Category: Nursing

  • nursing powerpoint

    PowerPoint Presentation: Advanced Practice in Nursing

    You are required to submit the following:

    A PowerPoint presentation (1015 slides), including:

    • Title slide and References (not counted in the 1015)
    • Speaker notes in the Notes section of each slide
    • APA format for citations and references
    • At least 4 scholarly sources (within the last 5 years)
    • Content Requirements

      Follow this structure in your presentation:

    • 1. Research Problem (Slide 12)
      • Identify a current issue in advanced nursing practice.
      • Explain why it is a problem (in 3 sentences or fewer).
      • State your research question clearly.

      2. Research Design (Slide 3)

      • Indicate whether a qualitative or quantitative study best answers your question.
      • Justify your choice.

      3. Middle-Range Theory (Slide 4)

      • Select and briefly describe a middle-range nursing theory.
      • Explain its relevance to your chosen research problem.

      4. Literature Review and Study Critique (Slides 512)Utilizing your Literature review from earlier in the course, summarize and critique the relevant studies based on its design.If Qualitative:

      • Study purpose and design
      • Ethical considerations
      • Sampling and recruitment
      • Data collection and analysis methods
      • Rigor (4 criteria: credibility, dependability, transferability, confirmability)
      • Key findings and limitations
      • Trustworthiness and nursing implications

      If Quantitative:

      • Study purpose and design
      • Blinding and randomization
      • Ethical considerations
      • Sampling method and sample size
      • Data collection instruments and procedures
      • Validity and reliability
      • Statistical analysis and significance
      • Key findings and limitations
      • Trustworthiness and nursing implications

      5. Conclusion (Slide 1314)

      • Recap key takeaways
      • Reflect on the importance of using research and theory in advanced nursing practice

      6. References Slide (Final Slide)

      • APA format
      • At least 4 scholarly references from the last 5 years

    Requirements: 10-15 slides   |   .ppt file

  • Nursing Question

    PLEASE MAKE SURE THIS ASSIGNMENT PASSES TURNITIN.COM AND AI DETECTION PLEASE (PREFERABLY UNDER 30% FOR TURNITIN.COM):

    In order to write a case study paper, you must carefully address a number of sections in a specific order with specific information contained in each. The guideline below outlines each of those sections.

    Section

    Information to Include

    Introduction (patient and problem)

    • Explain who the patient is (Age, gender, etc.)
    • Explain what the problem is (What was he/she diagnosed with, or what happened?)
    • Introduce your main argument (What should you as a nurse focus on or do?)

    Pathogenesis

    • Explain the development or evolution of the disease, from the initial stimulus (how etiologic factors alter physiologic function) to ultimate expression of manifestations of the disease and related complications.
    History
    • Explain what health problems the patient has (Has she/he been diagnosed with other diseases?)
    • Detail any and all previous treatments (Has she/he had any prior surgeries or is he/she on medication?)

    Nursing Physical Assessment

    • List all the patients health stats in sentences with specific numbers/levels (Blood pressure, bowel sounds, ambulation, etc.)

    Related Treatments

    • Explain what treatments the patient is receiving because of his/her disease

    Nursing Diagnosis & Patient Goal

    • Explain what your nursing diagnosis is (What is the main problem for this patient? What need to be addressed?)
    • Explain what your goal is for helping the patient recover (What do you want to change for the patient?)

    Nursing Interventions

    • Explain how you will accomplish your nursing goals, and support this with citations (Reference the literature)

    Evaluation

    • Explain how effective the nursing intervention was (What happened after your nursing intervention? Did the patient get better?)

    Recommendations

    • Explain what the patient or nurse should do in the future to continue recovery/improvement

    Your paper should be 10-12 pages in length and will be graded on how well you complete each of the above sections. You will also be graded on your use of APA style and on your application of nursing journals into the treatments and interventions. For integrating nursing journals, remember the following:

    • Make sure to integrate citations into all of your paper
    • Support all claims of what the disease is, why it occurs, and how to treat it with references to the literature on this disease
    • Always use citations for information that you learned from a book or article; if you do not cite it, you are telling your reader that YOU discovered that information (how to treat the disease, etc.)
    Criteria Ratings Pts

    Introduction

    3.5 to >3.12 ptsExceeds Expectations – Introduction summarizes the case comprehensively and prepares the reader for the remainder of the paper.

    3.5 pts

    Pathophysiology

    8.1 to >7.21 ptsExceeds Expectations – Identifies and thoroughly explains the pathogenesis of the disease topic. Information is scientifically sound, thorough, supported and sufficient.

    8.1 pts

    History, Physical and Related Treatments

    8.4 to >7.48 ptsExceeds Expectations – Provides a detailed patient history, physical assessment findings, treatment, and related treatments for the disease topic. Information is scientifically sound, thorough, supported and sufficient.

    8.4 pts

    Nursing Diagnosis and Patient Goals

    8.1 to >7.21 ptsExceeds Expectations – Provides thorough and detailed nursing diagnosis and patient goal. Information is scientifically sound, supported and sufficient.

    8.1 pts

    Nursing Interventions

    8.1 to >7.21 ptsExceeds Expectations – Thoroughly details the nursing interventions. Detailed explanation of nursing goals.Rationale is thorough, supported and sufficient.

    8.1 pts

    Evaluation

    8.1 to >7.21 ptsExceeds Expectations – Provides thorough and insightful explanation of the effectiveness of the nursing intervention. Information is scientifically sound, supported and sufficient in detail.

    8.1 pts

    Recommendations

    8.1 to >7.21 ptsExceeds Expectations – Provides an overall thorough explanation of patient recommendations.Clinical findings are supported with evidence, compared and rationalized thoroughly. Recommendations for continued recovery/improvement explained and supported.

    8.1 pts

    APA format and References

    7 to >6.23 ptsExceeds Expectations – Meets all the requirements related to length. There is a minimum of 3 scholarly resources with at least 1 non-internet source. All references are correctly cited in APA format. The student shows a solid grasp of APA formatting, paraphrasing and citations.

    7 pts

    Mechanics

    5.6 to >4.98 ptsExceeds Expectations – Answers are well written throughout. Information is well organized and clearly communicated.The writing is free of spelling and grammatical errors.

    5.6 pts

    Requirements:

  • Teaching plan

    please make it very informative and nice pictures very detailed
  • Discussion Board

    Support Group #4


    After studying , discuss a very brief description (one paragraph for the group session do NOT include the actual 12-steps) to include the following:

    • Official name of the program or group you observed.
    • When and where did you go to the group?
    • Why did you choose this specific meeting?
    • Brief history of program or group MUST CITE you obtained this information somewhere. If you obtained information during the meeting, cite IN the paper personal communication. (not on the Reference page)
    • Criteria for client entrance into program or group.
    • Describe the demographics of the group, (ie., age, gender, ethnicity, number of members)
    • Organizations goals of program or group.

    The main body of the paper should address:

    • Your objective impression of the program or group in meeting the clients needs and your rationale.
    • Identify two or more therapeutic factors observed. Provide a detailed description of these factors.
    • In your opinion, was the group process (leadership style, established norms, etc.) effective?
    • Were there any patient management issues, and how were they handled?
    • Describe your feelings about this group and how it enriched you.
    • Would you refer future clients to this group?

    Submission Instructions:

    • Your initial post should be at least 250-500 words, formatted and cited in the current APA style.
    • Provide support for your work from at least 2 academic sources less than 5 years old.
    • The Geriatric Patient and Mental Illness

      Read and watch the lecture resources & materials below early in the week to help you respond to the discussion questions and to complete your assignment(s).(Note: The citations below are provided for your research convenience. You should always cross reference the current APA guide for correct styling of citations and references in your academic work.)

      Read

      • Tusaie, K. R., & Fitzpatrick, J. J. (2016).
        • Chapter 14

      Watch

    Requirements: 500

  • Case study 2

    The Case Study is done on one patient and broken into two parts, look at the rubric and the checklist (not just the template) to help guide you on what is required in part one and part two. I will provide the case study 1 that was already completed to help with part 2

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Comprehensive Case Study Part 2.pdf, Smith Ashley CMN-553 Section 811 PMHNP Practicum I Case Study one.docx, Case Study 2 Student Checklist.docx, CASE STUDY 2 TEMPLATE-1 (1).docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Discussion Board

    Hip Fracture


    After studying , discuss the following:

    The patient is a 71-year-old widowed man who is seen regularly in the clinic for health maintenance and follow-up of his chronic insomnia and anxiety. He has regular prescriptions for triazolam (Halcion) and clonazepam (Klonopin) for these problems. Recently he has been reporting frequent episodes of losing his balance and falling, and eight weeks ago was hospitalized for a hip fracture sustained during one of these falls resulting in hip surgery. On this visit, he also complains of becoming increasingly confused.

    • What information would be most critical for you to collect in the first visit?
    • What is the primary goal for the treatment of this patient?
    • Identify potential obstacles for change. Which educational approach would the PMHNP provide to overcome these obstacles?
    • How would you teach the patient about the Beers list and Halcion?
    • Discuss a medication in detail that could be safely substituted to treat insomnia in geriatric patients.

    Submission Instructions:

    • Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style.
    • Provide support for your work from at least 2 academic sources less than 5 years old.
    • Read

      • Preston, J.D., O’Neal, J.H., Talaga, M.C., & Moore, B.A. (2021)
        314-316
      • Tusaie, K. R., & Fitzpatrick, J. J. (2022).
        Chapter 14

    Requirements: 500

  • write two responses to a peers discussion post

    1. Construct a post in which you:
      • Confirm that the selected article is primary research. If you agree, state that. If you disagree, explain your thoughts and provide evidence.
      • State whether you agree with the study design reported by your peer. If you do not agree, propose a study design and provide a brief rationale supported by evidence.
      • State whether you agree with the level of evidence reported by your peer. If not, describe how you would rate it.
      • Describe areas of disagreement (only) on matrix elements; itemize them as needed. If you agree with your peers abstraction of all matrix elements, state that.
      • Search for a high-quality review article relevant to your peers PICOT question.
      • Share the APA reference with hyperlink and abstract.

    First post link to study:

    McManus, B. M., Richardson, Z., Schenkman, M., Murphy, N., & Morrato, E. H. (2019). Timing and intensity of early intervention service use and outcomes among a safety-net population of children. JAMA Network Open, 2(1), e187529.

    second post link to study:

    Pawik, ., Pawik, M., Karwacka, M., Wysoczaska, E., Schabowska, A., Kuciel, N., Biernat, K., Dbiec-Bk, A., Lewandowska, J., & Fink-Lwow, F. (2021). Body balance after fascial therapy in athletes with soft lower limb muscle injuries. Symmetry, 13(9), 1586.

    There should be a total of two responses (1 to for each post)

    Requirements: a few paragraphs

  • week 5 project

    For this final assignment, you will be tasked to review your work in the Topic 3 case study and continue to analyze the case to best determine spiritual care interventions throughout their plan of care. In particular, the focus will be on the Christian application of the four principles, as well as appropriate options in providing a patient with spiritual care.

    Based on the chart you completed and questions you answered in the Topic 3 about “Case Study: Healing and Autonomy” and reading the topic Resources, complete the “Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis” document, in which you will analyze the case study in relation to the following:

    • Patient autonomy
    • Christian perspective and actions related to sickness and health, principles of beneficence, and nonmaleficence
    • Spiritual needs assessment and appropriate interventions for all involved in providing care
    • Accountability that would demonstrate an ethical manner that reflects professional standards of practice and person-centered care and participatory approach to care

    Note: Participatory approach to care calls for involving stakeholders, particularly the participants in a program or those affected by a given policy, in specific aspects of the evaluation process. The approach covers a wide range of different types of participation, and stakeholders can be involved at any stage of the impact evaluation process, including its design, data collection, analysis, reporting, and managing a study.

    Also, person-centered care is “empowering people to take charge of their own health rather than being passive recipients of services” (WHO, 2021). This care strategy is based on the belief that patient views, input, and experiences can help improve overall health outcomes.

    Support your response using only the following Topic 5 Resources:

    • Chapter 5 from the textbook Practicing Dignity: An Introduction to Christian Values and Decision-Making in Health Care
    • “Assessing Spiritual Health Through the Use of Spiritual Health Assessment Tools: Indications for End-of-Life Care”
    • “Faith-Sensitive End-of-Life Care for Children, Young People, and Their Families”

    While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

    This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

    You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

    Benchmark Information

    This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies:

    BS Health Sciences

    1.2: Assess for the spiritual needs and provide appropriate interventions for individuals, families, and groups.

    BS Nursing (RN to BSN)

    9.1: Demonstrate an ethical comportment in one’s practice reflective of nursing’s mission to society.

    9.2: Employ participatory approach to nursing care.

    9.3: Demonstrate accountability to the individual, society, and the profession.

    9.5: Demonstrate the professional identity of nursing.

    American Association of Colleges of Nursing Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education

    This assignment aligns with AACN Core Competencies: 2.8, 9.1, 9.2, 9.3, 9.5

    Requirements: All pages

  • Dementia Medication Table

    Preparing the Assignment

    Follow these guidelines when completing each component of the assignment. Contact your course faculty if you have questions.

    General Instructions

    Download the and complete the required information using the template.

    Include the following sections (detailed criteria listed below and in the grading rubric)

    1. For each medication listed, complete the following:
    2. Provide FDA Indication (include stages), neurotransmitters Affected/Mechanism of Action, and Target Symptoms.
    3. Include formulation (Short-acting, intermediate-acting, or long-acting), duration of action, half-life, and CYP 450 enzyme information.
    4. List notable side effects and precautions.
    5. Include Patient Education Instructions.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Week_8_Medication_Table.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.