Category: Mechanical Engineering

  • Laboratory #2 Technical Report

    Ill send the filled out work sheet

    Overview

    Your individual Technical Report should address the objectives of Laboratory #2. It should presentthe data collected and calculated and provide an interpretation of the results.Your analysis should focus on the comparison between the experimental values of friction factor andthe corresponding theoretical predictions (also represented graphically in the Moody Chart) for thelaminar, transitional and turbulent flow regimes this type of approach is often used to experimentallyvalidate modelling techniques.In this exercise, you should demonstrate your analytical and communication skills with a clear andsuccinct presentation of technical content to disseminate engineering knowledge.

    Assessment

    The Technical Report is worth 50% of the Laboratory Portfolio.

    Please refer to the rubric in the Assessment and Feedback Specification available on BlackBoard forthe expectations, the Engineers Australia Stage 1 competencies to be demonstrated and the criteriaused for marking Technical Reports.

    Figure presentation

    These guidelines must be followed when preparing the two required graphs:

  • Figures should be large enough and of sufficient resolution for details to be discernible.
  • Anytext within the figures should be large enough to be legible.
  • Figures should have a caption including a relevant description.
  • Axes should be labelled appropriately.
  • Figures should include a legend when necessary.
  • Figures should only include a title if it provides information not appearing anywhere else (i.e. a title
  • restating the caption or the axes labels is superfluous).

  • Data points should be represented by markers, which may be connected by a dashed or dotted line
  • (original data points may need to be reordered to avoid the line to cross itself).

  • Data-fitting curves should only be included if they provide relevant information that can be used to
  • support discussion points.

    For the graph showing the pressure gradient against the mean velocity of the flow:

  • Data points should be plotted as three different sets corresponding to the three flow regimes.
  • Alinear scale should be used for both axes.
  • For the graph showing the friction factor against the Reynolds number:

  • Datapoints should be plotted as three different sets corresponding to the experimental data, laminar
  • predictions and turbulent predictions.

  • Alogscale should be used for both axes.
  • the regions corresponding to the three flow regimes should be indicated in the graphFormatting and Structure
  • The Technical Report must be prepared using the template available on BlackBoard and must

    include the following sections:

    Experimental Data: Report in the table the experimental data collected during Laboratory#2 session.

    Calculated Data: Report in the table the processed data and corresponding predictions. Additional

    data (e.g. relative error) may be included in this table to support discussion points in the Analysis

    and Interpretation section.

    Sample Calculations: Provide the steps showing how the processed data and corresponding predictions were obtained for one of the water manometer tests corresponding to the laminar flow regime; an one of the mercury manometer tests corresponding to the turbulent flow regime.

    Graphs: Provide the two required graphs pressure gradient against mean velocity of the flow; and friction factor against Reynolds number.

    Analysis and Interpretation: For each subsection, address the following points (200~250 words for

    each subsection):

    Experimental data: Describe and comment on the variations of pressure gradient with flow velocity and on the variations of experimental friction factor with Reynolds number for the different flow regimes. Compare and comment on the trends in the two graphs (dimensional and non-dimensional).

    Experimental validation: Comparetheexperimentalvaluesoffrictionfactorandthecorrespond ing theoretical predictions for the different flow regimes. Comment on the agreement between experimental and theoretical values, and discuss possible discrepancies.

    Describe possible

    sources of errors and propose alternatives that may improve the quality of the measurements.

    Critical reflection: Provide a brief critical analysis of the work conducted and how the objectives

    were addressed. Comment on the outcomes of the study and their significance in a broader

    context.

    Submission

    The Technical Report must be submitted through Turnitin using the submission link available on the

    Laboratory #2 page on BlackBoard.

    As indicated in the unit outline, late submission is NOT permitted for this assessment item. Please

    make sure to leave plenty of time to submit your report through Turnitin before the due date and time.

    Allow time for any unexpected technical issues.

    Due date and time for the Technical Report submission:

    2 teaching weeks after the date of the Laboratory #2 session attended 11:59pm (AWST)

    Refer to the Laboratory Schedule available on BlackBoard for the exact due date of your group

  • Laboratory #2 Technical Report

    Ill send the filled out work sheet

    Overview

    Your individual Technical Report should address the objectives of Laboratory #2. It should presentthe data collected and calculated and provide an interpretation of the results.Your analysis should focus on the comparison between the experimental values of friction factor andthe corresponding theoretical predictions (also represented graphically in the Moody Chart) for thelaminar, transitional and turbulent flow regimes this type of approach is often used to experimentallyvalidate modelling techniques.In this exercise, you should demonstrate your analytical and communication skills with a clear andsuccinct presentation of technical content to disseminate engineering knowledge.

    Assessment

    The Technical Report is worth 50% of the Laboratory Portfolio.

    Please refer to the rubric in the Assessment and Feedback Specification available on BlackBoard forthe expectations, the Engineers Australia Stage 1 competencies to be demonstrated and the criteriaused for marking Technical Reports.

    Figure presentation

    These guidelines must be followed when preparing the two required graphs:

  • Figures should be large enough and of sufficient resolution for details to be discernible.
  • Anytext within the figures should be large enough to be legible.
  • Figures should have a caption including a relevant description.
  • Axes should be labelled appropriately.
  • Figures should include a legend when necessary.
  • Figures should only include a title if it provides information not appearing anywhere else (i.e. a title
  • restating the caption or the axes labels is superfluous).

  • Data points should be represented by markers, which may be connected by a dashed or dotted line
  • (original data points may need to be reordered to avoid the line to cross itself).

  • Data-fitting curves should only be included if they provide relevant information that can be used to
  • support discussion points.

    For the graph showing the pressure gradient against the mean velocity of the flow:

  • Data points should be plotted as three different sets corresponding to the three flow regimes.
  • Alinear scale should be used for both axes.
  • For the graph showing the friction factor against the Reynolds number:

  • Datapoints should be plotted as three different sets corresponding to the experimental data, laminar
  • predictions and turbulent predictions.

  • Alogscale should be used for both axes.
  • the regions corresponding to the three flow regimes should be indicated in the graphFormatting and Structure
  • The Technical Report must be prepared using the template available on BlackBoard and must

    include the following sections:

    Experimental Data: Report in the table the experimental data collected during Laboratory#2 session.

    Calculated Data: Report in the table the processed data and corresponding predictions. Additional

    data (e.g. relative error) may be included in this table to support discussion points in the Analysis

    and Interpretation section.

    Sample Calculations: Provide the steps showing how the processed data and corresponding predictions were obtained for one of the water manometer tests corresponding to the laminar flow regime; an one of the mercury manometer tests corresponding to the turbulent flow regime.

    Graphs: Provide the two required graphs pressure gradient against mean velocity of the flow; and friction factor against Reynolds number.

    Analysis and Interpretation: For each subsection, address the following points (200~250 words for

    each subsection):

    Experimental data: Describe and comment on the variations of pressure gradient with flow velocity and on the variations of experimental friction factor with Reynolds number for the different flow regimes. Compare and comment on the trends in the two graphs (dimensional and non-dimensional).

    Experimental validation: Comparetheexperimentalvaluesoffrictionfactorandthecorrespond ing theoretical predictions for the different flow regimes. Comment on the agreement between experimental and theoretical values, and discuss possible discrepancies.

    Describe possible

    sources of errors and propose alternatives that may improve the quality of the measurements.

    Critical reflection: Provide a brief critical analysis of the work conducted and how the objectives

    were addressed. Comment on the outcomes of the study and their significance in a broader

    context.

    Submission

    The Technical Report must be submitted through Turnitin using the submission link available on the

    Laboratory #2 page on BlackBoard.

    As indicated in the unit outline, late submission is NOT permitted for this assessment item. Please

    make sure to leave plenty of time to submit your report through Turnitin before the due date and time.

    Allow time for any unexpected technical issues.

    Due date and time for the Technical Report submission:

    2 teaching weeks after the date of the Laboratory #2 session attended 11:59pm (AWST)

    Refer to the Laboratory Schedule available on BlackBoard for the exact due date of your group

  • 784 – ANSYS STRESS .

    Assignment Execution Instructions Stress Analysis (MECH0018.1)

    Student Name: BASHAR ISSA SALIM ABDULLAH AL AGHBARI

    You are required to complete the full lab portfolio assignment using ANSYS Mechanical APDL R1 2026. The work must be accurate, complete, and professionally presented, including all required simulation files.

    ## General Requirements

    – Use ANSYS Mechanical APDL 2026 R1 only

    – Provide step-by-step modeling with clear screenshots

    – All results must be explained and justified

    – Submit a complete Word report

    – Include all ANSYS software files

    – Use consistent units (mm, N, MPa)

    ## Task 1: Stress Concentration Analysis

    ### Student Data:

    – A = 135 mm

    – B = 115 mm

    – C = 85 mm

    – D = 75 mm

    – E = 85 mm

    – F = 42 mm

    ### Model Setup:

    – Plate with hole (as per assignment figure)

    – Load = 70 kN (tensile)

    – Thickness = 15 mm

    – Material:

    – E = 210 10 N/mm

    – = 0.29

    – Element Type: PLANE183

    – Plane stress with thickness

    ### Required Work:

    A. Define and explain PLANE183 element

    B. Compute deformation:

    – With hole

    – Without hole

    Provide comparison with figures

    C. Mesh Sensitivity Analysis:

    – Coarse mesh

    – Medium mesh

    – Fine mesh

    Select optimum mesh and justify

    D. Determine maximum stress at:

    – Section 1

    – Section 2

    – Section 3

    E. Calculate Stress Concentration Factor (Kt)

    F. Thickness Study:

    Repeat analysis for:

    – 20 mm

    – 25 mm

    – 30 mm

    Compare results

    G. Fillet Analysis:

    Add fillet and compare stress with and without fillet

    ## Task 2: Buckling Analysis

    ### Student Data:

    – L1 = 130 mm

    – L2 = 110 mm

    – Force = 14 kN

    – I-Beam = W200 22

    – Number of Modes = 6

    ### Model Setup:

    – Element Type: BEAM188

    – Material:

    – EX = 210e6

    – PRXY = 0.27

    – Density = 7.8e-9

    – Number of elements per line = 30

    ### Required Work:

    – Perform buckling analysis

    – Extract 6 modes

    ### Results:

    For each mode:

    – Deformation at points a, b, c

    – In directions X, Y, Z

    – Fill the required table completely

    ## Task 3: Fracture Mechanics Analysis

    ### Student Data:

    – Crack length (a) = 0.015 m

    – Plate width (b) = 0.15 m

    – Applied stress = 115 MPa

    ### Model Setup:

    – Material:

    – E = 180 GPa

    – = 0.3

    – Use PLANE183 and quarter-point crack-tip elements (PLANE82)

    ### Required Work:

    A. Stress Intensity Factor (SIF)

    1. Analytical solution

    2. ANSYS solution

    3. Compare results

    4. Calculate percentage error

    B. Crack Length Study

    Increase crack length three times:

    – 0.025 m

    – 0.035 m

    – 0.045 m

    Provide table and discussion

    C. Stress vs SIF

    – Use stress values from 120 MPa to 240 MPa (increment 20 MPa)

    – Plot SIF vs stress

    – Determine maximum allowable stress using KIC = 23

    – Repeat for semi-circular crack

    ## Required ANSYS Files

    You must submit all software files:

    For each task:

    – .db

    – .rst

    – .log

    – .inp or APDL command files

    – Any macros used

    Folder structure:

    – Task1_Bashar

    – Task2_Bashar

    – Task3_Bashar

    ## Report Structure

    The report must include:

    1. Title Page

    2. Table of Contents

    3. Introduction

    4. Methodology with screenshots

    5. Results (tables and figures)

    6. Discussion

    7. Conclusion

    8. References (APA style)

    ## Important Notes

    – All work must be original

    – No copy-paste

    – Every step must be documented

    – Results must be logically explained

    ## Final Deliverables

    1. Complete Word report

    2. All ANSYS APDL files

    3. Screenshots of modeling steps and results

    4. Graphs and tables

    Complete all tasks with high accuracy and professional presentation.

  • 383 – CFD – FEA

    You are required to complete the Computational Methods coursework (CFD & FEA) using ANSYS software and prepare a professional technical report. All work must be carried out individually.

    ## 1. Student Information

    Student ID: 202411578

    From this ID:

    – A = 8

    – B = 7

    – E = 78 GPa

    – P = 8 GPa

    ## 2. CFD Assignment

    ### Task 1: Flow Through a Bifurcated Tube

    You are required to analyse water flow through a Y-shaped tube using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD).

    #### Geometry:

    – Inlet diameter = 2A = 16 cm

    – Outlet diameters = A = 8 cm each

    – Element size = 0.00BA = 0.0078 m

    #### Requirements:

    1. Build the geometry in ANSYS.

    2. Generate a mesh with the specified element size.

    3. Apply appropriate boundary conditions:

    – Velocity inlet

    – Pressure outlets

    4. Perform simulations for:

    – Laminar flow

    – Turbulent flow

    #### Analysis:

    – Determine Reynolds number.

    – Compare CFD results with theoretical and empirical data.

    – Select a turbulence model (e.g., k- or k-) and clearly state its assumptions.

    – (Optional for higher marks) Compare multiple turbulence models.

    – Use flow conditions different from tutorial examples.

    #### Outputs:

    – Velocity contours

    – Pressure contours

    – Flow distribution

    – Discussion of discrepancies and possible sources of error

    ### Task 2: Laminar Flow in a Nozzle

    You are required to model laminar flow through a sinusoidal nozzle.

    #### Given:

    – Inlet height = 0.2 m

    – Flow area reduction = 20%

    #### Requirements:

    1. Create the nozzle geometry in ANSYS.

    2. Apply laminar flow conditions.

    3. Use multiple mesh sizes to demonstrate mesh independence.

    4. Compare CFD results with classical theory:

    – Parabolic velocity profile

    – Entrance length

    – Pressure drop per unit length

    #### Outputs:

    – Velocity profile plots

    – Pressure distribution

    – Mesh comparison results

    ## 3. FEA Assignment

    ### Task 1: Tunnel Under

    You are required to analyse a concrete tunnel under external pressure using ANSYS Workbench.

    #### Material Properties:

    – Youngs Modulus = 78 GPa

    – Poissons Ratio = 0.15

    #### Loading:

    – External pressure = 8 GPa

    #### Boundary Condition:

    – Bottom of the tunnel is fixed

    #### Requirements:

    1. Model the geometry based on Figure 1.

    2. Apply material properties and loading.

    3. Perform structural analysis.

    #### Outputs:

    – Maximum deformation

    – Maximum von Mises stress

    – Stress distribution plots

    ### Task 2: Truss Bridge Analysis

    You are required to analyse a planar truss structure.

    #### Material:

    – Youngs Modulus = 78 GPa

    – Poissons Ratio = 0.29

    #### Cross Section:

    – A B = 8 mm 7 mm

    #### Loading:

    – 30 kN applied at specified joints

    #### Requirements:

    1. Model the truss structure in ANSYS.

    2. Apply loads and supports correctly.

    3. Perform structural analysis.

    #### Outputs:

    – Deflection at each joint

    – Structural deformation plot

    ## 4. Report Requirements

    Prepare a professional report (maximum 8 pages) including:

    ### Sections:

    1. Abstract

    2. Introduction

    3. Theory and Methodology

    4. Results and Discussion

    5. Conclusion and Recommendations

    ### Important Notes:

    – Include figures (mesh, contours, results)

    – Compare theoretical vs simulation results

    – Discuss errors and limitations

    – Ensure proper academic writing and structure

    ## 5. Submission Details

    – Format: word

    – Maximum length: 8 pages

    – Submission via Moodle

    Ensure that all simulations are properly validated and results are clearly presented. The work should demonstrate strong understanding of both CFD and FEA principles, along with correct use of ANSYS tools.

    —————————————————————————-

  • Laboratory #2 Technical Report

    Ill send the filled out work sheet

    Overview

    Your individual Technical Report should address the objectives of Laboratory #2. It should presentthe data collected and calculated and provide an interpretation of the results.Your analysis should focus on the comparison between the experimental values of friction factor andthe corresponding theoretical predictions (also represented graphically in the Moody Chart) for thelaminar, transitional and turbulent flow regimes this type of approach is often used to experimentallyvalidate modelling techniques.In this exercise, you should demonstrate your analytical and communication skills with a clear andsuccinct presentation of technical content to disseminate engineering knowledge.

    Assessment

    The Technical Report is worth 50% of the Laboratory Portfolio.

    Please refer to the rubric in the Assessment and Feedback Specification available on BlackBoard forthe expectations, the Engineers Australia Stage 1 competencies to be demonstrated and the criteriaused for marking Technical Reports.

    Figure presentation

    These guidelines must be followed when preparing the two required graphs:

  • Figures should be large enough and of sufficient resolution for details to be discernible.
  • Anytext within the figures should be large enough to be legible.
  • Figures should have a caption including a relevant description.
  • Axes should be labelled appropriately.
  • Figures should include a legend when necessary.
  • Figures should only include a title if it provides information not appearing anywhere else (i.e. a title
  • restating the caption or the axes labels is superfluous).

  • Data points should be represented by markers, which may be connected by a dashed or dotted line
  • (original data points may need to be reordered to avoid the line to cross itself).

  • Data-fitting curves should only be included if they provide relevant information that can be used to
  • support discussion points.

    For the graph showing the pressure gradient against the mean velocity of the flow:

  • Data points should be plotted as three different sets corresponding to the three flow regimes.
  • Alinear scale should be used for both axes.
  • For the graph showing the friction factor against the Reynolds number:

  • Datapoints should be plotted as three different sets corresponding to the experimental data, laminar
  • predictions and turbulent predictions.

  • Alogscale should be used for both axes.
  • the regions corresponding to the three flow regimes should be indicated in the graphFormatting and Structure
  • The Technical Report must be prepared using the template available on BlackBoard and must

    include the following sections:

    Experimental Data: Report in the table the experimental data collected during Laboratory#2 session.

    Calculated Data: Report in the table the processed data and corresponding predictions. Additional

    data (e.g. relative error) may be included in this table to support discussion points in the Analysis

    and Interpretation section.

    Sample Calculations: Provide the steps showing how the processed data and corresponding predictions were obtained for one of the water manometer tests corresponding to the laminar flow regime; an one of the mercury manometer tests corresponding to the turbulent flow regime.

    Graphs: Provide the two required graphs pressure gradient against mean velocity of the flow; and friction factor against Reynolds number.

    Analysis and Interpretation: For each subsection, address the following points (200~250 words for

    each subsection):

    Experimental data: Describe and comment on the variations of pressure gradient with flow velocity and on the variations of experimental friction factor with Reynolds number for the different flow regimes. Compare and comment on the trends in the two graphs (dimensional and non-dimensional).

    Experimental validation: Comparetheexperimentalvaluesoffrictionfactorandthecorrespond ing theoretical predictions for the different flow regimes. Comment on the agreement between experimental and theoretical values, and discuss possible discrepancies.

    Describe possible

    sources of errors and propose alternatives that may improve the quality of the measurements.

    Critical reflection: Provide a brief critical analysis of the work conducted and how the objectives

    were addressed. Comment on the outcomes of the study and their significance in a broader

    context.

    Submission

    The Technical Report must be submitted through Turnitin using the submission link available on the

    Laboratory #2 page on BlackBoard.

    As indicated in the unit outline, late submission is NOT permitted for this assessment item. Please

    make sure to leave plenty of time to submit your report through Turnitin before the due date and time.

    Allow time for any unexpected technical issues.

    Due date and time for the Technical Report submission:

    2 teaching weeks after the date of the Laboratory #2 session attended 11:59pm (AWST)

    Refer to the Laboratory Schedule available on BlackBoard for the exact due date of your group

  • Laboratory #2 Technical Report

    Ill send the filled out work sheet

    Overview

    Your individual Technical Report should address the objectives of Laboratory #2. It should presentthe data collected and calculated and provide an interpretation of the results.Your analysis should focus on the comparison between the experimental values of friction factor andthe corresponding theoretical predictions (also represented graphically in the Moody Chart) for thelaminar, transitional and turbulent flow regimes this type of approach is often used to experimentallyvalidate modelling techniques.In this exercise, you should demonstrate your analytical and communication skills with a clear andsuccinct presentation of technical content to disseminate engineering knowledge.

    Assessment

    The Technical Report is worth 50% of the Laboratory Portfolio.

    Please refer to the rubric in the Assessment and Feedback Specification available on BlackBoard forthe expectations, the Engineers Australia Stage 1 competencies to be demonstrated and the criteriaused for marking Technical Reports.

    Figure presentation

    These guidelines must be followed when preparing the two required graphs:

  • Figures should be large enough and of sufficient resolution for details to be discernible.
  • Anytext within the figures should be large enough to be legible.
  • Figures should have a caption including a relevant description.
  • Axes should be labelled appropriately.
  • Figures should include a legend when necessary.
  • Figures should only include a title if it provides information not appearing anywhere else (i.e. a title
  • restating the caption or the axes labels is superfluous).

  • Data points should be represented by markers, which may be connected by a dashed or dotted line
  • (original data points may need to be reordered to avoid the line to cross itself).

  • Data-fitting curves should only be included if they provide relevant information that can be used to
  • support discussion points.

    For the graph showing the pressure gradient against the mean velocity of the flow:

  • Data points should be plotted as three different sets corresponding to the three flow regimes.
  • Alinear scale should be used for both axes.
  • For the graph showing the friction factor against the Reynolds number:

  • Datapoints should be plotted as three different sets corresponding to the experimental data, laminar
  • predictions and turbulent predictions.

  • Alogscale should be used for both axes.
  • the regions corresponding to the three flow regimes should be indicated in the graphFormatting and Structure
  • The Technical Report must be prepared using the template available on BlackBoard and must

    include the following sections:

    Experimental Data: Report in the table the experimental data collected during Laboratory#2 session.

    Calculated Data: Report in the table the processed data and corresponding predictions. Additional

    data (e.g. relative error) may be included in this table to support discussion points in the Analysis

    and Interpretation section.

    Sample Calculations: Provide the steps showing how the processed data and corresponding predictions were obtained for one of the water manometer tests corresponding to the laminar flow regime; an one of the mercury manometer tests corresponding to the turbulent flow regime.

    Graphs: Provide the two required graphs pressure gradient against mean velocity of the flow; and friction factor against Reynolds number.

    Analysis and Interpretation: For each subsection, address the following points (200~250 words for

    each subsection):

    Experimental data: Describe and comment on the variations of pressure gradient with flow velocity and on the variations of experimental friction factor with Reynolds number for the different flow regimes. Compare and comment on the trends in the two graphs (dimensional and non-dimensional).

    Experimental validation: Comparetheexperimentalvaluesoffrictionfactorandthecorrespond ing theoretical predictions for the different flow regimes. Comment on the agreement between experimental and theoretical values, and discuss possible discrepancies.

    Describe possible

    sources of errors and propose alternatives that may improve the quality of the measurements.

    Critical reflection: Provide a brief critical analysis of the work conducted and how the objectives

    were addressed. Comment on the outcomes of the study and their significance in a broader

    context.

    Submission

    The Technical Report must be submitted through Turnitin using the submission link available on the

    Laboratory #2 page on BlackBoard.

    As indicated in the unit outline, late submission is NOT permitted for this assessment item. Please

    make sure to leave plenty of time to submit your report through Turnitin before the due date and time.

    Allow time for any unexpected technical issues.

    Due date and time for the Technical Report submission:

    2 teaching weeks after the date of the Laboratory #2 session attended 11:59pm (AWST)

    Refer to the Laboratory Schedule available on BlackBoard for the exact due date of your group

  • 467 – Project ANSYS .

    Assignment Execution Instructions Stress Analysis (MECH0018.1)

    Student Name: Usama Mohamed Said Al Jahwari

    You are required to complete the full lab portfolio assignment using ANSYS Mechanical APDL R1 2026. The work must be accurate, complete, and professionally presented, including all required simulation files.

    ## General Requirements

    – Use ANSYS Mechanical APDL 2026 R1 only

    – Provide step-by-step modeling with clear screenshots

    – All results must be explained and justified

    – Submit a complete Word report

    – Include all ANSYS software files

    – Use consistent units (mm, N, MPa)

    ## Task 1: Stress Concentration Analysis

    ### Student Data:

    – A = 90 mm

    – B = 70 mm

    – C = 50 mm

    – D = 40 mm

    – E = 50 mm

    – F = 25 mm

    ### Model Setup:

    – Plate with hole (as per assignment figure)

    – Load = 70 kN (tensile)

    – Thickness = 15 mm

    – Material:

    – E = 210 10 N/mm

    – = 0.29

    – Element Type: PLANE183

    – Plane stress with thickness

    ### Required Work:

    A. Define and explain PLANE183 element

    B. Compute deformation:

    – With hole

    – Without hole

    Provide comparison with figures

    C. Mesh Sensitivity Analysis:

    – Coarse mesh

    – Medium mesh

    – Fine mesh

    Select optimum mesh and justify

    D. Determine maximum stress at:

    – Section 1

    – Section 2

    – Section 3

    E. Calculate Stress Concentration Factor (Kt)

    F. Thickness Study:

    Repeat analysis for:

    – 20 mm

    – 25 mm

    – 30 mm

    Compare results

    G. Fillet Analysis:

    Add fillet and compare stress with and without fillet

    ## Task 2: Buckling Analysis

    ### Student Data:

    – L1 = 118 mm

    – L2 = 92 mm

    – Force = 13 kN

    – I-Beam = W530 66

    – Number of Modes = 5

    ### Model Setup:

    – Element Type: BEAM188

    – Material:

    – EX = 210e6

    – PRXY = 0.27

    – Density = 7.8e-9

    – Number of elements per line = 30

    ### Required Work:

    – Perform buckling analysis

    – Extract 5 modes

    ### Results:

    For each mode:

    – Deformation at points a, b, c

    – In directions X, Y, Z

    – Fill the required table completely

    ## Task 3: Fracture Mechanics Analysis

    ### Student Data:

    – Crack length (a) = 0.016 m

    – Plate width (b) = 0.17 m

    – Applied stress = 105 MPa

    ### Model Setup:

    – Material:

    – E = 180 GPa

    – = 0.3

    – Use PLANE183 and quarter-point crack-tip elements (PLANE82)

    ### Required Work:

    A. Stress Intensity Factor (SIF)

    1. Analytical solution

    2. ANSYS solution

    3. Compare results

    4. Calculate percentage error

    B. Crack Length Study

    Increase crack length three times:

    – 0.026 m

    – 0.036 m

    – 0.046 m

    Provide table and discussion

    C. Stress vs SIF

    – Use stress values from 120 MPa to 240 MPa (increment 20 MPa)

    – Plot SIF vs stress

    – Determine maximum allowable stress using KIC = 23

    – Repeat for semi-circular crack

    ## Required ANSYS Files

    You must submit all software files:

    For each task:

    – .db

    – .rst

    – .log

    – .inp or APDL command files

    – Any macros used

    Folder structure:

    – Task1_Usama

    – Task2_Usama

    – Task3_Usama

    ## Report Structure

    The report must include:

    1. Title Page

    2. Table of Contents

    3. Introduction

    4. Methodology with screenshots

    5. Results (tables and figures)

    6. Discussion

    7. Conclusion

    8. References (APA style)

    ## Important Notes

    – All work must be original

    – No copy-paste

    – Every step must be documented

    – Results must be logically explained

    ## Final Deliverables

    1. Complete Word report

    2. All ANSYS APDL files

    3. Screenshots of modeling steps and results

    4. Graphs and tables

    Complete all tasks with high accuracy and professional presentation.

  • System dynamic & control_ Lab 7

    Hello,

    Please solve the problems in the “LAB -07” report file.

    I am also attaching the tutorial file for your reference.

    Thanks.

  • System dynamic & control_ Lab 7

    Hello,

    Please solve the problems in the “LAB -07” report file.

    I am also attaching the tutorial file for your reference.

    Thanks.

  • solve the report

    solve the report in PDF format