Bright Academic Experts

Category: Law

  • generate an AI case note then critically analyse while expla…

    The total word count is 3,500 + 10% divided in the following way:

    1. Case Note represents 2,500 words + 10% excluding footnotes, appendices, and bibliography.

    2. Blog representing 1000 words + 10% excluding footnotes, appendices, and bibliography

    Demonstrate a detailed and analytical knowledge and understanding of the legal principles and awareness of the established concepts and competing ideas within European Union Law.

    you will need to mention which AI u used and how u used it for the AI generated case note that you are analysing.

    LO3. Analytically apply knowledge to problems, construct legal arguments and propose solutions to problems arising from that analysis within European Union Law.

    LO4. Analyse a range of authoritative and reliable materials, including primary legal sources and academic commentary, relevant to European Union Law

    .

    L05. Effectively tailor communication of European Union Law to a variety of audiences in writing The assessment contains two components:

    1. Produce notes for a case note on Case C200/02 Zhu and Chen You will need to critically analyze an AI generated case note.

    This case consists of two parts. First the Advocate Generals Opinion and second, the Judgment of the Court. Your task is to consider the AI produced case note from which you will develop you own ideas/notes.

    2. Write a blog on Case C-200/02 Zhu and Chen.. The blog should be on an aspect of the case that your solicitors firm feels is important. The audience need not be legally trained

    Case Note: A case note is an analysis and overview of a legal case, and it typically has two parts: a case summary and a case analysis:

    1.Case summary- A description of the case’s facts, legal reasoning, and procedural history.

    2.Case analysis-An analysis that discusses the case’s legal implications and impact or the development of one aspect of the case.

    The primary aim of a case note is to critically analyse a particular opinion and decision and the effect it has on the law. Critically analyse can be a confusing phrase, so considering some of the following questions may be a useful starting point:

  • Is the logic of the opinion/judgment sound? Do you agree with it? Why or why not.
  • Does the opinion/judgment differ from or depart from previous decisions?
  • How does the judgment compare with EU/international precedent?
  • Does the judgment reflect political/economic/cultural tensions?
  • Does the judgment fail to acknowledge any legal or extra legal repercussions it may have?
  • Has the judgment failed to address any important questions?
  • Do you agree with the decision? Why?

    • Blog

    1. Choose one issue from the case which you feel is worth communicating.

    2. Choose an audience for your blog, e.g. professionals, students, interested parties.

    3. Decide what information you wish to impartwhat are you saying and why, is it clear, will your audience understand and why they should read it?

    4. Will this be a one-off blog or will it be part of a series of blogs on the case/similar cases.

    5. Determine how your blog will lookjust text or photographs, chats etc

  • generate an AI case note then critically analyse while expla…

    The total word count is 3,500 + 10% divided in the following way:

    1. Case Note represents 2,500 words + 10% excluding footnotes, appendices, and bibliography.

    2. Blog representing 1000 words + 10% excluding footnotes, appendices, and bibliography

    Demonstrate a detailed and analytical knowledge and understanding

    of the legal principles and awareness of the established concepts and

    competing ideas within European Union Law.

    LO3. Analytically apply knowledge to problems, construct legal arguments and propose solutions to problems arising from that analysis within European Union Law.

    LO4. Analyse a range of authoritative and reliable materials, including primary legal sources and academic commentary, relevant to European Union Law

    .

    L05. Effectively tailor communication of European Union Law to a variety of audiences in writing The assessment contains two components:

    1. Produce notes for a case note on Case C200/02 Zhu and Chen You will need to critically analyze an AI generated case note.

    This case consists of two parts. First the Advocate Generals Opinion and second, the Judgment of the Court. Your task is to consider the AI produced case note from which you will develop you own ideas/notes.

    2. Write a blog on Case C-200/02 Zhu and Chen.. The blog should be on an aspect of the case that your solicitors firm feels is important. The audience need not be legally trained

    Case Note: A case note is an analysis and overview of a legal case, and it typically has two parts: a case summary and a case analysis:

    1.Case summary- A description of the case’s facts, legal reasoning, and procedural history.

    2.Case analysis-An analysis that discusses the case’s legal implications and impact or the development of one aspect of the case.

    The primary aim of a case note is to critically analyse a particular opinion and decision and the effect it has on the law. Critically analyse can be a confusing phrase, so considering some of the following questions may be a useful starting point:

  • Is the logic of the opinion/judgment sound? Do you agree with it? Why or why not.
  • Does the opinion/judgment differ from or depart from previous decisions?
  • How does the judgment compare with EU/international precedent?
  • Does the judgment reflect political/economic/cultural tensions?
  • Does the judgment fail to acknowledge any legal or extra legal repercussions it may have?
  • Has the judgment failed to address any important questions?
  • Do you agree with the decision? Why?

    • Blog

    1. Choose one issue from the case which you feel is worth communicating.

    2. Choose an audience for your blog, e.g. professionals, students, interested parties.

    3. Decide what information you wish to impartwhat are you saying and why, is it clear, will your audience understand and why they should read it?

    4. Will this be a one-off blog or will it be part of a series of blogs on the case/similar cases.

    5. Determine how your blog will lookjust text or photographs, chats etc

  • Chapter 4 Discussion – Larissa Schuster – What If?

    Chapter 4 Discussion – Larissa Schuster – What If?

    Larissa Schuster – What If?

    Read the case of Larissa Schuster:

    Which actions contributed to her and her accomplice, James Fagone, convictions and eventual sentencing? What actions could have led to different to receive a lenient charge and lesser charge.

    Discussion:

    You must respond and post to receive full credit.

    Your post must be 300 words or more, you must respond to two colleagues (150 words or more).

    NO AI, PLAG REPORT OF ABOVE 5% RECEIVES ZERO.

    bOOK HERE

  • Chapter 4 – HOMICIDE, PROXIMATE CAUSE, AND LARISSA SHUSTER A…

    Chapter 4 – HOMICIDE, PROXIMATE CAUSE, AND LARISSA SHUSTER A! Generation

    Book pdf here

    Chapter 4

    Read the chapter for clarity to respond to the following scenario and using AI:

    1) Create a scenario which illustrates the Felony Murder Rule.

    2) Create a scenario which illustrates First Degree Murder.

    3) Create a scenario which illustrates Second Degree Murder.

    4) Create a scenario which illustrates Manslaughter

    5) Create a scenario which illustrates Justifiable Homicide.

    Criteria:

    Identify List AI Generator

    Date Created and website in references

    Must be in APA format

    APA Format Cover Sheet & Reference Page

  • business law question

    Note: You must post to the discussion board in order to view your classmates posts. A grading rubric is attached assist students in criteria for effective discussion postings.

    Discussion Introduction:

    For all business owners, the protection of the legal property rights held by the company is critical. As business becomes more global in virtually all aspects, the nation-state-based laws protecting property ownership are constantly under assault. In this discussion we will review more the underlying principles of property ownership and how the law formulates protection of those rights.

    Instructions and points:

    Property Ownership- Legal Protections

    Scenario: ML Genius Holdings, LLC, which operates an internet platform on which music fans post transcribed song lyrics, sued LyricFind for allegedly misappropriating those transcriptions from Genius platform and Google for displaying those transcriptions in response to internet searches for a particular song. Notably, Genius did not claim infringement of the underlying lyrics, because it does not hold the copyright to those lyrics. Genius claimed that it used a complex system of watermarking to determine that Google was in fact displaying the lyrics from Genius website. Genius asserted claims for breach of contract, indemnification, unfair competition and unjust enrichment.

    PART 1: Students Post

    Please provide typed responses submitted in Brightspace Module Discussion. Address each question and answer in complete sentences. Be sure to answer all parts of each question. You may need to refer to your textbook, the Internet and other resources in order to fully address the questions.

    Based on the above scenario please fully answer following questions:

    What are the most effective legal arguments based upon intellectual property law that supports Genius Holdings, LLC’s position. Fully explain your reasoning.

    What are the most effective legal arguments based upon intellectual property law that supports Google’s position. Fully explain your reasoning.

    What additional information would you need or like to know in order to support one party or the other?

    PART 2: Peer Responses

    Please read your classmates’ postings and respond to at least TWO of them. There is a required minimum of 3 sentences or more per response. This is how we generate discussion in the on-line environment.

    Your aim is to add value to the discussion. Responses such as “Good answer,” or “I agree” will not be awarded credit.

    Be sure that your primary post and your two peer responses are grammatically correct and are written in complete sentences. Therefore, check to make sure that you use proper grammar, initialization and a professional tone in all of your postings.

    PART 3: Sources and Citations

    In order to explore the broader world and current setting for class concepts and academic questions, students are required to conduct independent outside research in order to complete each discussion and assignment.

    In a professional and academic setting it is always important to give credit to your sources. Moreover, it helps prevent allegations of plagiarism or academic dishonesty. It reminds students of where they got information and helps to return to it later. Citing sources is important not only for direct quotes, paraphrasing and ideas, but as reference to resources and general background to a topic. Also, it adds to your credibility in demonstrating research and support for your ideas and conclusions.

    If I have seen further than others, it is by standing upon the shoulders of giants. Isaac Newton Source: that we are “discovering truth by building on previous discoveries.” Source:

    Newton, Issac. Isaac Newton Quotes. BrainyQuote, www.brainyquote.com/quotes/isaac_newton_135885. Accessed 6 Jan. 2022.

    Wikipedia Contributors. Standing on the Shoulders of Giants. Wikipedia, 19 Nov. 2021, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standing_on_the_shoulders_of_giants.

    Be sure to include at least three citations and/or links to all sources in APA formats.

    Sources Cited: 3 sources required

  • SWK-625 Evidence Based Practice

    Social workers need to understand that one evidence-based practice intervention is not always a one-size-fits-all approach. However, for this assignment, you will be challenged to research one evidence-based intervention of your choosing that is appropriately aligned with the substance use disorder you are focusing on.

    Using the assigned readings and videos for this topic, identify ONE substance use disorder and identify ONE evidence-based practice intervention.

    Create an infographic that includes the following:

    • Briefly describe the main components of the evidence-based practice intervention across the micro, mezzo, and macro levels of social work.
    • Explain what impact the intervention has on the micro, mezzo, and macro levels.
    • Assess how applicable this intervention may be with diverse communities. Support the information in your infographic.
    • Briefly explain how a major life event like the pandemic could lead to substance use disorder.
    • Briefly describe the professional and personal implications for social workers.
    • Cite the resources that you used to create the infographic.

    Infographic Assignment Guidelines:

    To design your infographic, use the templates in Microsoft Office Publisher, Canva, or any alternative word processing program. If you do not have these programs, you can use the online template resources on the Word Automation website. Omit/delete items on templates that do not pertain to the assignment criterion. Keep in mind that only .doc, .docx, .eps, .htm, .pdf, .rtf, .txt, or .wpd files are accepted, with file size not to exceed 40 MB.

    While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

    This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

    You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

    This assignment is informed by the following EPAS Standards:

    4: Engage In Practice-informed Research and Research-informed Practice

    5: Evaluate with Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities

  • law study material

    Law study material and labour

  • Law Question

    This assignment is continuation of the exploration of Lynn Hunts (2007) claim about the role of reading
    novels (or autobiographies and life stories) in developing a deep understanding of human rights and
    social justice. You are required to select and read one of four books this term and reflect on how the
    topic of the book relates to human rights and social justice issues.


    feedback from proposal attached please take into consideration and change accordingly


  • Law Question

    Attached are instructions

  • Law Question

    BOOK REVIEW ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS

    OVERVIEW

    Objectively reviewing the work of others is an invaluable skill for future scholars. Writing a

    critical assessment of a scholarly book allows you to practice objectively critiquing the work of

    others and helps you become a more engaged and critical scholar.

    The goal of every scholar is to publish peer-reviewed work. The skills necessary to review and

    critique anothers work form the foundation upon which you will build your own written and

    analytical skills.

    Before you begin writing your review, read the book in its entirety and take notes as you read.

    Note the key themes of the book, the authors stated purpose in writing the book, and any other

    key information about the book that is relevant to your review. Be sure to include page numbers

    in your notes so you can easily go back to the relevant sections as you write.

    INSTRUCTIONS

    In this Book Review Assignment, you will critically assess one academic book related to Public

    Policy from the books list provided to you. Your Book Review Assignment should:

  • Include an opening statement that peaks the readers interest in the book under review;
  • Identify the central thesis of the book;
  • Assess the main themes of the book;
  • Explain any methods used to support the themes of the book;

    • o State whether the method is quantitative or qualitative and give a brief

    explanation of the methodological approach.

  • Explain and evaluate the conclusions drawn by the books author(s);

    • o Assess whether the conclusions drawn seem sound based on the data they present.

    o Identify any weaknesses or oversights of the book.

  • Evaluate the books place within the field of public policy.

    • o how does the book build upon or fit within the public policy themes you have

    studied so far in this course?

    o Provide specific examples and citations from course readings to support your

    evaluation.

    Your Book Review Assignment should be presented in current APA format. It should be 1,500

    to 2,000 words in length, not including title page, footnotes/endnotes, abstract, or bibliography. It

    should avoid long, block quotes of the book and summarize key themes in your own words