Category: Law

Purpose: This assignment is meant to give you an opportunity to develop and articulate your view of critical issues in law and society. In other words, I want you to show me your perspective, and I encourage you to develop your ideas and opinions. However, your opinion must be grounded in scholarly research, and you must engage with evidence or arguments both in favor and against your perspective.

Essay Options

Option 1: Argue to uphold or overturn a major supreme court case

This semester we have learned about dozens of important court decisions that have shaped our understanding of law and society. In some instances, weve learned about the court issuing a ruling at one time, and then reversing itself years later as facts, circumstances, or politics change. Take an existing court ruling, one that is standing as law today, and either argue for or against overturning it.

Option 2: Argue for or against amending the constitution

This semester we have taken a brief look at American constitutional history, including moments of constitutional expansion (ie: the reconstruction amendments), and the ways that courts have changed their interpretation of the Constitutions amendments. Now, as we approach the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence, it is worth considering whether the constitution should be changed, either by editing an existing Amendment, or adding a new one.

Option 3: Identify a violation of the rule of law and how the Rule of Law can be strengthened

Return to our week 1 discussion of Paul Gowders 3 pillars of the rule of law: regularity, publicity, and generality. Do you see areas of the law where one of these elements of the rule of law is being violated today? Identify the violation, what may be causing it, and what it might take to repair this violation and strengthen the rule of law.

Guidelines for all essay options:

Structure and Requirements: Your essay should have an introduction, conclusion, and 3 main body elements. In the body of your essay, you should develop 2 arguments for your position and engage with 1 strong argument against your position. When you engage with the counter-argument, explain that perspective fully and then explain why your perspective remains stronger. Reference the elephant in the room.

Length and formatting: Your essay should be a minimum of 4 pages long, though 5 pages is encouraged. Use Times New Roman, 12pt font, double spaced, with 1-inch margins. You may either place citations on the last page or in footnotes.

Scholarly engagement and citations: Do not use Chat-GPT, Grammarly, or other AI programs. You must cite at least 3 sources (one per major body section), but are encouraged to cite more. They must all be external sources, not the casebook, lecture, or assigned readings (these are acceptable to reference but dont count towards your citation total). Cite academic sources – peer reviewed scholarly journal articles or books published by academic presses. Do not use History.com, Encyclopedia Brittanica, etc., as a citation. I should be able to locate your citations through a search on google scholar.

Purpose: This assignment is meant to give you an opportunity to develop and articulate your view of critical issues in law and society. In other words, I want you to show me your perspective, and I encourage you to develop your ideas and opinions. However, your opinion must be grounded in scholarly research, and you must engage with evidence or arguments both in favor and against your perspective.

Essay Options

Option 1: Argue to uphold or overturn a major supreme court case

This semester we have learned about dozens of important court decisions that have shaped our understanding of law and society. In some instances, weve learned about the court issuing a ruling at one time, and then reversing itself years later as facts, circumstances, or politics change. Take an existing court ruling, one that is standing as law today, and either argue for or against overturning it.

Option 2: Argue for or against amending the constitution

This semester we have taken a brief look at American constitutional history, including moments of constitutional expansion (ie: the reconstruction amendments), and the ways that courts have changed their interpretation of the Constitutions amendments. Now, as we approach the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence, it is worth considering whether the constitution should be changed, either by editing an existing Amendment, or adding a new one.

Option 3: Identify a violation of the rule of law and how the Rule of Law can be strengthened

Return to our week 1 discussion of Paul Gowders 3 pillars of the rule of law: regularity, publicity, and generality. Do you see areas of the law where one of these elements of the rule of law is being violated today? Identify the violation, what may be causing it, and what it might take to repair this violation and strengthen the rule of law.

Guidelines for all essay options:

Structure and Requirements: Your essay should have an introduction, conclusion, and 3 main body elements. In the body of your essay, you should develop 2 arguments for your position and engage with 1 strong argument against your position. When you engage with the counter-argument, explain that perspective fully and then explain why your perspective remains stronger. Reference the elephant in the room.

Length and formatting: Your essay should be a minimum of 4 pages long, though 5 pages is encouraged. Use Times New Roman, 12pt font, double spaced, with 1-inch margins. You may either place citations on the last page or in footnotes.

Scholarly engagement and citations: Do not use Chat-GPT, Grammarly, or other AI programs. You must cite at least 3 sources (one per major body section), but are encouraged to cite more. They must all be external sources, not the casebook, lecture, or assigned readings (these are acceptable to reference but dont count towards your citation total). Cite academic sources – peer reviewed scholarly journal articles or books published by academic presses. Do not use History.com, Encyclopedia Brittanica, etc., as a citation. I should be able to locate your citations through a search on google scholar.

Use this link for some of the vocab

Why not selling notes this website

Instructions:

1. Students will individually answer questions related to Part VII (7).

2. You will use the slides and videos to help you. However, you will also have to do a little bit of online research to find out the answers to some of the questions.

3. Students will use the inline-text function to enter a response. No other formats will be accepted.

Do not copy and paste answers!

Any violations of academic integrity, to include assignment misconduct will carry penalties to include the instructor granting a ZERO for the assignment.

Students will answer the following questions:

1. In your own words, what is a monarchy? [.1 pt]
2. Give four (4) examples of a monarchy: [.2 pts]
3. In your own words, what is an absolute monarchy? State the features [.1 pt]
4. Give four (4) examples of an absolute monarchy – [you cannot use answers previously used]: [.2 pts]
5. In your own words, what is a constitutional monarchy? State the features [.1 pt]
6. Give four (4) examples of a constitutional monarchy – [you cannot use answers previously used]: [.2 pts]
7. In your own words, what is a unitary form of government? State the features. [.1 pt]
8. Give four (4) examples of a unitary government – [you cannot use answers previously used]: [.2 pts]
9. In your own words, what is a federal form of government? State the features. [.1 pt]
10. Give four (4) examples of a federal government [.2 pts]
11. Can a country have an official name / a formal name, yet not officially function / work like its formal name says? [.1 pt]
12. Give two (2) examples of a country not functioning / working like its formal name says. [.2 pts]
13. In your own words, what is a republic? [.1 pt]
14. Give one (1) example of a republic – [you cannot use answers previously used] [.1 pt]

Instructions:

1. Answer questions related to the Property Law unit.

Any violations of academic integrity, to include assignment misconduct will carry penalties to include the instructor granting a ZERO for the assignment.

Answer the following questions in the inline text function:

1. In your own words, how would you describe the Torrens System? [.13 pt.]
2. Name two (2) countries that uses the Torrens system: [.13 pt.]
3. In your own words, how would you define a mortgage? [.14 pt.]
4. Where does someone ordinarily get a mortgage? What are the names of the mortgaging parties? [.13 pt.]
5. What is a freehold estate? [.13 pt.]
6. Name two (2) examples discussed in class. [.14 pt.]
7. What is a leasehold estate? [.13 pt.]
8. Name two (2) examples used of a leasehold estate discussed in class. [.13 pt.]
9. In your own words, how would you define ownership in a life estate? [.14 pt.]
10. At Common-Law, what are two (2) forms of life estate discussed in class? [.13 pt.]
11. What is a limitation of a life estate at Common-Law? [.13 pt.]
12. What is a servitude? [.14 pt.]
13. Does KSA have its own version of profits? If so, what is the name? [.13 pt.]
14. Does KSA use easements? If so, name two (2) purposes. [.14 pt.]
15. How does a property get attached with a servitude? [.13 pt.]

Attached is the official simulation prompt and a google document summing up what is expected and what the requirements are. Please refer to both to complete the assignment.

Why not selling notes this website

apa pengertian hukum, sebutkan fungsi hukum,dan jelaskan jenis-jenis hukum

I am completing a project that requires that I create a new or altered amendment to the United States Constitution. I want to create something like the Utah SEDI (State Endorsed Digital Identity) that would put in place an individual’s rights to creating and controlling their own digital identity with federal endorsement and protections. It would include things like a right to paper (every citizen has a right to have a purely paper identity and no digital identity), a right to ‘disappear’ and delete their digital presence, and data limitations on what data a company can hold about a person. It would focus on protecting individuals- especially children and others who are at higher risk to digital abuses.

I am unsure how I would write this into the US constitution/where. It needs to be legally written and defensible. I need to find supporting court cases or real world instances where these constitutional protections could have helped/prevented. I am able to find these court cases myself, but I am not opposed to any additional ones. I mainly need to figure out how to successfully hypothetically write this into the US federal constitution. If I could get pointers, examples, tips, and/or outlines- it would be greatly appreciated.