (Spanish, Asian, Indian, etc.) at their company.
- Describe some of the cultures at the company.
- Describe how they have specifically impacted success.
Submission Requirements
- Deliverable should be:
- Word document
- References: Minimum of three credible sources, including at least one scholarly source and the real-world examples/articles used.
- All assignments should be in APA format. Please review the APA guidance that isfound in the library or at
- Please check the Course Calendar for specific due dates.
- The name of the file should be your first initial and last name, followed by an underscore and the name of the assignment, and an underscore and the date. An example is shown below:
- Jstudent_exampleproblem_101504