Category: Humanities

  • Humanities Western Culture

    After reading Agamemnon by Aeschylus, Oedipus Tyrannus by Sophocles, and Medea by Euripides, we will read Thomas More’s Utopia and Nicollo Machiavelli’s The Prince. Both have prompted arresting controversies. Another eye-opening work by Bartholome Las Casas was translated as The Tears of the Indians by John Phillips in 1656. These texts are attached. Next, we will read Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar and Hamlet. Both plays, like Oedipus and Medea, are very controversial, and as such, they offer openings for interesting research. The 2,000-word research paper can enlighten or illuminate any of the works on the syllabus, but mere plot summaries or rambling “explorations” or theme studies are forbidden. I have attached a “Sample Structure” for the research paper. The research paper must incorporate a brief review of at least eight scholarly articles, and each onemust be at least ten-pages long. Remember, any use of AI to assist you in composing papers for my class is strictly forbidden. Such essays will receive grades of “F” and zero points. Assume that your reader has already read the work you’ve chosen. Be sure to cite all of your sources. For the second essay, each student will be asked to compose a research paper intended to interpret or illuminate one of the works on the syllabus. Reliance on commercial Internet sites is strongly discouraged, and students are required to read and cite a minimum of eight scholarly articles by seven different scholars; each scholarly article or book chapter must be at least ten or fifteen pages long. (Full-text articles are readily available on JSTOR; the instructor will provide research assistance during office hours.) Papers that are shorter than the assigned length will be penalized. This second essay should be at le ast six to eight pages long2,000 words of textnot counting the title-page, notes or works cited. After a brief, but detailed review of previous scholarship, the student should offer a plausible original interpretationnot a plot summaryof the work theyve chosen. For every sentence quoted or paraphrased from another scholar, the student should compose at least three sentences of your own. (There is no maximum length: as long as the essays are not padded, students can take as much space as they need.) Each essay must contain a brief introductory review of previous scholarship and each student must offer an independent thesis supported by argument and evidence. Please note, inadequate research and plagiarism will both be penalized severely. The sources of any borrowed ideas or phrases must be clearly, u n am b ig u o u sly acknowledged. Quotations and paraphrases should be framed: they should be initiated by an announcement of the author and concluded by a citation of the source. Essays should be neat, typed, double-spaced, and easily legible with one inch margins. They should be either typed, ink-jetted or laser printed in 14 point Times Roman. (Parenthetical citation is permitted for the first essay, but proper footnotes in 10 pt or 12 pt type are required for citations in the second essay.) For the second assignment, students are not allowed to use parenthetical citations; instead, footnotes should be formatted according to either the MLA footnote style (Appendix B in the MLA Handbook) or in Chicago style. Remember, the use of AI is strictly forbidden, and AI-assisted papers will receive zeroes. Please note, I check papers for AI usage. In addition, anyone caught documenting an essay with fake citations risks failing the entire course for that offense alone, and I will never write them a letter of recommendation.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): LasCasasBartholome-TearsoftheIndians-TransJohnPhillips-02.pdf, julius-caesar_PDF_FolgerShakespeare.pdf, hamlet_PDF_FolgerShakespeare.pdf, 1512-MachiavelliThePrince-1903-TransRicci-01 (4).pdf, 1516-MoreThomasUtopiaEtAliaEditedbyMorley-03 (4).pdf, EuripidesMedeaTrans-12ABC.pdf, OedipusTyrannusSophocles-23ABC.pdf, SampleStructure-Hum-201-07.pdf, Humanities201-Spring2026-21941-TR-930-1050-01.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Poetry In Motion

    Poetry in Motion Purpose The purpose of this assignment is to explore the relationship between visual form and poetic meaning through the creation of a calligramme, inspired by Guillaume Apollinaires innovative approach to poetry. Creating your own hand-drawn calligramme allows you to experiment with the fusion of form and content, while your reflection encourages you to analyze your creative process and explain how your visual design reinforces the meaning of your poem. This assignment promotes creativity, self-expression, and a deeper appreciation of how visual structure can shape literary interpretation. Refer to the Course Alignment page for detailed information regarding CLO and ILO alignment to materials, activities, and assessments. Instructions In this assignment, we are going to go more in-depth on the visual poem. Step 1: Research Guillaume Apollinaire invented a type of visual poem called a calligramme. Read back through the section in your book that discusses Its Raining and its innovative quality in the literary world. Step 2: Create Now hand-write your own calligramme in a similar spirit as Apollinaire. Step 3: Reflect Briefly explain what made the calligramme an innovative form of poetry in the early 20th century. Then describe how your own creative process connects to that tradition. For example, you might write a poem about your pet snail and arrange the words in a spiral. Use your imagination! You will be graded on how clearly you discuss your creative process and how well you explain the relationship between the poems content and its visual form, not on the literary quality of the poem itself. This reflection should be about 250 words. Requirements Reflection with a minimum of 250 words Includes a picture of your calligramme
  • The Shock of the New: Midterm Essay

    The Shock of the New: Midterm Essay

    Due: Sunday, March 15, 11:59 PM CT | Points: 100 | Length: 1,200 words

    Overview

    This essay asks you to synthesize what you’ve learned in the first half of the course (Modules 14). You’ll develop an argument about a theme, movement, or set of works we’ve studied, using specific evidence to support your ideas. This is your chance to dig deeper into something that has captured your interest.

    Choose One Prompt

    Select one of the following prompts for your essay:

    Prompt A: Revolution and Reaction

    Early modernist movements (Fauvism, Cubism, Stravinsky’s music) deliberately shocked audiences by breaking artistic “rules.” Choose two works from Module 2 and analyze how they challenged conventions. Why did audiences react so strongly? What were these artists trying to achieve, and did they succeed?

    Prompt B: Art and Catastrophe

    World War I fundamentally changed artistic expression. Compare how artists responded to the waryou might contrast the optimism of pre-war modernism with the absurdism of Dada, or analyze how specific works attempted to represent trauma. What can art do in the face of catastrophe that other forms of expression cannot?

    Prompt C: Identity and Expression

    The Harlem Renaissance was both an artistic movement and a declaration of identity. Analyze how two or more works from Module 4 assert Black identity, challenge racism, or redefine what American culture could be. How did these artists use their work to claim space and dignity?

    Prompt D: Design Your Own

    Have a different idea? Propose your own thesis that draws on material from Modules 14. You must email Dr. Presley for approval by March 8 if you choose this option.

    Requirements

    • Length: 1,200 words (approximately 45 pages double-spaced)
    • Thesis: A clear, arguable thesis statement in your introduction
    • Evidence: Specific references to at least 23 works (artworks, texts, or musical pieces) from the course
    • Analysis: Don’t just describeinterpret and argue
    • Format: Double-spaced, 12-point font, 1-inch margins
    • Citations: Cite your textbook and any other sources (MLA or APA format)

    What Makes a Strong Essay?

    • Arguable thesis: Takes a position someone could disagree with
    • Specific evidence: Describes artworks in detail, quotes texts
    • Analysis: Explains why your evidence supports your argument
    • Organization: Logical flow with clear paragraphs
    • Engagement: Shows genuine thinking, not just summary

    Grading Rubric

    Essay grading criteria and point values

    CriterionPointsThesis & Argument: Clear, arguable thesis; coherent argument throughout25Evidence & Analysis: Specific examples from course material; insightful interpretation30Organization: Logical structure; clear paragraphs; smooth transitions20Writing Quality: Clear prose; proper grammar and mechanics15Format & Citations: Meets length; proper formatting; sources cited10Total100

    Tips for Success

    • Start earlygood essays need time for thinking and revision
    • Re-read relevant sections of your textbook with your prompt in mind
    • Visit the
    • for free writing help
    • Proofread carefully before submitting

    How to Submit

    Upload your essay as a Word document (.doc or .docx) using the submission button below. Make sure your name is on the document.

  • Article Review

    Article Review

    One of your ethical responsibilities as a social worker is to stay up to date on trends and emerging evidence-based practices (EBP). Applying EBP includes two steps: (1) researching for further information or ways to solve a problem; and (2) putting that information or solution into practice. Your field experience is the optimal setting to try this out, with the support of your field instructor.

    During your Week 1 Field Seminar, you identified a social work topic and searched in the Walden Library for a journal article on that topic. For this Assignment, you will engage in the first step of EBP by reading and reviewing an article that is relevant to your field experience. As you do so, you will consider the second step: the informations application to generalist practice.

    To prepare:

    • If you have not already done so: Using the Walden Library, search for a journal article on the social work topic you identified in the Week 1 Seminar.
    • Read the article critically, and then consider its application to your field experience setting.

    Main Assignment: Submit a 2- to 3-page paper addressing the following sections: No more than 3 pages

    Purpose and Main Points

    • What is the purpose of the article?
    • Why did you choose this article?
    • How does this article relate to the field experience?
    • What are the main points of the article?

    Population and Findings

    • Does the article focus on any at-risk or vulnerable populations? If so, which ones?
    • How did the authors arrive at their conclusions or findings? Were there any references to research, data collection, etc.?

    Application to Generalist Social Work Practice

    • How would you be able to integrate the information from the article into generalist social work practice?
    • Overall, how would you rate the quality of the information provided in the article?

    Add an introduction and conclusion to help organize your paper effectively. Be sure to provide APA citations and a reference list acknowledging your chosen journal article and any other resources you have used in your Assignment.

    Note: After you have finished your paper, prepare 35 slides that summarize the article and its key findings. During the Week 4 Field Seminar, you will give a brief presentation. See the Week 4 Field Seminar for full details.

    • OASIS. (n.d.). . Walden University.
    • OASIS. (n.d.). [Multimedia]. Walden University.
  • Engagement with Diverse Population

    Engaging clients and systems is an important part of social work practice. Your agency likely uses many strategies to engage clients and the community at large. How effective are these strategies with diverse populations? And to what extent do they align with principles of anti-racism, diversity, equity, and inclusion (ADEI)? Such principles recognize that racism is systemic, that the client is the expert of their story, and that voices should not be silenced. Social workers actively attempt to disrupt racism at all levels of practice. Even you, in your capacity as a social work student, can support how ADEI principles are applied at your agency.

    In this Discussion, you consider engagement strategies in the context of diverse populations.

    To prepare:

    • Review the articles in the Learning Resources, which discuss outreach and engagement with diverse populations. Also review the Bussey et al. article Leading the Charge in Addressing Racism and Bias.
    • Reflect on the strategies that your field agency usesand doesnt useto engage diverse populations.

    Main Assignment: Post

    • Identify two strategies from the articles that are being used in your agency. Explain how they are used.
    • Explain how these strategies align with anti-racism, diversity, equity, and inclusion (ADEI) related to the diverse population.
    • Identify one strategy from the articles that is not being used, and explain how it would help engage clients if it were used.

    Reflect to at least two colleagues:

    • Explain how your colleague might help implement the strategy not being used.

    Articles on Engagement With Diverse Populations

    • Levenson, J. S., Craig, S. L., & Austin, A. (2023). . Psychological Services, 20(Suppl. 1), 134144.
    • Bekteshi, V., Hunter, C. D.-A., & Bellamy, J. L. (2024). . Journal of Social Service Research, 50(6), 10751087.
    • Bond, L., Wusinich, C., & Padgett, D. (2022). . Qualitative Social Work: Research and Practice, 21(1), 177193.

    Article on ADEI

    • Bussey, S. R., Thompson, M. X., & Poliandro, E. (2022). . Social Work Education, 41(5), 907925.
      • Review Table 1 and Table 6, which list concrete tenets and actions that are associated with anti-racism, diversity, equity, and inclusion.
  • two discussion questions 250 words with 2 peer supported sch…

    2 Discussion Questions 250 words with 2 peer supported scholarly resource per question.

    Question 1.

    250 words with 2 peer supported scholarly resource.

    Assessment Description

    An externality constitutes a market failure. An example of an negative externality is air pollution from power-generating facilities (e.g., coal-fired power plant). Identify and explain two market-based solutions that would help to mitigate negative externalities, like air pollution? How would government, if at all, need to play a role in pollution abatement?

    Question 2.

    250 words with 2 peer supported scholarly resource.

    Assessment Description

    Have legislative remedies, like the Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act, produced results to mitigate negative externalities? At what cost? Have the benefits of the legislation outweighed the costs to industry? Identify and describe two additional measures that state and/or city governments are undertaking to reduce contributions to climate change by addressing degradation of air, land, and water (e.g., efforts in California, City of Phoenix).

  • Exploring the Sublime in High Renaissance Art

    image.jpg

    Select an artwork (painting, sculpture, architecture) from the High Renaissance period that you consider to embody the concept of the sublime. Share the image of the painting along with a brief analysis explaining why you believe it captures the sublime. Consider elements such as composition, use of light and shadow, and subject matter to support your analysis. Examine how the artist’s choices enhance the painting’s grandeur and emotional impact. Do not repeat an artwork from your peers.

    • Find an artwork that is not explained or discussed in the book or PowerPoint. Do not repeat an artwork used by another student.

    As this is a higher-education course, please respond accordingly. It is essential to reply to at least two classmates. If not, a deduction will be made from the grade. Your statement should be at least 250 words, and each reply should be at least 150. This is due next Saturday at 11:59 p.m.

    Artists from the Renaissance period:

    Leonardo da Vinci, Titian, Michelangelo, Raffaello, Donato Bramante, Sebastiano del Piombo, Andrea del Sarto, ecc.

  • Humanities Question

    I will add all the guidelines below

  • Humanities Question

    For your first paper, you will continue thinking and writing about Cultural Relativism. You will write a 1200-1500 (minimum) word reaction/position paper. There is no maximum.

    You will be watching the movie HOTEL RWANDA and following the instructions below.

    Make sure to CITE your sources. You CAN ONLY use class material to make your case.

    NO OUTSIDE SOURCES! (Unless we are using FACTS (like the video below, you cannot use outside opinion or analysis unless you have run it by me first.)

    Link to movie description on internet movie database is below but you must find access to the movie yourself. You can find it on the library website.

    If you are having trouble, please contact me immediately/asap. In very rare cases, I would be up for changing the film but, again, this is rare. That should not dissuade you from speaking to me about your issues/concerns. Obviously, the sooner you contact me, the better.

    For some more historical/cultural background, you can watch this video (in addition to watching the movie). This is not the movie, only an informational video:

    (part 1 of 2)

    ————————————————————————————

    HANDY-DANDY GUIDE TO WRITING A PAPER FOR ME:

    1.Introduction/Thesis: State your Thesis and introduce your paper!

    • the sketch of your primary claim with relevant supporting ideas (do you lean towards a universal or relativistic model of morality?)
    • mention the movie and how it’s relevant
    • here you should be making specific but not detailed (think of your introduction as your table of contents) claims/points

    2. SUMMARY/SYNOPSIS What are you reacting to? THIS SHOULD ONLY BE A SHORT SUMMARY. It should not be more than a few hundred words.

    Goal: Present what you are writing about.

    Identify all of the basic information: about the book/movie/documentary that you will be relating to your argument and explaining in more detail later in your paper.

    • the author of the piece, the title of the piece, the title of the book or journal from which it was taken (if relevant), the publisher, and the year of publication;
    • the topic or subject of the piecefor example, “The Triangle Shirt-Waist Fire” or “Revitalization efforts underway in Roxbury’s Codman Square.” In other words, tell what the piece is about in a word or a phrase.
    • Ex? In-class.

    3. What is Cultural Relativism? How does the movie relate?

    • Explaining Cultural Relativism, the argument(s), give elaborations in terms of the movie, and how does CR arise in different circumstances in the movie?
      • You should be using scenes from the movie and class materials (books, lectures, etc…) to explain what CR is, including the argument(s) for it.
      • You should be citing class materials and quoting when appropriate (from both the book and the movie).
      • Give examples that parallel the scenes in the movie to back up your interpretive analysis.
      • Ex. ? In-class.

    4. .Thought Prompts/Analysis/Personal Response

    You will be choosing a side: Pro Relativism or Pro Universalism (weak or strong).

    Goal: You should be writing about your naive* views as they relate to the possibility of a universal morality versus a relativistic model. You should use the movie as an entry point.

    *Naive? Let’s talk about it….

    I have listed a few questions below that should help you think about the case you want to make and how to relate it back to the movie. You should be connecting our discussion about cultural relativism (esp, the cultural differences argument [ie, the argument for CR) and criticisms of CR) with the themes and ideas in the movie. The questions below are NOT the writing prompts for this assignment. They are meant to get you brainstorming.

    +What goals does the United Nations pursue? When, if at all, is UN intervention or involvement morally permissible?

    +Tatsi tells her husband (scene 17, roughly 1:20:24 into the film): “You are a good man, Paul Rusesabagina.” Does she mean he is a good Hutu? If not (or if not merely that), what does it mean to be a (morally) good person?

    +How do you react to the piece on a (moral) personal level? Why?

    +How does the piece relate to your experience or your own “naive” moral perspective?

    +what questions does the piece raise for you — about the material, about other things?

    +does the piece remind you of other readings you’ve done for the class? compare and contrast the piece to those readings.

    Class material to cite could be from:

    Videos talked about in class:

    Vice- Wife Kidnapping

    Honor Killing:

  • Gender Similarities and Differences in Correctional Staff Wo…

    Guiding questions for Gender Similarities and Differences in Correctional Staff Work Attitudesand Perceptions of the Work Environment.
    1. What are the two theoretical models that are commonly used to guide research on genderdifferences among correctional officers?
    2. What was the authors general conclusion regarding research on gender differences incorrectional staff work attitudes and perceptions?
    3. What did the authors conclude in their study? Were there gender differences betweenstaff work attitudes and perceptions in correctional staff?

    Increasing Numbers of Female Correctional Officers: Benefits and Challenges

    Watch this video that discusses female correctional officers ()

    Suppose our goal was to increase the number of female correctional officers in male prisons

    What issues stand out to you regarding challenges of being a female correctional officer that might make this goal difficult?

    Respond to at least 1 other student by Friday, March 6th at 11:59 p.m.

    Start a New Thread

    Sort by: