Create a Power Point describing concepts of diversity, equity, inclusion and/or social determinants of health. Explain how a nurse might provide culturally congruent care by been culturally competent, having culture sensitivity, cultural knowledge, and using cultural assessment. Mention the Relationship between Nursing culturally congruent care and community engagement. How a nurse could affirm gender identity in nursing care: benefits, barriers, and best practices. The student will create a power point with a minimum of 3 slides for issues objective criteria, for a total of minimum 12 slides (Content slides, no including pictures, introduction, or references). All slides must include citations of reference used. Remember references should be from 5 years or less. The Power Point should include key elements identified to substantiate your presentation and provide appropriate references.

This assignment will count as an additional 5 % toward your final course score. The rubric will describe the evaluation method and score based on major concepts related to Culture, ethnicity, social, and gender differences.

1. Concepts of diversity, equity, inclusion and/or social determinants of health

2. Culturally Congruent Care in Nursing: cultural competence, culture sensitivity, cultural knowledge, and cultural assessment

3. Relationship between Nursing Culturally Congruent Care and Community Engagement

4. Affirming Gender Identity in Nursing Care: Benefits, Barriers, and Best Practices

Assignment Middle Range Nursing Theory PowerPoint Presentation, Introduction, Analysis of the underpinning for the middle range theory you selected, Applications of the Middle Range Theory you selected, Suggestion for additional research, Conclusion, APA format & Use of a minimum of six current scholarly references.

visible body activity

visible body lab activity

hello. good morning can tou help me whit this medical surgical work about appendicitis Power Point please . there is the criteria files

There have been at least 12 Special Fraud Alerts issued by the Office of Inspector General (OIG) since 1994. Select one of these fraud alerts and then find a specific case related to that fraud alert.

Complete a two to three-page APA style case analysis paper. Note that the title page and reference page do not count toward the total number of pages.

1. Per APA guidelines, please ensure that your paper has an introduction (with a thesis statement), a body, and a conclusion. Be sure to use in-text citations for your supporting evidence, and include a reference page.
2. Discuss the specifics and details of the case and how the case was involved in this type of fraud alert.
3. Discuss the role of a compliance officer in this type of case and include prevention strategies to prevent future occurrences of this type of fraud.
4. Detail the outcomes of the case.

Please support your arguments with credible professional sources and references.

Submission Instructions:

• Save your file as a Word document (.docx).
• Include the term Fraud Alert and your Last Name when saving your file. Example: Fraud Alert_Garcia.docx.
• Upload your completed document using the Browse button, and then click the Submit button.

APRN Roles and Issues PowerPoint Presentation (CO – 1, 2, 3, 4,6)

• Points 230
• Submitting a text entry box, a website url, a media recording, or a file upload
• Attempts 0
• Allowed Attempts 1

Purpose

Per the American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AANC, 2021), advanced practice nurses are responsible for advancing the scholarship of nursing by disseminating one’s scholarship to diverse audiences using a variety of approaches or modalities. Additionally, they should translate evidence into practice.

The purpose of this assignment is to analyze and synthesize prior course information about current and emerging practice issues, scope of practice, licensure, ethical issues, legal parameters, national benchmarks, and quality improvement and safety impacting the student’s chosen future APRN role (AGACNP, FNP, PMHNP, Nurse Leader).

Assignment

Students will present a voice-over PowerPoint Presentation about an issue of their choice within the context of their chosen future advanced practice role. You may use information from content you presented in prior DB posts. If you need inspiration for a topic, you could consider

• Nurse turnover, job satisfaction, environment
• Patient flow/throughput
• Admissions/discharges/transfers
• Device utilization (be specific about device type)
• Technology (be specific about the technology)
• Safety: patient falls, near misses, errors, restraints, drug resistant organisms, ventilator associated events, workplace violence
• Care issues: pain assessment CAUTI, central line infections, IV infiltrations, burns, demetia, heart failure, depression, oncology issues, preventative care, stigma associated with mental illness, access to care

Instructions

1. Title slide with presentation title, student’s name, course name, and date

2. Explain the chosen future APRN role (FNP, AGACNP, PMHNP, Nurse Leader)

• scope of practice
• patient population served in that role (must include age ranges)
• practice environment typical of that role (clinics, ICU, community, etc).
• licensure requirements for the role (including education, certification exam types and entities offering, clinical hours, etc).

3. Explain a current/emerging practice issue impacting the patient population of your future APRN role

• Identify the issue: must be within the last 5 years OR projected to be an issue within the next 5-10 years.
• Analyze (do not just list) how the issue could impact you in the APRN role
  • must include legal parameters and ethical issues
• Analyze (do not just list) how the issue impacts the patient population of the chosen APRN role
  • must include legal parameters, ethical issues, and whether it creates or reduces disparities

4. Explain the national benchmarks used to assess quality outcomes related to the issue. You can find these in the book, the Joint Commission site, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services site, etc.

• Explain the National Benchmark and what entity regulates it

5. Discuss how you would apply a quality improvement strategy (ex: LEAN, PDSA, Six SIGMA) to address the issue related to the national benchmarks, legal parameters, disparities, and patient outcomes.

• Note the QI strategy
• Explain how each phase of the chosen strategy relates to the chosen issue

6. Include a references slide

• APA-formatted references
  • Do not have to double-space for this presentation
  • Do not have to have a hanging indent for this presentation
• Minimum of 10 scholarly references (5 of which must be Journal Articles; NO blogs are permitted)
• May shrink the text to fit the slide

Presentation Parameters and Formatting

1. Maximum of 8 slides (including title and Reference slides)

• Be strategic with what information you put on the slide vs. what you explain verbally
• Be concise with your verbiage

2. Maximum 8-minute of your presentation as if you were presenting it at a conference (i.e., use formal language)

• Suggest rehearsing to eliminate “umm”, “ahh”, and unnecessary verbiage
• Be strategic and concise with your explanations
• Do not state the citations in the recording (those should be on each slide)
• Must have a “speaker” button visible on the corner of each slide to show viewers where to click to hear your audio
• You are responsible for verifying that the audio is present and has adequate recording volume
• You are responsible for looking up for the PowerPoint presentation on your device (internet has resources or the HELP desk)

3. Must be a PowerPoint (.ppt or .pptx) file

• • Do not submit .key, .pages, pdf, or .docx file

4. Must have a transcript of the voiceover in the NOTES section of each slide (not a separate transcript file or document).

• Recommend writing the transcript first, then read the transcript for the recording
• How to add speaker notes in
• The purpose of the transcript is so that the faculty will know what was said in case there are audio issues. You would still get points deducted for audio issues, but at least you would still get points for content.
• The purpose of the transcript is NOT for citations or references.

5. Slide formatting parameters

• No more than 3 sizes of font (title font, body text font, and references font).
  • Font should be consistent (i.e. if you choose 12 pt for the body, all the body text should be 12 pt). If you choose black font, all the font should be black.
• Font should be no smaller than 12pt (may be 8-10 pt for references and citations)
• Color schemes and pictures should not be distracting
• No pictures of people, patients, etc. You may only use images that are generic “stock” pictures without copyright.
• Text and slide background should contrast for easy reading
• Textboxes should align with their corresponding title box
• Slide should be easy to read and follow
• Check spelling, grammar, and punctuation
• Do not use full sentences/paragraphs in your slides; use bullet points instead (remember, you will be doing a voice-over to explain details).

6. Follow APA rules

• Acronyms: define per APA the first time you use them in the presentation and then use the acronym after that
• In-text citations on each slide. If you only have 1 source for the information on the slide, you may cite it at the end of each slide. If you have multiple sources, you need to cite them at the end of each statement.
• No direct quotes for this presentation
• References per APA formatting rules previously noted
• Title slide per APA formatting rules previously noted
• Correct spelling, punctuation, grammar

Submission and Grading

• You may submit ONE time. Please verify that the presentation is how you want it and in the correct file format before you submit.
• To ensure prompt grade posting for all students, faculty will begin grading presentations as they are submitted
• See rubric for grading parameters
• Grades will be posted for all students at the same time, within 7-10 business days of the due date

Rubric

NUA 5020 PowerPoint APRN Roles & Issues Presentation

NUA 5020 PowerPoint APRN Roles & Issues Presentation

Criteria	Ratings	Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePresentation Content	190 to >142.5 ptsExcellentPresentation elements are thoroughly explained using appropriate resources, and no areas are missing.142.5 to >95.0 ptsGoodPresentation elements are moderately explained using appropriate resources, and/or may be missing 1 element. 95 to >47.5 ptsFairPresentation elements are somewhat explained using appropriate resources, and/or may be missing up to 2 elements.47.5 to >0.0 ptsPoorPresentation elements are minimally explained, and/or may have some areas that are missing appropriate resources, and/or may be missing up to 3 elements.0 ptsNo EvidenceNo done, and/or submitted more than 48 hours past the due date without an approved extension, and or missing more than 3 elements.	190 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA, spelling, grammar, punctuation	20 to >15.0 ptsExcellentPresentation exhibits 0-3 errors in APA, spelling, grammar, and punctuation.15 to >10.0 ptsGooPresentation exhibits 4-6 errors in APA, spelling, grammar, and punctuation. 10 to >5.0 ptsFairPresentation exhibits 7-9 errors in APA, spelling, grammar, and punctuation.5 to >0 ptsPoorPresentation exhibits more than 9 errors in APA, spelling, grammar, and punctuation.	20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePresentation Formatting and Aesthetics	20 to >15.0 ptsExcellentPresentation is within the time and slide limit. Audio is present, adequate volume, speaker button present, and not distracting. The transcript is on each slide. Presentation is professional in appearance (no distracting fonts/colors, contrast between font and background facilitates readability, exhibits enough white space to facilitate easy reading/understanding of content, content is organized and easy to follow, no inappropriate graphics used).15 to >10.0 ptsGoodPresentation is 1 minute over time, and/or 1 slide over the limit; and/or audio issue is present (volume issue, speaker button issue); and/or the transcript is just and outline vs a full transcript on each slide; and/or the presentation exhibits 1-2issues in professional in appearance (no distracting fonts/colors, contrast between font and background facilitates readability, exhibits enough white space to facilitate easy reading/understanding of content, content is organized and easy to follow, no inappropriate graphics used). 10 to >5.0 ptsFairPresentation is 2 minutes over time, and/or 2 slides over the limit; and/or audio issue is present (volume issue, speaker button issue); and/or the transcript on each slide does not have enough detail to follow; and/or the presentation exhibits 3-4 issues in professional in appearance (no distracting fonts/colors, contrast between font and background facilitates readability, exhibits enough white space to facilitate easy reading/understanding of content, content is organized and easy to follow, no inappropriate graphics used).5 to >0.0 ptsBelowPresentation is 3 minutes over time, and/or 3 slides over the limit; and/or audio issue is present (volume issue, speaker button issue); and/or the transcript on each slide does not have enough detail to follow; and/or the presentation exhibits 5-7 issues in professional in appearance (no distracting fonts/colors, contrast between font and background facilitates readability, exhibits enough white space to facilitate easy reading/understanding of content, content is organized and easy to follow, no inappropriate graphics used).0 ptsNo EvidencePresentation not submitted, and/or submitted more than 48 hours past due due date without approved extension, and/or Presentation is more than 3 minutes over time, and/or more than 3 slides over the limit; and/or audio issue is not present and does not have an available transcript to follow on each slide and/or the presentation exhibits more than 7 issues in professional in appearance (no distracting fonts/colors, contrast between font and background facilitates readability, exhibits enough white space to facilitate easy reading/understanding of content, content is organized and easy to follow, no inappropriate graphics used).	20 pts

Total Points: 230

If you could work at the practice of your dreams, what would that look like? How would you negotiate that dream job contract?

Graduating from nurse practitioner school is an exciting time of accomplishment. However, its also time to turn dreams into reality and begin your search for the perfect job. Being passionate about the specialty you would like to go into, and the impact you would like to have on your community and profession are all important aspects of landing a job. After all, attitude can be everything to a future employer, but there are some things to consider before your job search and interview: The type of practice that would work best for you (and your family), and the position contract you will negotiate.

For this assignment, you will develop a PowerPoint Presentation (8-10 slides) answering the questions listed in Parts 1 and 2 of the assignment. The presentation is to be recorded in your own words, as if you were presenting it to your instructor. You are to use the audio produced by PowerPoint and not an Mp3 file.

You are to follow the 10/20/30 rule for presentations: no more than 10 slides, presentation not longer than 20 minutes, and text is not lower than 30-point font.

To Prepare:

• Review the weekly resources.
• Seek out professional resources on contract negotiations.
• Review the FNP scope of practice for your state.
• Seek out local NP organizations to assess which organizations would best fit your needs.

Submit the recorded PowerPoint presentation. (This assignment does not need to be submitted through Turnitin) but you must have a reference slide to support your thoughts and ideas.

For Part 1 of this assignment:

1. Discuss the type of practice and setting you would like to work out of (specialty, family, geriatrics, hospital, nursing home, hospice, urgent care, etc.). What makes for an ideal work environment? What type of support system and staff do you need? What services do you see yourself providing? What services are you NOT willing to or are not comfortable providing?
2. How will you meet your CME requirements while practicing at this setting? How will you keep track of your CME hours?
3. What nursing organization(s) interest you in joining, and how will joining an organization benefit you at your position?
4. Once you have met the requirements for autonomy in your state while working at your current position, and for those of you who practice in a lifetime of collaboration state, assume you will one day have autonomy. How will you maintain your collaborative relationships with other nurse practitioners you have worked with, the practitioners you have referred to, as well as your collaborative physician?

Part 2 of the assignment:

Youve just been offered a position at the perfect job you discussed in Part 1 of the assignment.

Besides focusing on patients, reaching a fair and equitable contract that includes not only your salary and benefits but expectations of your patient load, the amount of time you will be spending at the clinic or a health care setting, and the services you will be providing, will affect how you feel about your job over time. Its time now to consider the positions job offer.

Part 2:

1. What questions should you ask your potential future employer about the offer?
2. What salary and bonus structure are acceptable to you?
3. How can you figure out your net worth for the practice?
4. If you are expected to take call, what percentage of your salary is reasonable toward this activity?
5. List the benefits you should negotiate into your contract.
6. Discuss the practice expectations with your employer. How can you be sure that you are being asked to practice within the scope of your practice? Please create a powerpoint and also write notes in a note area so I can present it please.

How do the body cope up with unplunpleasant situation

For the qualitative study, I selected Stone, Wainwright, and Guest (2025), a systematic review examining social influences

on transitions to or from long-term (chronic) pain. The research purpose to explore how social factors shape patients

experiences aligns directly with a qualitative synthesis design, which is appropriate for integrating multiple qualitative

findings. The review included 71 studies with 1,291 participants, ensuring a broad representation of perspectives; this

sampling strategy provided sufficient depth for thematic analysis but was limited by the primary studies heterogeneity.

Data collection in the original studies involved interviews, focus groups, and diaries, while the review applied rigorous

thematic synthesis to combine findings across studies. Trustworthiness was addressed through double coding, iterative

analysis, and transparent inclusion criteria, enhancing credibility, dependability, and reflexivity. Ethical considerations

were accounted for at the primary study level, and the review ensured that only ethically conducted research was

included. Overall, the study provides rich insights into the social context of chronic pain, contributing to nursing theory

and informing patient-centered interventions (Stone et al., 2025).

For the quantitative study, I selected Ntenkaire, Mukasa, Muwanguzi, Mikka, and Lunkuse et al. (2026), a mixed-method

study investigating attrition and associated factors among patients on chronic antihypertensive therapy at Mulago

Hospital, Uganda. The research purposeto identify prevalence and predictors of therapy attritionaligns with a

quantitative approach embedded within a mixed-methods design, which allows measurement and statistical analysis. The

study included 400 patients, providing an adequate sample size for multivariable analysis and statistical power. Data

collection involved structured questionnaires, medical record review, and objective clinical measurements. Analysis used

logistic regression to identify factors associated with attrition, supporting internal validity. Reliability was strengthened

through the use of validated instruments and standardized procedures, while validity was supported by controlling for

potential confounders. Ethical considerations were carefully addressed, including informed consent, institutional ethical

approval, and participant confidentiality. The study provides actionable evidence to guide interventions aimed at

improving adherence and chronic disease outcomes (Ntenkaire et al., 2026).

Comparison:

Qualitative and quantitative research contribute complementary knowledge. The qualitative review emphasizes lived

experiences, social context, and patient-centered insights, using rigor and trustworthiness to ensure credible findings

(Stone et al., 2025). The quantitative study emphasizes measurable outcomes, reliability, and validity, generating evidence

to support interventions and policy (Ntenkaire et al., 2026). Both approaches are essential for comprehensive evidence-

based nursing practice.

Reflection:

Understanding both qualitative and quantitative designs strengthens my ability as a nurse practitioner to integrate patient

experiences with measurable outcomes. This dual perspective enhances clinical decision-making, supports evidence-

based interventions, and promotes holistic, patient-centered care that improves adherence and health outcomes (Stone et

al., 2025; Ntenkaire et al., 2026).

Reference:

Ntenkaire, N., Mark, K. M., Muwanguzi, P., Mikka, B., Lunkuse, S., Mubiru, J., . . . Kalyango, J. N. (2026). Attrition and associated factors among patients on chronic antihypertensive therapy at mulago hospital, uganda: A mixed method study. PLoS One, 21(2), 20. doi:

Stone, S., Wainwright, E., & Guest, A. (2025). Social influences in the experience of transition to or from long-term (chronic) pain: A systematic review of qualitative research studies. PLoS One, 20(7), 22.