Bright Academic Experts

Category: History

  • History Question

    Prompt: What were the main themes of Petrarchs moral and political writing?

    Length of essay: At least five and no more than six, double-spaced pages, in font size 12, using MLA CITATIONS. NO AI NO PLAGARISM.

    I have the first few paragraphs done if thats helpful. edit them to make sure there’s no ai and everything is correct. and then write the rest of the essay.

    Instructions

    • Ensure that the essay is based on the relevant primary and on the secondary sources of the course.
    • Before writing, spend time considering the language of the question you have chosen to answer. Do not think of the questions simply as prompts. Each question asks you to consider a particular historical problem. Each question requires you to respond to specific terms in which that problem is framed.
    • The essay should have a coherent and logical structure from beginning to end.
    • The opening should contain an outline of the general argument. Some kind of thesis statement
    • The essay should unfold in progressive stages divided into paragraphs of appropriate length and conclude properly.
    • Good conclusions briefly recapitulate the central points of an argument in order to show that the question has been sufficiently answered.
    • Each paragraph should be organized around an idea or theme or argument. It should not simply be a chronological narrative of events
    • Every claim made should be supported by proof derived principally from primary source material. The primary material is the textual basis of your historical evidence, and it must be cited accordingly.
    • In answering the question you have chosen, you will also always be expected to demonstrate knowledge of the secondary historiography you have been set. A capacity to describe the interpretations of the relevant modern historians, and identify the strengths and weaknesses of their positions and arguments, must be on display. The best answers to historical questions thread a path through existing interpretations in the light of the primary sources
    • The essay must be informed by the relevant material which is presented only in lectures. Failure to demonstrate learning from class will cost you grade points.
    • Clarity of expression is crucial, complex arguments are often best expressed in lucid, clear statements. Formulate your thoughts in a more straightforward language. You will be judged upon your ability not only to communicate your ideas and arguments accurately and grammatically but also fluently.

    Requirements:

  • DP

    Unit 2 – Discussion: Week 3 Prepare Read pages 252 to 259 in the text to prepare for this discussion. Prompt What strikes you about the examples of the art and culture of the indigenous peoples of the Americas that you see on those pages? Note that the Anasazi seed jar (Figure 9.12) on page 254 and the gold ceremonial knife (Figure 9.13) on page 255 are around a thousand years old. (See the Colossal Olmec head from Veracruz, Mexico (figure 1.34), which is three thousand years old.) What does that suggest about the cultures of the Americas? Read again the Navaho Night Chant (still in use today) that begins with House made of dawn on p. 255. What gives it its meaning and beauty? How does your awareness of these cultural achievements (and those from Africa earlier in this chapter) affect your thinking about what is recounted under The Europeans in Africa on p. 252 and The Spanish in the Americas on page 259? If necessary, a document is available with text descriptions of the artwork and links to larger images Download text descriptions of the artwork and links to larger images of the artwork. Procedure Incorporate APA-formatted citations and references from the course readings in your responses to demonstrate your understanding of key concepts. See the syllabus or calendar for due dates. Important! By Thursday – Post your initial response (200 words or more). By the end of the week – Make 2 additional replies to your peers or instructor (100 words or more). Discussions should utilize a minimum of 2 cited sources: your textbook (or other course materials) and one external source. You must post your initial response before you see your classmates’ responses. See the APA-Formatted References page for a list of APA-formatted sources in the course materials. Click on the 3 vertical dots in the upper right corner of the discussion thread, then choose Show Rubric to see how this assignment will be graded.

  • History Question

    Primary Source Analysis #1

    Due: Mon Feb 9, 2026 11:59pmDue: Mon Feb 9, 2026 11:59pm

    Ungraded, 0 Possible Points

    0 Points Possible

    For this assignment, you must bring together two to three different primary sources from Canvas. No outside sources are permitted. While you may incorporate a secondary source or two (say, Fatima El-Tayeb’s essay or Wolfgang Schivelbusch’s “Culture of Defeat”) in order to contextualize your analysis of the historical documents, the body of your work must focus heavily on the two to three primary sources.

    For this primary source analysis, you must examine historical documents from before February 9 (the deadline of submission) not after. So imagine, in other words, writing a primary source analysis that examines Rosa Luxemburg and Eduard Bernstein, for example, since that is something that we have already covered in class.

    In approximately 750 words, you must identify in exhaustive detail the creators of the primary sources, the reasons for their creation, a brief summary of their contents, an analysis of their implications, and an argument that connects the readings together. How do these documents work together in comparison or juxtaposed to each other? What do they reveal?

    We will be grading you according to this rubric Download rubric

    , which is listed under files and pasted below. Please submit your document as a Microsoft Word file to your individual discussion section’s Canvas page.

    RUBRIC (out of 100 points)

    Argument and Main Theme (20)

    * Does your paper relate to the main themes we have discussed in lecture and discussion section? If so, what are the main themes and where are they located in your analysis?

    *Is your argument easily identifiable?

    * Is your argument persuasive?

    Identification and Analysis of the Texts (25)

    * Do you identify the author of each text (and quote that you use) in your essay?

    * Does your evidence match your argument?

    *Do you cite directly from the source?

    * Are you able to weave different examples from your text(s) together to show what they have in common?

    * Do you interrogate and explain any quotes that you use in your paper?

    * Are you able to identify moments when the author is employing literary devices such as sarcasm, irony, understatement, repetition, or analogy? Are you able to articulate why the author chose to write that way?

    Historical Knowledge and Contextualization (20)

    * Does your analysis illustrate that you are knowledgeable about the time period in which the document was written?

    * Does your paper successfully relate the primary source to the historical context in which it was created?

    * Does your analysis identify/propose who the original audience was for this text?

    Prose (20)

    * Is your writing clear and comprehensible?

    * Does your writing use proper grammar and spelling?

    * Do you use active voice instead of passive voice?

    * Is your prose formal instead of too casual, informal, or colloquial?

    * Is your writing persuasive? Some of the best texts are persuasive not only because they are well-argued but also because theyre beautifully written. Strive for beautiful, simple, elegant prose.

    Organization (10)

    * Does the structure of your paper make sense?

    * Are your paragraphs all proper lengths (not too long, not too short)?|

    * Does each paragraph have an obvious signpost at the beginning of it to alert the reader as to what your paragraph is about?

    * Does each paragraph easily flow from one to the next?

    Citation (5)

    * Do you properly cite your sources? Is it possible for a complete stranger to grab your paper and find the original quotation that you mentioned using only your paper as a guide?

    VERY IMPORTANT: I ALREADFY CHAT GPT AN ESSAY WITH QUOTES FROM MY PRIMARY SOURCES AND CITATIONS. I JUST NEED YOU TO REWRITE THE ENTIRE THING. MAKE IT GOOD. MAKE IT BETTER. MAKE IT HUMAN

    Requirements: 750

  • discussion forum

    reword my answers to the questions and keep the quotes i use for each of them tho. I need you to run it thru turnitin.com and make sure it no ai detected and make sure the wording follows up with what my quote says below the answer. the quote supports my answer. so reword it and run thru ai detector please and thanks.

    7. What inspired Jane Addams and the women who worked at Hull House to join the settlement

    house movement? Why did these middle and upper class, educated women choose to live in

    working class, immigrant neighborhoods? How did their work provide fulfillment and purpose in

    their lives? Do you think their work was more beneficial to the community or to themselves?

    Jane Addams and the women of Hull House were driven by a “subjective necessity” to bridge the gap between their privileged educations and the harsh realities of industrial America. Inspired by Londons Toynbee Hall, they moved into Chicagos 19th Ward to practice “social democracy,” believing that true reform required living as neighbors to the immigrants they served rather than practicing charity from a distance. This lifestyle provided these women with a vital escape from the “Family Claim”the era’s expectation that they remain idle household figuresoffering them instead a path toward professional fulfillment as social investigators and political activists. While the community gained life-changing resources like a day nursery, public baths, and legal aid, the movement was equally beneficial to the reformers themselves; it gave a “stolen” generation of educated women a public voice and a revolutionary sense of purpose long before they had the right to vote. This quote supports my answer remarkably well because it highlights the moral obligation both reformers felt to make their life experiences useful to the public –

    “Riiss work was written in the belief that every mans experience ought to be worth something to the community from which he drew it, no matter what that experience may be, so long as it was gleaned along the line of some decent, honest work. –

    3. Describe Riiss literary style. Does his writing style seem particularly journalistic? What was he trying

    to accomplish through this style of writing? Was he trying to just present the facts or do something else?

    Jacob Riis utilized a “muckraking” style that fused gritty, firsthand reporting with intense moral urgency. Rather than providing neutral observations, he used sensational language to shock the upper classes into recognizing the horrors of apartment life. He aimed to prove that filthy environments, rather than essential character flaws, were responsible for the “misery and vice” of the poor. Ultimately, his writing was a strategic tool for reform designed to provoke the moral resentment necessary to force immediate legislative change. Therefore, to support my answer, I will include –

    “Riis knew what it was to suffer, to starve, and to be homeless, and, though his prose was sometimes sensationalist and even occasionally prejudiced, he had what Roosevelt called “the great gift of making others see what he saw and feel what he felt.” –

  • Power, Politics, and Daily Life in Ancient Rome

    Please do like you usually do for me. Use page numbers for answers and read directions well please . Chapter 5 pictures are uploaded

  • History 107B

    The instruction should be in the pdf.

    The question I wanna do is #2 & #4

    1. For question #2 the reading that need to be incorporated is Allsen, Donal Stewart, Atamian, and especially Kouymjian
    2. For question #4 that reading that need to be incorporated is Shapiro, Herzig, Bentley, and Richards.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): richards Early Modern India and World History clean 2.pdf, Herzig Deportation of Armenians and Europes Myth of Shah Abbas.pdf, Bentley Early modern world and Early modern europe CLEAN.pdf, Shapiro JEMH 23 (2019).pdf, Khouymjian_on_intrusion_of_East_Asian_imagery CLEAN.pdf, Donal Stewart The_Armenian_Kingdom and the Mamluks CLEAN.pdf, Allsen Mongols as Vectors.pdf, Atamian Cilicia chapter CLEAN.pdf, List of commonly made mistakes 2026 copy.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Journal Writing (multiple pages)

    please advise I do tip so dont fully worry about the price for this assignment!! Will need 1-4 [thesis, analysis, contemporary analysis and question(s)]for teachings of Ptahhotep in 30 mins but full journal entry by march 1st 1. (Thesis) What is the authors main argument and or problem. 2. (Analysis) How you conceptualized or made sense of the reading, how you came to understand the thesis. 3. (Contemporary Analysis) How the reading relates/applies to our modern world. 4. (Questions) What questions you have about the reading. There should be four journal entries for the readings. 1. (Hillard) The Teachings of Ptahhotep 2. (Karenga) MAAT: The moral idea of ancient Kemet 3. (Som) Of Water and Spirit 4. (Nggi) Decolonizing the Mind 5. (Glissant) Poetics of Relation Here are the links to each lecture as well:

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): GlissantPoeticofRelation.pdf, GlissantPoetics2.pdf, SomeOfWaterandSpiritpt2.pdf, SomeOfWaterandSpiritpt1.pdf, KarengaMAATpt3.pdf, KarengaMAATpt2.pdf, KarengaMAATpt12A.pdf, HillardTeachingofPtahhoteppt2.pdf, HillardTeachingofPtahhoteppt1.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Reaction Paper 3

    The purpose of this 600-word minimumreaction paper is to show that you have a thorough understanding of the weeks reading assignments. I expect you to explain briefly the contents of the readings, as well as how they helped you to understand more fully various aspects of premodern slavery. In this reaction paper, you should clearly define: * The authors arguments * How effective the authors were in conveying their arguments clearly * How the readings challenged, changed, and/or reinforced what you already knew or thought about the past

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Ali – War Servitude and the Imperial_Household.pdf, Marmon – Eunuchs and Sacred Boundaries in Islamic Society (Ch 1).pdf, Karras – Unmarriages (Section of Ch 2).pdf, McKee – The Implications of Slave Womens Sexual Service in Late Medieval Italy.pdf, Townsend – Sex Servitude and Politics among the Pre-Conquest Nahuas.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Module 3 – Indian Ocean

    Study the “Transatlantic Slave Trade” Site– Click through and read: 5 subheading,

    Slave Economy Document

    Study:

    Lecture: Study Week 4: Colonies and the Triangular Trade.

    View: Crash Course World History, Atlantic Slave Trade

    Discussion: What is the social impact of the Atlantic Slave trade? How do the economics of the 16th century fundamentally transform the cultural landscape of the Triangular Trade and perpetuate it?

  • History Question

    Please put 120 days if you want bid to selected 4 courses in total but only 2 are ~16 weeks. Other 2 are 8 weeks

    These are Humanities classes (History classes, communication) and one is Astronomy class in SMC

    Requirements: as above