Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Week 1 DISCUSSION DIRECTIONS.docx, Week 1 Discussion Rough Draft- Comprehensive Integrated Psychiatric Assessment.docx
Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.
Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Week 1 DISCUSSION DIRECTIONS.docx, Week 1 Discussion Rough Draft- Comprehensive Integrated Psychiatric Assessment.docx
Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.
Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): NRS-460-RS-T1-CaseStudy-JohnDoe-EmergencyDepartmentTemplate.docx, NRS-460-RS-T1-CaseStudy-JohnDoe-EmergencyDepartment.docx
Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.
Literature Review
[The introduction to the paper must be at least 5 sentences with 1 in-text citation, a fully stated purpose statement, and PICOT Question. In this section, introduce the topic to the reader. Indicate why the selected topic is important and why it is important to conduct a literature review as part of the project. Make sure the PICOT question is written as a quality improvement question, not a research question and that it contains all components of PICOT. End this section stating, “The purpose of this paper is … “]
Project Proposal Topic
[The project proposal section must be at least 1 fully formed paragraph (at least 5 sentences in length) with in-text citations. In this section, present an overview of the topic by discussing the topic in general. Consider providing some background information and describing the gap (current practice versus best practice) in nursing practice that was identified. Consider using statistics here to reinforce the point.]
Methods of Searching
[This section must be at least 1 fully formed paragraph (at least 5 sentences in length).This section should describe how the literature search was conducted. For example: A literature review was conducted using both electronic and manual resources… Describe how the search for literature was conducted by explaining what databases or search engines were used to find the peer-reviewed articles. Describe what keywords were used; what date range was used to obtain the most current information (remember they must be less than 5 years old); what things were excluded (example: blogs, websites with biased information, etc).]
Review of the Literature
[There must be at least 5 fully formed paragraphs (at least 5 sentences in length) with 5 in-text citations that correlate with the current, peer-reviewed references used. This will be the bulk of the review. Organization of the material here is important. In one paragraph for each of the 5 current, peer-reviewed articles, elaborate on the relation to the project topic/PICOT question, as well as what best practices were identified. Integrate key details of each article, demonstrating a clear understanding of the content reviewed. Consider the main takeaways after reading each article as they relate to the project project/intervention. This section should outline details of each article and also include the learners insight as they relate to the project and PICOT. Also include any other pertinent information about the topic that was discussed in the articles chosen.]
Findings
[This section must be at least 2 fully formed paragraphs (at least 5 sentences in length) with in-text citations. In this section, provide a summary of the most significant findings found in the Review of the Literature section. Identify strengths and weaknesses of the literature (for example, small sample sizes that limit the validity of the findings or conclusions that you disagree with as an evaluator); and identify any gaps in the literature found. Begin with The literature has shown…]
Conclusion
[The section should be at least 1 paragraph (at least 5 sentences in length), summarize at least 3 key points, and contain at least 1 in-text citation. Provide a thorough summary with at least 3 key points. Although not required, it is suggested learners restate the PICOT question in this section, so the reader is drawn to refocus on the topic/question.]
References
[There must be at least 5 current (within the last 5 years), peer-reviewed references. Use APA-7 formatting specific to reference type, including (but not limited to) alphabetical order and hanging indent. Specific reference examples have been discussed in the webinars.]
This is my PICOT question: In women undergoing surgery in the Obstetrics and Gynecology (ob/gyn) preoperative department of Kaiser Permanente, will the implementation of preoperative chlorhexidine gluconate bathing, compared to current practice, reduce the incidence of surgical site infections by 20% within 45 days after surgery?
The school is very strict on plagiarism. Also, it does not have to sound too professional please.
I just need the assignment edited . I wrote the paper already but my professor stated I didnt include everything that was asked for. I just need each section to contained headers each paragraph needs to be 1-2 paraphrasing long. 15% or less AI/.turnitin.com score References must be a Scholary article no more than 5 years of age Assignment: The adult gerontology acute care nurse practitioner (AGACNP) must be proficient in managing acute and complex conditions across various settings, including the emergency department, inpatient units, progressive care, and critical care units. For this assignment, you will explore the management strategies of one acute illness of a patient in the emergency department (ED), and non-critical inpatient units, not progressive or critical care unit patients. Pick one acute illness you will likely see in the acute care setting. Provide a brief overview of the pathophysiology of this condition. Discuss common signs/symptoms and consider unique presentations of this condition. Discuss how this condition is ultimately diagnosed. Discuss how the patient will be managed in the emergency department or non-critical inpatient unit (consider initial lab tests, medications, imaging, etc.). Discuss criteria for admission or discharge from the emergency department or noncritical inpatient unit Discuss how this condition is managed in the inpatient (noncritical) setting (include medications, diagnostics, consultation(s), and education, etc.). Discuss criteria for considering admission to the intensive care unit. Discuss management strategies for intensive monitoring of this condition. Finally, discuss discharge planning for this scenario and consider when the patient is stable enough to be discharged home, to a skilled nursing facility, rehabilitation, or other outpatient center. Your paper should include a minimum of three peer-reviewed references from scholarly articles no more than 5 years old. Your paper must include 1 national guideline. Refer to the rubric for additional guidance.
Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Assignment 2.pdf
Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.
I have a part of presentation to talk about geriatric Risk factors for upper respiratory tract infection and pneumonia with the reference and plagiarism ratio less than 15%
Requirements:
Discussion Question: Mixed Methods Research in Nursing Practice
Mixed methods research combines both quantitative and qualitative approaches to gain a more comprehensive understanding of a research problem.
Initial Discussion:
Briefly describe mixed methods research design in your own words. How does combining quantitative and qualitative data strengthen nursing research compared to using only one approach?
Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): CH 12 – Mixed Method Research Quality Improvement and Other Special Types of Research.pdf
Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.
Option 1:
In 3 pages of double spaced text, provide an overview of an outbreak of disease in a particular moment in American history. If you cite something-you need to provide a quote from it; the papers need to focus on the US and US history. You should use one primary and at least one secondary source. You should cite, have a strong argument and provide a focused examination. Push the importance!
Option 2
Watch 3-4 episodes of Ken Burns American Revolution. React to it explaining what it did well or not do well and how it provided (or didnt provide) a voice for non-elite participants. Papers should have specific examples (episode cited), a strong argument and push the importance.
Option 3-Group project; 2-3 slides per individual if in a group; 4 slides if an individual presentation. Everything should be cited.
Requirements: 4-5 pages